Topic: [FLAGGED] [scam] BetKing.io broke ICO promise and dropped token value 99% - page 4. (Read 3938 times)

It is the accusers job to prove, you show me proof, I don't have to do shit amigo.

What the fuck?

Why did you have a crazy 180 change in opinion?

---

Can you at least refute one of the claims instead of just saying they're false?

Show that they're false.

  Look this forum is dying and it's filled with corrupt people like yourselves who have banded together to make false claims and assumptions based on no facts. All the people who came to Deans defense were not payed anything. I have explained this and many other things that you state as facts that are lies or assumptions and you just ignore them, and repeat it or block me. All you have done is tarnish Deans reputation with your lies and make it harder for investors to recuperate funds back, which is ironic since you act like you been concerned for their well being or even players well being, yet not 1 single player has anything bad to say. At the end of the day you have spent hundreds of hours and days  spreading lies to fuck everyone over. I hope you get what you deserve eventually!

This is an excellent post.

So many people added their voice to your voice in order to tag serial scammer Dean Nolan and his scam betking website.

Since the chatbox was removed from the betking website it seems as though the cronies hoping to receive free EOS BKT tokens by attacking people here have stopped and accepted the betking website is in irreversible decline but it needs to be kept on record that serial scammer Dean Nolan used his betking website as a vehicle to dupe investors via an ICO in 2017.

It must also be kept on record all the other scams he carried out using his scam betking website.

Scammer need to be exposed no matter where they are and what they do.

I'm bumping this thread to add Flags to the 4 known accounts owned by BetKing.


Therefore, I'll use the starting date of this topic (March 2019) as the starting date for the Flags.

I'm also adding one more piece of evidence of contractual violations:

When I opened this topic, the amount scammed was just over $700, worth almost 0.2 BTC at the time. Because my remaining BKB tokens would expire, I swapped them to BKT tokens recently, and sold them. I received about 0.0045 BTC for this.
BetKing is now promoting his site more actively again on Bitcointalk, which is all the more reason to Flag his accounts.

I ask all users who tagged the accounts to support the Flag. It needs at least 3 DT members to show a big red Flag on the accounts:

Flags
Flag on BetKing.io
Flag on BetKing Support
Flag on PocketRocketsCasino
Flag on dean nolan

Serial scammer Dean Nolan broke virtually all ICO promises including about developing new games. This is a 99.999999% identical roulette game that serial scammer Dean Nolan used in the betking website before the pre-ICO and post-ICO, adding and removing when he wanted to. In April 2019 he added it again without making any reference to its past because it was not a "new" game.

Poor old "VG" whoever that is saying "The new roulette looks good". It is not new, it was coded before the ICO was ever conceived in 2016 and serial scammer Dean Nolan added and removed it as and when his mood swings dictated.

There is more going on, you are right. More people are endorsing the scam website here than they have users there 

Today, Burst Dice! 1000 dice rolls in just couple seconds! (archived) was opened, and several including including Newbies and senior accounts are shilling for BetKing.
I instantly received red feedback from 2 of them (archived direct link).

I wouldn't be surprised if the shills are getting paid (in worthless tokens, Lol ):
Even though the bounty program is officially closed, I find it hard to believe so many users are all of a sudden endorsing a website that barely has any users.

The fact he scammed you when you participated in the signature campaign speaks volumes. He could easily have responded to your emails but thinks he is above everybody else.

that's what i mean though

the thread where he was selling it he said " i want to pursue other projects" that's understandable, but closing down a dice site, to pursue a dice site within a years time.
i think the "project" he was working on may have been the ico and the tokens with such a short time frame, and how well thought out the ico was. It had more answers then googles FAQ page lol
but what did he have to gain from closing down a successful dice site, just to offer more revenue share





But there's no doubt the site is doing worse, tokens are worth alot less, and my reply to him last post "his argument is you should have nicely contacted him before calling him out" myself and others have had trouble contacting him via the contact emails, i think the only way i got his attention was calling him out in chat "and we didn't find a solution, because i called him out" , i never got my tokens from him to ever get a buyback, but i'm sure the op is right.

If he wanted to scam, his 2 best opportunities has passed, and hes playing the long con so he can get less? i don't think his intentions where to scam. more like losing interest,acting on impulse followed by tons of bad decisions. but that's my opinion, ignoring support inquiries because he lost interest, then posting bs like this

there's no excuse for that and he has a history of losing interest quickly, and should have never asked for investments in the first place, because if i know it he definitely knows it.
And i also know that he will reply denying it, and somehow turn it around that i'm just out to get him like the others and then explaining how hes the victim.

But actions speak louder then words, and anyone that knows him, or wants to research his past post,web archives, etc will see these patterns.

he hasn't just given up those 3 sites, he has changed those sites, then did a 360 reverting them back countless times. that's why i said impulsive for those that didn't use the older sites, and thats kinda what hes doing now with the token swap.

A short summary (by heart) from other topics: Dean was tired of running the site by himself, even though it was very profitable at the moment. He tried to sell it several times, but asked for too much, and eventually closed it to do something else.

I haven't seen any audit.

Tbh i don't understand the point of this, before betking.io you had a different dice site with a bankroll of 1-2 million "i think" i don't know why you closed that and started an ico offering such a large amount of profits, and the old site had more players then you do now.

and before that you had pocketrocketscasino which wasn't no where near as big as these two, but imo it had the most potential. the "be the house feature" it was like moneypot 3-4 years before it was even created, and they where really popular in the beginning before they made a bunch of bad decisions.

So i can't understand how you went from "successful" to "losing money"


I'm sure if they did actually lose money or felt they had they would be in contact.

I joined the signature campaign and ill admit i entered the username wrong or something i don't remember, but i couldn't link my btctalk account. and just to be clear "linking my btctalk may be wrong" this was so long ago i'm not sure how it worked all i know is i read the instructions, saw i mistyped something and couldn't change it.  I wrote you 3 emails and didn't get a reply. i still had the betking avatar and sig on my account for 5-6 months and never got one reply.


Country restrictions
it's also shitty that "united states was banned 1-2months after launch"
i'm sure running 2 previous casinos you where aware of any legal troubles, that you could have investigated before launch.

So i'm sure you already knew that you where going to do this, and kept this information from investors, a big decision factor for investing in the ico.

That is a regular usual pattern 99% of these scammers apply. They alter and they change the narrative of various promises to suit their present needs. I am not surprised in the least about this altering facts and selective amnesia from serial-scammer Dean Nolan.

I was calling out serial-scammer Dean Nolan for well over a year but with hardly anybody accepting it. Thankfully occasional posts were made by users from back in the day when serial-scammer Dean Nolan was using pocketrocketcasino and during the early days of betking to scam affiliates

Then everything changed when I made that fateful post in the Bustabit thread asking whether serial-scammer Dean Nolan scammed Bustabit by not paying 2 BTC licence fee: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.47430632

This was the post which drew a response from the Bustabit owner followed by a response from serial-scammer Dean Nolan and the whole things generated pace as the betking scam unravelled.

Add to that this fantastic scam thread started by LoyceV and it effectively left betking with zero credibility and zero future.

Serial-scammer Dean Nolan will try to utilise betking for maximum personal profit as much as he can before calling it a day and trying his luck at scamming the next batch of his ICO investors with the bitsafe exchange scam, maybe that is why he is altering the facts and presenting a new narrative in order to dupe gullible investors and newbies

I've seen so many scammers try to change their story to convince new victims they're just misunderstood so they can scam more people.

I don't have the time to do this, but would like to see such a list indeed.

Apparently Dean is now telling people that it is a misconception that he promised the terms of buy-backs in the first place. He seems to be claiming people who used them as a USD hedge were misunderstanding the terms of ICO. While this is kind of silly for people who were around at the time of Dean repeatedly making such promises (and me having private chat logs of him promising it's personally guaranteed by him and encouraging its use to decrease my BTC exposure just days before he scammed everyone with it).

If anyone has the time, could they help compile a list of quotes of where Dean publicly stated the buy-back policy or endorsed investors understanding of it (especially regarding it being a USD hedge)? It would be nice to have a post to link someone to that definitively demonstrates Dean did make such promises and they were the common-understanding between him and investors.

Noted.

My suggestion is that you stop posting in these threads about betking. If you will not do that I would stop referring to its owner as "scammer Dean Nolan".

My personal opinion is that betking appears to be owned by a scammer, and if its owner is named "Dean Nolan" my opinion is it would not be inaccurate to refer to him this way.

The way you post in this thread gives me sympathy to betking, that only goes away after a close examination of the evidence and facts surrounding his ICO/debt tokens. I don't know that other people will be willing to take the time to review the evidence as closely as I did.

Just my two cents, you can take it or leave it.

Considering the silence, looks like his recent scam attempt failed!

Thank you for posting his PM here. One day he says he does not care if he gets -9999 trust and another he sends you PMs


This is quite interesting too. Another ICO attempt to make serial-scammer Dean Nolan several more millions.

I wonder how many others he sent PMs to trying to engage in chit-chat with in the hope of having his red feedback reduced.

I'll drop this here so I don't have to keep this garbage in my PM folder:

Yes, not fulfilling investment promises is a criminal offense!