further improved phatk_dia kernel for Phoenix + SDK 2.6 - 2012-01-13 - page 7.

navigator

sr. member

Activity: 362

Merit: 250

DELETED for privacy

damon1492

newbie

Activity: 31

Merit: 0

Not faster for me still same hashes,
maybe just .2%extra but nothing big

doing about 24.3Ghash/s so not a big difference

1984

newbie

Activity: 51

Merit: 0

cyrusfox have you tried using the PLATFORM= option?

cyrusfox

newbie

Activity: 15

Merit: 0

Quote from: maykelmoya on July 01, 2011, 02:52:39 PM

Not working for me. phoenix 1.48, ubuntu 11.04 64bits.

[01/07/2011 14:45:48] Finding inner ELF...
[01/07/2011 14:45:48] Patching inner ELF...
[01/07/2011 14:45:48] Patching instructions...
[01/07/2011 14:45:48] BFI-patched 472 instructions...
[01/07/2011 14:45:48] Patch complete, returning to kernel...
[01/07/2011 14:45:48] Applied BFI_INT patch
[01/07/2011 14:45:48] FATAL kernel error: Failed to load OpenCL kernel!

Not working for me. phoenix 1.5, Linuxcoin.

Yes I copied both files kernel.cl and __init__.py into kernels/phatk/

I get this when I try to start Phoenix(it will work fine with the original kernel files, 6850@930/830=250Mh/s, 6950@850/735= 340 Mh/s)

Quote

user@linuxcoin:/opt/miners/phoenix$ ./phoenix.py -u http://user:[email protected]:8334/ -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT
[18/07/2011 09:27:56] Finding inner ELF...
[18/07/2011 09:27:56] Patching inner ELF...
[18/07/2011 09:27:56] Patching instructions...
[18/07/2011 09:27:56] BFI-patched 472 instructions...
[18/07/2011 09:27:56] Patch complete, returning to kernel...
[18/07/2011 09:27:56] Applied BFI_INT patch
[18/07/2011 09:27:56] FATAL kernel error: Failed to load OpenCL kernel!

Can anyone tell me what I am doing wrong? Thanks

Diapolo

hero member

Activity: 769

Merit: 500

Quote from: anatolikostis on July 18, 2011, 02:59:09 AM

5770@900core/200mem 512Mb

got decrease from 200MH/s to 198MH/s (working size 128/256/64 - no changes just more decrease), have rolled back to 11-07-2011 mode...

may be this because of 512Mb mem or 200MHz freq?

What happens if you raise your mem clocks a little? Could be, that some optimisations are bad for older or weaker cards, because newest version uses more GPU registers, than the previous ones. Well if that's the case it's a trial and error, which version works best Wink

.

Dia

anatolikostis

legendary

Activity: 2026

Merit: 1005

5770@900core/200mem 512Mb

got decrease from 200MH/s to 198MH/s (working size 128/256/64 - no changes just more decrease), have rolled back to 11-07-2011 mode...

may be this because of 512Mb mem or 200MHz freq?

ssateneth

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1004

Got about 0.75 more on my 5830's. Not sure about my 5870 but its likely on the magnitude of 1-1.5. Keep up the hard work!

edit: 5870 had about 0.5-0.75 improvement

simonk83

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

No change for me with the latest version. Can't complain though

streetuff

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

my 5770 is at 975/300

Reuef

newbie

Activity: 40

Merit: 0

5830 went from 313mh/s to 316 mh/s. 1000/400

ZeroShift

newbie

Activity: 21

Merit: 0

Radeon 5770 @ 935/300: 200 MH/s to 213 MH/s!

Coins are on the way Grin

streetuff

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

just wanted to report....

HD5770 from 220 -> 222MH/s
HD5850 from 355 -> 359MH/s

with 2011-07-17

Soak

full member

Activity: 213

Merit: 100

388 to 391 with last update (Radeon HD 6970). Now equal with original poclbm miner. Thank you! Grin

Diapolo

hero member

Activity: 769

Merit: 500

Quote from: Bert on July 17, 2011, 01:43:27 PM

Thanks for the hard work, sent you another donation. 458.88Mh/sec up to 459.41 with the last update on overclocked 5870's running at 1000/347.

Thanks Bert, you are one of the frequent donators and I really appreciate it

! Have fun with this latest version!

Dia

Bert

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Thanks for the hard work, sent you another donation. 458.88Mh/sec up to 459.41 with the last update on overclocked 5870's running at 1000/347.

Diapolo

hero member

Activity: 769

Merit: 500

Quote from: Tartarus on July 17, 2011, 11:26:02 AM

Both the new kernel.cl and __init__.py need to go into kernels/phatk/

That's it, I thought I made it clear enough Cheesy

.

Dia

Tartarus

newbie

Activity: 47

Merit: 0

Quote from: BeeTeaSea on July 17, 2011, 11:03:18 AM

Hi,

I am getting this error with a ATI 5870. The modified kernel from July 6th works fine.

./phoenix.py -u http://XXX DEVICE=1 -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=14 FASTLOOP=true -q 8
[17/07/2011 16:58:36] Phoenix 1.50 starting...
[17/07/2011 16:58:36] Connected to server
[0 Khash/sec] [0 Accepted] [0 Rejected] [RPC]Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/threading.py", line 504, in __bootstrap
self.__bootstrap_inner()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/threading.py", line 532, in __bootstrap_inner
self.run()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/threading.py", line 484, in run
self.__target(*self.__args, **self.__kwargs)
--- ---
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/python/threadpool.py", line 207, in _worker
result = context.call(ctx, function, *args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/python/context.py", line 59, in callWithContext
return self.currentContext().callWithContext(ctx, func, *args, **kw)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/python/context.py", line 37, in callWithContext
return func(*args,**kw)
File "kernels/phatk/__init__.py", line 391, in mineThread
self.output_buf)
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/pyopencl/__init__.py", line 202, in kernel_call
self.set_args(*args)
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/pyopencl/__init__.py", line 224, in kernel_set_args
self.set_arg(i, arg)
pyopencl.LogicError: clSetKernelArg failed: invalid arg size

Both the new kernel.cl and __init__.py need to go into kernels/phatk/

BeeTeaSea

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

Hi,

I am getting this error with a ATI 5870. The modified kernel from July 6th works fine.

./phoenix.py -u http://XXX DEVICE=1 -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=14 FASTLOOP=true -q 8
[17/07/2011 16:58:36] Phoenix 1.50 starting...
[17/07/2011 16:58:36] Connected to server
[0 Khash/sec] [0 Accepted] [0 Rejected] [RPC]Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/threading.py", line 504, in __bootstrap
self.__bootstrap_inner()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/threading.py", line 532, in __bootstrap_inner
self.run()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/threading.py", line 484, in run
self.__target(*self.__args, **self.__kwargs)
--- ---
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/python/threadpool.py", line 207, in _worker
result = context.call(ctx, function, *args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/python/context.py", line 59, in callWithContext
return self.currentContext().callWithContext(ctx, func, *args, **kw)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/python/context.py", line 37, in callWithContext
return func(*args,**kw)
File "kernels/phatk/__init__.py", line 391, in mineThread
self.output_buf)
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/pyopencl/__init__.py", line 202, in kernel_call
self.set_args(*args)
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/pyopencl/__init__.py", line 224, in kernel_set_args
self.set_arg(i, arg)
pyopencl.LogicError: clSetKernelArg failed: invalid arg size

urstroyer

full member

Activity: 142

Merit: 100

very nice work, thanks a lot!

bcheck555

newbie

Activity: 5

Merit: 0

roughly .5Mhash/s increase with latest. Thanks.
337.20>337.86
5830 1050/350 -k phatkmod DEVICE=1 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=13

Topic: further improved phatk_dia kernel for Phoenix + SDK 2.6 - 2012-01-13 - page 7. (Read 51230 times)