This campaign will not be continuing for now. Everyone may remove their sigs.
Thanks for the update, nice working with you once again. Wishing Gamdom the best and you as well 
Topic: Gamdom.com Signature and avatar campaign (Read 4392 times)
This campaign will not be continuing for now. Everyone may remove their sigs.
Thank you for the update , I will keep the signature on till I find a new one . Stay safe everyone.
This campaign will not be continuing for now. Everyone may remove their sigs.
Thank you yahoo62278, hopefully it will be back in the near future.
This campaign will not be continuing for now. Everyone may remove their sigs.
Bitcointalk Username: Danydee
Profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/danydee-139084
Post Count: 2234 (including this one)
Gamdom Name: 00016
Forum Rank: Legendary
Btc Address: 1xxxxx2rCoKhP8txQRDYx8FEWzuifTGkb
Profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/danydee-139084
Post Count: 2234 (including this one)
Gamdom Name: 00016
Forum Rank: Legendary
Btc Address: 1xxxxx2rCoKhP8txQRDYx8FEWzuifTGkb
Also, one of the problems is that many people aim to do minimum required posts, in this case 25, and then if 2-3 get disqualified, they cry for not getting payment.
This has been seen accross all campaigns, accross all managers.
It really shows a manager who is here to actually help users and companies and who is here for money only. I'm not against anyone making money, but don't cry when you are a mediocre user doing the bare minimums and end up not qualifying. You took a risk and it didn't pay off.
Bitcointalk Username: B_UN1T
Profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bun1t-149064
Post Count: 331
Gamdom Name: B_UN1T
Forum Rank: Senior Member
BTC Address: 38pFgUR5jeqeRgWqswEWj3BqNa3iaW8jeX
Profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bun1t-149064
Post Count: 331
Gamdom Name: B_UN1T
Forum Rank: Senior Member
BTC Address: 38pFgUR5jeqeRgWqswEWj3BqNa3iaW8jeX
Yeah, lesson learned. 
=> 
Let's move on and wait for the 2nd week announcement, that is more important than the current discussion.
=> Let's move on and wait for the 2nd week announcement, that is more important than the current discussion.
Cool down everyone and just wait for update from manager.
I am sure yahoo62278 and Gamdom will find the best solution for everyone to continue with campaign now that we have everyones attention.
Lesson learned for some people
I am sure yahoo62278 and Gamdom will find the best solution for everyone to continue with campaign now that we have everyones attention.
Lesson learned for some people
Thank you for showing the whole forum you are a worthless employee.
Instead, you browsed the rules quickly or assumed this campaigns rules were the same as all other campaigns. You're at fault here for not keeping up with your job and doing it correctly. Be a man and accept responsibility for your mistakes.
Worthless employee? Because I pointed out your mistake? Ok. I stand by my words that you are at fault here and not the campaign participants due to the unclear rules causing so much confusion which could have been avoided.Instead, you browsed the rules quickly or assumed this campaigns rules were the same as all other campaigns. You're at fault here for not keeping up with your job and doing it correctly. Be a man and accept responsibility for your mistakes.
I advise you to accept responsibility for your mistakes too which could probably make you a better manager in the future.
This will be a lesson for other campaign participants that only focus on making the weekly required posts
My rule of thumb is usually, if the majority of people got it wrong, then rules are not clear enough.
However, if the majority of people did it correctly, then the minority who got it wrong never read the rules, or didn't bother to clarify them.
Also, one of the problems is that many people aim to do minimum required posts, in this case 25, and then if 2-3 get disqualified, they cry for not getting payment.
This has been seen accross all campaigns, accross all managers.
However, if the majority of people did it correctly, then the minority who got it wrong never read the rules, or didn't bother to clarify them.
Also, one of the problems is that many people aim to do minimum required posts, in this case 25, and then if 2-3 get disqualified, they cry for not getting payment.
This has been seen accross all campaigns, accross all managers.
~
Worthless employee? Because I pointed out your mistake? Ok. I stand by my words that you are at fault here and not the campaign participants due to the unclear rules causing so much confusion which could have been avoided.
I advise you to accept responsibility for your mistakes too which could probably make you a better manager in the future.
Since you have a account registered in 2014 and you since you said you were in many campaigns where is the confusion when the rules were clearly written by @ yahoo62278 and if you look back in some of the campaigns every one has specific rules and if you are participating in it, it is your duty to check where they want the advertisement to be displayed and this is not a new concept and here you are arguing that the campaign manager has to bend to your rules which is silly.Worthless employee? Because I pointed out your mistake? Ok. I stand by my words that you are at fault here and not the campaign participants due to the unclear rules causing so much confusion which could have been avoided.
I advise you to accept responsibility for your mistakes too which could probably make you a better manager in the future.
I understood the rules as this is not the first time i am participating in a campaign and usually i do not in discussion and since the rule set was clear i did not post many in gambling discussion as the rule set was clear. Just accept and move on as you understand the mistake and if you are not interested no one is forcing you to continue in a campaign with specific rule set that you are not interested.
Bitcointalk Username: Insanerman
Profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/insanerman-815650
Post Count: 894 (including this one)
Gamdom Name: will update
Forum Rank: SR. Member
Btc Address: will update
Good day, yahoo! I'd like to be part of the campaign and I'll just update every necessary requirement upon acceptance. Thank you so much!!!
Profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/insanerman-815650
Post Count: 894 (including this one)
Gamdom Name: will update
Forum Rank: SR. Member
Btc Address: will update
Good day, yahoo! I'd like to be part of the campaign and I'll just update every necessary requirement upon acceptance. Thank you so much!!!
Thank you for showing the whole forum you are a worthless employee.
Instead, you browsed the rules quickly or assumed this campaigns rules were the same as all other campaigns. You're at fault here for not keeping up with your job and doing it correctly. Be a man and accept responsibility for your mistakes.
Worthless employee? Because I pointed out your mistake? Ok. I stand by my words that you are at fault here and not the campaign participants due to the unclear rulesInstead, you browsed the rules quickly or assumed this campaigns rules were the same as all other campaigns. You're at fault here for not keeping up with your job and doing it correctly. Be a man and accept responsibility for your mistakes.
Well, I wouldn't call that a mistake
If we apply strict, formal logic here, there is nothing you can pit against yahoo62278 regarding this specific rule. The only thing which is somewhat out of whack here is that you wouldn't really expect only 1 post to be counted in the Gambling Discussion board for a casino signature campaign. Personally, I thought it was a typo on the manager's part. But after it has been made abundantly clear in the thread that it is a correct provision (and twice at that), there is nothing you could do but obey the rules or suffer the consequences
Thank you for showing the whole forum you are a worthless employee.
Instead, you browsed the rules quickly or assumed this campaigns rules were the same as all other campaigns. You're at fault here for not keeping up with your job and doing it correctly. Be a man and accept responsibility for your mistakes.
Worthless employee? Because I pointed out your mistake? Ok. I stand by my words that you are at fault here and not the campaign participants due to the unclear rules causing so much confusion which could have been avoided.Instead, you browsed the rules quickly or assumed this campaigns rules were the same as all other campaigns. You're at fault here for not keeping up with your job and doing it correctly. Be a man and accept responsibility for your mistakes.
I advise you to accept responsibility for your mistakes too which could probably make you a better manager in the future.
btw, @Yahoo62278, is there any open positions for Sr Members? If there's any then i would like to join.
Thank you for showing the whole forum you are a worthless employee.
Instead, you browsed the rules quickly or assumed this campaigns rules were the same as all other campaigns. You're at fault here for not keeping up with your job and doing it correctly. Be a man and accept responsibility for your mistakes.
Worthless employee? Because I pointed out your mistake? Ok. I stand by my words that you are at fault here and not the campaign participants due to the unclear rules causing so much confusion which could have been avoided.Instead, you browsed the rules quickly or assumed this campaigns rules were the same as all other campaigns. You're at fault here for not keeping up with your job and doing it correctly. Be a man and accept responsibility for your mistakes.
I advise you to accept responsibility for your mistakes too which could probably make you a better manager in the future.
Just saw the spreadsheet and imo yahoo is bit generous. There are some participants who actually didn't deserve the payment which they were less of 1-2 qualified post but he decided to appreciate their effort by paying half. And yeah, keeping an eye on your campaign thread is a must, and the rule is written there. I was bit confused too at the first day of enrollment but when deisik asked to make sure about that rule yahoo has answered it clearly. But I still appreciate that you are stating your opinion using your own account. I think it could be a lesson for everyone.
The rule is saying that quite explicitly
Another matter it is not what you would normally expect from a casino signature campaign, and in that I agree with you. That's why I felt it would be better to clarify this point further and asked just that. Here's the reply
The entire confusion is in the rules itself period. I have worked on many casino signature campaigns over time and never faced this sort of issue because the rules were crystal clear and easy to follow.Another matter it is not what you would normally expect from a casino signature campaign, and in that I agree with you. That's why I felt it would be better to clarify this point further and asked just that. Here's the reply
The manager should have explicitly mentioned that only 1 out of 25 posts in the gambling discussion section would count instead. Instead, he made it clear later on by replying to your post which many including me didn't read.
The manager and the rules are at fault here and I don't really care whether others agree with me or not.
You don't really understand the rules in this campaign, every manager has different rules including in the Gamdom campaign and usually if the price is high then the rules are stricter, you have to understand that in my opinion what is explained by yahoo62278 is very clear. The proof is that many receive payments in the first week.
Be smart in understanding rules, don't compare the rules with other campaigns, each manager has his own perception.
Quote
Posts in Games & Rounds, Off-topic, Lending, Auctions, Politics & Society, Beginners and help, Tokens, or Archival will not count
I qualified for the payment this week. Though, honestly, the rule was a little ambiguous for me. I didn't risk posting on gambling discussion just to be on the safe side.
Since it was not mentioned that posts on the Gambling discussion will not count, the phrase only 1 post per week will count in gambling discussion made a lot of people assume this only applies for the required 5 posts on the campaign not on the 25 posts requirement as a whole.
Instead, he made it clear later on by replying to your post which many including me didn't read.
5 posts per week must be in gambling sections, only 1 post per week will count in gambling discussion. Other 4 must be in GAMBLING section
The above rule was posted in the thread from day 1. How hard is it to understand 1 post per week will count in gambling discussion? Also, when you are in a campaign it is your responsibility to keep an eye on the campaign thread and see if any updates have been posted , or replies which might clarify a rule for those who asked questions. Better yet, maybe PM the manager if you have a question about the rules.
Instead, you browsed the rules quickly or assumed this campaigns rules were the same as all other campaigns. You're at fault here for not keeping up with your job and doing it correctly. Be a man and accept responsibility for your mistakes.
Jump to: