Pages:
Author

Topic: forum is slow as owl snot in january... (Read 2361 times)

full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
June 15, 2011, 02:32:01 PM
#23
It is slow for me using plain http.  I would also be willing to chip in a few btc for server improvements.

The CPU/memory/disk load is actually quite minimal. Something else is wrong.
This leaves bandwidth.  Could that be the problem?

propagation delay.

the load needs to be spread out geographically.  two more physical servers, in two other widely separated locations - with load-balancing set up for closest connection...
sr. member
Activity: 371
Merit: 250
Disk wait times? Wink
newbie
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
Someone rang?
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
firstbits: 121vnq
The CPU/memory/disk load is actually quite minimal. Something else is wrong.

Really? Having hundreds/thousands of simultaneous users browsing a forum usually results in a pretty substantial number of requests. In any case, APC wouldn't hurt if it isn't already installed.
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
It is slow for me using plain http.  I would also be willing to chip in a few btc for server improvements.

The CPU/memory/disk load is actually quite minimal. Something else is wrong.
This leaves bandwidth.  Could that be the problem?
administrator
Activity: 5222
Merit: 13032
The CPU/memory/disk load is actually quite minimal. Something else is wrong.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
firstbits: 121vnq
awesome, let's take up a donation to upgrade the damn RAM or get on a dedicated box. Should probably also get memcache and/or APC setup.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
http://network-tools.com/default.asp?prog=express&host=forum.bitcoin.org

This will show that the server is sitting somewhere in rackspace who actually bought out theplanet a while back.
Code:
IP address: 174.143.149.98
Host name: forum.bitcoin.org
Alias:
forum.bitcoin.org
174.143.149.98 is from United States(US) in region North America

TraceRoute to 174.143.149.98 [forum.bitcoin.org]

Hop (ms) (ms) (ms)      IP Address Host name
1    1   0   0      8.9.232.73   xe-5-3-0.edge3.dallas1.level3.net 
2    1   0   1      4.69.145.204   ae-4-90.edge2.dallas3.level3.net 
3    2   2   2      4.59.36.50   rackspace-m.edge2.dallas3.level3.net 
4    2   2   2      98.129.84.181   vlan907.core7.dfw1.rackspace.net 
5    2   2   2      98.129.84.217    - 
6    2   2   2      174.143.149.98   forum.bitcoin.org 
Trace complete

Their NS are hosted from a finnish webhost (louhi.net redirects to louhi.fi).
Code:
Authority records
bitcoin.org NS dns2.louhi.net 3600s
bitcoin.org NS dns3.louhi.net 3600s
bitcoin.org NS dns1.louhi.net 3600s

Going down the list...you will see that they are a customer of Slicehost.
Code:
CustName:       Slicehost
Address:        9725 Datapoint
City:           San Antonio
StateProv:      TX
PostalCode:     78225
Country:        US
RegDate:        2009-09-10
Updated:        2011-03-19
Ref:            http://whois.arin.net/rest/customer/C02312276

Slicehost is a VPS provider that gets their servers from rackspace.
Code:
RNOCHandle: NETWO1456-ARIN
RNOCName:   Network Operations
RNOCPhone:  +1-210-312-4000
RNOCEmail:  [email protected]
RNOCRef:    http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/NETWO1456-ARIN

Yeah, I'm a networking guy. I love my stuff. Cheesy
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
firstbits: 121vnq
are we even on a VPS or just commodity hosting? What about moving to the cloud?
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1005
Simple - use a different forum.

I might have a suggestion as to which one to use as well...   Wink
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 252
I don't get the reference but I wholeheartedly agree with you.

It took me about 20 seconds for this page to load on a 100mbps dedicated connection.

Whoever is in charge of this forum... increase it's server power and increase every bitcoin forum member's productivity! Also new user take up... Studies show that if a visitor to a "new" web page has to wait more than a few seconds they will usually hit the back button and forget about it.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 101
People, we really need to fix this. It's becoming unbearable.
I know we have record numbers on the forum, but I think we should be better prepared for such occurrences.
If it's a matter of money, I and probably many on this forum would be willing to chip in for a new server/bandwidth/whatever
Please, let's address this problem!
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
   Forum becom even more slower, by twice, that week ago. Should i with my pitty 7 BTC, declare bounty on this, or some BTC reach man will do something about that ?
   And i am do not mean  - " Oh that forum is overcrowded, - we, real old and reach BTC owners should move on some other forum, and hide that forum from other public"  
    You, - for shure can do this. But you will left alone in this new shiny forum, - like year ago.

   WTF ? It tooks month to some of you, to  take actions that slightly regulate  the forum rules. Did we should wait for other half or year, to regulate overload of BTC forum ?
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
I'm got experience with finding ways to get better performance out of LAMP platforms. This could be a mysql performance issue or a web server issue. Either way there are probably steps you can take to delay the need for more hardware.  If a forum admin wants to contact me send me a PM, I can probably help.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
June 09, 2011, 09:50:09 PM
#9
I prefer nginx to lighttpd. Smiley
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
June 09, 2011, 09:15:13 PM
#8
forum is slow for me!!! sometimes it will just stop loading and stays on a white page making me have to reload before i see the page. its not my computer either.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
June 09, 2011, 09:03:21 PM
#7
Not using HTTPS, - forum becomes slower and slower everyday.
I am don`t mention mess in sections of forum, that is mentioned before, in other topics.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 101
June 09, 2011, 08:06:20 PM
#6
I've not been using https lately, but browsing this forum today was worse than choosing death by scrotum hair plucking
administrator
Activity: 5222
Merit: 13032
June 09, 2011, 06:53:16 PM
#5
Someone on IRC said that lighttpd is bad with HTTPS. Maybe that's it.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
June 09, 2011, 06:37:14 PM
#4
I find when using HTTPS that it is very slow; when not using HTTPS it runs fine. So I think a better CPU is called for.
Pages:
Jump to: