This punter is either the biggest genius at analyzing British football in the world or he's extremely lucky(or maybe both).
Perhaps he could give some betting advice on Premier League and Championship games to us for free(or maybe for a fee).
I'm sure that he tried doing this in the past,but failed multiple times.Betting low amounts on a big sequence of games seems like an interesting strategy.I might try it.
Guessing the winning teams out of 16 games probably has lower odds than guessing the lottery numbers,I'm no mathematician.
Good for him.He could reinvest that money into sports betting or start his own betting advice website.
If you are interested in betting with large odds, that is, multibets, then you will be interested in reading my topic:
Why a single bet is better than a multi bet. The strategy of betting on many events is very unprofitable and his winning is pure luck. Another question is that if you want to get such a huge odds, then you should multibet. But in fact, it is much more profitable to make such a bet in dice.
It is not about profitable or not, but it is more about preferences because betting in single bet may not something profitable for some users.
I'm not betting sports regularly but once I want to bet, I'll choose to play multi bets because I have the chance to win bigger with smaller bets.
Comparing multi bets in sports betting to dice (high multiplier) is not apple to apple because dice is pure luck based game.
Sports need some researches, knowledge, and analysis first before placing a bet.
Even if you are forcing to compare multi bets to dice, profitable or not is based on the final result not about what game to play.