Topic: food supply Blockchain technology. (Read 280 times)

The process that food production undergoes from the point of production to the point of consumption by the final consumer is accompanied by regular quality checks to ensure that they are not harmful to the users.

The quality control and assurance teams work hand in hand in most food manufacturing company to look at the process that leads to the final product that is sent to the market and this process leads to the removal of goods or foods that does not meet the required standard set out by the standardized organization.
Of course, because of the high rate of corruption in the society, some of these safety measures are being boycotted and defective and harmful product see being sent into the market. Some private firms might take it upon themselves to run a check on some of this product and bring out their own finding to ascertain if the product is good for the masses consumption and this is the reason why most household might not accept the quality assurance coming from some some of the standardized organisation set out by the government.

Preservatives have ALWAYS been used in one form or another. This did not apply only to products from the “picked - ate, killed - ate” series. Even in ancient times, people salted, smoked, dried food... Stocking up on food is one of the most ancient processes. But they all balance between the safety of the stored PRODUCT and the safety of the preservative itself.

For example, take salt and meat! A good preservative, it even kills some pathogenic organisms, which allows you to prepare meat/fish for long-term storage. The nutritional value of meat/fish is preserved. But... it's salt. the benefit of which in large quantities is negative.

Let's take the second option - drying meat. Often, using the same salt, excess moisture is removed from meat, and then the natural drying process occurs. And here is a nuance - if ideal conditions are not created, insect larvae (not the most beneficial) will be deposited in the meat, or mold will appear, and it will not be beneficial at all.

Now the situation has changed, there are stronger and more selective substances and technologies (for example, heat treatment and vacuum). Yes, in large doses the chemicals will cause harm, but they are almost 100% safe compared to previous preparation methods. and the most important thing is that the taste of the products is preserved much better.

What can the technology you mentioned solve? In reality, it will not change the processing technology; it will only allow you to confirm that a specially “labeled” batch of goods will be exactly the one that the manufacturer sent to you or to the retail chain. Those. Blockchain can only increase the level of control over the product life cycle. No, for example, you can build IoT devices into containers that, from the manufacturer’s warehouse to the supermarket shelf, will record and record in the blockchain all the characteristics of the environment, temperature, humidity, illumination, integrity of packaging, etc. data. Then this will increase the quality of DELIVERY, but not the quality of the product. Those. the idea is good, but the quality of the product still depends on the manufacturer and the production process.

OP, Food supply blockchain technology is a good step to regain trust of country food. If country food is used by the public then there will be huge positive impact on country's economy. So food items should be free of chemicals because these chemicals are major causes of many diseases in USA. These chemicals are creating asthma and other breath related diseases. These chemicals are also major cause of stomach problems ,So food supply blockchain technology should work on this issue because health is at top in our list and this way economy will also be stronger and USA will be at top of the World in economic point of view.

Food safety is a crucial issue that affects everyone, and it's understandable why many people are concerned about the use of preservatives in food products. The UNISOT's use of blockchain technology to improve transparency and traceability in the food supply chain is a promising solution that could restore trust in the food industry. However, it's important to note that blockchain technology alone may not be sufficient to solve all of the challenges facing the food industry. It will require collaboration among various stakeholders, including food producers, regulators, and consumers, to ensure that food safety standards are upheld and that consumers can have confidence in the food products they consume.

I think Blockchain Technology might be effective in increasing transparency and improving the food supply chain is enabling secure and tamper-resistant transaction records consumers can have greater confidence in the safety and quality of the food they consume and has the potential to reduce food waste and improve supply chain efficiency, which in turn can benefit producers and consumers. But, The Blockchain Technology is not a panacea and cannot completely eliminate food fraud or contamination. It can only serve as a tool to increase accountability and help prevent such problems from occurring. For food preservation, although it is useful for extending the shelf life of food products.

This is not the only problem, but sometimes the use of the blockchain increases the complexity of the problem, such as making it slower, more expensive, with difficulties such as the inability to delete and modify or the high transparency that can harm the industry.

Improving the blockchain here will be closer to those who try to use gold in electrical connections, as it is expensive, and will not give a fundamental change to the average user who may not be able to afford the price of the final product.
An improvement in one aspect and neglecting the rest will lead to the uselessness of this improvement.

Yes, you are right there, because the blockchain technology only burns when Bitcoin is accepted as an options payment in a merchant such as supermarkets in a mall.

       And besides that, Blockchain doesn't go directly into food. Therefore, it is still a bit difficult to connect it to the food industry unless they can think of something good that will actually fit the blockchain.

I am from the seventies and eighties, so I remember perfectly when I was young how food items (vegetables, fruits, canned food...) were different from what they are today in terms of taste and health.

Packaging or the use of preservatives was not widespread, so the materials were much healthier than they are now. Today, packaging and preservatives are not the only problem, but pollution has spread everywhere in the air, water and soil.

Blockchain can make things more transparent about food data and the extent of the harm it can cause to humans, but I don't expect it can stop this harm.

At a current stage, the food chain is not qualified to adopt blockchain technology due to the complexities of the process stages that require the existence of a decentralized entity.
What I notice in general is that the blockchain is being pushed into many areas despite the small chance of success. This is the same thing we noticed during the wave of ICO campaigns, when the blockchain became popular in various sectors. I do not know if any of you remember bananacoin, where bitcoin was inserted into the production of bananas, and of course it turned out later that it was a failed project with no purpose other than to collect the money of unsuspecting investors.

What can be done with that nChain blockchain is that no 3rd party scam/fraud can harm the end consumer but what can protect consumers from the company itself?

Are producers really truthful to what they are saying about the products ingredients and all when it comes to adding the data in the blockchain. Because these can be altered by the food producers.

blockchain tech can also be used in the logistics and supply chain management in the food industry. we have seen several projects exploring this concept. however, the implementation is quite hard as i think the industry is not yet ready.
but if you will look into it. there are a lot of issues that blockchain can resolve in this industry. transparency and real-time visibility and tracking of goods and products are just few benefits. if implemented in most companies, they will lessen a lot of trouble encountered among different parties in the supply chain.

First of all are u trying to spread to other people about Unisot or just an example brand.

Blockchain can solve some of human problem but not all of it in my opinion for now we need people from inside the government to set a rule about it. but you will think like this "if we wait the government then we will wait forever" and yes it is true but this the closest problem solver for now

and I don't know how if blockchain can fix the current food system

Blockchain does not work for anything else in economic systems or that entire digital, but when the human element has entered, the blockchain cannot do much.
When we come to food supply chains, the Standardization Authority must verify all the data received and that the farms are committed to all necessary measures, and therefore, unless the sensors develop to be the perfect work without the need for human intervention, this process will not change.


Also, after the system is completely digital, the blockchain is somewhat slow.

In general, the effort must have the state and scrutiny to gain from the violations of these regimes and random and popular control.

    -   First of all, we know that the preservative does nothing good, and it is mixed with chemicals. It is often used in grocery supermarkets such as fruits, vegetables, fish, chicken, and others so that it does not rot immediately so it takes a long time to spoil.

Of course, when it is said that it is a preservative, since it contains a chemical, once it is introduced into our body, it will actually cause a chemical reaction in our body, not immediately because we have an immune defense mechanism that is called.

The only thing I don't understand is what is the relevance of blockchain here in the matter of preservative foods. Anyone?

Everything is being improved with blockchain technology in food supply, but the use of blockchain in food can go beyond ensuring food safety. It helps the market by balancing market prices. Traditional pricing systems for buying and selling rely on the judgment of the parties rather than the information provided by the entire value chain. Blockchain's unique decentralized structure ensures creating a marketplace for premium products with transparency things are getting complicated as time passes.

From the article:


But it works, right?
I just washed myself with a shampoo that uses blockchain technology and I need a lawnmower to shave!

Salt is a preservative, too much of it can cause hypernatremia and too little of it if you consume a food without sodium will cause hyponatremia so the answer to your concern is pretty much just balanced. Some of the preservatives sure cause more harm even if there's only a little amount of it but there are guidelines for this stuff so it's nothing to worry about.

Preserving of food is already a thing before even we don't the technology like the freezer that could freeze foods to avoid spoiled foods. If I remember correctly we have different methods I remember the pot thing where they put foods inside then buried them. Even when a long time passes by the foods are still fresh and new. But if you're concern about how blockchain could help people to be aware of their food they intake, I think most of the people are aware of expiration date and still people doesn't care about it. So in short even blockchain couldn't do about it as people already lost their trust.

In my opinion, the problem lies not in the sales technique. Because all companies that are engaged in the food sector, including in America too, must have carried out maximum sales promotions. But the problem is the matter of the ingredients in these foods, namely chemicals or food preservatives as you wrote. Now everyone knows and is aware of the preservative content in certain foods, especially in foods that can be stored for a very long time or fast food. Even though these preservatives have been approved by the government in each country, it's no longer a secret, that chemicals that are put in fast food or put in as preservatives, will definitely cause side effects on the human body.

Even though the effect is not felt immediately, in a period of several years if consumed continuously you will definitely feel the effects of these chemicals.
And about the blockchain system, if it is applied to a food sales system, I think it might be fine. But maybe it just needs adjustments to its consumers.

Regaining trusts from their people is a hard battle they need to face and no one is willing to risk their own wealth and resource just to convince people to believe them without any monetary gain. I don't think blockchain can help in this case when we are talking about real time products and not just any other products you can easily manage as long as you have internet. Besides that, even as we are now facing global economic crisis, nobody would even want to risk losing what they have in exchange of recognition or patriotism, and I don't think it is also the answer to this problem especially now that even crypto is facing problems in terms of not only adoption but also from the hands of high authorities.