Pages:
Author

Topic: Freicoin: bitcoin with demurrage - page 4. (Read 31257 times)

hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
hm
March 29, 2013, 02:53:31 PM
#83
Well, I don't think there will be an iphone 34 or that anyone should buy any drm iphone.

In any case, ok, deflation doesn't fully stop consumption but it does halt investments.

Say you have 10,000 btc and are considering investing them on building a cell-phone factory, for example.
If you have 10% annual deflation, the factory must yield more than 10% (more than 1000 btc annually) for the investment to make sense.
So ist is if you hold Apple stocks which gain 10% annual "deflation". So do Apple halt investments because their stock is increasing in value? If you want to come to the solution, you have to ask ypurself why is there an deflation? Demand succeeds over supply. But why is that so? Or take gold as an example.

Do we have to destroy all durable goods to foster encourage investments? In my opinion it would make more sense to stop punish successful investments.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1002
March 29, 2013, 02:17:54 PM
#82
Well, I don't think there will be an iphone 34 or that anyone should buy any drm iphone.

In any case, ok, deflation doesn't fully stop consumption but it does halt investments.

Say you have 10,000 btc and are considering investing them on building a cell-phone factory, for example.
If you have 10% annual deflation, the factory must yield more than 10% (more than 1000 btc annually) for the investment to make sense.

Just saving you don't grow the economy, you need to invest what you don't consume (savings) in order to make that happen.
An economy without investments actually contracts, since real capital (like Freicoin and Gesell's free-money but unlike capital-money) perishes.
I think my claim "deflation reduces money velocity" isn't particularly crazy or controversial among economists.
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
hm
March 29, 2013, 01:48:55 PM
#81
If you can buy an apple today with a bitcoin and two apples tomorrow with the same bitcoin. Why would you buy anything today?

Because you're hungry?

Well, of course you would expend the necessary to survive, but nothing else.

So you want to tell us, that you never ever bought a TV, a cellphone, a computer, a printer etc. because in one year you can get for the same money more value? I don't believe you! If you have a stable deflation of let's say 2% in a year, you have nothing to threaten the merchant. "Haha, now I wait and you can't sell and will gain losses. Now sell it to me for a lower price. You have to!" vs. "Haha, buy it now or you have to wait forever, because you will get more value for the same money forever."

I can imagine some peaple:
No, I don't buy the I-Phone 5 because in one year I can get an I-Phone 5s for the same money.
One year later:
No, I don't buy the I-Phone 5s because in one year I can get an I-Phone 6 for the same money.
One year later:
No, I don't buy the I-Phone 6 because in one year I can get an I-Phone 6s for the same money.

Then with the age of 86:
Hm, I still have my cellphone of 1994. Should I buy the I-Phone 34s or should I wait another year?
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
January 02, 2013, 10:33:58 AM
#80
There will always be people that will try to control an economy using monetary policies, rather than let money be the reflection of an economy. This only creates lies and lies can not go on forever.

To be more specific, I believe arbitrary money policies like demurrage coerce people into changing their economic behaviors. I say coerce, because they are effictively forced to spend their money whereas they might have otherwise saved it to buy something later.

This creates a situations where goods and services are being baught for the wrong reasons. People try to get rid of their money instead of making sensible economic decisions. To pick an example, a family father might decide to spend all of his monthly income instead of saving some for sending his kids to college. It creates a lie, because people act differently than they would otherwise do.

Money should be as neutral as possible and should not get into the way of making economical decisions. And as far as the money circulation argument goes, good money circulation should be the result of a healthy economy. It doesn't work the other way around.

The good news is that inflationary/demurrage based currencies can only be widely adopted at gunpoint. In a free money economy where actors can transact in the currency of their choice, value-retaining currencies will prevail. In any case, time will tell.
Let me challenge that a bit.

Is it coercion if the coin is a voluntary unit that can be selected for adoption based on parameters like demurrage that can be understood up front? Especially since it is likely there will be ever more ways to turn FRC into another coin/fiat that does not have demurrage. At this point I think that coerce is too strong a word, right now FRC is a choice, it only has the potential to be coercion if someone is forced to transact in FRC in some way. Persuade, or "assisting the user in tricking themselves to do the right thing" (like all the crazy stuff ppl do to remember/force themselves to go to the gym) may also be accurate descriptions. I agree that it is arbitrary at time of currency creation, but it is a known quantity (and generally fixed) before mass adoption happens.

Your second point assumes goods/services that are only available for FRC, if the vendor takes fiat or another one does for the same commodity you have a market force that will push you to buy from the vendor that offers the better deal. In this example you have to do the cost/benefit analysis of using FRC with one vendor at his price with fiat at another vendor for the same item. If "net item price" in FRC is more than 5% less (if you only turn over your FRC once a year, far less if you just keep liquid cash as FRC and convert the rest) than the fiat price, then you are better off using FRC, but if it is more expensive then maybe you don't spend your FRC that day. We are talking about 50/1000 coins a year, so waiting a few days to find a good deal in FRC will only cost a fraction of a Freicoin a day. If you turn over 100% of your FRC every month I doubt you will worry about it beyond converting some funds if there are left-over FRC that are not budgeted. Your example is about incenting savings, which is not what FRC is trying to do (except in as much that it incents you to convert your long term funds into a better currency.) So are the goods and services being bought for the "wrong" reasons, or is it just one factor (others include price, promotions, advertising) pushing you towards spending?

Good money always naturally follows with a good economy?: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/precusors-of-bitcoin-private-coinage-during-the-early-industrial-revolution-1534
Industrial Revolution England is a pretty strong argument against the absolute link between good money and a good economy (or innovation.)

I'm pretty sure that money can be just about anything, but it has to circulate, no matter how "good" or "bad" it is. Baseball/Pokemon/etc. cards are horrible money, but you see them being used as loan collateral and exchange medium on the playground. Wide adoption with a currency means something different that with a lot of technologies, I think it is that because money is an intensely local (physical or virtual locations) phenomenon, and seeing a currency go global is the exception rather than the rule.

Personally I think that value-retaining currencies have an advantage right now because of economic conditions, if liquidity is king in the 2020's then it might flip over to some degree. Either way your point about force is 100% correct, so we have a relatively free market to observe.
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
January 02, 2013, 07:26:10 AM
#79
There will always be people that will try to control an economy using monetary policies, rather than let money be the reflection of an economy. This only creates lies and lies can not go on forever.

Is that relevant to the discussion to some way, or just a standard piece of dogma you like to share?

Whom?
Which policies?
Which money?
What economy?
What lies?
Why not?

I truly am interested in your logic here, but there is nothing specific in your post.

Sorry if my statement appeared to be out of context.

To be more specific, I believe arbitrary money policies like demurrage coerce people into changing their economic behaviors. I say coerce, because they are effictively forced to spend their money whereas they might have otherwise saved it to buy something later.

This creates a situations where goods and services are being baught for the wrong reasons. People try to get rid of their money instead of making sensible economic decisions. To pick an example, a family father might decide to spend all of his monthly income instead of saving some for sending his kids to college. It creates a lie, because people act differently than they would otherwise do.

Money should be as neutral as possible and should not get into the way of making economical decisions. And as far as the money circulation argument goes, good money circulation should be the result of a healthy economy. It doesn't work the other way around.

The good news is that inflationary/demurrage based currencies can only be widely adopted at gunpoint. In a free money economy where actors can transact in the currency of their choice, value-retaining currencies will prevail. In any case, time will tell.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1002
January 02, 2013, 07:23:29 AM
#78
@king_pin
Maybe you're interested on this thread about mining:
http://www.freicoin.org/help-for-new-miners-t77.html

4) And probably the biggest (and hardest to decide on) change...80% of the initial distribution won't be mined, but given to non profits through grants.
https://github.com/freicoin/freicoin/issues/29

So you decided to defraud the participants after all? Cool story...

I mean go for it!

Yes, just like those other "community cronies" at ithaca http://ithacahours.info/loansgrants.php
Or like the bundesbank when it distributed the newly issued money equally among German citizens. I guess the issuing process must be wasteful enough (bitcoin, gold) for you to consider it legitimate. The fact is our issuance costs will be much lower bitcoin's.
I wonder what will you think when the new Ripple launches...don't know how they will do the issuance but their chain has no proof of work, so it won't go to miners.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
January 02, 2013, 02:15:45 AM
#77
There will always be people that will try to control an economy using monetary policies, rather than let money be the reflection of an economy. This only creates lies and lies can not go on forever.

Is that relevant to the discussion to some way, or just a standard piece of dogma you like to share?

Whom?
Which policies?
Which money?
What economy?
What lies?
Why not?

I truly am interested in your logic here, but there is nothing specific in your post.
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
January 02, 2013, 01:56:50 AM
#76
There will always be people that will try to control an economy using monetary policies, rather than let money be the reflection of an economy. This only creates lies and lies can not go on forever.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
January 02, 2013, 12:28:51 AM
#75
I'm shouting, cause I've looked over an hour and I couldnt find shit. There is TMI on the alternative cryptocurancies, and all I got was www.freicoin.org.  Huh

Thank you for the www.freico.in link!  Roll Eyes

I wanted to be sure, this was post #5 on the first page of the first thread.

where u get these from?? got a link to the client / daemon? and whitepaper, pools etc?

website: http://freico.in/
Forums: www.freicoin.org
Github: https://github.com/freicoin/freicoin

The forums are a mess, I'm still trying to sort it out, here's a quick dump.

It was referenced in a "lost bitcoins" conversation recently, so I grabbed the client (released on 12-21-12) and started solo mining.




I'm still looking for more information such as the coin limit (if any) (100 million) but I know this much...

It's been in the works a while:
Original project announcement thread:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/freicoin-bitcoin-with-demurrage-3816

Article from June
http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/onepercent/2012/06/freicoin-occupys-online-curren.html

Failed Indiegogo pitch:
http://www.indiegogo.com/freicoin

Beta started this fall, and the chain was reset on 12-21-12 for production.

It's an odd critter. It's a demurrage based currency where your coins are constantly losing 4.89%/year which is paid to miners as a subsidy. It's brainchild came out of the 99% movement so it's aimed at disincentivising  hoarding and lowering interest rates. I don't quite get how this could work with other currencies in existence, but the slow 4.89% seep rate may not matter too much in the end. It may just be like bitcoin but with skewed interest rates and less desire to hold.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
January 01, 2013, 07:33:38 PM
#74
4) And probably the biggest (and hardest to decide on) change...80% of the initial distribution won't be mined, but given to non profits through grants.
https://github.com/freicoin/freicoin/issues/29

So you decided to defraud the participants after all? Cool story...

I mean go for it!
sr. member
Activity: 416
Merit: 250
January 01, 2013, 12:30:22 PM
#73
I'm shouting, cause I've looked over an hour and I couldnt find shit. There is TMI on the alternative cryptocurancies, and all I got was www.freicoin.org.  Huh

Thank you for the www.freico.in link!  Roll Eyes
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
January 01, 2013, 11:14:09 AM
#72
Excuse me for the noob question, but I want to start mining FRC fast and I cant find out how to make  a wallet.
How can you make your own wallet for FRC and is there a Freicoin_qt

You don't have to shout...

You might want to head over to the alternate cryptocurrencies subforum and read up there, there are 3-4 posts going right now including a fairly long one I started on day 2.

The public facing site where you can get the client and more information is freico.in

There is also a nascent online wallet option under development at endlessfreico.in

Lastly if you need help, please stop by #freicoin on freenode IRC.

Enjoy!
sr. member
Activity: 416
Merit: 250
January 01, 2013, 10:04:17 AM
#71
Excuse me for the noob question, but I want to start mining FRC fast and I cant find out how to make  a wallet.
How can you make your own wallet for FRC and is there a Freicoin_qt
legendary
Activity: 905
Merit: 1011
December 23, 2012, 07:00:32 PM
#70
3) Divisibility has been improved.
https://github.com/freicoin/freicoin/issues/67
Actually this one was eventually rejected. But to handle demurrage properly we made a switch to exact rational arithmetic internally, which would make it trivially simple to implement sub-satoshi support such as using decimal64 for amounts. It'd be a hard-fork, however.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1002
December 23, 2012, 06:45:59 AM
#69
What differences (if any) from the OP are in the 12-21-12 release?

Maybe Mark knows something else, but I would say...

1) A reference block is added to transactions to calculate the payback.
https://github.com/freicoin/freicoin/issues/3

2) Merged mining isn't implemented from the start since we were afraid of being attacked when our difficulty is still low.

3) Divisibility has been improved.
https://github.com/freicoin/freicoin/issues/67

3) Initial distribution is not logarithmic, but linear
https://github.com/freicoin/freicoin/issues/55

4) And probably the biggest (and hardest to decide on) change...80% of the initial distribution won't be mined, but given to non profits through grants.
https://github.com/freicoin/freicoin/issues/29

Oh, I almost forgot. Demurrage is not 5% a year but 4.9something % (2^-20% each block) for optimization.

Thank you for your interest and don't hesitate to ask more questions.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
December 23, 2012, 05:38:15 AM
#68
What differences (if any) from the OP are in the 12-21-12 release?
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1002
August 20, 2011, 12:58:31 PM
#67
Demurrage would seem to discourage Merchants joining on freicoin/bitcoin.  With fees, you get what you charged for.  With demurrage I see destroying money that people own, have earned, and have every right to spend, and give it to whoever they want. (This is an idea of bitcoin representing value owned.  A very attractive idea to me.) For what? To avoid an honest Supply/Demand economy in bitmining?

The concept of people leaving the bitmining pool and joining thus creating a raise and drop in prices is really simple supply and demand economy.  This is free market at it's finest and simplest.

The market for mining would act the same way with this system. The only difference is that miners will be rewarded by the system (as they are today) perpetually. Some people claims that the transaction fees market would be a tragedy of the commons and the security of the network in proportion of the market cap will severely drop when the reward halves.

I oppose the idea that inflation or demurrage prevents savers from saving. There are many ways of saving, the most productive for the society is investing. Savers are just discouraged to hoarding the currency. They can hoard other goods if that's their passion.

Inflation punishes savers and creates bubbles today just because it is created through cheap loans to privileged borrowers (the state and commercial banks). InflataCoin lenders would just add the corresponding inflation premium to the real interest of their loans: lenders don't suffer from inflation if it is totally predictable.

Apart from the "obvious" accounting inconvenience, inflation has another disadvantage over demurrage. "With demurrage the debasement happens instantaneously, and evenly across currency owners. With inflation, prices gradually get bid up as the new money works its way through the economy" (that's from d'aniel).
That contribute to the bubbles formation but also has another implication:
Pure inflation creating (without debt, like the greenbacks advocates want) does not lower interest rates. Demurrage does.
When negotiating, the lender doesn't have to necessarily take the losses of inflation if instead of lending buys the market that is going to be inflated. So liquidity yields in itself because it can take advantage of the unexpected changes of the near future.
With demurrage the lender has an unavoidable incentive to lend the money or invest it.
It is a transfer of wealth from lenders to investors that would enable capital yields to drop to zero by competition just like ordinary sustained profits do. But the lenders privilege came from
the fact that money is scarce, everlasting and necessary for all sectors. Their privilege is what has stopped investors to compete until capital yields and thus interest rates go to zero. The total revenue of a given capital (until the time destroys it) could equal its production costs (zero profits). Now capital goods need to be at least as profitable as lending money. If we suppress the bottom limit for interests, we also suppress the artificial upper limit that is set on investments. There will be always unemployment if there's interest, because there will always be more workers than factories in order for them to be as profitable as money and not just solvent.

I feel strongly about the apple scenario.  Somebody answered the question 'Why buy an apple today when tomorrow you can buy two?' with 'Because your hungry.' Which is exactly the point of it!  With the deflating dollar I need to buy a dozen apples today to retain my dozen apple value that I received in pay for my hard work, even though I won't be able to trade those apples for a car I may need in the future.  So I have to stop purchasing so many apples and save money at a rate that exceeds the rate of inflation, when in fact if I had saved my money and only bought apples when I was hungry I could have purchased the car sooner and replaced the vehicle more often, and all parties involved would benefit.  The apple seller would be getting an increasingly valuable currency for his apple, the car dealer as well for his cars.

I won't the argument that "deflation prevents trade" anymore as I recognaise that it could be just a myth.
But the logic tells me that deflation discourages real capital accumulation.

Anyway, the main points of freicoin are to lower interest rates and keep on rewarding miners after the maximum monetary base has been issued. Encouraging trade is not a bad thing though.
member
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
August 20, 2011, 10:00:16 AM
#66
Demurrage would seem to discourage Merchants joining on freicoin/bitcoin.  With fees, you get what you charged for.  With demurrage I see destroying money that people own, have earned, and have every right to spend, and give it to whoever they want. (This is an idea of bitcoin representing value owned.  A very attractive idea to me.) For what? To avoid an honest Supply/Demand economy in bitmining?

The concept of people leaving the bitmining pool and joining thus creating a raise and drop in prices is really simple supply and demand economy.  This is free market at it's finest and simplest.

I feel strongly about the apple scenario.  Somebody answered the question 'Why buy an apple today when tomorrow you can buy two?' with 'Because your hungry.'  Which is exactly the point of it!  With the deflating dollar I need to buy a dozen apples today to retain my dozen apple value that I received in pay for my hard work, even though I won't be able to trade those apples for a car I may need in the future.  So I have to stop purchasing so many apples and save money at a rate that exceeds the rate of inflation, when in fact if I had saved my money and only bought apples when I was hungry I could have purchased the car sooner and replaced the vehicle more often, and all parties involved would benefit.  The apple seller would be getting an increasingly valuable currency for his apple, the car dealer as well for his cars.

-DiamondPlus
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1002
August 20, 2011, 08:41:33 AM
#65
The two scenarios are EXACTLY THE SAME.

In terms of purchasing power of the money holder, yes.
In term of inflation (the unit of value for calculations and contracts), no.
In terms of interest rates, no.
The economic decision making is different.


I think they are correct that the two scenarios are effectively equal.

With inflation, the purchasing power of all money holders decreases.

With demurrage, the purchasing power of all money holders decreases.

Total money supply = 2X, purchasing power = X vs. total money supply = X, purchasing power = X/2.

They are mathematically equivalent. In both cases the winners are miners, the losers are savers.

Here I elaborate a little more the differences between inflation and demurrage:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.469848
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1002
August 08, 2011, 02:27:10 PM
#64
1) I see transaction fees as being quite separate from demurrage. As you say, with demurrage there is no need to use transaction fees for ensuring currency stability or as a reward for miners. I don't understand why in the future currency holders would pay through monetary inflation, or how that would be an externality. Care to specify?

No. Now bitcoin miners are rewarded through inflation (new bitcoins are created with each block that go to the miner) and tx fees, In the future only tx fees will pay for the work of the miners.
With demurrage, fees are also allowed, but freicoin holders also pay miners, not only the people who want to move their coins fast.
The externality is the following: some users that gain from the bitcoin network won't pay anything for the miners work. Currently every holder is also paying indirectly the reward for the miner, since this new created coins make their own coins less valuable.

Merged mining seems a good idea.

I think users will accept freicoins, but I have some doubts about the ease of use for commerce with the software as it is now. It isn't to everyone's taste to be deal with bugs in transfers or complications with wallets. Things will have to get simpler from the end user standpoint, if the currency is going to have wide appeal. 

Things will have to get simpler from the end user standpoint for bitcoin too. There's many people working on it.
Pages:
Jump to: