Pages:
Author

Topic: FPGA Mining Contract - page 14. (Read 38809 times)

legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000
December 04, 2011, 05:21:55 AM
1) Why our spartan 6 is so slow ?
My test implementation without any optimization got 180Mhash/s according to the Xilinx ISE tool.

2) How our current solution compares to existing ones:
http://www.dinigroup.com/new/DNBFC_S12_PCIe.php



3) How much does Virtex 7 cost ?
"The Virtex-7 2000T the 2 million logic cell will begin initial sampling in August and November of 2011"
Is it possible to receive samples ? (somehow we already miss these intervals, but it is still possible to try to obtain samples)
Is it possible to get promotional discounts for it?

For the comparison, the price of SPARTAN 6 is
I think you should target the Xilinx spartan 6, LX150(T) :  XC6SLX150-2FGG484C
Costs about 170$ at digikey for one, but I've heard 120$ with some volume.

I am asking, because it uses 28 nm technology, which is more modern that 45 nm in Spartan 6

What will be it's approximate hash rate?
Next year it seems the Artix-7 series will give us the most "bang for the buck".
"Artix-7 FPGA initial samples will ship first quarter of 2012."

5) The same question about Kintex-7
It was already shipped: http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-products/electronic-product-reviews/fpga-pld-products/4214345/Xilinx-ships-first-28nm-Kintex-7-FPGAs
hero member
Activity: 720
Merit: 528
December 04, 2011, 02:50:44 AM
Statistics site showing more fpgas now, but only a couple are running.  Status update?

The boards are here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.639925

But I'm doing a lot of work setting them up and testing, so mining will be intermittent for the rest of the weekend at least. I'll post some pics of them mining away soon!
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
December 04, 2011, 12:13:33 AM
Statistics site showing more fpgas now, but only a couple are running.  Status update?
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000
December 02, 2011, 07:15:49 PM
Somehow FPGA.contract is not in the list:

> Public information about companies traded on GLBSE

http://companies.herokuapp.com/

I think it's absence affects the price of shares Smiley
hero member
Activity: 720
Merit: 528
December 01, 2011, 03:13:14 AM
Astrologers proclaim the month of Hydra!!!
All FPGA cards are multiplied by seven.


Haha! I hope this seven headed beast is born quickly and painlessly (at least from now on). I'm expecting to get it up and running over the weekend. I'll keep you all updated!
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000
November 30, 2011, 05:29:30 PM
Astrologers proclaim the month of Hydra!!!
All FPGA cards are multiplied by seven.
legendary
Activity: 1029
Merit: 1000
November 28, 2011, 08:40:37 AM
One day to difficulty drop. Next dividends will be higher Wink
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
Psi laju, karavani prolaze.
November 28, 2011, 07:21:08 AM

ArsenShnurkov, good eye noticing that our site doesn't list the last dividend. It's actually automatically filled from a custom API kakobrekla built (using the python interface for GLBSE). I'll check with him to see why it's acting up.


Fixed.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
November 28, 2011, 01:19:44 AM
It wouldn't be hard to modify the glbse python script to hardcoded the password and then you could use that in a script to get the deposit address.
hero member
Activity: 720
Merit: 528
November 28, 2011, 12:30:52 AM
Dividends paid for the week of 11/20!

A little later than usual, but also a little bigger.

Total paid to 6000 shares: 6.56708092 BTC
Dividend per share: 0.00109451 BTC

ArsenShnurkov, good eye noticing that our site doesn't list the last dividend. It's actually automatically filled from a custom API kakobrekla built (using the python interface for GLBSE). I'll check with him to see why it's acting up.

As for automation, yeah, I didn't mean that I would automatically pay a hardcoded amount. If I implemented this, it would need to keep track of earnings and make the correct payment to shareholders. There's no way to automatically deposit funds at GLBSE (can't use the same address twice), so I would have to maintain a balance there. Right now, it doesn't seem worth the trouble. It could be a good idea for long term automation of this project in general, though.
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000
November 27, 2011, 11:09:54 PM
will make the payment when I get home in a few hours

Please also update table at
http://contract.fpgamining.com/?page_id=34
because it miss previous payment information

a little variability in the dividend payment helps

Automation doesn't mean hardcoded amounts per share.
You can gather actual data (from pools?) and provide variability it this way.

Also, if you want a checkpoint you can add an approval step
into the automated workflow
donator
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
November 27, 2011, 08:44:26 PM
We demand regularity of dividend payments!

I, for one, don't care much how/when dividends are payed.

hero member
Activity: 720
Merit: 528
November 27, 2011, 08:38:05 PM
We demand regularity of dividend payments!

Automate them!

Whoa, please don't Occupy GLBSE yet!  Tongue It's still the weekend here in California, after all. I don't really like automating things when real money is involved, just because screwups can get expensive. Also, a little variability in the dividend payment helps to encourage long term investment, I think.

I'm traveling this weekend but will make the payment when I get home in a few hours.
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000
November 27, 2011, 05:52:21 PM
We demand regularity of dividend payments!



Automate them!
hero member
Activity: 720
Merit: 528
November 21, 2011, 07:25:48 PM
Some people are not content with the centralization and coresponding lack of control surrounding GLBSE.

If a new exchange is setup, would you be interested in moving to it? Migrating/liquidating shares is something that we are going to have to figure out.

There's a thread discussing our GLBSE alternative here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/on-a-decentralized-bitcoin-based-stock-market-52494

I would certainly not be opposed to alternatives, although they seem some time off. My biggest worry about GLBSE is that I rely on the central authority to tell me who the shareholders are. If that was solved, I would feel much more comfortable.

The idea of listing a sell order with the shares you own is clever, but not bulletproof. One problem I see with it is that you could prove to me that you own shares now, and then immediately sell them. I need to see not only the current shareholders, but also a public list of transactions. I think if GLBSE would list all transaction history with account ids and I could match up users' public keys with those accounts, the problem would be solved. That's not possible already, is it?
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
November 21, 2011, 07:12:09 PM
Some people are not content with the centralization and coresponding lack of control surrounding GLBSE.

If a new exchange is setup, would you be interested in moving to it? Migrating/liquidating shares is something that we are going to have to figure out.

There's a thread discussing our GLBSE alternative here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/on-a-decentralized-bitcoin-based-stock-market-52494
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 102
Bitcoin!
November 21, 2011, 07:01:40 PM
Thanks fizzisist.
hero member
Activity: 720
Merit: 528
November 21, 2011, 06:56:01 PM
Dividends have been paid for the week of 11/14!

Another week, another payment for our loyal shareholders.

Total paid to 6000 shares: 5.19582123 BTC
Per share: 0.00086597 BTC

Also, a quick update on the status of the rest of the boards. Everything is moving and they are being built right now. The latest from the manufacturer is that the PCBs are finished, and they will begin assembly on Monday. We expect them to be here on the Wednesday after Thanksgiving, Nov. 30th.
So 5.2 BTC was mined in a week with the current boards, correct?  What might be a projection of how much this might go up once the new boards are in place?

Currently, I have been contributing my two GPUs to this, which will be turned off when the FPGAs get here. The hashrate I'm getting on the X6500 is 250 MH/s and we will soon have 7 of those, or 1750 MH/s. The next difficulty estimate is 1133504, and 1750 MH/s should earn 10.87 BTC/week on average at that difficulty. Of course, there will be occasional downtime (like we had last night when my internet went out in a storm). On the other hand, I fully expect to reach higher MH/FPGA soon, with improvements to the code. That's probably a good ball park on the estimated earnings, though.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 102
Bitcoin!
November 21, 2011, 06:44:39 PM
Dividends have been paid for the week of 11/14!

Another week, another payment for our loyal shareholders.

Total paid to 6000 shares: 5.19582123 BTC
Per share: 0.00086597 BTC

Also, a quick update on the status of the rest of the boards. Everything is moving and they are being built right now. The latest from the manufacturer is that the PCBs are finished, and they will begin assembly on Monday. We expect them to be here on the Wednesday after Thanksgiving, Nov. 30th.
So 5.2 BTC was mined in a week with the current boards, correct?  What might be a projection of how much this might go up once the new boards are in place?
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
Psi laju, karavani prolaze.
November 21, 2011, 05:24:15 PM
What is stopping me from making several 'identification sell orders', one after another?

Example
sell order: 10 shares for 1000.12345
*got 10 shares with preowner right*
just after that
sell order: 10 old plus 10 new shares total 20 for 1000.67891
*got 20 shares with preowner right*
repeat
Pages:
Jump to: