FTC needs real miners more than anything to fight it.
Folks are scared, thus the attacks and 24 hour launch delay. Childish.
My comment had absolutely nothing to do with details about UNOCS.
My comment was that you do not understand how an attack works. When a coin is under a large hash attack, one of the best methods of mitigation is to maintain the real miner hash power and try to add to it if you can. You told people to bail on the coin and go mine your pool so you can make money instead. That negatively impacts a coin under attack(potential attack) and helps the attackers.
When 3 coins partner up, their value becomes connected. If someone controls 33.3% of a company or entity or group and has issues, it typically effects the other partners as well. Same theory that everyone is banking on in that combining 3 coins provides positive reinforcement to the pricing. The positive end is that all 3 collectively add and benefit each other, the negative is that each coin poses an additional layer of risk. The combining of 3 coins is not the same of providing redundancy for protection since they are all working in unison but separately.
If you support one of the three coins, and support UNOCS, you should support all 3 coins equally to get the most benefit.
Wires crossed then - you are hurting your PXC investment via UNOCS partnership. - Sounds like a dig at UNOCS. But if you didn't mean that, fair enough.
As for the partnership, I can't comment. That will have to be seen when it all goes live.