One wonders, perhaps he had an error...(!?)
Man, I have read some comments, such as "how stupid", "how are you going to make that bet...", "the risk of x$, it was not worth that return y$"... etc.
Would you buy this:
Louis Vuitton LV x Nike Men's 7.5 Virgil Abloh Air2 Damier Force7,9Damier Azur7
Oh! and curious Free Shipping. With which company do they send me shoes of that price (hahaha)
In those shoes is the answer to that bet:
My point, so, Let's say that for your spending budget, $100 shoes would be fine, that is, if you lose them in a suitcase or they are stolen, no problem, surely that does not hit your budget.
Now! in the case of the person who buys Louis Vuitton LV x Nike, they are stolen, surely you will not only him be able to buy others, I say capable and it comes with a monthly insurance of several dollars.
So, equivalence is welcome here, I've seen bets of $600,000 for @1.01, there they are, there are several Twitter accounts with crazy alerts for the common mortal. I mean, they're not that weird.
Now, it must be clarified that in this case it was @1,008. Whatever, the issue then is that if you are surprised by that bet it is that you think that surely nobody will buy a pair of $276,923 sneakers and that the correct thing is $100 because if you lose them it is only $100.
So, to the point, the mistake here is that the guy makes a $1.4M bet and can only buy $100 sneakers, but if he's a guy who can buy $276,923 sneakers, surely it's just a blow to his ego or he just has a red amount of - $1.4M.
Now, the bookmakers accept these bets because they get a great benefit but only win 0.8% of the time, in this case for example.
So, you have a 99.2% chance of winning, and add that you have additional information, it's a live bet, oh sure, bet $100 if it's okay, $276,923 is an error.
My ...:
The issue here is not losing, since 99.2% is not negligible, (yes, yes, yes, you have to understand the mirage) the issue is that the same bet does not offer a quick return in time in case of losing and that in itself It is itself what makes it very bad in the long run.
If we reduce the numbers we can say that for each risk of $1400, $11.2 is earned (benefit). Now, having a 99.2% probability of winning, it would take him 125 times to reach the breakeven. In other words, it is a Fk bitch-bet, unless you have $1,400 left over for @1,008 at 125 times, come on! it's like buying a pair of shoes for + $200,000.
corollary:The issue of whether he is an addict as mentioned, or whatever, it is another story, do not mix feelings here.