David Raya was also a target for Manchester United but ended up choosing Onana, which in my opinion choosing Onana was a mistake. Today Raya proved that she is better than Onana, very clear and comparable over the last few kagas. Manchester United has again made the wrong decision in choosing a goalkeeper. There is a lot of praise that David Raya can get with Arsenal considering that if Arteta has given him a place and continues to be used as a starter, it means that Artets has great trust. It is possible that a permanent option will be realized next season. Ramsdale may have to be willing to share space because after all this is a risk he has to accept.
I think Onana is not a bad choice but it was unnecessary for sure. It is difficult for any new player at the beginning at United. At United , pressure is huge and right now Onana is under a huge pressure. I would say Onana hasn't adjusted well at United and needs a bit more time in my opinion.
Raya also could have been a good choice but the difficult part is Brentford doesn't wants to let him go easily and at that time when United were looking for goalkeeper, United were actually looking for a permanent option and not a temporary one.
We should not just approach issues as simple as they appear. There is no guarantee that Raya will no longer flop throughout the season and there is no guarantee that Onana has failed as a goalkeeper. Presently, we can say that Raya is doing outstandingly well and also we can say that Onana is struggling but this two developments will not remain static
It is known that Manchester United is used to making mistakes in the transfer market but I can attest that the case of Onana wasn't a mistake. Onana was among the best of not the available best as at when Manchester United went into the market in search of a goalkeeper. In as much as Onana has not given his best, I can confidently say that Manchester United problem is not a goalkeeper. If Manchester United team is stabled, their goal keeper will be stable.
honestly I can't understand the signings that Manchester United have made, they already had a good goalkeeper, I don't understand why they didn't keep things as they were with the old goalkeeper and focused on the attack which is a disaster, it seems like everyone coaches that they have changed cannot have the courage to go to the market to make big signings for the attack, they had Kane who they could have hired if they had made an effort (made good offers), they could have gone looking for other good players to reinforce in the attack . but they keep wasting money on hiring goalkeepers and then the same goalkeeper gets involved in an argument with maguire on the field, something that shouldn't happen
and Manchester United fans start to blame the team's defeats on Maguire, but see that the England national team recently played against Italy in the Euro qualifying game and Maguire played from the beginning of the game until the end of the game and he wasn't substituted and England won the game, so are Manchester United's defeats really Maguire's fault? Or is it the former goalkeeper's fault? Manchester United's problem comes from the top, it starts from the management that seems to me to interfere in the issue of player signings and if I'm wrong, and it's the coach who is in charge of all the signings, then the team won't go along some.
this is already a lost season for manchester united, in the premier league there are no things like a team that is in position number 10 and with a difference of 8 points being able to recover to the point of overtaking all the top teams and becoming champions, at most Manchester United had won a place in the Europa League. They need to get their signings right in the next opening of the transfer window, their focus should be on attack, in 8 games they only managed to score 9 goals