GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 1078.

Paul Revere

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 260

The Scamcoats are coming!

Quote from: Crestington on March 29, 2015, 07:18:51 PM

I wonder how many real accounts are left on hashtalk since it's likely a good majority of them are fake accounts considering there is so much banning going on. My guess would be about 30 real people?

Sounds about right. But don't tell Mr. Coins that, he is still claiming "thousands of people" are active on HT.

TheMage

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000

Litecoin Association Director

Quote from: Paul Revere on March 29, 2015, 05:58:42 PM

The HT braintrust is at it again, this time with the brilliant idea of defacing Federal Reserve Notes with a Paycoin advertisement.

This is directly from the "Where's George?" Wiki, the same one that Wildfirebill quotes as saying his scheme of advertising Paycoin on Federal Reserve Notes is legal. In fact, it says the OPPOSITE. Typical dumb as fucking dirt HashTaker anti-logic at work.

But hey, who cares if the Secret Service says advertising on Federal Reserve Notes is illegal, right? I mean if this caused yet another branch of the government to start investigating Paycoin/GAW that would make Paycoin all that much more legit, according to the douchebags on HT, anyways. Roll Eyes

Specific law forbidding advertising on money:

Edit to add: And now this effing imbecile Wildfirebill is encouraging others to do the same in other countries, based of course on his"investigation" that he concluded said advertising on US currency is legal, when in fact it is not.

The pathetically stupid and blind leading the pathetically stupid and blind.

In all fairness, there has been a number of Bitcoiners as well doing the same thing Roll Eyes

Crestington

legendary

Activity: 882

Merit: 1024

I wonder how many real accounts are left on hashtalk since it's likely a good majority of them are fake accounts considering there is so much banning going on. My guess would be about 30 real people?

deep.throat

newbie

Activity: 31

Merit: 0

Quote from: CoinFire on March 29, 2015, 06:18:24 PM

Quote from: vObh0n]6W on March 29, 2015, 03:01:26 PM

Here's some proof that this was customers, at least partially. I followed the transaction Paul linked until it led to https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?474805.htm. That sends 3.21 XPY to PMinemanWoBbpPhxeoV7Zy8kND6nMZJMSR.htm. That struck me as a vanity address, so I googled it, and came across https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:10aSkaqC_JIJ:https://hashtalk.org/topic/31206/wallet-minting%3Fpage%3D1+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us. (https://archive.today/0FT9O in case it goes expires).

So this address was in someone's sig over a month ago. Does that qualify as an "average Joe" who got a withdrawal, or did I somehow make them up or something?

Also, they said they were manually confirming transactions. These could have been from the backlog.

But go on denying the evidence, it's cute.

We have concrete evidence Josh has been dumping coins from the US Government. Emails, transaction logs, forensic accountants etc.

It will be in a future report. His own words.

Yep. In his own words indeed.

bitpop

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1060

Got it lol, I was thinking silk road

torelle

newbie

Activity: 53

Merit: 0

Quote from: bitpop on March 29, 2015, 06:36:55 PM

Quote from: CoinFire on March 29, 2015, 06:18:24 PM

Quote from: vObh0n]6W on March 29, 2015, 03:01:26 PM

Here's some proof that this was customers, at least partially. I followed the transaction Paul linked until it led to https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?474805.htm. That sends 3.21 XPY to PMinemanWoBbpPhxeoV7Zy8kND6nMZJMSR.htm. That struck me as a vanity address, so I googled it, and came across https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:10aSkaqC_JIJ:https://hashtalk.org/topic/31206/wallet-minting%3Fpage%3D1+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us. (https://archive.today/0FT9O in case it goes expires).

So this address was in someone's sig over a month ago. Does that qualify as an "average Joe" who got a withdrawal, or did I somehow make them up or something?

Also, they said they were manually confirming transactions. These could have been from the backlog.

But go on denying the evidence, it's cute.

We have concrete evidence Josh has been dumping coins from the US Government. Emails, transaction logs, forensic accountants etc.

It will be in a future report. His own words.

Why did the government have paycoin?

Not sure if you were joking or not, but i'll clarify anyhow.

Coin Fire meant they have confirmation from the US government (SEC?) via transaction ids, personal emails etc, that definitively shows GAW dumping coins in exchanges.

CoinFire

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Online at CoinFire.io

Quote from: bitpop on March 29, 2015, 06:36:55 PM

Quote from: CoinFire on March 29, 2015, 06:18:24 PM

Quote from: vObh0n]6W on March 29, 2015, 03:01:26 PM

Here's some proof that this was customers, at least partially. I followed the transaction Paul linked until it led to https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?474805.htm. That sends 3.21 XPY to PMinemanWoBbpPhxeoV7Zy8kND6nMZJMSR.htm. That struck me as a vanity address, so I googled it, and came across https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:10aSkaqC_JIJ:https://hashtalk.org/topic/31206/wallet-minting%3Fpage%3D1+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us. (https://archive.today/0FT9O in case it goes expires).

So this address was in someone's sig over a month ago. Does that qualify as an "average Joe" who got a withdrawal, or did I somehow make them up or something?

Also, they said they were manually confirming transactions. These could have been from the backlog.

But go on denying the evidence, it's cute.

We have concrete evidence Josh has been dumping coins from the US Government. Emails, transaction logs, forensic accountants etc.

It will be in a future report. His own words.

Why did the government have paycoin?

As in the proof is from the US Government. Should have been separated. Via mobile so blah.

bitpop

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1060

Quote from: CoinFire on March 29, 2015, 06:18:24 PM

Quote from: vObh0n]6W on March 29, 2015, 03:01:26 PM

Here's some proof that this was customers, at least partially. I followed the transaction Paul linked until it led to https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?474805.htm. That sends 3.21 XPY to PMinemanWoBbpPhxeoV7Zy8kND6nMZJMSR.htm. That struck me as a vanity address, so I googled it, and came across https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:10aSkaqC_JIJ:https://hashtalk.org/topic/31206/wallet-minting%3Fpage%3D1+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us. (https://archive.today/0FT9O in case it goes expires).

So this address was in someone's sig over a month ago. Does that qualify as an "average Joe" who got a withdrawal, or did I somehow make them up or something?

Also, they said they were manually confirming transactions. These could have been from the backlog.

But go on denying the evidence, it's cute.

We have concrete evidence Josh has been dumping coins from the US Government. Emails, transaction logs, forensic accountants etc.

It will be in a future report. His own words.

Why did the government have paycoin?

Paul Revere

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 260

The Scamcoats are coming!

Quote from: CoinFire on March 29, 2015, 06:18:24 PM

We have concrete evidence Josh has been dumping coins from the US Government. Emails, transaction logs, forensic accountants etc.

It will be in a future report. His own words.

CoinFire

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Online at CoinFire.io

Quote from: vObh0n]6W on March 29, 2015, 03:01:26 PM

Here's some proof that this was customers, at least partially. I followed the transaction Paul linked until it led to https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?474805.htm. That sends 3.21 XPY to PMinemanWoBbpPhxeoV7Zy8kND6nMZJMSR.htm. That struck me as a vanity address, so I googled it, and came across https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:10aSkaqC_JIJ:https://hashtalk.org/topic/31206/wallet-minting%3Fpage%3D1+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us. (https://archive.today/0FT9O in case it goes expires).

So this address was in someone's sig over a month ago. Does that qualify as an "average Joe" who got a withdrawal, or did I somehow make them up or something?

Also, they said they were manually confirming transactions. These could have been from the backlog.

But go on denying the evidence, it's cute.

We have concrete evidence Josh has been dumping coins from the US Government. Emails, transaction logs, forensic accountants etc.

It will be in a future report. His own words.

bitpop

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1060

More proof centralization sucks, they'll go straight to Homero.

Paul Revere

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 260

The Scamcoats are coming!

The HT braintrust is at it again, this time with the brilliant idea of defacing Federal Reserve Notes with a Paycoin advertisement.

This is directly from the "Where's George?" Wiki, the same one that Wildfirebill quotes as saying his scheme of advertising Paycoin on Federal Reserve Notes is legal. In fact, it says the OPPOSITE. Typical dumb as fucking dirt HashTaker anti-logic at work.

But hey, who cares if the Secret Service says advertising on Federal Reserve Notes is illegal, right? I mean if this caused yet another branch of the government to start investigating Paycoin/GAW that would make Paycoin all that much more legit, according to the douchebags on HT, anyways. Roll Eyes

Specific law forbidding advertising on money:

Edit to add: And now this effing imbecile Wildfirebill is encouraging others to do the same in other countries, based of course on his"investigation" that he concluded said advertising on US currency is legal, when in fact it is not.

The pathetically stupid and blind leading the pathetically stupid and blind.

bitpop

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1060

Quote from: capsqrl on March 29, 2015, 05:24:55 AM

Quote from: m3 on March 29, 2015, 02:50:50 AM

I own btcfeed.net and after publishing articles about paycoin in the past we have been mysteriously hit with a DDOS attack shortly after. We decided to stop reporting about paycoin because we didnt want to loose traffic from the ddos that followed. I salute cryptocoinsnews for standing up against this scum and we will soon be publishing an additional report about gawceo and paycoin.

Are you serious? Just this Friday, one of your most prolific writers offered Garza to write a positive review of CoinStand on BTCFeed "to rebuild the trust".

Btcfeed and ccn take bribes, you can tell when Homero doesn't pay and they write negative articles.

Rebuild trust aka coinstand invite aka MacBook gift from Homero from Amazon aka bribe

Paul Revere

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 260

The Scamcoats are coming!

So, you mean that ~2,000,000+ XPY were not withdrawn by Paybase users since 3-27? But, but, ikeboy says that is what is going on, and he is known to be consistently right. Oh, wait a second, no he isn't. I figured that some HT user would come forward saying that some address was theirs, but ikeboy managed to spot one that is real and not just a shuffle or accumulator address. That leaves all of those that are connected to each other, which accounts for the vast majority of transactions going on. So the mix/shuffle> send to exchanges is being done right along side of the actual Paybase transactions from the same GAW wallets.

Crestington

legendary

Activity: 882

Merit: 1024

Quote from: vObh0n]6W on March 29, 2015, 03:51:11 PM

Quote from: Paul Revere on March 29, 2015, 03:34:09 PM

Quote from: vObh0n]6W on March 29, 2015, 03:28:25 PM

Quote from: Paul Revere on March 29, 2015, 03:23:05 PM

Quote from: vObh0n]6W on March 29, 2015, 03:13:01 PM

Quote from: Paul Revere on March 29, 2015, 03:08:37 PM

Quote from: vObh0n]6W on March 29, 2015, 03:01:26 PM

Here's some proof that this was customers, at least partially. I followed the transaction Paul linked until it led to https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?474805.htm. That sends 3.21 XPY to PMinemanWoBbpPhxeoV7Zy8kND6nMZJMSR.htm. That struck me as a vanity address, so I googled it, and came across https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:10aSkaqC_JIJ:https://hashtalk.org/topic/31206/wallet-minting%3Fpage%3D1+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us. (https://archive.today/0FT9O in case it goes expires).

So this address was in someone's sig over a month ago. Does that qualify as an "average Joe" who got a withdrawal, or did I somehow make them up or something?

Also, they said they were manually confirming transactions. These could have been from the backlog.

But go on denying the evidence, it's cute.

Good find, ikeboy. You have uncovered 1 transaction going to a real person , coming from the mixing groups. Well done. How does that change that the other 99.999% of transactions go to either exchanges or accumulator wallets? When you are done tracing all of those, then you can work on an explaination of how these mixing transactions kept occurring the whole time Paybase was locked up and people could not do transactions.

You said that zero transactions went to customers, I disproved that. Many addresses have been in use for months, but don't show up in google searches other than blockchain results. Those probably belong to individuals who didn't post it online. It's not possible to prove one way or another who such an address belongs to, and note that what I said above was that it's possible for it to be matching withdrawals, not that it was definite. They could be skimming off also.

And as for paybase being down, which I didn't test at the time, there could have been a backlog that was approved while it was down. Was it down during the entire range of transactions?

Incorrect, I said that of those that I personally checked I did not find any. Thank you for finding one. That does not change the fact that damn near all of them still go to accumulator addresses, and certainly does nothing to explain why all of these transactions continued even when Paybase was locked up and no one could do transactions. Please, continue.

And thank you for making sure this discussion of GAW / Josh Garza & Co. , continuing to dump massive amounts of Paycoin (XPY) into the markets every day. I am glad you are doing your part to make sure that any search of GAW, Paycoin Scam, XPY Scam, Josh Garza, Homero Garza, H. Josh Garza, scam, scammer, crpto scamme, fraud, etc. will direct here. Please continue!

You said you checked thousands. I checked much less than that and found two, so if you really checked thousands you should have found at least one.

And even many of the ones not tied to accounts were still used for a while. I'm not sure exactly what you mean by accumulator, but if it just means an address that never sent out coins, then it isn't true that most transactions went to one of those for the bunch I looked through.

And I did give an explanation for why there could be withdrawals when paybase was down.

You are quite welcome to believe what you like. I checked many , many addresses and all of them that I checked all lead back to accumulator addresses. Why exactly are you not posting any of those? And, for the record, your explanation of how Paybase transactions continue while no one has access to their accounts at the same rate as when Paybase was open is amusing and shows how desperate you are to try to make your scam dog hero Homero look like something other than the scam dog scammy scammer that he is. Please, continue.

And thank you for making sure this discussion of GAW / Josh Garza & Co. , continuing to dump massive amounts of Paycoin (XPY) into the markets every day. I am glad you are doing your part to make sure that any search of GAW, Paycoin Scam, XPY Scam, Josh Garza, Homero Garza, H. Josh Garza, scam, scammer, crpto scamme, fraud, etc. will direct here. Please continue!

The transaction you said you started from was https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?481633.htm. I went through the previous ten transactions and copied the address coins were sent to.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?481631.htm :PMtCumrpBRsGgoLfNggdWTjzVmVtiuz9UN
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?481629.htm :PB3UBQhoxKy9Sa913TgQr7zaGA3efHk5fQ
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?481626.htm :PMtCumrpBRsGgoLfNggdWTjzVmVtiuz9UN
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?481623.htm :PMtCumrpBRsGgoLfNggdWTjzVmVtiuz9UN
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?481620.htm :PSHjvTzm7jeLZwVcLC3D1jhMs4iE7SCDzS
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?481616.htm :PAB3LqnnZqqukEarqE7UAXmaDKaVBMiY28
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?481612.htm :P9Z7T5LLLJqxb13rUp83qy6AoyF1L7UDwY
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?481590.htm :PVVf3m3sSgX5r1Mc9uMJ2syJqQUZ6FK1nb
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?481569.htm :PRE3cnyuxFbQfye8Z1wwd3sduSQVVGVCy7
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?481555.htm :PCiWsrmRW49p67cBAKGzKpEPpyGPHYoKKG
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PMtCumrpBRsGgoLfNggdWTjzVmVtiuz9UN.htm has been in use a long time, and looks consistent with a private wallet.
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PB3UBQhoxKy9Sa913TgQr7zaGA3efHk5fQ.htm leads to https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PD8Bbe7hUYsEHrXAAjbrYpKk5QHmAFfuoE.htm, which has a bunch of tiny stakes, strongly suggestive of an individual. Gaw has no need to stake small amounts when they can prime stake.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PSHjvTzm7jeLZwVcLC3D1jhMs4iE7SCDzS.htm has been in use over a month.

PAB3LqnnZqqukEarqE7UAXmaDKaVBMiY28 has been in use over 3 months, and the staking pattern also suggests individual.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?P9Z7T5LLLJqxb13rUp83qy6AoyF1L7UDwY.htm is cryptsy, in use almost 3 months.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PVVf3m3sSgX5r1Mc9uMJ2syJqQUZ6FK1nb.htm has been in use a couple of weeks, and also has the tiny staking pattern.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PRE3cnyuxFbQfye8Z1wwd3sduSQVVGVCy7.htm has only two transactions, and at first glance looks mixing. It doesn't connect directly to any interesting addresses. Only one on the list that looks suspicious, and it's for 10 xpy.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PCiWsrmRW49p67cBAKGzKpEPpyGPHYoKKG.htm has the same staking pattern and has been around since last year.

I traced through several thousand transactions and can say that nearly all transactions are akin to a program being run by one computer. You stated that GAW wouldn't stake Coins if they have the prime controllers, this is false because if they only staked the prime controllers that all the Coins would compound indefinitely so the tiny Stakes are needed to keep the Blockchain moving. The pattern of the shuffle suggests that there are very few actual withdrawals and if withdrawals are happening then all the withdrawals could be released.

The actual amount of use of Coins on any Blockchain are very low to begin with, most everyone hold on to Coins and never trades them. An active Staking Coin with high inflation gets a high stake rate from it's userbase, one with less than 5%, people don't even bother because it's so low and just leaves it on exchanges. The amount of people moving Coins around to exchanges would be less than 500 XPY a day.

The pattern is shuffle, shuffle, shuffle, dance, dump, shuffle, shuffle, shuffle, dump, dance, shuffle, repeat

You gotta get the steps just right though

vObh0n]6W

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: Paul Revere on March 29, 2015, 04:06:32 PM

OK, finally traced that group all the way back to it's origin. It went in then out of this wallet
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PSBP8BgUUBUhmkrsBRAVy5FpQVy2B7ro9m.htm

and that transaction leads back to this transaction, where the source group of that 50,000 XPY was derived from a group of 71,014.729 XPY, with the remainder going to this address where they still are. You know, because someone happened to make a 21,014.729 XPY withdrawal into a brand new wallet, leaving EXACTLY 50,000 XPY in that group that went on the Paycoin Shuffle. What luck , huh?

And where did the 71,014.729 XPY come from? Why, the #1 wallet that had ~5,000,000 XPY in it recently (~3,800,000 now), of course. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PDzubEnhb45Gz8zBNq9zsPi9UohwzUhniP.htm

That's probably a gaw cold wallet. They split a wallet into 50,000 hot and the change cold, then used the hot one to disperse when needed.

Paul Revere

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 260

The Scamcoats are coming!

OK, finally traced that group all the way back to it's origin. It went in then out of this wallet
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PSBP8BgUUBUhmkrsBRAVy5FpQVy2B7ro9m.htm

and that transaction leads back to this transaction, where the source group of that 50,000 XPY was derived from a group of 71,014.729 XPY, with the remainder going to this address where they still are. You know, because someone happened to make a 21,014.729 XPY withdrawal into a brand new wallet, leaving EXACTLY 50,000 XPY in that group that went on the Paycoin Shuffle. What luck , huh?

And where did the 71,014.729 XPY come from? Why, the #1 wallet that had ~5,000,000 XPY in it recently (~3,800,000 now), of course. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PDzubEnhb45Gz8zBNq9zsPi9UohwzUhniP.htm

maildir

legendary

Activity: 924

Merit: 1060

Quote from: jdebunt on March 29, 2015, 03:58:08 PM

Quote from: maildir on March 29, 2015, 03:40:04 PM

Read more like you were trying to curry favor in order to get the "freebie". What more could you possibly have written that the first two shills didn't provide in excruciating detail? All of, signing up, browsing, selecting a product, pressing purchase, then two days later it arrives? What more precisely could you possibly add to that in order to make a story out of it all? You signed up 4 days before the invitations were to become available suggesting you really wanted to review the service in order to write about it, then ignored, then upon Homero's whining about the media, there you were again, in your what was it third only post to the forum, offering to heal the wounds between the media you could....just get in invite.

That's fine if you saw quick and easy opportunity to get that new laptop you've been wanting for so long, for nothing under the guise of writing about it. Another self-proclaimed "journalist" attempted the same thing bit did it all wrong; he wrote a bad article and back channeled that he'd remove it if he got an invite. You smartly offered to heal the wounds if you got one instead. Well done to you.

Have you ever written anything about them before?

One article about Paybase : http://digitalmoneytimes.com/crypto-news/how-paybase-approached-us-for-advertisement-space-the-insider-story/

There is a lot more about that process that could be covered in my opinion, but we won't know for sure until I actually get in.

Maybe it'll all turn out to be boring as hell, who knows? At least I tried to do something "different" from an unbiased perspective

EDIT : And one article on XPY being removed from Shapeshift ==> http://digitalmoneytimes.com/crypto-news/paycoin-xpy-officially-removed-from-shapeshiftio/

Then why don't you step up, knock on the front door, present your press credentials inform them you wish to write an article on their new service, instead of sitting on the forum like a lap dog wagging your tail waiting to be given a bone, meekly hinting about writing an article if you did get an invitation.

jdebunt

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1010

Quote from: maildir on March 29, 2015, 03:40:04 PM

Read more like you were trying to curry favor in order to get the "freebie". What more could you possibly have written that the first two shills didn't provide in excruciating detail? All of, signing up, browsing, selecting a product, pressing purchase, then two days later it arrives? What more precisely could you possibly add to that in order to make a story out of it all? You signed up 4 days before the invitations were to become available suggesting you really wanted to review the service in order to write about it, then ignored, then upon Homero's whining about the media, there you were again, in your what was it third only post to the forum, offering to heal the wounds between the media you could....just get in invite.

That's fine if you saw quick and easy opportunity to get that new laptop you've been wanting for so long, for nothing under the guise of writing about it. Another self-proclaimed "journalist" attempted the same thing bit did it all wrong; he wrote a bad article and back channeled that he'd remove it if he got an invite. You smartly offered to heal the wounds if you got one instead. Well done to you.

Have you ever written anything about them before?

One article about Paybase : http://digitalmoneytimes.com/crypto-news/how-paybase-approached-us-for-advertisement-space-the-insider-story/

There is a lot more about that process that could be covered in my opinion, but we won't know for sure until I actually get in.

Maybe it'll all turn out to be boring as hell, who knows? At least I tried to do something "different" from an unbiased perspective

EDIT : And one article on XPY being removed from Shapeshift ==> http://digitalmoneytimes.com/crypto-news/paycoin-xpy-officially-removed-from-shapeshiftio/

vObh0n]6W

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: Paul Revere on March 29, 2015, 03:34:09 PM

Quote from: vObh0n]6W on March 29, 2015, 03:28:25 PM

Quote from: Paul Revere on March 29, 2015, 03:23:05 PM

Quote from: vObh0n]6W on March 29, 2015, 03:13:01 PM

Quote from: Paul Revere on March 29, 2015, 03:08:37 PM

Quote from: vObh0n]6W on March 29, 2015, 03:01:26 PM

Here's some proof that this was customers, at least partially. I followed the transaction Paul linked until it led to https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?474805.htm. That sends 3.21 XPY to PMinemanWoBbpPhxeoV7Zy8kND6nMZJMSR.htm. That struck me as a vanity address, so I googled it, and came across https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:10aSkaqC_JIJ:https://hashtalk.org/topic/31206/wallet-minting%3Fpage%3D1+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us. (https://archive.today/0FT9O in case it goes expires).

So this address was in someone's sig over a month ago. Does that qualify as an "average Joe" who got a withdrawal, or did I somehow make them up or something?

Also, they said they were manually confirming transactions. These could have been from the backlog.

But go on denying the evidence, it's cute.

Good find, ikeboy. You have uncovered 1 transaction going to a real person , coming from the mixing groups. Well done. How does that change that the other 99.999% of transactions go to either exchanges or accumulator wallets? When you are done tracing all of those, then you can work on an explaination of how these mixing transactions kept occurring the whole time Paybase was locked up and people could not do transactions.

You said that zero transactions went to customers, I disproved that. Many addresses have been in use for months, but don't show up in google searches other than blockchain results. Those probably belong to individuals who didn't post it online. It's not possible to prove one way or another who such an address belongs to, and note that what I said above was that it's possible for it to be matching withdrawals, not that it was definite. They could be skimming off also.

And as for paybase being down, which I didn't test at the time, there could have been a backlog that was approved while it was down. Was it down during the entire range of transactions?

Incorrect, I said that of those that I personally checked I did not find any. Thank you for finding one. That does not change the fact that damn near all of them still go to accumulator addresses, and certainly does nothing to explain why all of these transactions continued even when Paybase was locked up and no one could do transactions. Please, continue.

And thank you for making sure this discussion of GAW / Josh Garza & Co. , continuing to dump massive amounts of Paycoin (XPY) into the markets every day. I am glad you are doing your part to make sure that any search of GAW, Paycoin Scam, XPY Scam, Josh Garza, Homero Garza, H. Josh Garza, scam, scammer, crpto scamme, fraud, etc. will direct here. Please continue!

You said you checked thousands. I checked much less than that and found two, so if you really checked thousands you should have found at least one.

And even many of the ones not tied to accounts were still used for a while. I'm not sure exactly what you mean by accumulator, but if it just means an address that never sent out coins, then it isn't true that most transactions went to one of those for the bunch I looked through.

And I did give an explanation for why there could be withdrawals when paybase was down.

You are quite welcome to believe what you like. I checked many , many addresses and all of them that I checked all lead back to accumulator addresses. Why exactly are you not posting any of those? And, for the record, your explanation of how Paybase transactions continue while no one has access to their accounts at the same rate as when Paybase was open is amusing and shows how desperate you are to try to make your scam dog hero Homero look like something other than the scam dog scammy scammer that he is. Please, continue.

And thank you for making sure this discussion of GAW / Josh Garza & Co. , continuing to dump massive amounts of Paycoin (XPY) into the markets every day. I am glad you are doing your part to make sure that any search of GAW, Paycoin Scam, XPY Scam, Josh Garza, Homero Garza, H. Josh Garza, scam, scammer, crpto scamme, fraud, etc. will direct here. Please continue!

The transaction you said you started from was https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?481633.htm. I went through the previous ten transactions and copied the address coins were sent to.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?481631.htm :PMtCumrpBRsGgoLfNggdWTjzVmVtiuz9UN
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?481629.htm :PB3UBQhoxKy9Sa913TgQr7zaGA3efHk5fQ
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?481626.htm :PMtCumrpBRsGgoLfNggdWTjzVmVtiuz9UN
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?481623.htm :PMtCumrpBRsGgoLfNggdWTjzVmVtiuz9UN
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?481620.htm :PSHjvTzm7jeLZwVcLC3D1jhMs4iE7SCDzS
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?481616.htm :PAB3LqnnZqqukEarqE7UAXmaDKaVBMiY28
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?481612.htm :P9Z7T5LLLJqxb13rUp83qy6AoyF1L7UDwY
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?481590.htm :PVVf3m3sSgX5r1Mc9uMJ2syJqQUZ6FK1nb
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?481569.htm :PRE3cnyuxFbQfye8Z1wwd3sduSQVVGVCy7
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?481555.htm :PCiWsrmRW49p67cBAKGzKpEPpyGPHYoKKG
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PMtCumrpBRsGgoLfNggdWTjzVmVtiuz9UN.htm has been in use a long time, and looks consistent with a private wallet.
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PB3UBQhoxKy9Sa913TgQr7zaGA3efHk5fQ.htm leads to https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PD8Bbe7hUYsEHrXAAjbrYpKk5QHmAFfuoE.htm, which has a bunch of tiny stakes, strongly suggestive of an individual. Gaw has no need to stake small amounts when they can prime stake.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PSHjvTzm7jeLZwVcLC3D1jhMs4iE7SCDzS.htm has been in use over a month.

PAB3LqnnZqqukEarqE7UAXmaDKaVBMiY28 has been in use over 3 months, and the staking pattern also suggests individual.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?P9Z7T5LLLJqxb13rUp83qy6AoyF1L7UDwY.htm is cryptsy, in use almost 3 months.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PVVf3m3sSgX5r1Mc9uMJ2syJqQUZ6FK1nb.htm has been in use a couple of weeks, and also has the tiny staking pattern.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PRE3cnyuxFbQfye8Z1wwd3sduSQVVGVCy7.htm has only two transactions, and at first glance looks mixing. It doesn't connect directly to any interesting addresses. Only one on the list that looks suspicious, and it's for 10 xpy.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PCiWsrmRW49p67cBAKGzKpEPpyGPHYoKKG.htm has the same staking pattern and has been around since last year.

Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 1078. (Read 3377945 times)