Topic: Fortunejack casino working with proven scammers and nutildah willing scam facili (Read 316 times)

Given the irrefutable evidence of laudas scamming in the other thread you posted in lauda should have a flag.
Nutildah should probably have one too

Since DT is pretty much corrupt and full of scammer supporters it would be cast down  at this point.
Feel free to reference my lauda is a scammer thread as proof for a type 1 flag and i will support it.

Many others may over time also. Nobody has dared try to refute the evidence as yet.

Lauda is a scammer and worker for sure, and contolled by efialtis.
efialtis is controlling other accounts as well. When you are in discussion with him, suddenly 7-8 other accounts are coming in, defending this troll (or it is him or his team).
He ruined my website, and I want to make sure he will not ruin other sportsbooks as well.

Somebody must stop him.
Can we make a flag here for this user?

Bump for fortunejack attention.
I want to ensure fortunejack casino is not put in question over sponsoring a proven willing scam facilitator for pay like nutildah

This needs to be answered.
Does hhampus understand hiring scammers or scam facilitators can harm fortunejack casinos reputation.

Hey, actually I guess it is possible I'm not getting what you mean.

I am going to do as you say.

Take it calmly and debate with members in a measured and objective way.

Let's begin. I think I'm going gain a lot from having a sensible discussion with you and working through the lack of evidence i don't have.

1. The witch hunt? Is that for

a_lauda the proven scammer
b_nutildah the willing scam facilitator for pay
c_hhampuz fortune jack campaign manager
d_ fortunejack who is sponsoring lauda the proven scammer and nutildah the self defined willing scam facilitator for pay and trust abuser?

Can you also provide publicly the definition of witch hunt you are referring  to?

You seem a very smart guy. Please don't vanish because it will appear like you have run away and are frightened  to debate with me.

Hurry back.

I rest my case.... good luck with your witch hunt.

Motive is irrelevant when the evidence is independently verifiable. Please don't speculate.
If you wish to skip then you can. I don't think you can succeed where all others have failed.
I don't require support the evidence is irrefutable. I want people to try to debunk it from every angle.
They are greatly assisting me and every honest member here.


Your stated opinion is irrelevant. You need to debunk the clear evidence of scamming and willing scam facilitating.
Proceed.

The evidence is concrete on both members. You are free to debunk it here if you wish.

Fortunejack or hhampuz can come here and tell me they are unaware and will terminate sponsoring scammers.  

You simply need to be careful when your business relies on trust not to work with or sponsor scammers.

Please discuss the specific evidence not just say there is no evidence or make other stupid claims like defamation.
Else you will be deleted.

Debunk the threads linked then present your case

Take your time. Prepare well. Mr bitvest

Not that I want to go to much into it but you seem to be making a lot of these aggressive threads recently , which to me it kind of seems you're just after your personal vendetta against some DT members , regardless just my 2 cents on the matter . I'd like to point out 2 things :


1. I don't understand the connection with your problems with nutildah and Lauda , what they have to do with Fortunejack ? They are probably participating in the FJ signature campaign , but other then that I don't see how u can claim that FJ is working with "proven scammers" .  So more or less it's looking like a defamation attempt at FJ.

2. Before you call out someone a scammer I think it's wise to prove it no ? Like a well structured report with evidence they've scammed someone ?
  - the way you address these threads is like you're constantly angry and "shouting"  and honestly at this point I'm mostly skipping your posts alltogether
  ,so please before continuing this thread try to re-analize the way you're approaching all of this situation , cause honestly right now in my oppinion the
   effect you're trying to achieve with all this stuff is backfiring on you.

I have just noticed nutildah is now working with fortune jack. He has also now trust abused my account with a red tag.
He is trying to prevent me providing legitimate warnings about scammers operating on bitcointalk.

You will notice when you examine the evidences nutildah tries to delete evidence of his untrustworthy  past by deleting his posts.

So far fortunejack casino is working with.

Lauda a proven scammer and extortionist


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/lauda-scammer-extortionist-nullius-twat-double-standards-cheater-5231720

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/laudatmanminifrijironmarvel2owlcatz-extortion-attempt-1764757


But now fortunejack casino is sponsoring and paying Nutildah the willing scam facilitator?

Nutildah the member who has defined himself by both his words and actions to be a willing scam facilitator for pay, he has also started using red tags to deter people from warning others how untrustworthy and dangerous he is.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nutildah-willing-to-facilitate-scammers-for-around-300bucks-deleting-evidence-5190369

I suggest that hhampuz or whoever represents fortunejack casino here on bitcointalk come to discuss this matter

Are fortunejack aware they are sponsoring and paying scammers and other dangerous and dishonest members like nutildah to trust abuse other members into silence?

Do fortunejack and hhampuz wish to pay scammers and willing scam facilitators to place honest members in increased danger of being scammed on bitcointalk.

I am open to debate on this matter.

All off topic irrelevant posts will be removed.

Let us work together to rid bitcointalk of scammers and projects or companies that pay scammers to enable scamming or reduce the value of our trust system.

~lauda
~nutildah
~Hhampuz

Go to your trust settings delete default trust and exclude scammers and those assisting scammers

The evidence is indisputable hence why they should not be getting paid to facilitate scamming on bitcointalk by sponsors.