Yes, maths says so. But after calculation i watched some matches with odds between 1.03 and 1.1. All the teams won their games but i can say that without some analyze i can`t say that it looks like guaranteed victory.
PS. I will try later with some small enough some and will try to calculate everything. I think it would be interesting.
Alot have to be considered before making such a decision to bet on low odds for a year cycle hoping to accumulate either 10% profits or anything close to that as in profits, and we should also avoid making it look as if because a game have low odds that increases the tendency of their winning, sometimes the case is just different and you won't know what happened the bet is already list , just like in the case with the gambler in this discussion, he made such a wooping stake because he believes that with the low odds he may be having a sure predictions not knowing that he gona lose regardless, and that is what have him the hope and motivation to stake such huge amount of money on that bet, if going for low odds make you win, then every sport bettors will always be on the winning side since basically they will just be picking all the games with low odds and by the time the accumulate at least 10-20 games with such low odds, they will be in a better position to win the bet, but it not so and that doesn't work all the time.
Although using such methods may slightly increase your chances of winning but not giving you just a straight winning as you guy's may think it will, games are most time based on luck and once you have your lucky day no matter how poor your analysis of the team are and your games selected, you eventually will still win regardless.
I will test it by myself. I`m long enough in sport betting, may be if will help me. Anyway i think that it can be a strategy and i`ll try it with some small sum. I don`t want to bet all the matches with such odds, but i think that i can find 10 bets per day that will be good enough for me.
Yes, maths says so. But after calculation i watched some matches with odds between 1.03 and 1.1. All the teams won their games but i can say that without some analyze i can`t say that it looks like guaranteed victory.
PS. I will try later with some small enough some and will try to calculate everything. I think it would be interesting.
Indeed maths says so but the reality may be different and this has lured many into deception and the end is always a regret.
My concern here is that it is interesting if one has that low odds with a higher chance of winning, but are people considering the possibility of losing as well? An unforeseen circumstance can happen with a high chance of winning, that is why it's smart to also consider the management of the risk we are talking about. I don't see anything smart in going for the high odds with a huge risk, it will take a whole lot of time and tries before the gambler will recover such risk, that's if the subsequent bets are all positive winning streaks for him. How encouraging is that? For this, this kind of risk has no other interpretation but senseless, betting your money on what will take you more than 100 times of similar betting to recover your money back can never be wise.
Last several years i was betting only high odds, never less than 2 and the main part of the odds were higher than 3.5. And it works. I don`t remember even a month with negative balance. So i want to try another way. It is not about profit. It is just an experiment that interesting for me. This thread gave me some information to think about.