^^^ Space is fake and gay, it's all just propaganda including a lot of controlled opposition i.e. space mouse.
Space is falling for you like a ton of bricks down a well. Too bad for you that it's a gravity well that you are at the bottom of.
Topic: FLAT MARS (Read 1412 times)
This is the ultimate truth they don't want you to know. Elon Musk is a glitch in the matrix.
We have to stop taking Elon Musk seriously and sometimes ignore his tweets. He does such gimmiks to get attention of his followers and make them ponder. Or at times it is done intentionally to market his product or mission , for example consider Tesla's launch of MUV where he shattered the glass. It was for sure played well and was a way to male things viral. I am sure after all these years of interest in space exploration that Mars is indeed not flat and Earth like.
^^^ Space is fake and gay, it's all just propaganda including a lot of controlled opposition i.e. space mouse.
This is NASA astronaut and homosexual Scott Kelly aboard the ISS:
The Three Musketeers are an all male thruple, it's blatant pro-masonic homosexual propaganda.
I'm noticing a pattern here. A secret obsession with homosexuality?
Or maybe not so secret.
Indeed...
"Balls" are not spherical and are not balls.
And something else ... is notably FLAT.
I just started watching this video:
SPACEX to MARS 2020 DEBUNKED BY MOUSE ON OUTSIDE OF ROCKET -- https://youtu.be/6V4-7W-uepA (2:22:10)
edit:
Short, to the point video:
Did A Mouse Just Prove SpaceX Is Fake? - Learn how to think -- https://youtu.be/DGH29k07nII (7:20)
edit2:
The footage is definitely fake, but I don't see a mouse. YouTube buried all the good videos, now I get ones full of strawman arguments, they suck.
Why the fuck did all these videos and these people suddenly appear claiming there's a mouse when there's no fucking mouse?
This is the ultimate truth they don't want you to know. Elon Musk is a glitch in the matrix.
Space exploration has been going for many years now and there are both inactive and active mission on Mars which prove it is certainly not flat and similar to Earth. I have myself seen Mars with naked eye once when I wenr to a friend's place who has a super telescope which made possible to see till Saturn clearly. Elon is known to make wild out of blue tweets in order to grab attention and make fhe followers think. Dont take him literally always.
Obviously NASA is behind it, keeping the flat Martians at bay!
Martians are flat like graphene is flat.
This is the ultimate truth they don't want you to know. Elon Musk is a glitch in the matrix.
Stop taking twitters of Elon Musk seriously all the time as that guy enjoys putting wild thoughts in minds of his followers. Being a visionary with his special love for outer space loves to play with your mind and also wants to learn what the world on twitter thinks. Mars for sure is not flar and is Earth like and I completely cant think of it being flat after several successfull missions to Mars. Curiosity and Insight being few of them.
Marth is nar flar fer shar.
This is the ultimate truth they don't want you to know. Elon Musk is a glitch in the matrix.
Stop taking twitters of Elon Musk seriously all the time as that guy enjoys putting wild thoughts in minds of his followers. Being a visionary with his special love for outer space loves to play with your mind and also wants to learn what the world on twitter thinks. Mars for sure is not flar and is Earth like and I completely cant think of it being flat after several successfull missions to Mars. Curiosity and Insight being few of them.
Obviously NASA is behind it, keeping the flat Martians at bay!
Mars has rim and hexagon core, it looks like a coin:
The image is for the most part in focus and this is not the camera aperture.
If Mars is flat, the Earth is flat, and this photo was taken from Earth, how did we get a photo of the top of Mars? Does this mean Mars is not only flat, but also sideways? How do the martians keep from falling off Mars? The image is for the most part in focus and this is not the camera aperture.
If the Earth is flat for the flat Earthers, then the logical conclusion would be that Mars if flat. That's a great way of proving to them that the Earth is round. In fact it's a logical conclusion for those people who lived before Columbus discovered America.
belief is the adversary of knowledge.
Wow, the irony is thick in this post, I'm going to read it to my anemic neighbor.
I would like to present this award to you:
Congratulations.
I graciously accept. My children and I thank you.
belief is the adversary of knowledge.
Wow, the irony is thick in this post, I'm going to read it to my anemic neighbor.
I would like to present this award to you:
Congratulations.
belief is the adversary of knowledge.
Wow, the irony is thick in this post, I'm going to read it to my anemic neighbor.
@Butwhytho belief is the adversary of knowledge.
Get a super zoom camera and test the globe! Here's a calculator for the distance to the horizon on a globe ifPython Pythagorean theorem isn't your forté.
@Cnut237 Mars is directly measured at 25.1 arcseconds, this equates to a plasma disc with a 1/4 mile radius. It really is nothing more than an electrical light in the sky a few thousand miles up.
...but hey, don't let ridiculous things like empirical evidence and documentation get in the way of your mockery, I don't believe the fucking cartoon balls I'm shown are real after all.
Get a super zoom camera and test the globe! Here's a calculator for the distance to the horizon on a globe if
@Cnut237 Mars is directly measured at 25.1 arcseconds, this equates to a plasma disc with a 1/4 mile radius. It really is nothing more than an electrical light in the sky a few thousand miles up.
...but hey, don't let ridiculous things like empirical evidence and documentation get in the way of your mockery, I don't believe the fucking cartoon balls I'm shown are real after all.
My main problem with flat earthers is that I never know if someone is trolling me and trying to make me believe they are flat earther, they are joking and being sarcastic, or they are earnest.
'Flat Mars' is an anagram of Starflam, which is a Belgian hip-hop group.
Starflam released a record called Bled Runner.
Bled Runner is simply Blade Runner spoken with a South African accent.
The South African 'Blade Runner' is Oscar Pistorius, the paralympian who is currently serving a murder sentence.
Batman movie The Dark Knight was famously snubbed for a Best Picture Oscar.
Therefore: Flat Mars -> Best Picture -> not Batman.
The best picture we have of Flat Mars in this thread is the one from notbatman. Ignore the 'spherical' nonsense from other posters, notbatman has shown us the truth: Mars is flat.
The fevered ramblings of a deranged mind? I don't think so.
Tenuous associations and misdirections made in bad faith? I don't think so.
Starflam released a record called Bled Runner.
Bled Runner is simply Blade Runner spoken with a South African accent.
The South African 'Blade Runner' is Oscar Pistorius, the paralympian who is currently serving a murder sentence.
Batman movie The Dark Knight was famously snubbed for a Best Picture Oscar.
Therefore: Flat Mars -> Best Picture -> not Batman.
The best picture we have of Flat Mars in this thread is the one from notbatman. Ignore the 'spherical' nonsense from other posters, notbatman has shown us the truth: Mars is flat.
The fevered ramblings of a deranged mind? I don't think so.
Tenuous associations and misdirections made in bad faith? I don't think so.
This is the ultimate truth they don't want you to know. Elon Musk is a glitch in the matrix.
Elon Musk is known to be active on twitter with out of this world to know what the followers think and make them thinking more. I really dont think Mars is flat after soo many explorations and space missions. There are two rovers by mars already doing their work known as Curiosity and Insight by NASA. Other countries like China and India are too preparing for missions at Mars. Mars is certainly known to have life supporting atmosphere and is known to be Earth like but absolutely it is not flat.
^^^ I'd like to agree with you, but it isn't so... not of notbatman at least.
Look at notbatman's name. If he is not batman, he has to be batwoman.
So, she is definitely heterosexual.
Look at notbatman's name. If he is not batman, he has to be batwoman.
So, she is definitely heterosexual.
This is NASA astronaut and homosexual Scott Kelly aboard the ISS:
The Three Musketeers are an all male thruple, it's blatant pro-masonic homosexual propaganda.
I'm noticing a pattern here. A secret obsession with homosexuality?
Or maybe not so secret.
The Three Musketeers are an all male thruple, it's blatant pro-masonic homosexual propaganda.
Thanks for this I am dying.
Whats even funnier is he's serious.
(as serious as his FE or moon landing hoax bollocks trolling is anyway....)
The Three Musketeers are an all male thruple, it's blatant pro-masonic homosexual propaganda.
Not true, the 'pro-masonic homosexual propaganda' propaganda is actually Animal Rights propaganda. NASA are probably involved, too. (They usually are, aren't they?)
Stop believing conspiracy theories and face the truth. These Musketeers are, and always have been, dogs. I don't remember who on here suggested that they were chocolate bars, but that's clearly false, too, as the photo below proves beyond any reasonable doubt.
The Three Musketeers are an all male thruple, it's blatant pro-masonic homosexual propaganda.
Thanks for this I am dying.
The Three Musketeers are an all male thruple, it's blatant pro-masonic homosexual propaganda.
The truth comes out. As I said a long time ago, notbatman is such because he's not batman. He's Batwoman.
The Three Musketeers are an all male thruple, it's blatant pro-masonic homosexual propaganda.
Sorry, veering off-topic a bit.
You'd better be sorry. Your off topic rambling is getting in the way of a very serious discussion here.
Re: Three Musketeers question, I would imagine branding a chocolate bar after 3 French dudes would potentially not be a great branding choice in a nation with lots of historical rivalry with France.
Explanation of joke usually ruins it.
Yeah, I didn't want to do it, but at the same time I don't want to start a debate where I am pretending I believe something, and then arguing against people who I actually agree with. What kind of lunatic would do that?I'm surprised at the low number (635,000). There are billions of craters > 7-10 meters in diameter on the Moon. Guess the presence of a slight atmosphere makes a big difference.
Yes probably, I suppose you'd expect the atmosphere to burn up some of the smaller stuff. I think the 635k was a count of current craters rather than an estimate of all impacts - Mars does have vulcanism, so lava has likely covered over a lot of old craters. Plus also when a meteor hits milk chocolate, the chocolate tends to melt and then reform, so likely there are plenty of meteors buried within Mars's delicious interior.The real question for me is why does the UK Mars look very similar to the US Milky Way? And why is the UK Milky Way called 'Three Musketeers' in the US? And why does the UK not have Three Musketeers? I'll tell you why: because in the UK, a chocolate bar cannot be a swashbuckling epic of chivalry, honor, and derring-do, set in France during the 1620s, richly populated with romantic heroes, unattainable heroines, kings, queens, cavaliers, and criminals in a whirl of adventure, espionage, conspiracy, murder, vengeance, love, scandal, and suspense - that's why.
Sorry, veering off-topic a bit.
Edit: Wow, I've just got promoted to Senior whilst writing that. I must be doing something right. Guess I'll continue posting in a similar vein to the above. Apologies in advance :p
Apparently Mars has been battered by 635,000 meteors.
I'm not disputing that Mars is battered, but I don't understand how a meteor can do it, because a meteor has no opposable thumbs and so can't operate the deep fryer. Astronomy is perplexing.
I'm not disputing that Mars is battered, but I don't understand how a meteor can do it, because a meteor has no opposable thumbs and so can't operate the deep fryer. Astronomy is perplexing.
I'm surprised at the low number (635,000). There are billions of craters > 7-10 meters in diameter on the Moon. Guess the presence of a slight atmosphere makes a big difference.
outer space is [...] gay!
Pictures or it didn't happen. Preferably in a new thread tagged as NSFW.
...
This is NASA astronaut and homosexual Scott Kelly aboard the ISS:
Nonsense. Astronauts aren't real, and neither is the ISS. They are both flat, 2-dimensional drawings on that firmament thing you're always talking about.
As for R "Scott" Kelly, he's a singer, not an astronaut. Although he did write an opera called "Trapped in the Closet," so what do I know.
How do you sure that astronaut was not true? Is there any proof for that? Why they are many people who create some fake news about some person who really not true?
Sorry, I was being sarcastic. Notbatman seems to think that most things are fake or a conspiracy, I was making a joke based on that. The astronaut is indeed real (as is the ISS). The photo of him in his underwear I suspect is fake, but honestly I have no interest in researching that.
outer space is [...] gay!
Pictures or it didn't happen. Preferably in a new thread tagged as NSFW.
...
This is NASA astronaut and homosexual Scott Kelly aboard the ISS:
Nonsense. Astronauts aren't real, and neither is the ISS. They are both flat, 2-dimensional drawings on that firmament thing you're always talking about.
As for R "Scott" Kelly, he's a singer, not an astronaut. Although he did write an opera called "Trapped in the Closet," so what do I know.
How do you sure that astronaut was not true? Is there any proof for that? Why they are many people who create some fake news about some person who really not true?
Sorry, I was being sarcastic. Notbatman seems to think that most things are fake or a conspiracy, I was making a joke based on that. The astronaut is indeed real (as is the ISS). The photo of him in his underwear I suspect is fake, but honestly I have no interest in researching that.
outer space is [...] gay!
Pictures or it didn't happen. Preferably in a new thread tagged as NSFW.
...
This is NASA astronaut and homosexual Scott Kelly aboard the ISS:
Nonsense. Astronauts aren't real, and neither is the ISS. They are both flat, 2-dimensional drawings on that firmament thing you're always talking about.
As for R "Scott" Kelly, he's a singer, not an astronaut. Although he did write an opera called "Trapped in the Closet," so what do I know.
How do you sure that astronaut was not true? Is there any proof for that? Why they are many people who create some fake news about some person who really not true?
outer space is [...] gay!
Pictures or it didn't happen. Preferably in a new thread tagged as NSFW.
...
This is NASA astronaut and homosexual Scott Kelly aboard the ISS:
Nonsense. Astronauts aren't real, and neither is the ISS. They are both flat, 2-dimensional drawings on that firmament thing you're always talking about.
As for R "Scott" Kelly, he's a singer, not an astronaut. Although he did write an opera called "Trapped in the Closet," so what do I know.
outer space is [...] gay!
Pictures or it didn't happen. Preferably in a new thread tagged as NSFW.
...
This is NASA astronaut and homosexual Scott Kelly aboard the ISS:
Video [NSFW]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qqoqkg241EM
outer space is [...] gay!
Pictures or it didn't happen. Preferably in a new thread tagged as NSFW.
I'm convinced that notbatman is actually a professional troll, being paid hundreds of thousands of dollars a year (by Nasa) to discredit Flat-Earthers. And he's doing a marvelous job. Nobody can convince me otherwise, regardless of any evidence to contrary, so don't bother trying to change my mind.
I concur. I heard* it was millions of dollars.
*voices in my head
What ever happened to pictures or it didn't happen? Check out the night sky with a super-zoom camera like the P1000!
Mars is a close small light source in the sky, if you think a rock is reflecting light back at you over 400 million miles then you were brainwashed by pedophiles as a child!
NASA is propaganda agency and outer space is fake and gay!
Mars is a close small light source in the sky, if you think a rock is reflecting light back at you over 400 million miles then you were brainwashed by pedophiles as a child!
NASA is propaganda agency and outer space is fake and gay!
I'm convinced that notbatman is actually a professional troll, being paid hundreds of thousands of dollars a year (by Nasa) to discredit Flat-Earthers. And he's doing a marvelous job. Nobody can convince me otherwise, regardless of any evidence to contrary, so don't bother trying to change my mind.
Are you stating that Mars is flat because it got battered by all those meteors?
Not completely flat, it's about 1 inch high. The outer surface is crispy, beneath this is a brown layer analagous to soil, below that a mantle that flows a bit like caramel, below that the planet has more of a nougat-like consistency.This is the ultimate truth they don't want you to know. Elon Musk is a glitch in the matrix.
Haha it's the peak of the absurdThis is the ultimate truth they don't want you to know. Elon Musk is a glitch in the matrix.
Haha it's the peak of the absurd
Apparently Mars has been battered by 635,000 meteors.
I'm not disputing that Mars is battered, but I don't understand how a meteor can do it, because a meteor has no opposable thumbs and so can't operate the deep fryer. Astronomy is perplexing.
I'm not disputing that Mars is battered, but I don't understand how a meteor can do it, because a meteor has no opposable thumbs and so can't operate the deep fryer. Astronomy is perplexing.
Are you stating that Mars is flat because it got battered by all those meteors?
Apparently Mars has been battered by 635,000 meteors.
I'm not disputing that Mars is battered, but I don't understand how a meteor can do it, because a meteor has no opposable thumbs and so can't operate the deep fryer. Astronomy is perplexing.
I'm not disputing that Mars is battered, but I don't understand how a meteor can do it, because a meteor has no opposable thumbs and so can't operate the deep fryer. Astronomy is perplexing.
Well, looks like I've got egg on my face.
How can you see that. Flat mirror?
Well, looks like I've got egg on my face.
I took a photo of Mars this morning (below)
Is that not a photo of Creptune? Or is it Mercrepey?Sorry, not sorry.
Mercrepey is good, but Creptune is batter.
I took a photo of Mars this morning (below)
Is that not a photo of Creptune? Or is it Mercrepey?Sorry, not sorry.
You had me at Creptune but jumped the shark with Mercrepe.
I took a photo of Mars this morning (below)
Is that not a photo of Creptune? Or is it Mercrepey?Sorry, not sorry.
Previously I mocked this thread, but now I have come to my senses. I took a photo of Mars this morning (below), and it is indeed flat. You can even see the crust around the edge to keep all the butter and syrup martian rocks from falling off.
FLAT MARS
I am totally sure that Mars is hollow same as Earth. Why should be any different? Mars and Earth are part of same solar system. And when you have a hollow Mars, it cant be flat. Where you saw any hollow object that is flat. Please.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=hole+shot+in+a+coin&t=ffab&iax=images&ia=images
FLAT MARS
I am totally sure that Mars is hollow same as Earth. Why should be any different? Mars and Earth are part of same solar system. And when you have a hollow Mars, it cant be flat. Where you saw any hollow object that is flat. Please.
There are a lot of topic about outer space and everybody should have a theory about everything about the thing that no one knows. They can easily invent a word without a proof also they can create a fake proof just for them to be the center of attention.
For mars, I don't believe on that because there are a lot of proofs by a lot of scientist about that.
For mars, I don't believe on that because there are a lot of proofs by a lot of scientist about that.
@Cnut237,
The moon is evenly lit.
The moon is a 32 mile wide disc of sonoluminescent electrical plasma in an upper atmospheric plane.
The image of the moon is reflected off of a concave mirror creating a projected hologram. The mirror is a golden glass-like oxide layer on a nickel-iron composite steel dome that covers the earth; the firmament.
edit:
Miles are in Nautical Miles.
1 minute = 1 nautical mile.
Mars is projected like the moon, it's [mars] angular size is 25.1 seconds.
The moon is evenly lit.
The moon is a 32 mile wide disc of sonoluminescent electrical plasma in an upper atmospheric plane.
The image of the moon is reflected off of a concave mirror creating a projected hologram. The mirror is a golden glass-like oxide layer on a nickel-iron composite steel dome that covers the earth; the firmament.
edit:
Miles are in Nautical Miles.
1 minute = 1 nautical mile.
Mars is projected like the moon, it's [mars] angular size is 25.1 seconds.
You are so silly. If the moon were a "sonoluminescent electrical plasma," and the image of the moon is "a projected hologram," who has had this hologram technology for the thousands of years that the moon has existed? And how do you know it about who has the technology?
Flat Mars is due to the limitations of the eye to see anything other than a flatness in everything. That's why we have instrumentation to see things that the eye is too limited to see. But, I commend you for bringing your head out of the sand long enough to see that there are such things as the moon and Mars.
@Cnut237,
The moon is evenly lit.
The moon is a 32 mile wide disc of sonoluminescent electrical plasma in an upper atmospheric plane.
The image of the moon is reflected off of a concave mirror creating a projected hologram. The mirror is a golden glass-like oxide layer on a nickel-iron composite steel dome that covers the earth; the firmament.
edit:
Miles are in Nautical Miles.
1 minute = 1 nautical mile.
Mars is projected like the moon, it's [mars] angular size is 25.1 seconds.
The moon is evenly lit.
The moon is a 32 mile wide disc of sonoluminescent electrical plasma in an upper atmospheric plane.
The image of the moon is reflected off of a concave mirror creating a projected hologram. The mirror is a golden glass-like oxide layer on a nickel-iron composite steel dome that covers the earth; the firmament.
edit:
Miles are in Nautical Miles.
1 minute = 1 nautical mile.
Mars is projected like the moon, it's [mars] angular size is 25.1 seconds.
Ignoring lunatics and trolls, and assuming that some people genuinely do believe that Earth is flat, Mars is flat, everything we can see is flat - what about the phases of the moon? We can see with the naked eye how sunlight strikes different parts of the sphere.
What is the flat-Earthist explanation for this? Do they think the flat-moon is shaped like a contact lens?
Well, if that's true, then how come the New Moon isn't associated with ANY of the below symptoms?
"
10 Normal Symptoms for New Moon Viewers
Here are 10 normal symptoms for new moon viewers as they adjust to the lens-shaped moon -
Moon Movement
If it feels like the moon is moving, that is what is supposed to happen. There is a natural fluid flow in the moon and the lens-shape needs to permit it.
Minor Irritation
The first couple of times a new viewer looks at the lens-shaped moon, they will say they can "feel" the moon. It takes a bit of time for the eye to accept the moon because it is a medical device. Any feelings of discomfort should ease away in 15 minutes.
Tearing
Moon viewers will tear up when they look at the lens-shaped moon with their eye. It's totally normal and once adapted to the lens-shape, the tears will stop.
Light Sensitivity
New viewers will sometimes note sensitivity to bright lights. Such as the moon. Like other symptoms on this list, this should go away with moon adaptation.
Burning
This symptom is cause for concern for a lot of New Moon viewers. Rightfully so, a burning sensation in your moon is alarming. What it signals is that the moon is dry and needs moisture. Moon drops will do the trick and re-lubricate the lens-shaped moon by pooling in its dish-like underside.
Blurring
The New Moon is supposed to clear up vision, not blur it. If the moon is making a new viewer see things blurry it typically means there are a lot of tears generated or there are oils on the moon. Using solution to clean the moon and reinserting it will clear up the vision. If the problem persists, call your moon doctor.
Dislodged Moon
The moon will seldomly either go "off-center" or lift off from the night sky. If this rare occurrence happens, a simple blink will reposition the moon.
Excessive Blinking
This symptom is actually beneficial to the moon. Full, complete blinks when the moon is first inserted will keep the lens-shape comfortable.
Red Eyes
This symptom is fairly common with the burning. Basically, the moon is dry if this is a mild case. Some saline solution moon drops should do the trick.
Itchy Moon
This symptom usually comes paired with red eyes. Moon drops should sooth the moon. If it still feels itchy even at a distance of 384,000km then you need urgent psychiatric attention.
"
https://www.4greatvision.com/10-normal-symptoms-for-new-contact-lens-wearers/
What is the flat-Earthist explanation for this? Do they think the flat-moon is shaped like a contact lens?
Well, if that's true, then how come the New Moon isn't associated with ANY of the below symptoms?
"
10 Normal Symptoms for New Moon Viewers
Here are 10 normal symptoms for new moon viewers as they adjust to the lens-shaped moon -
Moon Movement
If it feels like the moon is moving, that is what is supposed to happen. There is a natural fluid flow in the moon and the lens-shape needs to permit it.
Minor Irritation
The first couple of times a new viewer looks at the lens-shaped moon, they will say they can "feel" the moon. It takes a bit of time for the eye to accept the moon because it is a medical device. Any feelings of discomfort should ease away in 15 minutes.
Tearing
Moon viewers will tear up when they look at the lens-shaped moon with their eye. It's totally normal and once adapted to the lens-shape, the tears will stop.
Light Sensitivity
New viewers will sometimes note sensitivity to bright lights. Such as the moon. Like other symptoms on this list, this should go away with moon adaptation.
Burning
This symptom is cause for concern for a lot of New Moon viewers. Rightfully so, a burning sensation in your moon is alarming. What it signals is that the moon is dry and needs moisture. Moon drops will do the trick and re-lubricate the lens-shaped moon by pooling in its dish-like underside.
Blurring
The New Moon is supposed to clear up vision, not blur it. If the moon is making a new viewer see things blurry it typically means there are a lot of tears generated or there are oils on the moon. Using solution to clean the moon and reinserting it will clear up the vision. If the problem persists, call your moon doctor.
Dislodged Moon
The moon will seldomly either go "off-center" or lift off from the night sky. If this rare occurrence happens, a simple blink will reposition the moon.
Excessive Blinking
This symptom is actually beneficial to the moon. Full, complete blinks when the moon is first inserted will keep the lens-shape comfortable.
Red Eyes
This symptom is fairly common with the burning. Basically, the moon is dry if this is a mild case. Some saline solution moon drops should do the trick.
Itchy Moon
This symptom usually comes paired with red eyes. Moon drops should sooth the moon. If it still feels itchy even at a distance of 384,000km then you need urgent psychiatric attention.
"
https://www.4greatvision.com/10-normal-symptoms-for-new-contact-lens-wearers/
We can see that Mars isn't flat. All we need is a mat and some flares.
Mat Flar[e]s.
Mat Flar[e]s.
^^^ Don't be fooled by the green man, Mars is a 3,000 foot wide disc of electrical plasma.
Take this, Globalists Green Mans!
Mars has rim and hexagon core, it looks like a coin:
The image is for the most part in focus and this is not the camera aperture.
The image is for the most part in focus and this is not the camera aperture.
@TECSHARE,
Gatekeep much you sack of doorknobs? The fluid atmosphere is between the observer and mars, this my point you faggit and it's all relatively in focus. The atmosphere is classified as a fluid and the refraction would not be articulated if the camera was out of focus.
Also, in your example do you think it's possible to document the refraction above a candle on video if the camera is out of focus?
The P1000 rips all the Jesuit astronomers and liars at NASA a new asshole when you point it at the night sky; the stars and planets are not what we're being told and shown.
Gatekeep much you sack of doorknobs? The fluid atmosphere is between the observer and mars, this my point you faggit and it's all relatively in focus. The atmosphere is classified as a fluid and the refraction would not be articulated if the camera was out of focus.
Also, in your example do you think it's possible to document the refraction above a candle on video if the camera is out of focus?
The P1000 rips all the Jesuit astronomers and liars at NASA a new asshole when you point it at the night sky; the stars and planets are not what we're being told and shown.
While I certainly do appreciate your enthusiasm for not automatically believing what you are told, I must say I usually avoid interaction with you because this enthusiasm in some people such as your self can reach pathological proportions and makes any kind of rational discussion impossible.
That said, the gaseous atmosphere does in fact have fluid dynamic properties, which was my point.
here is a technical description of the phenomenon: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/238789/the-refraction-through-hot-air-around-a-candle-flame
Here is a video of the effect refracting laser light: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsyPVevDcJc
If that is not enough for you well too bad, you will have to excuse me I have gates to keep apparently.
@TECSHARE,
Gatekeep much you sack of doorknobs? The fluid atmosphere is between the observer and mars, this my point you faggit and it's all relatively in focus. The atmosphere is classified as a fluid and the refraction would not be articulated if the camera was out of focus.
Also, in your example do you think it's possible to document the refraction above a candle on video if the camera is out of focus?
The P1000 rips all the Jesuit astronomers and liars at NASA a new asshole when you point it at the night sky; the stars and planets are not what we're being told and shown.
Gatekeep much you sack of doorknobs? The fluid atmosphere is between the observer and mars, this my point you faggit and it's all relatively in focus. The atmosphere is classified as a fluid and the refraction would not be articulated if the camera was out of focus.
Also, in your example do you think it's possible to document the refraction above a candle on video if the camera is out of focus?
The P1000 rips all the Jesuit astronomers and liars at NASA a new asshole when you point it at the night sky; the stars and planets are not what we're being told and shown.
We can no longer hide from the truth. The Flat Earth Society was created by the government to distract from the fact that mars is flat. The moon is also flat and no one can tell me otherwise.
^ I purposely chose a clip with a lots of refraction, to show the fluid dynamics, to show that the image is in focus.
As some one with professional photography experience, including with astronomical objects, I can tell you with absolute certainty that your image is not at all in focus, and the only fluid dynamics you are seeing is the temperature differential of the atmosphere causing light to refract. You can see the same effect if you look closely about 3 inches above an open flame. This is the same physical mechanism that can cause mirages. Also, if Mars was fluid, it would all just pour over the flat edge. There is no ice wall there after all.
You should probably move this to Off-topic instead of Politics&Society.
I think it's racist to assume that [flat] Martians don't have politics or society.
I think it should be established how flat the flatness of the flat Martians is. My guess is it's pretty darn flat. But how would you measure flat, if you were flat and everything around you was flat? Just try to hold a ruler up, perpendicular to the flat. It won't go "up", and maybe, "up" does not even exist. Are we talking about a world in 2D? How would people there watch Avatar?
^ I purposely chose a clip with a lots of refraction, to show the fluid dynamics, to show that the image is in focus.
Here's a P1000 video clip:
If you would take camera's matrix resolution into account, you will realize that it's strange to forget about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_aberration.
It's got a hexagon.
@iluvbitcoins NASA gets $60 million USD a day tax money.
And the US military gets that every 45 minutes. 
You should probably move this to Off-topic instead of Politics&Society.
I think it's racist to assume that [flat] Martians don't have politics or society.
@iluvbitcoins NASA gets $60 million USD a day tax money.
It's relevant to the society of lizard people who live on Mars.
You should probably move this to Off-topic instead of Politics&Society.
^^^ Andromeda series, The Lone and Level Sands, Captain Hunt, "Oh,no. More Ogami?"
Mars is a small, close light maybe 3,000 or so miles up; it's a disc of electrical plasma.
What these guys are selling is the biggest fairy tale I've ever seen!
What these guys are selling is the biggest fairy tale I've ever seen!
Here's a P1000 video clip:
[Mars]
Lets compare:
[Mars]
Lets compare:
He is not using a tripod and is probably at a much lower elevation and or colder area.
Here's a P1000 video clip:
[Mars]
Lets compare:
Somebody is selling you a fairly tale.
[Mars]
Lets compare:
Somebody is selling you a fairly tale.
Speaking in nobatman's language, Mars is flat by default.
Of course it's flat. It has no oceans, which means no ships going over the horizon, which means no proof of roundness.
Signature temporarily suspended for posting in this thread
I don't believe in outer space hahaha
What if flat Mars is just the underside of flat Earth?
This is the ultimate truth they don't want you to know. Elon Musk is a glitch in the matrix.
Jump to: