Topic: Gavin Andresen: stay away from Blockstream, Greg and Samson are toxic trolls. - page 2. (Read 2079 times)

When this initially happened I assumed Gavin Andresen was in on the joke, or was intentionally trying to muddy the waters to protect Satoshi.  It's still hard to believe he would fall for Craig Wright's BS.

FUD Thread from Kiklo. = Lambie. Lambie's 9384673764th troll account. She's trolling only to try to get cheaper coins.

Followed by BU troll Rawdog.

Followed by R.I.P BU troll Jonald Fyookball

Followed by copy/paste noob and paid shill Franky1.

How Blockstream was rewarded to make BIP and promote Bitcoin dev solution ? Every Business have an economic model my friends. The politician world and developper world is by nature opposite

It's because nullc criticized Gavin's new private key inspector service:
https://www.randomsanity.org/

Satoshi introduced payment channels himself (the foundation for lightning network) you dumbass.

Anyway, keep praising Gavin Andersen, the guy that wanted to set a benevolent dictator in bitcoin:

http://coinjournal.net/gavin-andresen-mike-hearn-will-be-the-benevolent-dictator-of-bitcoinxt/

And the same idiot that got trolled by Craig Wright into being satoshi.

This pathetic moron should be hiding under a rock for the rest of his life, but idiots always have idiots following them so he'll keep tweeting as long as there are idiots circlejerking about anything he says.

Well if it is good enough for the leader of the free world, then it is good enough for Bitcoin!

But in all seriousness, wouldn't it be nice if people could sit down together, even if that means remotely, and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the different block sizes, respect each others opinions, and not troll each other or bad mouth each other afterwards?

I know that when money is involved, that won't happen, but it would be nice!

Gavin is the reason bitcoin went from about $5 in 2011 to $1000 in 2013. He held things together, his original faucet which gave away free whole bitcoins had a massive impact on spreading the word, he did marketing as well as developing. Bitcoin simply wouldn't be where it is without him. It's all gone a bit downhill since he left.

he is well funded  now as a blockstream employee.

i guess bobbly lee wasnt paying him enough or the DCG cartel thought he would be more useful under the blockstream subsiduary rather than the btcc subsiduary

http://dcg.co/portfolio/#b

http://www.coindesk.com/blockstream-55-million-series-a/

I don't wanna get into the drama silliness but Mow really does troll pretty hard on twitter lol

Pretty much this. His credibility in the bitcoin world is zero these days.

Kaka-makr = Fucking moron.  Holy fuck.  

I didn't say user/miners in charge of coding.  Are you stupid?  They are and should be in charge of the network.  


Precisely.  And this is why those assholes at Blockstream are losing.  It is not because of paid shills or FUD or ASICBOOST.  It is because SegWit is garbage that renders the network control over to Blockstream via LN and does nearly nothing to address capacity.  

Lots of FUD coming up now that Bitcoin has jumped a crapton. First some vs post about how Litecoin has jumped up (Mind you, it's market was relatively small and with all the segwit hype it's blown up, only by $30 or so. You can say it's a 500% increase, but it's market cap hadn't increased nearly as much as Bitcoin's has.

I think that with all these big names attacking each other, they'll only continue to do so. It's evident that Segwit will not activate, and Unlimited is a very risky business. Is it really that hard to come up with a compromise?

the only implementation that has bypassed users support.. is blockstream(core)
asic boost has nothing to do with it. just like opencl had nothing to do with any decisions of core back in the day of the GPU mining.

imagine it. imagine core in 2012 wanted to change something but couldnt because it would cause issues with ATI's openCL. people would laugh at core if they started blaming ATI.
same goes for now.. if segwit hits a wall before being active, then REWRITE SEGWIT!!

its all just finger pointing drama, to get everyon looking in every direction apart from blockstream.
so just look at blockstream
EG blockstream made cludgy code instead of a clean node upgrade event.
EG blockstream made it so only pools get the vote('going soft').
EG blockstream going soft is an admitted backdoor exploit and they admit they want to add more backdoors to be able to go soft more often. (in th wrong hands its called a trojan)
EG blockstream now crying because all them all-inclusive exotic weekends didnt buy the pools into flag waving by last christmas (due to 65% abstaining/ objecting to the cludgy code)
EG blockstream now found out their 2merkle cludge is not as compatible as first thought (so now asking abstainers/objectors to reprogram themselves, to use filter/bridging nodes, to fork off, to add code to avoid attack vectors segwit causes, even offering to PoW bomb just to get the cludgy code in)

yep. instead of just backing down and going for a plan B of a 1 merkle segwit with proper block size increase for the entire network benefit, blockstream still want to bypass the idea of a network consensus upgrade and go straight to a controversial bilateral split..

much simpler blockstream just redo segwit as a proper 1 merkle version, remove the cludge and add the other features the community want too instead of pointing the fingers to blame pools, other implementations (which have done nothing for 2 years) and wasting upto 3 years just to push the cludgy version (UASF 'late2018' mandatory activation) and then make yet again half baked promises that they will remove the cludge and make it 1merkle full proper upgrade after that.. (no one believes them anymore)

a 1 merkle rewrite with the extra features the community want to unite the community. is safer AND FASTER to implement than the 2merkle cludge and all the threats half promises and features that wont 100% fix the network issues.. that blockstream are 'demanding get implemented or else'

Yea, the master troll in action again. So you saying the users/miners should be in control of the coding and developing? How fucked up would that be, if the users and miners were in control of programming the code. If I were getting paid to shill for Blockstream, I would probably not be able to afford a McDonald burger with my post history. ^LoL^

Whoever has the best code, will have the users/miners support, or that is the theory.... Lately the people with the most money to spam the network and to use backdoors seem to control the consensus. ^grrrrrr^

That is not their software.  That is Satoshi's software.  Their software is full of shit like SegWit and Lightning hooks.  Fuck them.  They are toxic and Gavin knew it all along but tried to be decent until it became impossible.

GMaxwell can just fuck right off.  It'd be even better if he managed to do it yesterday.



You see there!  Even the Blockstream shills admit that Blockstream is "in control"  I thought the distributed users/miners were in control?  Blockstream believes they are "in control".  This is the primary reason Blockstream is fucked up and people need to stand up and resist now.  Even if you just make one post, do fucking SOMETHING.  Sitting there like a lamb is the only thing that assures your slaughter.

Gavin had his chance to be a Lead Developer and then he could not handle it and left. Now he wants to throw stones at the people who are in control and he even tried to take them down with XT and that failed miserably. When that did not work, he teamed up with BU to try another angle and that is looking bad too. < poor coding and bad flaws >

So if you cannot beat them with your code, try attacking them personally. ^Ooooooo^

Gavin Andersen has zero reliability, don't forget that he was the guy who believed that Craig Wright is the person who invented Bitcoin.

Greg trolling one of his newest open source side projects on reddit or twitter.

The same toxic trolls have a $24B market running on their software and they definitely didn't kill our beloved Satoshi and burned his body in acid.

Seriously though all they want is the name brand of BTC otherwise they could've easily create a clone with another name and mining with the same ASICcough coughboost machines.
Why wont they do it already? if they are so good then I'm sure people will see and abandon bitcoin to join them.

Andresen is a CIA informant, Satoshi disappeared because of him.