It seems like all of Vlad2Vlad's insane conclusions come from his answer to one difficult question:
Who is buying XPY?
V2V, for some unknown reason, assumes it's GAW or Garza or whomever, even though that makes absolutely zero sense.
However, it's a good question. For every sell, there's a buy. Who's buying? Who would want XPY? There can't be that many believers in that honor program (who also can't figure out how bad of a deal it is even if it does happen) to keep the price up above 50 cents for this long, can there?
I have been noodling on that question too. Here is a tinfoil hat answer (though I hate to fuel speculation on XPY, I do admit to buying some down at .0028 on this theory just in case my crazy theory is right ...):
Josh knows he is in a shitload of trouble. He has major investors who bought a coin at $2-4 which is now worth $0.80 USD. The CAF was clearly a fraud. Josh spent the millions he received on a jet, bodyguards, and god knows what else. The SEC is investigating. His "new" legal team has finally gotten it through to Josh that a revenue generating device based solely on the business activities of GAW/Paybase/etc. is a "security" and he can't sell that to raise new money... and lawsuits are sure to come. What to do?
One idea to "save" Josh might be letting XPY settle to a very low amount, and then buy up all of the XPY held by third parties on the market at the lowest possible price. Why? Because once a large enough percentage of the XPY in the wild is bought back (at a fraction of the original ICO price), Josh could have enough money to offer "rescission" to the remaining "faithful"... e.g., he could offer to REFUND anyone who purchased XPY from GAW, once he has gotten rid of the largest holders through buybacks on the market. This is much like what he did with Hashlets where he offered to refund hashlet purchases (less profits) after it became clear that Hashlets were a ponzi.
Just a crazy thought.