World control is not just about money.
Even though there is some truth in what you say, when it comes back to the context of rich and poor, it is actually necessary, everyone cannot be rich and everyone cannot be poor.
It's like an inseparable chain where if there is rich then there must be poor because we cannot define us as rich if there is no comparison.
Talking to bitcoin needs to be remembered that this is also only one of the options for investing and trying to get profits, not that this is the only person to get rich so that in this case everyone has their own way. Those of us who are in bitcoin will definitely choose bitcoin as a means to benefit ourselves but we also cannot compare ourselves with others because everyone has their own strategy and it could be that other people also think we are wrong because they have their own perspective.
in some aspects, OP's idea of fixing the world has a point. but on Earth, it's the rich guy's world. whoever has more BTC will rule and will still oppress the young countries. once one country is dependent on the rich, you can expect the poor country will get sanctions.
money had been fixed many times in the past and we always return to Gold and silver backing the real currency but after hundreds of years pass, we'll be back again to one empire losing its grip passing the torch to another.
There is nothing wrong with the idea that the OP said because I also did not say it was something wrong but on the other hand of course we also know that such conditions are clearly something that is difficult to happen.
When talking about rich and poor everything will be endless especially when you want to equalize because this will not be able to even be forced.
Talking about bitcoin everything also remains the same because in this case when talking about investing we who can be said to be ordinary people cannot be equated with billionaires who make investments because it is an impossible thing.
They have a wider range than us even though in terms of investment we are the same but in terms of numbers it will obviously be very much different.
World control is not just about money.
Even though there is some truth in what you say, when it comes back to the context of rich and poor, it is actually necessary, everyone cannot be rich and everyone cannot be poor.
It's like an inseparable chain where if there is rich then there must be poor because we cannot define us as rich if there is no comparison.
Talking to bitcoin needs to be remembered that this is also only one of the options for investing and trying to get profits, not that this is the only person to get rich so that in this case everyone has their own way. Those of us who are in bitcoin will definitely choose bitcoin as a means to benefit ourselves but we also cannot compare ourselves with others because everyone has their own strategy and it could be that other people also think we are wrong because they have their own perspective.
Money is only one of the factors that provide power. You also need a certain influence in society and a certain position. Money doesn't always matter - do you need money in the wilderness? No. Survival skills are needed there. So it all depends on the specific conditions - there is nothing that provides absolute power.
I don't deny that because there are some things that money can't do but on the other hand we live where money will always be praised and people who have money always have advantages and higher qualifications than those who don't have money.
Talking about influence in society when we don't have money we may also have a great influence but such conditions must be done in a way that is not easy because we must have some advantages so that we are recognized and have influence in contrast to people who have money their way will be easier.
I'm not going to be naive in this case because we live where the money paradigm rules. not that I'm a money worshipper but in this case I'm trying to be more realistic.