Topic: [Fund] Exchange Rate Differences: Arbitrage Opportunites (Read 3549 times)

Made a new thread:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3661431

Annual return of 25% BTC. All the performance results are btc-denominated as well.

I am also considering accepting fiat for issuing shares, however this would require additional legal counsil and cost. So, for the time being I am accepting btc only.

25% USD annual or BTC?

Hi all,


I have built a website with information on the fund that I am operating. I will also open an 'official' thread (seems convenient).

It’s named BITOBS: www.bitobs.net


http://bitobs.net/img/logo.png


The fund is now public, so everyone can invest.

I have tried to be as clear as possible about how the Fund is operated.
If you are interested, please have a look and let me know when anything is unclear or should be further explained.

Currently, the Fund will only accept the issuance and redemption of shares directly.

Regarding a possible IPO please let me know whether you would be interested in this. Of course, it would make shares freely tradable between investors. However, the unreliability of the Bitcoin securities exchanges is a problem (e.g. withdrawals from BitFunder are currently stuck). Cryptostocks is an option, but involves costs. Maybe a forum trading method with escrow would be a more viable option. Your opinion is appreciated.

What is BITOBS?
BITOBS is an open-ended investment fund with a variable capital. The objective of the Fund is to obtain a positive return while preserving a sufficient risk spreading. The aim is to realize an average annual total return of at least 25%, after deduction of all expenses.

Investment strategy (short version):
     1. Anticipating the Bitcoin exchange rate.
     2. Investing in arbitrage opportunities that may arise.

Investment restrictions (short version):

• At all times, a minimum of 25% of the Fund’s NAV must be held in fiat or Bitcoin.
• Investments in Bitcoin (mining) assets are not permitted.
• A maximum of 50% of the Fund’s size can be used for any investment opportunity.
• Stock lending is permitted.
• Borrowing is permitted for up to 25% of the Fund's NAV.

Other notes:

• Current NAV/share is BTC0.012583
• Minimum investment is 100 shares.

---

Monthly Report - October:
Result: the NAV/share decreased by 1.52%.

Due to a significant increase in the Bitcoin exchange rate, the Fund struggled to retain its value. Although, we were able to gain sporadic returns which minimized the Fund's depreciation, this month's return is -1.52%.

Generally, a part of our strategy involves selling part of the Fund's Bitcoins whenever there is a reason to do so, i.e. an indication of an imminent decrease in the Bitcoin exchange rate. While there were almost none of these indications, we have held 75% of the Fund's value in Bitcoin, most of the time. The other 25% of Fund's NAV (held in fiat) decreased by almost 37% (BTC-denominated).

The Silk Road raid of October 2nd; we were able to profit from the price drop by selling part of the Fund's Bitcoins before the exchange rate decreased any further. Additional active trading resulted in a decent return of 9% for that day.

Market inefficiencies were exploited wherever possible, however the opportunities were limited. Any schemes that would involve selling Bitcoins and withdrawing fiat through Mt.Gox have been avoided due to the (increasingly) long 'cycle times' associated with Mt.Gox withdrawals.

Finally, we were able to 'bet' on the Bitcoin price going up, by borrowing fiat money (an equivalent of 10% of the Fund's NAV). After deduction of interest payments, these funds gained a 19.67% return.

Overall, it has been a month in which the Fund struggled due to the decreasing value of the fiat held by the Fund, but the overall result of -1.52% is tolerable.

---

I will do my best to continue creating value for my investors. Feedback is always welcome!

Yes that is true. Thanks for your comment.

I am currently just orientating, i.e. if a public fund would make sense. If it does, I will try to determine how it would be best set-up. I have the help of my brother in law (who is a respected hedge fund manager) and the current investors (who are mainly friends and relatives with an interest in bitcoin). I will post here if or when we come up with a plan.

Wanted to add... all these games are limited to a point since the opportunities are limited. So i guess it might work for someone but as soon as you want to collect money through an IPO you will get fast to the point where the offers at mtgox or the offers at the other exchange arent big enough to make a considerable win. The orderbook only contains mostly no big amounts of bitcoins at good prices. At least it will lower the win.

I do this as well every now and then, but I do think there is a potential market for somekind of fund here.  I suggest using bitfinex instead of bitstamp though, simply for the fact that bitfinex allows you to use bitstamp or their internal exchange at the same time so you have the chance of getting cheaper BTC from bitfinex (which is usually the case)

Deprived is irrational.  You are putting too much emphasis on BTC value when most realistic people realize that what matters the most is the currency in which we have most of our income and expenses (USD or another one).

It is only someone who is crazy about bitcoin so much that they expect it to rise endlessly and irrationally that they would ignore the fact that they are spending 90-99% of their money in fiat and how much fiat they have has a greater impact on their ability to buy things (and survive/enjoy life) than bitcoins.

As a rational individual, I'd be happier owning a hundredth of a bitcoin with bitcoin at a thousand dollars dollars (eg $10 of value) than one bitcoin that was worth $9.99 as that is 0.1% more.

If you want to go short or long, buy options or use bitfinex.

That depends on whether I am willing to invest more fiat to increase the btc I hold, and thereby increasing the absolute return I could gain from the proposed scheme. If I would do this, I will increase my btc-risk. Therefore, I am more interested in profiting from the returns on a btc-denominated fund while using my fiat as a means to do so.


Here it also depends whether investors are shielded from fiat-risk or not, which they are if no btc is being converted to fiat (meaning that return on a BTC-denominated fund is not affected by price changes), which indeed means that more fiat is required to maximize the return. It is also possible to create a fiat-denominated fund in the same way, although I think there are more investors (like me) who only hold a (small) percentage of their money in btc and are in it for the long run, and are therefore more interested in returns on btc than fiat.


I agree that this is an important point that should be carefully addressed if a potential fund would be set up.

Your last paragraph is true.  But there's a problem with it - specifically this:

If you raise BTC from investors then you need MORE fiat to actually use those invested BTC withut exposing investors to fiat-risk.  If you had those extra fiat then you wouldn't need to be raising funds from investors in the first place.

Put simply: if you have enough fiat to be able to shield investors from fiat-exposure (i.e. keep their investment always denominated in BTC) then you don't need their investment at all.

My view on investments like this is that if they want to be denominated primarily in one currency then they need fiat-denominated investment not BTC-denominated  - because you can minimise BTC exposure easily (due to it being liquid) but can't do the same with fiat exposure (due to a lack of ability to move it rapidly between exchanges).  Don't interpret my comments as me being opposed to fiat-exposure - I'm not, and maintain significant fiat-exposure with my BTC myself intentionally.  What I'm opposed to is attempts to sell 'BTC' investments where the investment can make a 'profit' but still end up worse than just holding BTC (which, incidentally, includes nearly all mining 'investments').

Something like this works nicely if (and ONLY if) investors WANT significant fiat exposure and are happy to accept that they'll do worse than holding BTC if BTC rises vs fiat.  Specifically they need to understand, accept and even WANT that if BTC rises fairly sharply vs fiat then they'll get back less BTC than they put in.  In return they do, of course, do a LOT better than just holding BTC if BTC falls even slightly vs fiat.

For those saying the main risk is MtGox - just no.  Historically the main risk in ANY security is the issuer.  Even when GLBSE closed, the exchange itself only stole a very small percentage of invested funds (under 10% of deposited cash and next to nothing from value tied up in securities) - which is nothing compared to what issuers steal.  That's not a comment about this particular (potential) issuer - I'm just pointing out that issuer counter-party risk can never be treated as something negligible.

Your analysis is true of course, i.e. you mean that:

On October 8th, I had €3,000 + BTC30.56  which was worth (in btc) 30.56 + 32.73 = BTC63.29 on that day.
And on October 23rd I had BTC32.73 + €3,000 which was worth (in btc) 32.73 + approx. 22 = BTC54.73 on that day.

Meaning that if I had bought €3,000 of btc and did not sell any on October 8th, i.e. going long in Eur/btc, I would have had more Euro's worth of BTC now, True! Though, €/BTC could also decline.

Nevertheless, it all depends on the way that a potential fund would be set-up. One way could be that the amount of fiat that I own will be used as a means of growing a BTC-denominated fund. This will mean that investors' funds in BTC would grow aside from the unchanging amount of fiat. This would not require the investors' btc to be converted to fiat and investors will be benefiting from an increased btc exchange-rate.

To make a BTC-denominated profit, the TOTAL value of your holdings (in BTC) has to rise.

Yes - you make a 'profit' on the trade.  But if you look at the TOTAL value of your capital then whether you actually made an overall profit or not depends far more on the how the exchange-rate moved than on the difference between the exchange-rates at different exchanges.

What you're proposing only makes sense for people who want some of their BTC to be converted to fiat and held as fiat.  i.e. those who believe BTC won't move much or will fall vs fiat over whatever period they intend to be invested for.  And because the BTC exchange-rate tends to move a lot, the end result they achieve will have more to do with how the rate moves than with the 'profit' from the arbitrage.

Simply put : for a BTC-denominated investment to make a profit it must end up with more BTC than it started with.  And you have to value ALL capital (even the part held in euros) in BTC to measure that.  I'm not saying it's necessarily a bad thing to do - just that it doesn't make sense to do it IF you want to hold BTC.  If investors intended to hold a mix of BTC and fiat anyway then it starts to make sense - as they DO end up making a profit compared to just passively holding the mix of currencies.

In fact it makes most sense as an investment for those who want to try to profit from BTC without committing to holding any long-term (as the BTC part is always liquid so can be exchanged out if the rate starts to move unfavourably).

The mistake you made is in portraying it as a means by which a profit in BTC could be made - when whether any such profit is made or not depends far more on how the exchange-rate moves (and hence the value of the part locked up in fiat) than on the difference between the rates on different exchanges.

We're discussing a whole other fund with a different type of strategy here. Though, "bonds" might be a means to set up a fund as discussed here to obtain BTC-denominated profits.

If you would be able to do this 24 times a year though (assuming you have enough EUR available) :

1.06^24 - 1 = 305% (6% is quite a low average still)

Or even 12 times a year would mean your get a 101% return.

But yes, the main (and only major) risk here is Mt.Gox defaulting.

I know that. But i believe that crashes could be relatively good be forseen in the past. And i believe too that bitcoins have to rise in price when they are used more widely. And i believe thats the case. The more people want to use it the higher the price will go.


I see that. But i think mtgox isnt really a good partner for this. Search the forum. Some users had to wait months! to get their fiat. And even when its only 2 weeks. Thats something you can do 24 times in one year only. I admit that overall you might get a positive result though. I only dont like the unreliability of mtgox in this game.
But maybe thats only my personal view. If it works for others its fine...

Your proposal of simply converting the 3000€ to BTC is a different investment, relying on the increase in price of BTC. The arbitrage-scheme discussed here relies on the exchanges operating properly. It is perfectly reasonable for someone to keep part of his capital in fiat currencies and if you have the fiat available, the scheme discussed here can use that fiat to obtain BTC-denominated profits and this is a viable course of action if you assume the reward outperforms the risk of MtGox defaulting.

Sebastian, Please keep in mind that the bitcoin exchange rate may also decline. You're assuming that BTC will always raise. In that case you would even increase the expected profit.

I only say that i dont use mtgox to sell Bitcoins because i think its too risky that i will get less fiat than i should at the time i actually have the fiat. And i think so because i believe that bitcoins generally will have the tendency to rise in price for some time now.

I forgot you had the 3000€ on top. So if you had turned them to bitcoins 2 weeks ago you now could exchange them to 45% more fiat, not only 7%, so in fact you lost money by not keeping everything as bitcoins. Something that never could have happened when mtgox wouldnt be so slow. Thats why i keep my money in form of bitcoins. And i dont sell bitcoins at mtgox because i know that such things like in the last 2 weeks can happen anytime. On top i dont plan weeks or months in advance to when i need fiat on my bank. And i cant guess in how many weeks mtgox will give my fiat.

You're implying that on October 8th I should have only bought btc to for example sell it today? What if the price would have declined? Anyway, that would require the ability to predict the future btc price...

And I still have the BTC32.73! Meaning that my transaction has only increased the amount of BTC in my portfolio:

• Ocotober 8th: I had €3000 + BTC30.56.
• Today: I have €3000 + BTC32.73

Anyway. I understand that most people here have faith in the btc price increasing. This doesn't mean that we cannot make money of price differences as illustrated.

I see it this way... Buying BTC... keeping... when you need Fiat then selling at bitstamp and having the full value in 2-3 workdays.

Would you have sold the 32.37BTC today at bitstamp (i know its unfair since it takes some time to withdraw there too) then you would need, at a Price of $201.5, $4135.5, which means you sell 20.52BTC, got the 3000€ for it and still would have 15BTC.
I mean time is something crucial for bitcoins.