Topic: Flat Earth (Read 1095196 times)
Earth is flat
Can you imagine 800 pages of something as silly as flat earth? You have it all wrong, clearly the world is on the back of a turtle moving thru space. Just be thankful its not a Thoroid, Homer would be pleased...
notbatman is wrong. the earth is flat, but Los Angeles is the center of the earth, and thus the universe (Hollywood, more specifically).
the ocean spills into a circumferential receptacle not unlike an endless pool. it is heated up into vapor and redistributed around theglobe er flat earth in the form of rainfall. have you ever tried to cross the edge no i didnt think so case closed.
the ocean spills into a circumferential receptacle not unlike an endless pool. it is heated up into vapor and redistributed around the
FTFY
No.
Here is a video on the Flat Earth International Conference 2019, made by flat earthers.
|
| The FEIC 2019 Wrap Up & Aftermath -- https://youtu.be/u5hYZ6KX7P8 (3:20:50)
No.
Here is a video on the Flat Earth International Conference 2019, made by flat earthers.
|
| The FEIC 2019 Wrap Up & Aftermath -- https://youtu.be/u5hYZ6KX7P8 (3:20:50)
^^^ The plot thickens...
The moon is still an object, a holographic one with a location, it has length, width and height. The atmospheric plane that contains the plasma used to display the moon is a gaseous fluid, a liquid crystal.
The moon is still an object, a holographic one with a location, it has length, width and height. The atmospheric plane that contains the plasma used to display the moon is a gaseous fluid, a liquid crystal.
Why did god make a holographic moon?
Same reason he buried dinosaur bones to test our faith. He's a prankster god.
The aether, in addition to behaving as super-fine gas is under maximum compression and is incompressible thus, has the ridged properties of a liquid crystal.
A gas is compressible by definition. There is no such thing an incompressible gas.
If it is rigid, then it must have a high viscosity. If it has mass, then it must have inertia. If it has a charge, then we should be able to manipulate it. I don't think any of these properties have ever been demonstrated.
Do you think you can compress a spring that's already fully compressed? Maybe flatten a box that's already completely flat?
OP, if you want proof the Earth is not flat, you can go to a harbor where there are lots of ships. From the ground, watch the ship sail off, and eventually you will see that it will appear to sink, and will not "fade off". You will see the bottom of the ship disappear, and eventually will see the top of the flag disappear.
After the ship has appeared to disappear, move to higher ground near where you are -- go to the top level of a building and look towards the ship. You will be able to see more of the ship than you could when you were on the ground.
OP, I am still waiting on a response to this method of verifying the Earth is not flat. After the ship has appeared to disappear, move to higher ground near where you are -- go to the top level of a building and look towards the ship. You will be able to see more of the ship than you could when you were on the ground.
Additionally, I can confirm that I have personally verified that the Earth is not flat.
You guys are fucking retards.
You can see that the horizon is not even when you fly by plane, for example
We're coming around to April Fool's Day 01 April again. It's 5th anniversary time for the thread!!!
Are we doing anything special? I think someone should bake a cake, and then take it out of the oven before it's fully cooked, so that it goes flat.
Any other (better) ideas?
Are we doing anything special? I think someone should bake a cake, and then take it out of the oven before it's fully cooked, so that it goes flat.
Any other (better) ideas?
OP, if you want proof the Earth is not flat, you can go to a harbor where there are lots of ships. From the ground, watch the ship sail off, and eventually you will see that it will appear to sink, and will not "fade off". You will see the bottom of the ship disappear, and eventually will see the top of the flag disappear.
After the ship has appeared to disappear, move to higher ground near where you are -- go to the top level of a building and look towards the ship. You will be able to see more of the ship than you could when you were on the ground.
OP, I am still waiting on a response to this method of verifying the Earth is not flat. After the ship has appeared to disappear, move to higher ground near where you are -- go to the top level of a building and look towards the ship. You will be able to see more of the ship than you could when you were on the ground.
Additionally, I can confirm that I have personally verified that the Earth is not flat.
Don’t hold your breath dude. He’ll just come up with some silly convoluted word salad involving refraction, mirages
vanishing points, or maybe mention fake NASA photo conspiracies, the Jews, hot ovens and roping yourself or some
such ridiculous thing. Then top it off with an obscure “wtf?” meme.
I’m sure it’s actually been discussed repeatedly in this rather long, farcical trolling thread,iirc. Not worth searching for it though.
OP, if you want proof the Earth is not flat, you can go to a harbor where there are lots of ships. From the ground, watch the ship sail off, and eventually you will see that it will appear to sink, and will not "fade off". You will see the bottom of the ship disappear, and eventually will see the top of the flag disappear.
After the ship has appeared to disappear, move to higher ground near where you are -- go to the top level of a building and look towards the ship. You will be able to see more of the ship than you could when you were on the ground.
OP, I am still waiting on a response to this method of verifying the Earth is not flat. After the ship has appeared to disappear, move to higher ground near where you are -- go to the top level of a building and look towards the ship. You will be able to see more of the ship than you could when you were on the ground.
But first find the difference, between notbatman & notcatman.
The aether, in addition to behaving as super-fine gas is under maximum compression and is incompressible thus, has the ridged properties of a liquid crystal.
A gas is compressible by definition. There is no such thing an incompressible gas.
If it is rigid, then it must have a high viscosity. If it has mass, then it must have inertia. If it has a charge, then we should be able to manipulate it. I don't think any of these properties have ever been demonstrated.
OP, if you want proof the Earth is not flat, you can go to a harbor where there are lots of ships. From the ground, watch the ship sail off, and eventually you will see that it will appear to sink, and will not "fade off". You will see the bottom of the ship disappear, and eventually will see the top of the flag disappear.
After the ship has appeared to disappear, move to higher ground near where you are -- go to the top level of a building and look towards the ship. You will be able to see more of the ship than you could when you were on the ground.
OP, I am still waiting on a response to this method of verifying the Earth is not flat. After the ship has appeared to disappear, move to higher ground near where you are -- go to the top level of a building and look towards the ship. You will be able to see more of the ship than you could when you were on the ground.
Additionally, I can confirm that I have personally verified that the Earth is not flat.
The aether, in addition to behaving as super-fine gas is under maximum compression and is incompressible thus, has the ridged properties of a liquid crystal.
These so-called modern scientists all claim they seek the holy grail of unified field theory, they do not! They seek to bury what was experimentally proven in 1939 at the university of Paris and scream "LALALALALALAL I can't hear you over the sound of muh relativity".
These so-called modern scientists all claim they seek the holy grail of unified field theory, they do not! They seek to bury what was experimentally proven in 1939 at the university of Paris and scream "LALALALALALAL I can't hear you over the sound of muh relativity".
How is my other favourite thread doing today?
Has this been posted yet?
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/daredevil-mad-mike-hughes-dies-homemade-rocket-launch-filmed-tv-n1141286
Bozo got famous for wanting to prove "once and for all" the earth was flat.
Wasn't it already proven once and for all when billions can see the curvature of the earth? Yeah, let's listen to a nutjob and replace all the textbooks with his delusions.
The planet as a whole just got a bit smarter.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/daredevil-mad-mike-hughes-dies-homemade-rocket-launch-filmed-tv-n1141286
Bozo got famous for wanting to prove "once and for all" the earth was flat.
Wasn't it already proven once and for all when billions can see the curvature of the earth? Yeah, let's listen to a nutjob and replace all the textbooks with his delusions.
The planet as a whole just got a bit smarter.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53898923
@seoincorporation, he died a hero's death!
“....For here
Am I sitting in a tin can,
Chute is far far away.
Dammit, now I’m doomed
And there’s nothing I can do....”
Boom....
(Apologies to David Bowie’s “Major Tom”)
Let's say the Earth is flat, then why I cannot see the Burj Dubai, Everest, from Europa?
I have some quite good lenses and I can clearly see some crates on the Moon, so why not here on Earth?
I have some quite good lenses and I can clearly see some crates on the Moon, so why not here on Earth?
The problem is that looking at the moon requires only a small amount of atmosphere to look through. Looking at something on the earth requires looking through several to many times worth of atmosphere.
As you go up, the atmosphere becomes less and less. At 20 miles high, there is not enough atmosphere to make a difference in upward vision. There is enough, however, to cause a flying vehicle to be affected by it if the vehicle is flying at high speeds.
Atmosphere causes distant objects on earth to not be seen correctly. Even though the atmosphere doesn't always produce a mirage, it still distorts images enough that you can only see a limited number of miles on the surface of the earth.
In other words, the atmosphere idea regarding flat Earth or globe Earth is irrelevant. Atmosphere blocks or would block vision on either FE or GE.
Let's say the Earth is flat, then why I cannot see the Burj Dubai, Everest, from Europa?
I have some quite good lenses and I can clearly see some crates on the Moon, so why not here on Earth?
I have some quite good lenses and I can clearly see some crates on the Moon, so why not here on Earth?
I remain unconvinced of the flat earth "buoyancy" theory of gravity because of the inconsistencies and contradictions, and because of the inability of proponents to explain it. I wonder if this one would be more suitable: Le Sage's theory of gravitation
...
The Coulomb force (electromagnetism) ultimately drives any material particles in motion. "Space and time" along with relativistic "gravity" is a concept from Relativity (1905) and was falsified by D&P Sagnac (1939) at the University of Paris. What was proven, is that there is a static aether.
I figured that Le Sage's theory might appeal to you because it describes something that is similar to buoyancy. Note that the theory does not depend on the existence of planets or space or relativity or aether.
My problem with your Coulomb force explanation (as I understand it) is that it requires an aether that has mass and charge. In addition, aether must be extremely rigid in order to transmit electromagnetic waves at high frequencies, but you write that it is a "super-fine gas", which is anything but rigid.
How to turn a square into a circle
https://thumbs.gfycat.com/PleasingUnpleasantJabiru-mobile.mp4
https://thumbs.gfycat.com/PleasingUnpleasantJabiru-mobile.mp4
Jump to: