Stop scaring the newbies, Meuh6879.
Stable at 61% of mining power.2017-07-18 07:02:09 UpdateTip: new best=000000000000000000fb89db8f91845067e0b5864e1620c7a0698c25ebb0e3bf height=476341 version=0x20000012 log2_work=86.778629 tx=240039240 date='2017-07-18 06:59:49' progress=0.999998 cache=154.2MiB(68076tx) warning='61 of last 100 blocks have unexpected version'
If you don't recognize a threat, you have a problem ... not me.
That's why BIP148 must stop this 61% mining power of no-standard blocks.
Segwit, it's this way, no an other magical vote on block version :
http://bitcoin.sipa.be/versions.htmlI see, you're another one of those people who think miners and other users have to blindly follow along and can't make their own decisions about the software they choose to run. I assure you, it's definitely you who has a problem. Why do you think Bitcoin is some form of dictatorship? Why do you honestly believe developers get to make every single last decision and no one has any option but to obey? It's not a "magical vote" at all, it's called
consensus and I don't know why you seem to despise it so much if you've decided to stick around for this long. It's an integral part of how Bitcoin works. If you don't like how Bitcoin works, I understand that bankster crapcoin Ripple functions in a way you'd find more favourable. Devs make all the decisions there and no one has any other option but to run that code and only that code. Maybe go play with that and leave the people who like freedom alone.
Both UASF and SegWit2x have every right to do what they're doing. You run whatever code you want, they can run whatever code they want. No one is putting a gun to your head and forcing you to stay if you can't deal with other people having a different view to the one you're desperately clinging onto.
Looks like you rewrite the history.
First the BU side refuse SegWit activation, by supporting BU, then they push for block expantion anyway if SegWit activate their way (i.e. BIP91).
So in other word, they are OK for SegWit but only if they activate it with some other stuff in it (2x and some other easter eggs).
If BitMain was an honest supporter of SegWit then we would have a nice BIP9 activation with 95% consensus.
Please stop shitting yourself, and I invite you to read all the BIP91 proposal, and what's really inside.
EDIT : And you should also have notice that the Old BU team is signaling 0x20000010 version so withoutSegWit readyness.
(Not the case of BitFury which signaling : 0x20000012 so readyness for BIP91 and SegWit )