People on twitter are saying that Sam has been spotted speaking with authorities as of a couple hours ago. It seems like he may actually end up in jail. When you think about how he was donating so much money now it doesn’t make him seem like such a great guy. I don’t know what laws he broke exactly, but losing billions of dollars of other people’s money doesn’t make him seem as altruistic as he was being presented a few weeks ago.
when it comes to crypto. crypto does not just disapear off blockchains. and so users that deposit crypto but dont swap it for non crypto(fiat/non blockchain tokens) their crypto should be reserved and held and returned 1:1
by users not being able to get back their crypto is bad and can involve unlawful/criminal reasons why those cryptos are gone
he could be speaking to them about giving evidence/proof of "hack" meaning he is a witness/victim giving evidence of an outside crime.. or the authorities could be looking at him as a suspect of insider fraud
we dont know yet so its speculation..
anyways
legally(contract/finance(punishment:fines/restrictions)
he sidestepped liability of personal bankruptcy and having to be limited in his future business practices by stepping back as CEO and putting a fall guy in when filing bankruptcy. (captain did not go down with the ship)
however
lawfully(criminal(punishment: probation/prison))
he could be done for fraud or theft if authorities can prove he wronged his customers outside of the terms/conditions of user agreements and where he crossed the lines of tax law or accounting law
i never seen him as altruistic. he was a liquidator. yes for a 30yo he had a savvi business mind about some of the loopholes and methods to gain assets
even things like saying "dont use the app, dont use the site" is savvi way to stop a bank run by getting users to not go to the site (if there was no real hack but just insider shuffling of assets)
...
many businesses think if they throw in the word "investment company" they can get away with users losing their value. but this is about the exchange market orders of the users swapping at bad value and not able to trade back later at better value. where the market is not at fault for users decisions to trade badly
however as a custodian (holder) of users assets not traded. those assets should not have moved/lost.