I discovered this only today thanks to you gentlemand
People seem to enjoy labeling him as an android piloted by three letter agencies but you'd be hard pressed to point out many others who've done more to advance the scene.
I think Gavin Andersen is generally a good guy and genuinely wants the best for Bitcoin, and when he says bigger blocks are a good idea he genuinely thinks that's the case. Mike Hearn on the other hand, for some reason makes me thing that he has an agenda. In any case I would expect such 2 intelligent individuals to understand how "specialization" in running full nodes is a big mistake.