Gambling Competition: Player with the smallest bonus donates all to Charity - page 2.

Dr.Bitcoin_Strange

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 538

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: DaNNy001 on July 21, 2024, 05:36:46 PM

I think the basic essence of what makes us human is that ability to actually care about the people we actually love and sometimes we get to do this the wrong way. There are so many persons that would have argued that this particular thought of giving even when you are completely inconveniencing yourself is actually a bad idea because it doesn't make sense but some moral teaching in some believe system deem it right to actually do something like that even when you are not having enough.

For me, I believe that one must be satisfied first before they can give to another person. If, for example, you have one loaf of bread and you're hungry and someone asks you for your bread, knowing how hungry you are, you cannot give out all your loaf to that person, but you can offer to share it with the person. That's an act of kindness. Kindness is not when one gives out everything they have for charity sake, while they actually need part of that thing to survive. You can give when you still have the one to depend on.

Lida93

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 605

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: DaNNy001 on July 21, 2024, 05:36:46 PM

Quote from: Dr.Bitcoin_Strange on July 21, 2024, 04:08:59 PM

Quote from: Lida93 on July 20, 2024, 01:43:46 PM

Quote from: bering on July 18, 2024, 05:37:34 PM

Quote from: danherbias07 on July 18, 2024, 11:04:31 AM

It's like you said, not too many gamblers will do such a thing. Maybe the rich one. Most gamblers are gambling trying to make a fortune out of those bonuses and I don't think they will just give it out. Honestly, it might become the other way around, where they will gamble more to make more fortune.

I salute those two for doing such a thing but let's face it, not everyone will do it. They might even say it's a waste of money because they don't know if it will really be spent on charity. I won't wash my hands and say I'd do such a thing too because I won't. I am not in a position where I could just give out money while my family is hungry. As I said, this could be done by the rich people who have nothing else to do with their money.

I am sure this family is a rich people because they are youtubers and according to their youtube channel this family is quite often to share their activities while visiting the particular casinos and playing slots game with their family and i can see it that they have millions of views in their videos which automatically they can earn a lot of money from that so i am sure donate a few thousand dollars is not a big deal for them

Exactly the first thought that came to mind when I was reading the Op. Most of all these gambling win later given out to donations by gamblers are usually done by rich gamblers, and some apart from the real intent of being benevolent they could initiate the act in order to attract recognition or other benefits from the public especially when it's been dragged to social media. I think am correct to say it's a win-win situation for both the parties involved - benefited directly while the other benefits indirectly (the million views alone is money).

Well, like I already said in my first comment, I can actually do this, but it all depends. Perhaps there's a saying that charity begins at home, which means that if someone have more than enough, they need to give to those that are lacking in their household before they can extend such charity to outsiders. For some to even be able to give to charity, they must have been successfully stable on their own before they can share with others. With that being said, there's no way one can have siblings or relatives who are suffering and would want to give to the outside world before giving to their own blood. As much as I would love to give to charity, I also want my house to be comfortable first before I can extend my helping hands to others.

I think the basic essence of what makes us human is that ability to actually care about the people we actually love and sometimes we get to do this the wrong way. There are so many persons that would have argued that this particular thought of giving even when you are completely inconveniencing yourself is actually a bad idea because it doesn't make sense but some moral teaching in some believe system deem it right to actually do something like that even when you are not having enough.

About giving, the impression has common been that it's people who have a lot (rich) that are in a good position of giving to the poor. But giving is an act that comes in naturally as a lifestyle for some people with the heart of giving irrespective of how big or small of what they have. And I agree with Dr.Bitcoin_Strange that charity should always begin from our home and with close acquaintance that we know are lacking and in dire need of certain help we are capable of offering. And it's paramount never to give under compulsion or self-inconvenience.

DaNNy001

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 520

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Dr.Bitcoin_Strange on July 21, 2024, 04:08:59 PM

Quote from: Lida93 on July 20, 2024, 01:43:46 PM

Quote from: bering on July 18, 2024, 05:37:34 PM

Quote from: danherbias07 on July 18, 2024, 11:04:31 AM

It's like you said, not too many gamblers will do such a thing. Maybe the rich one. Most gamblers are gambling trying to make a fortune out of those bonuses and I don't think they will just give it out. Honestly, it might become the other way around, where they will gamble more to make more fortune.

I salute those two for doing such a thing but let's face it, not everyone will do it. They might even say it's a waste of money because they don't know if it will really be spent on charity. I won't wash my hands and say I'd do such a thing too because I won't. I am not in a position where I could just give out money while my family is hungry. As I said, this could be done by the rich people who have nothing else to do with their money.

I am sure this family is a rich people because they are youtubers and according to their youtube channel this family is quite often to share their activities while visiting the particular casinos and playing slots game with their family and i can see it that they have millions of views in their videos which automatically they can earn a lot of money from that so i am sure donate a few thousand dollars is not a big deal for them

Exactly the first thought that came to mind when I was reading the Op. Most of all these gambling win later given out to donations by gamblers are usually done by rich gamblers, and some apart from the real intent of being benevolent they could initiate the act in order to attract recognition or other benefits from the public especially when it's been dragged to social media. I think am correct to say it's a win-win situation for both the parties involved - benefited directly while the other benefits indirectly (the million views alone is money).

Well, like I already said in my first comment, I can actually do this, but it all depends. Perhaps there's a saying that charity begins at home, which means that if someone have more than enough, they need to give to those that are lacking in their household before they can extend such charity to outsiders. For some to even be able to give to charity, they must have been successfully stable on their own before they can share with others. With that being said, there's no way one can have siblings or relatives who are suffering and would want to give to the outside world before giving to their own blood. As much as I would love to give to charity, I also want my house to be comfortable first before I can extend my helping hands to others.

I think the basic essence of what makes us human is that ability to actually care about the people we actually love and sometimes we get to do this the wrong way. There are so many persons that would have argued that this particular thought of giving even when you are completely inconveniencing yourself is actually a bad idea because it doesn't make sense but some moral teaching in some believe system deem it right to actually do something like that even when you are not having enough.

Weawant

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 509

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Davidvictorson on July 16, 2024, 02:49:20 AM

I watched a YouTube video where the father and son had a slot betting competition. The rule was simple- the individual with the biggest bonus wins while the individual with the smallest bonus will have to donate all of it to their favorite charity which the family has been involved in. I liked the idea gambling and donating to charity for a good cause. I have hardly heard of gamblers doing something exactly like this. Do you think this is the kind of competition you will like to get involved in knowing that even your smallest bonus wins will all be given to charity and you'll have nothing left?

This is really n amazing act of giving back, and the most amazing part will be with the fact that you will not be pressured gambling since you aren't doing it for yourself but for the sake.of charity, and just maybe like people will say, you may even get luckier. Most times people gamble for their selves, and that's why it becomes really difficult for them to be able to do a thing as this, it then feels like it's rare to find such, mostly gambling has been either for fun or to make some profit, gambling for charity, as a matter of fact this is even the first time I'm coming across it, so it's that rare to find but it's such an amazing idea I really welcome and would love to do if I'm opportuned.

tabas

hero member

Activity: 3024

Merit: 745

🌀 Cosmic Casino

Quote from: Davidvictorson on July 16, 2024, 02:49:20 AM

Do you think this is the kind of competition you will like to get involved in knowing that even your smallest bonus wins will all be given to charity and you'll have nothing left?

That's fine if it's just a bonus and it will be in good cause. From what I know, most gambling institutions or companies have their own ways of giving back to the community. Whether this is content or not for individuals, it's actually a good initiative that's also touching the hearts of others. Some might find it odd because it's through gambling and they dislike that idea. But overall, you look at the good part of it if it's going to their favorite charity and it will reach the less fortunate people. While maybe few gamblers are actually doing this, I guess each of us has their own ways as well on how we're giving back to the needy ones whether they're charitable institutions or just some act of love and giving to other individuals.

Dr.Bitcoin_Strange

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 538

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Lida93 on July 20, 2024, 01:43:46 PM

Quote from: bering on July 18, 2024, 05:37:34 PM

Quote from: danherbias07 on July 18, 2024, 11:04:31 AM

It's like you said, not too many gamblers will do such a thing. Maybe the rich one. Most gamblers are gambling trying to make a fortune out of those bonuses and I don't think they will just give it out. Honestly, it might become the other way around, where they will gamble more to make more fortune.

I salute those two for doing such a thing but let's face it, not everyone will do it. They might even say it's a waste of money because they don't know if it will really be spent on charity. I won't wash my hands and say I'd do such a thing too because I won't. I am not in a position where I could just give out money while my family is hungry. As I said, this could be done by the rich people who have nothing else to do with their money.

I am sure this family is a rich people because they are youtubers and according to their youtube channel this family is quite often to share their activities while visiting the particular casinos and playing slots game with their family and i can see it that they have millions of views in their videos which automatically they can earn a lot of money from that so i am sure donate a few thousand dollars is not a big deal for them

Exactly the first thought that came to mind when I was reading the Op. Most of all these gambling win later given out to donations by gamblers are usually done by rich gamblers, and some apart from the real intent of being benevolent they could initiate the act in order to attract recognition or other benefits from the public especially when it's been dragged to social media. I think am correct to say it's a win-win situation for both the parties involved - benefited directly while the other benefits indirectly (the million views alone is money).

Well, like I already said in my first comment, I can actually do this, but it all depends. Perhaps there's a saying that charity begins at home, which means that if someone have more than enough, they need to give to those that are lacking in their household before they can extend such charity to outsiders. For some to even be able to give to charity, they must have been successfully stable on their own before they can share with others. With that being said, there's no way one can have siblings or relatives who are suffering and would want to give to the outside world before giving to their own blood. As much as I would love to give to charity, I also want my house to be comfortable first before I can extend my helping hands to others.

coin-investor

hero member

Activity: 3024

Merit: 614

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Davidvictorson on July 16, 2024, 02:49:20 AM

I watched a YouTube video where the father and son had a slot betting competition. The rule was simple- the individual with the biggest bonus wins while the individual with the smallest bonus will have to donate all of it to their favorite charity which the family has been involved in. I liked the idea gambling and donating to charity for a good cause. I have hardly heard of gamblers doing something exactly like this. Do you think this is the kind of competition you will like to get involved in knowing that even your smallest bonus wins will all be given to charity and you'll have nothing left?

That's a new and fresh idea, but if you look at the creator of the video, he has over 650k subscribers and over 800 videos, so he is, in fact, an influencer who needs to feed his followers with new ideas and concepts about gambling. He is actually making money coming up with these ideas and concepts.
I prefer to donate money if I win and if I have excess money from my winning, I don't want to get involved in this idea to ease up the pressure while playing.

Casdinyard

hero member

Activity: 2184

Merit: 891

Leading Crypto Sports Betting and Casino Platform

Quote from: Davidvictorson on July 16, 2024, 02:49:20 AM

I watched a YouTube video where the father and son had a slot betting competition. The rule was simple- the individual with the biggest bonus wins while the individual with the smallest bonus will have to donate all of it to their favorite charity which the family has been involved in. I liked the idea gambling and donating to charity for a good cause. I have hardly heard of gamblers doing something exactly like this. Do you think this is the kind of competition you will like to get involved in knowing that even your smallest bonus wins will all be given to charity and you'll have nothing left?

Idea was a fun one but I think they both should give money to the charity cause I don't know, losing the bet and then ending up giving all the money you were able to come up with to someone else just rubs salt on the wound, and while I get the concept it's just something I can't get behind on fully lol. But I digress.

I have a similar thing with my friends back in the pandemic days, which is actually the reason why I gamble in the first place. So for starters, cause we're all bored and can't meet each other we devised a game where in we're all going to gamble on specific games on a particular site, back then it was roobet but we switch sites every once in a while, and from there whoever makes the highest win gets to go home with a prize pot that we all chipped some of our money into. That's a better way of doing this in my opinion, and even if we put the charity thing into the formula we can pretty much just make it so the winner gets to choose his charity of choice and we'd give it to them.

Sunderland

sr. member

Activity: 1439

Merit: 380

To Be Or Not To Be

Vegas Matt has been famous since a long time ago and I admit that his contents is quite interesting to watch, and he has been a professional gambler since 90's.
The competition he did was just for content and he got money from it, so it's useless if we debate whether we need to do or take part in a competition like that.
I prefer to donate when I win big rather than doing or participating in competitions like that, unless I'm an influencer like Vegas Matt with net worth more than $50M.

Zoomic

sr. member

Activity: 630

Merit: 277

Quote from: Davidvictorson on July 16, 2024, 02:49:20 AM

I watched a YouTube video where the father and son had a slot betting competition. The rule was simple- the individual with the biggest bonus wins while the individual with the smallest bonus will have to donate all of it to their favorite charity which the family has been involved in. I liked the idea gambling and donating to charity for a good cause. I have hardly heard of gamblers doing something exactly like this. Do you think this is the kind of competition you will like to get involved in knowing that even your smallest bonus wins will all be given to charity and you'll have nothing left?

This gambling style will give the loser a sense of responsibility, at least your money is being put into good use unlike the other kind of gambling where the loser loses and goes home without impacting the lives of those around him positively. Donating to charity is not entirely bad, a gambler who truly understands what it takes to show empathy to the less privileged will not feel too bad if he loses the game. I believe this condition was not imposed on any of the players, they understood clearly the terms of the game before going for it. Only those who are comfortable with this conditions will choose to gamble.

This kind of competition is not for regular gamblers, this is a unique competition with a purpose, and the purpose is more of a humanitarian service. Only those who agree with this purpose can give up their bonuses for those who need them more.

CryptoHeadlineNews

hero member

Activity: 1176

Merit: 785

Quote from: Rockstarguy on July 20, 2024, 01:57:03 PM

I think winning the small bonus is still the same thing as not winning because even if you win it goes back as donation to charity.

It's actually not the same mate, because such money is given to charity, it helps those kids acquire basic necessities of life, such as food and clothes, which wouldn't have been possible without an act of charity. So that's the difference.

However, it's obvious the father and Son are actually living a comfortable life, because I just made a little research about their channel, and got to know they earn roughly $131k monthly by streaming casino games on YouTube, which is quite a big money for a fancy lifestyle.

Quote

If it was something that every winner has the chance of collecting the win and the money was donated freely this is when it should be a surprise because most gamblers don't joke with their wins which they would want to use for things that means so much to them.

Yes, that's true, but in this case, I think this Dad and Son were not only able to donate the amount won to charity, but were also able to generate more funds from YouTube ads be posting this video content here, of which I'm sure with this single video, they are likely to have earned double or even triple what they gave to charity while simply having fun and recording that moment at the casino.

Rockstarguy

hero member

Activity: 1050

Merit: 592

God is great

Quote from: Davidvictorson on July 16, 2024, 02:49:20 AM

I watched a YouTube video where the father and son had a slot betting competition. The rule was simple- the individual with the biggest bonus wins while the individual with the smallest bonus will have to donate all of it to their favorite charity which the family has been involved in. I liked the idea gambling and donating to charity for a good cause. I have hardly heard of gamblers doing something exactly like this. Do you think this is the kind of competition you will like to get involved in knowing that even your smallest bonus wins will all be given to charity and you'll have nothing left?

This competition will really good for those that are not expecting so much from gambling just incase they end up getting the small bonus. I think winning the small bonus is still the same thing as not winning because even if you win it goes back as donation to charity . This shouldn't be a surprise to you because gamblers have no choice than to donate their win. If it was something that every winner has the chance of collecting the win and the money was donated freely this is when it should be a surprise because most gamblers don't joke with their wins which they would want to use for things that means so much to them.

Lida93

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 605

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: bering on July 18, 2024, 05:37:34 PM

Quote from: danherbias07 on July 18, 2024, 11:04:31 AM

It's like you said, not too many gamblers will do such a thing. Maybe the rich one. Most gamblers are gambling trying to make a fortune out of those bonuses and I don't think they will just give it out. Honestly, it might become the other way around, where they will gamble more to make more fortune.

I salute those two for doing such a thing but let's face it, not everyone will do it. They might even say it's a waste of money because they don't know if it will really be spent on charity. I won't wash my hands and say I'd do such a thing too because I won't. I am not in a position where I could just give out money while my family is hungry. As I said, this could be done by the rich people who have nothing else to do with their money.

I am sure this family is a rich people because they are youtubers and according to their youtube channel this family is quite often to share their activities while visiting the particular casinos and playing slots game with their family and i can see it that they have millions of views in their videos which automatically they can earn a lot of money from that so i am sure donate a few thousand dollars is not a big deal for them

Exactly the first thought that came to mind when I was reading the Op. Most of all these gambling win later given out to donations by gamblers are usually done by rich gamblers, and some apart from the real intent of being benevolent they could initiate the act in order to attract recognition or other benefits from the public especially when it's been dragged to social media. I think am correct to say it's a win-win situation for both the parties involved - benefited directly while the other benefits indirectly (the million views alone is money).

crwth

copper member

Activity: 2940

Merit: 1280

https://linktr.ee/crwthopia

I think they are just starting to make some reasons for gambling and make it somehow not negative in terms of the overall approach to gambling. Just attaching the word charity makes it even somewhat lesser evil in terms of just gambling you know. It is very popular in some countries to attach some lottery into charity as well

I think, as long as you see the results where it is being donated, I think it is okay. We want to get Entertained that is probably why this is created.

Tmoonz

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 256

Quote from: Apocollapse on July 16, 2024, 03:04:31 AM

Without this competition, it's already hard to beat the house, so having this competition make the gamblers have smaller chance to win. It's a good deed to donate your money to a charity, but actually even you didn't donate it, the casino high likely will give it to charity because they need to spend some money for social responsibility (although only regulated casinos did this).

For now I will not do it, but if I'm rich and there's nothing I want to achieve again in my life, I will do it.

Exactly, no competition no bonus and no winning so as for me since it is quite obvious that the family seems to be rich I don't see anything wrong spending the money to charity which is even my dream kind of thing to own a charity organization, it is better to do it as you might be the winner you never can tell so given a no to such competition is not a good idea, that is my opinion but yeah any one is free to contradict my opinion and comes up their own opinion as to this regards because as human we tend to have different way reacting to certain situation or condition.

freedomgo

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 1185

Playbet.io - Crypto Casino and Sportsbook

Quote from: Davidvictorson on July 16, 2024, 02:49:20 AM

I watched a YouTube video where the father and son had a slot betting competition. The rule was simple- the individual with the biggest bonus wins while the individual with the smallest bonus will have to donate all of it to their favorite charity which the family has been involved in. I liked the idea gambling and donating to charity for a good cause. I have hardly heard of gamblers doing something exactly like this. Do you think this is the kind of competition you will like to get involved in knowing that even your smallest bonus wins will all be given to charity and you'll have nothing left?

It's a Father's Day celebration, but it's done that way for them. Actually, we can do anything we like, but the main goal is to donate. There's nothing extraordinary about this, and I think I could also do this if I had the money. It's a YouTube video, so most likely it's a content that will also earn them money in return, as they have a good number of subscribers—almost 700k.

alani123

legendary

Activity: 2422

Merit: 1451

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Most people that play on slots and casinos in general can't have access to sponsored funds, especially sponsored funds they can decide where it gets spend too. So I'd say this isn't something that should be expected from gamblers. If people had the chance to save up for themselves, gambling and even charity donations on top I'm sure they'd do it already. After all gambling isn't guaranteed to give you profit, and if we judge by chance the most probable scenario would be that you lose, as most people do.

So if we reverse this scenario, if we like charity, it'd be nice to see some sort of casino competition where the casino itself pledges to give the rakeback to a charitable organization or something like that. The one with the certain profit would of course be good to give some back to the world. But most of the time they just don't. So good to see some people that have the money doing good but let's not expect it from everybody because many people can't afford to do it.

mirakal

legendary

Activity: 3108

Merit: 1290

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: robelneo on July 18, 2024, 06:42:25 PM

Many gamblers are already doing charity, however small, winning or losing, and I have friends doing that, but it's different when doing it for content just to attract more views, and those views will convert to profit; the channel is all about gambling content so I'm sure that will not going to be the last video of its kind.

You know, when you have followers, you have to feed them with new concepts and new content so they will continue to like and play those videos even if it's 30 minutes or more long.

I like the idea of giving donations to some charities out from our winnings in gambling, regardless if it's small or big amount. However, if you are still in the state of making money out from gambling just to sustain some basic needs of your family, then I don't think giving some donations would be reasonable this time. I would gladly do it maybe when I think I'm more than capable to give, even if it means giving a large portion of my winnings.

Now, this is another story already if you donate for your own content to attract more views from your audience. You might be doing a charitable work, and it's good, but it should not be just for the show to attract a lot of viewers and eventually subscribe on your channel.

AmoreJaz

legendary

Activity: 3122

Merit: 1102

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: robelneo on July 18, 2024, 06:42:25 PM

Many gamblers are already doing charity, however small, winning or losing, and I have friends doing that, but it's different when doing it for content just to attract more views, and those views will convert to profit; the channel is all about gambling content so I'm sure that will not going to be the last video of its kind.

You know, when you have followers, you have to feed them with new concepts and new content so they will continue to like and play those videos even if it's 30 minutes or more long.

People who are streaming what they are doing definitely is up for the views of their content. Of course, they do want to earn for what they are showing to their subscribers and sustain their interest. Without their followers, they won't get potential sponsorships from related companies.

If you are gambling to finance some of your charity works, people will talk and you will earn good reputation. But if you are up to the task of earning profits from what you are doing, it will also show without a doubt. You don't need to be a hypocrite to show that you care, because people will see your true colour sooner or later.

Davidvictorson

hero member

Activity: 1190

Merit: 901

Livecasino.io

Quote from: m2017 on July 16, 2024, 05:35:30 AM

What if both participants (father and son) are losers? It may be easier to directly donate this money to charity.

Both of participants can't be losers because the rule of the game is that the person with the least amount of bonus will donate it to charity.

Quote from: btc78 on July 16, 2024, 05:43:30 AM

It’s always a good thing to donate but having the person with a smaller win donate it to charity as some sort of punishment for the loser delivers the wrong message.

No, donating to the charity is not a punishment from what I understand. From the Video, donating to that charity has been their family tradition. And from the comments section, some of their views/fans also made donation pledges too. In the end the winner with the least amount of bonus from the game would have donated more than when then the person with the highest amount of bonus donates because of the other contributions from their viewers and fans.

Topic: Gambling Competition: Player with the smallest bonus donates all to Charity - page 2. (Read 779 times)