LOL. What a moron.
I had to know how flattards explain the sun cycle, so here's what I found. It was quite "enlightening."
https://wiki.tfes.org/Flat_Earth_-_Frequently_Asked_Questions
What evidence do you have?
The evidence for a flat earth is derived from many different facets of science and philosophy. The simplest is by relying on ones own senses to discern the true nature of the world around us. The world looks flat, the bottoms of clouds are flat, the movement of the Sun; these are all examples of your senses telling you that we do not live on a spherical heliocentric world.
(holy hell, that makes a lot of sense. I mean it explains a lot about flattards. Just ignore every bit of knowledge we can acquire as a species and go with your base instincts. It's what crocodiles do and it seems to work for them, right?)
How do you explain day/night cycles and seasons?
Day and night cycles are easily explained on a flat earth. The sun moves in circles around the North Pole. When it is over your head, it's day. When it's not, it's night. The light of the sun is confined to a limited area and its light acts like a spotlight upon the earth. The picture below illustrates how the sun moves and also how seasons work on a flat earth. The apparent effect of the sun rising and setting is usually explained as a perspective effect.
This is the stupidest thing I've ever seen. I'm dumbfounded. This means that the sun is always shining in Greenland and Alaska. Why do days get longer in the summer and shorter in the winter, and the converse in the southern hemisphere? Simply keeping the quote-unquote sun on a wire which gets closer to the quote-unquote north pole during the summer doesn't explain the seasonality of daylight.
The problems incurred by the flat earth theory far outweigh the problems of the existing model. What holds the sun up in the sky? What's fueling it? Why doesn't it burn out, or heaven forbid, fall to earth? What is the firmament made of? Why can't you travel to the south pole? How is there no outer space? What exists outside the "firmament"? What's the moon made of? What are all other planets and stars made of?
Existing models can satisfactorily answer all of these questions. Flat earth theory does not. It just creates more questions which have no answer.
That's just an example model obviously not 100% accurate. And yet it is more accurate than the globe model which cant explain anything for example it doesnt explain why polaris doesnt move in the sky and stars rotate in patterns and its always the same stars for if we was in a ball in a galaxy spiralling away into nothingness we would see different stars.
Funny thing is this heliocentric bullshit model was introduced by free masons in 15th century before which everyone in the world knew about geocentric flat earth.