FreeCash - the first casino that has a winners-only policy!

Zebash!

newbie

Activity: 37

Merit: 0

Quote from: Zebash! on March 07, 2019, 07:41:00 PM

📢 FreeCash Needs YOU! 📢

We are currently signing up players for Alpha Testing!

Be the first to form the FreeCash network! Give us feedback and inform the development of FreeCash. We promise to compensate our Alphas fairly. All successful applicants will be eligible for FreeCash Platinum Membership for life!

We are only accepting 50 Alphas so sign up today!

Start the FreeCash revolution: https:/[Suspicious link removed]/72q7UKRQxJ

Why not join us in alpha testing our miner?

Download the alpha build and be the first to get onto the platform, and the first to get the invites to the gaming app when it opens!

https://www.dropbox.com/s/z4gdzk2b72wqka9/FC-alphaBuild-20190502-RC02.apk?dl=0

Zebash!

newbie

Activity: 37

Merit: 0

📢 FreeCash Needs YOU! 📢

We are currently signing up players for Alpha Testing!

Be the first to form the FreeCash network! Give us feedback and inform the development of FreeCash. We promise to compensate our Alphas fairly. All successful applicants will be eligible for FreeCash Platinum Membership for life!

We are only accepting 50 Alphas so sign up today!

Start the FreeCash revolution: https:/[Suspicious link removed]/72q7UKRQxJ

Zebash!

newbie

Activity: 37

Merit: 0

Due to market Conditions - we will not be running a token sale for the foreseeable future, however, we will launch the product as planned in Q1 this year!

Full details in our latest Medium article.

“FreeCash Token Sale Update” by Freecash https://link.medium.com/JI0v6zyKJT

Zebash!

newbie

Activity: 37

Merit: 0

Quote from: daisynonwak on December 06, 2018, 05:07:20 PM

Can you tell us more about this project?

It will be a free to play game platform with real cash prizes.The FreeCash Online Casino does not allow anyone to deposit any cash or crypto, but instead allows players to use crypto-currency mining to generate gaming credits. Players can then freely gamble their gaming credits to win more!

We are currently building our platform, launching in India and Philippines in January, then onboarding players to eventually raise money in March next year.

daisynonwak

newbie

Activity: 21

Merit: 0

Can you tell us more about this project?

Zebash!

newbie

Activity: 37

Merit: 0

https://medium.com/@adam_72715/the-death-of-the-ico-535763685d9d

Check the latest article...

Zebash!

newbie

Activity: 37

Merit: 0

Quote from: Hanna_Money on November 07, 2018, 12:06:16 PM

i’m not working in this project and i’m strictly objectively interested in it. i’m not tryna make you invest in it. i just realize that it has qutie a good potential to compensate risky investments.

I can confirm they don't work for us. Also, we will not raise money until we have build the platform, launched and onboarded 100k players.

Zebash!

newbie

Activity: 37

Merit: 0

Hey all! We have been super busy behind the scenes.

We have successfully closed our 'Angel Round' and now putting efforts into building the platform.

We will also be obtaining a license that allows us to operate in some of our key target territories.

We agree with what you are saying to a certain extent. ICO's do not always deliver as promised, so we are approaching our raise in a more traditional way. Therefore, we will not raise money until we have firstly built the platform, then secondly onboarded at least 100 k players.

Anyone interested in signing up should head over to our website www.freeca.sh and sign up for the whitelist!

We will of course continue to update you on our progress!

Adam and the Freecash team!

DreamerJ

jr. member

Activity: 224

Merit: 2

Quote from: Sevreki on November 07, 2018, 02:51:05 PM

Quote from: pogi23 on November 07, 2018, 02:43:55 PM

Quote from: kmntrci on November 07, 2018, 02:18:30 PM

Quote from: ripzombie on November 07, 2018, 02:09:00 PM

Quote from: pogi23 on November 07, 2018, 01:49:40 PM

Let’s begin with the fact that each standard has individual requirements for contracts. And if Freecash organizers are approved by all aspects by ERC-20 - what’s bad in it?

well ok, if im a developer, how then can i write a typical smart contract for an ICO? and how these requirements are unique? lately all icos are either Timed, Capped, Refundable, etc.

in no way. you just take a certain project and write a smart contract turn key. usually, the thing that fits the standards context can come out unfit particularly for you(( that’s the truth of it…

damn(( i’ve almost decided to become a blockchain devleoper of level 80)))

only practice will help you my friend(

I think that participation is the only thing that matters here in crypt, because there are quite a lot of people that just complain but have never even tried ..

Xtonyonyack

jr. member

Activity: 112

Merit: 1

Quote from: JohnYDillinger on November 07, 2018, 03:41:16 PM

Quote from: libope on November 07, 2018, 03:37:38 PM

Quote from: beheper on November 07, 2018, 03:34:01 PM

Quote from: dhaemp64 on November 07, 2018, 03:30:31 PM

Quote from: HappStoreW on November 07, 2018, 03:27:03 PM

Quote from: Tamandrac on November 07, 2018, 03:23:59 PM

Quote from: Urakeavan on November 07, 2018, 03:13:45 PM

Talking about why projects select different standards to work with - some ICOs simply have specific token distribution terms, for instance, they can include the burning procedure or freezing of tokens for a fixed period of time. That’s all)

the features you’ve described need like 10-20 lines of code. In general, you can praise the ICO uniqueness all you want, but they’re all similar and everything’s already been invented and written when it comes to this concept. Everybody just wants to show off how they select something new instead of the ‘sucky’ old ERCoo-20 without even mentioning any technical details and whatnot

+1 absolutely agrreed with you. the learning curve is still pretty high but the topic of ICO still causes distrust for many. And the modern advanced standards statements simply confuse investors.

well, can i trust this here project?...

i get it, thnx) didn’t really understand a thing from a whitepaper)) well apart from statistics)) im thinking on purchasing a couple of tokens myself)))

you should risk, you won’t lose that much in any case, you can go with 100 bucks if you want

ahah, seems like on of the project organizers is writing this

yyeeeaaahhh, they’ll surely become amazingly rich due to your hundred

GucciGangClub

jr. member

Activity: 224

Merit: 1

Quote from: pactiond on November 07, 2018, 03:23:34 PM

Quote from: Sevreki on November 07, 2018, 02:51:05 PM

Quote from: pogi23 on November 07, 2018, 02:43:55 PM

Quote from: kmntrci on November 07, 2018, 02:18:30 PM

Quote from: ripzombie on November 07, 2018, 02:09:00 PM

Quote from: pogi23 on November 07, 2018, 01:49:40 PM

Let’s begin with the fact that each standard has individual requirements for contracts. And if Freecash organizers are approved by all aspects by ERC-20 - what’s bad in it?

well ok, if im a developer, how then can i write a typical smart contract for an ICO? and how these requirements are unique? lately all icos are either Timed, Capped, Refundable, etc.

in no way. you just take a certain project and write a smart contract turn key. usually, the thing that fits the standards context can come out unfit particularly for you(( that’s the truth of it…

damn(( i’ve almost decided to become a blockchain devleoper of level 80)))

only practice will help you my friend(

well i’m practicing) guys, excuse us for flooding so much, good luck in your professional beginnings

thank you very much and good luck to you as well))

JohnYDillinger

jr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 1

Quote from: libope on November 07, 2018, 03:37:38 PM

Quote from: beheper on November 07, 2018, 03:34:01 PM

Quote from: dhaemp64 on November 07, 2018, 03:30:31 PM

Quote from: HappStoreW on November 07, 2018, 03:27:03 PM

Quote from: Tamandrac on November 07, 2018, 03:23:59 PM

Quote from: Urakeavan on November 07, 2018, 03:13:45 PM

Talking about why projects select different standards to work with - some ICOs simply have specific token distribution terms, for instance, they can include the burning procedure or freezing of tokens for a fixed period of time. That’s all)

the features you’ve described need like 10-20 lines of code. In general, you can praise the ICO uniqueness all you want, but they’re all similar and everything’s already been invented and written when it comes to this concept. Everybody just wants to show off how they select something new instead of the ‘sucky’ old ERCoo-20 without even mentioning any technical details and whatnot

+1 absolutely agrreed with you. the learning curve is still pretty high but the topic of ICO still causes distrust for many. And the modern advanced standards statements simply confuse investors.

well, can i trust this here project?...

i get it, thnx) didn’t really understand a thing from a whitepaper)) well apart from statistics)) im thinking on purchasing a couple of tokens myself)))

you should risk, you won’t lose that much in any case, you can go with 100 bucks if you want

ahah, seems like on of the project organizers is writing this

libope

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Quote from: beheper on November 07, 2018, 03:34:01 PM

Quote from: dhaemp64 on November 07, 2018, 03:30:31 PM

Quote from: HappStoreW on November 07, 2018, 03:27:03 PM

Quote from: Tamandrac on November 07, 2018, 03:23:59 PM

Quote from: Urakeavan on November 07, 2018, 03:13:45 PM

Talking about why projects select different standards to work with - some ICOs simply have specific token distribution terms, for instance, they can include the burning procedure or freezing of tokens for a fixed period of time. That’s all)

the features you’ve described need like 10-20 lines of code. In general, you can praise the ICO uniqueness all you want, but they’re all similar and everything’s already been invented and written when it comes to this concept. Everybody just wants to show off how they select something new instead of the ‘sucky’ old ERCoo-20 without even mentioning any technical details and whatnot

+1 absolutely agrreed with you. the learning curve is still pretty high but the topic of ICO still causes distrust for many. And the modern advanced standards statements simply confuse investors.

well, can i trust this here project?...

i get it, thnx) didn’t really understand a thing from a whitepaper)) well apart from statistics)) im thinking on purchasing a couple of tokens myself)))

you should risk, you won’t lose that much in any case, you can go with 100 bucks if you want

beheper

jr. member

Activity: 210

Merit: 1

Quote from: dhaemp64 on November 07, 2018, 03:30:31 PM

Quote from: HappStoreW on November 07, 2018, 03:27:03 PM

Quote from: Tamandrac on November 07, 2018, 03:23:59 PM

Quote from: Urakeavan on November 07, 2018, 03:13:45 PM

Talking about why projects select different standards to work with - some ICOs simply have specific token distribution terms, for instance, they can include the burning procedure or freezing of tokens for a fixed period of time. That’s all)

the features you’ve described need like 10-20 lines of code. In general, you can praise the ICO uniqueness all you want, but they’re all similar and everything’s already been invented and written when it comes to this concept. Everybody just wants to show off how they select something new instead of the ‘sucky’ old ERCoo-20 without even mentioning any technical details and whatnot

+1 absolutely agrreed with you. the learning curve is still pretty high but the topic of ICO still causes distrust for many. And the modern advanced standards statements simply confuse investors.

well, can i trust this here project?...

i get it, thnx) didn’t really understand a thing from a whitepaper)) well apart from statistics)) im thinking on purchasing a couple of tokens myself)))

dhaemp64

newbie

Activity: 168

Merit: 0

Quote from: HappStoreW on November 07, 2018, 03:27:03 PM

Quote from: Tamandrac on November 07, 2018, 03:23:59 PM

Quote from: Urakeavan on November 07, 2018, 03:13:45 PM

Talking about why projects select different standards to work with - some ICOs simply have specific token distribution terms, for instance, they can include the burning procedure or freezing of tokens for a fixed period of time. That’s all)

the features you’ve described need like 10-20 lines of code. In general, you can praise the ICO uniqueness all you want, but they’re all similar and everything’s already been invented and written when it comes to this concept. Everybody just wants to show off how they select something new instead of the ‘sucky’ old ERCoo-20 without even mentioning any technical details and whatnot

+1 absolutely agrreed with you. the learning curve is still pretty high but the topic of ICO still causes distrust for many. And the modern advanced standards statements simply confuse investors.

well, can i trust this here project?...

HappStoreW

jr. member

Activity: 140

Merit: 1

Quote from: Tamandrac on November 07, 2018, 03:23:59 PM

Quote from: Urakeavan on November 07, 2018, 03:13:45 PM

Talking about why projects select different standards to work with - some ICOs simply have specific token distribution terms, for instance, they can include the burning procedure or freezing of tokens for a fixed period of time. That’s all)

the features you’ve described need like 10-20 lines of code. In general, you can praise the ICO uniqueness all you want, but they’re all similar and everything’s already been invented and written when it comes to this concept. Everybody just wants to show off how they select something new instead of the ‘sucky’ old ERCoo-20 without even mentioning any technical details and whatnot

+1 absolutely agrreed with you. the learning curve is still pretty high but the topic of ICO still causes distrust for many. And the modern advanced standards statements simply confuse investors.

Tamandrac

jr. member

Activity: 182

Merit: 1

Quote from: Urakeavan on November 07, 2018, 03:13:45 PM

Talking about why projects select different standards to work with - some ICOs simply have specific token distribution terms, for instance, they can include the burning procedure or freezing of tokens for a fixed period of time. That’s all)

the features you’ve described need like 10-20 lines of code. In general, you can praise the ICO uniqueness all you want, but they’re all similar and everything’s already been invented and written when it comes to this concept. Everybody just wants to show off how they select something new instead of the ‘sucky’ old ERCoo-20 without even mentioning any technical details and whatnot

pactiond

jr. member

Activity: 224

Merit: 1

Quote from: Sevreki on November 07, 2018, 02:51:05 PM

Quote from: pogi23 on November 07, 2018, 02:43:55 PM

Quote from: kmntrci on November 07, 2018, 02:18:30 PM

Quote from: ripzombie on November 07, 2018, 02:09:00 PM

Quote from: pogi23 on November 07, 2018, 01:49:40 PM

Let’s begin with the fact that each standard has individual requirements for contracts. And if Freecash organizers are approved by all aspects by ERC-20 - what’s bad in it?

well ok, if im a developer, how then can i write a typical smart contract for an ICO? and how these requirements are unique? lately all icos are either Timed, Capped, Refundable, etc.

in no way. you just take a certain project and write a smart contract turn key. usually, the thing that fits the standards context can come out unfit particularly for you(( that’s the truth of it…

damn(( i’ve almost decided to become a blockchain devleoper of level 80)))

only practice will help you my friend(

well i’m practicing) guys, excuse us for flooding so much, good luck in your professional beginnings

libope

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Quote from: DreamerJ on November 07, 2018, 02:53:13 PM

Quote from: saveeege on November 07, 2018, 02:49:07 PM

Quote from: JohnYDillinger on November 07, 2018, 01:58:04 PM

Quote from: Phileste on November 07, 2018, 01:55:01 PM

If guys from the buterin’s team don’t consider this standard a standard doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist and can’t be used for smart contracts

you’re contradicting yourself. let them use whatever they want. if a project is being built on the Ethereum project, why not use the ancestor of all the other standards - ERC-20?..

because it is an outdated standard. Let’s see it it changes in future. However I am doubting

outdated in what sense? maybe you meant one of the older ones? old doesn’t mean bad

there’s no point in arguing with you

Urakeavan

jr. member

Activity: 98

Merit: 2

It is best to keep your tokens after ISO in order to sell them in the future at a bargain price, so you can save the price of tokens. Bounty hunters sell tokens immediately after they appear on the stock exchange, and just the token costs nothing

Topic: FreeCash - the first casino that has a winners-only policy! (Read 22151 times)