.
Did they admit that? If so, how can this be seen as a secured wallet? If I am not wrong, Ledger claims, "Here at Ledger we strongly believe in open source. It's one of our core values, a great philosophy that advocates openness, and verifiability. Open source allows developers and security experts to review the code and ensure it is secure and not malicious. Open source means you don't need to trust" [1]
If they are open source, can't developers verify that the Ledger has a chance to steal users' private keys? Did nobody try it? Now, I am curious about it. Do you remember the recent hack of Atomic Wallet, where thousands of users reported that their wallet was hacked and they did not use any phishing? If users did not use phishing, how was their wallet hacked? These wallets are not non-custodial anymore.
It's proven that Ledger Live has the ability to extract the recovery seeds from the Hardware wallet also they admitted that they share the details with the third party which isn't right when you expect complete security for your crypto assets.
Discussion : Ledger Recovery Service.
Also, they lied about their status being open source : Ledger Open Source Fakery?!
So whoever wants to keep their crypto now should boycott Ledger as well as Trezor.