It's quite crazy to think that we live in a world wherein the ones who run the rules are the ones who knew nothing--or very little--with the very rules they are imposing. We all know the hype about bitcoin, and even the laymen know what it is, so it's just hard to comprehend that even people with high government positions are cramming to get a 'solution' or an 'answer' to bitcoin's growing audience.
It's almost the same argument people use that I disagree with. They say fiat and economies will crumble, and Bitcoin will be supreme. But for as long as people still need to live and eat in relatively low tech worlds, Bitcoin won't displace fiat, it will rely on each other for a while to come.
They are disregarding the fact that there are still countries that are relatively poor and does not have the technological capabilities you can see on developing and first world countries. They are pretty much just being swayed solely by the statistics without looking at it on a minute scale.
It seems like most of them skipped a class or two of microeconomics and focused solely on the larger sense of things, which is the first step towards oversight and failed planning.
That's all well and good, but bitcoin isn't going to threaten the US dollar. It's been more of an investment than a currency since its inception; it's global; and the US dollar is waaay too dominant to be replaced by bitcoin.
If currency giants such as the EU and CNY cannot deal with the power of the USD for decades, how capable is bitcoin in overtaking perhaps the most important currency there is currently (just because everyone and their mothers is using it)?