Topic: Fox News manipulation machine kicking into gear (Read 1410 times)
well peolpe i like hillary dot final and i think the all question into policy of usa into the btc world its just no need for soo much i do state that in this forum i found lots of topics of policies for this i depreend its too much for usa power into the btc forum world we are not all in america we dont use 100 per cent its policies im euro and i like to discuss more european ideas into the btc than this but ok hillary its my favourit i guess its intelgence and woman factor brings more bright to world of usa but i dont mess much with usa policies not even this country im in portugal
If the American public falls for this bullshit again I will have lost all respect for them, I suspect the lure of the first female president will be too great for them.
If they fall for it again you lose all respect?
You give the American voter much more credit than I could ever muster.
I keep trying to have faith in Democracy but it keeps screwing me over every time I'll admit
Quote
When John Kasich with his 2% gets up there but not Rand you know it is BS.
I think for Ron Paul they replaced him with Newt Gingrich ( or however the hell you spell it ) even though he was about to or already dropped out of the race.
When John Kasich with his 2% gets up there but not Rand you know it is BS.
Was going to say, it's exactly like the Ron Paul fox news coverage, not like it, exactly like it.
Rand Paul received 7%
Ah, looks like Ron Paul election theatre all over again.
If the American public falls for this bullshit again I will have lost all respect for them, I suspect the lure of the first female president will be too great for them.
If they fall for it again you lose all respect?
You give the American voter much more credit than I could ever muster.
If the American public falls for this bullshit again I will have lost all respect for them, I suspect the lure of the first female president will be too great for them.
Rand Paul received 7%
Pffft typical Faux News, so fair yet so balanced...
If a Republican does get in I hope it's Rand Paul even though I don't agree with a lot of his stances. His speech about the surveillance state was epic, surprised there aren't more Republicans supporting this been as they keep harping on about small governments.
If a Republican does get in I hope it's Rand Paul even though I don't agree with a lot of his stances. His speech about the surveillance state was epic, surprised there aren't more Republicans supporting this been as they keep harping on about small governments.
Fox News at it again
If the idea is to truly beat Hillary then the script would be to glow Rand's numbers so all the eyeglass wearing, social security sopping folks that allowed the republicans to become the party of spending just a little less, see who's their Ace. Too bad this Ace is truly a problem for the DC political class on both sides.
They've started already. Looks like we know who Fox News is pushing for this election season.
crap
I would say that they are trying to make it look like a certainty that Hilary will be the democratic candidate and that they want to have a "anyone but Hillary" campaign.crap
They don't seem to be backing anyone specific from the Republicans, or maybe I am completely misreading this!
When posting polls, who tends to be listed first?
They've started already. Looks like we know who Fox News is pushing for this election season.
I would say that they are trying to make it look like a certainty that Hilary will be the democratic candidate and that they want to have a "anyone but Hillary" campaign.They don't seem to be backing anyone specific from the Republicans, or maybe I am completely misreading this!
When posting polls, who tends to be listed first?
They've started already. Looks like we know who Fox News is pushing for this election season.
I would say that they are trying to make it look like a certainty that Hilary will be the democratic candidate and that they want to have a "anyone but Hillary" campaign.They don't seem to be backing anyone specific from the Republicans, or maybe I am completely misreading this!
Is it really a certainty that Hilary will be the Democratic candidate?
There has to be a way with today's social media to track down the guy that puts up the charts and ask him why he chose that order for the graphic.
You don't need to even ask him, if you look at the maths for these polls you'll find the percentages are full of shit, right below it says it's out of 1,000 polls, they could have just as easilly gathered a bunch of supporters to vote for the candidate they want in rather than done any meaningful polling.
The more you look at history and learn proper mathematics the more you hate these fuckers.
I don't see the point of the criticism. Isn't the chart intended to show how several Repubs play against one Dem?
Regardless, yes there will be a strong effort for the back room manipulation.
I remember Fox's coverage after the CPAC results came in and while they mentioned that Rand won it for the 2nd year in a row, they were saying that the main story there was Walker's surge as he came in 3rd I believe. When in reality, the weeks prior they were pumping Walker by interviewing and talking about him like everyday on multiple shows. Very few outside of Paul supporters can see the sheer propaganda hiding in plain sight.
CNN is just as bad. they one time when talking about Ukraine put the capitol of Mongolia as a city attacked by rebels.
There has to be a way with today's social media to track down the guy that puts up the charts and ask him why he chose that order for the graphic.
You don't need to even ask him, if you look at the maths for these polls you'll find the percentages are full of shit, right below it says it's out of 1,000 polls, they could have just as easilly gathered a bunch of supporters to vote for the candidate they want in rather than done any meaningful polling.
The more you look at history and learn proper mathematics the more you hate these fuckers.
I don't see the point of the criticism. Isn't the chart intended to show how several Repubs play against one Dem?
Look at the order of the results. Is it alphabetical? Based on the numbers?
There has to be a way with today's social media to track down the guy that puts up the charts and ask him why he chose that order for the graphic.
You don't need to even ask him, if you look at the maths for these polls you'll find the percentages are full of shit, right below it says it's out of 1,000 polls, they could have just as easilly gathered a bunch of supporters to vote for the candidate they want in rather than done any meaningful polling.
The more you look at history and learn proper mathematics the more you hate these fuckers.
I don't see the point of the criticism. Isn't the chart intended to show how several Repubs play against one Dem?
There has to be a way with today's social media to track down the guy that puts up the charts and ask him why he chose that order for the graphic.
You don't need to even ask him, if you look at the maths for these polls you'll find the percentages are full of shit, right below it says it's out of 1,000 polls, they could have just as easilly gathered a bunch of supporters to vote for the candidate they want in rather than done any meaningful polling.
The more you look at history and learn proper mathematics the more you hate these fuckers.
I don't see the point of the criticism. Isn't the chart intended to show how several Repubs play against one Dem?
Jump to: