Keep it simple.
Why did you think anyone would pay $20 for a coin when you launched?
What are you doing to make paycoins worth $20 in the near future?
Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 1438. (Read 3377857 times)
February 07, 2015, 09:11:57 PM
February 07, 2015, 08:48:52 PM
I don't really understand what you mean by "a way to avoid a real discovery". How would this result in avoiding any real discovery? The responses, and all evidence, will be publicly available.
He doesn't have to answer any questions he doesn't want to. Legal will ask him to not answer 80%++ of the things you'll send his way.
In a real discovery, you have to answer questions that are asked.
To me, this sounds like a way to save on legal fees, have the community send you everything they think they may have.
uhh, dude, he has been given numerous platforms to do this... reddit ama, miami in person, even on his own forum with the "30 days of questions/answers" bullshit. why do you think he all of a sudden changed his tune?
don't you find it a little odd that the guy can't answer ANYTHING that isn't pre-screened? this is just another shining example. he does not do/answer anything that he cannot control.
don't you find it a little odd that the guy can't answer ANYTHING that isn't pre-screened? this is just another shining example. he does not do/answer anything that he cannot control.
True, he already has 28 more questions to answer, let him start there.
Hrmm, I see your point. Like I said, I don't really expect much out of this, but I was surprised when he actually agreed to my request for proof that the allegations against him were not true. Maybe I should just throw some of the questions that I personally have + the remaining AMA questions at him and see what response that garners.
Although a likely futile attempt to get a straight answer, I suggest asking him one simple question:
Mr. Garza, in (250) words or less, please explain how you plain on defending your admitted involvement in what can be easily classified as a classic cryptocurrency pump-and-dump scheme in addition to other ongoing conduct relating to the mishandling of verifiable securities in violation of sections 5(a), 5(c), 17(a), and 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 [15 U.S.C. §§ 77e(a), 77e(c), 77q(a) & 77q(b)], Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)], and Rule 10b-5 thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5]?
Sum it up with, "Again, please stay on topic, keep it (250) words or less and be specific. Thank you."
Scott-
Time for me to read a few sections of the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934
February 07, 2015, 08:36:46 PM
I don't really understand what you mean by "a way to avoid a real discovery". How would this result in avoiding any real discovery? The responses, and all evidence, will be publicly available.
He doesn't have to answer any questions he doesn't want to. Legal will ask him to not answer 80%++ of the things you'll send his way.
In a real discovery, you have to answer questions that are asked.
To me, this sounds like a way to save on legal fees, have the community send you everything they think they may have.
uhh, dude, he has been given numerous platforms to do this... reddit ama, miami in person, even on his own forum with the "30 days of questions/answers" bullshit. why do you think he all of a sudden changed his tune?
don't you find it a little odd that the guy can't answer ANYTHING that isn't pre-screened? this is just another shining example. he does not do/answer anything that he cannot control.
don't you find it a little odd that the guy can't answer ANYTHING that isn't pre-screened? this is just another shining example. he does not do/answer anything that he cannot control.
True, he already has 28 more questions to answer, let him start there.
Hrmm, I see your point. Like I said, I don't really expect much out of this, but I was surprised when he actually agreed to my request for proof that the allegations against him were not true. Maybe I should just throw some of the questions that I personally have + the remaining AMA questions at him and see what response that garners.
Although a likely futile attempt to get a straight answer, I suggest asking him one simple question:
Mr. Garza, in (250) words or less, please explain how you plain on defending your admitted involvement in what can be easily classified as a classic cryptocurrency pump-and-dump scheme in addition to other ongoing conduct relating to the mishandling of verifiable securities in violation of sections 5(a), 5(c), 17(a), and 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 [15 U.S.C. §§ 77e(a), 77e(c), 77q(a) & 77q(b)], Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)], and Rule 10b-5 thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5]?
Sum it up with, "Again, please stay on topic, keep it (250) words or less and be specific. Thank you."
Scott-
"I'm sorry, I didn't understand the question, and my lawyers are no longer on talking terms with me. Could you ask something
Josh-
February 07, 2015, 08:31:43 PM
I don't really understand what you mean by "a way to avoid a real discovery". How would this result in avoiding any real discovery? The responses, and all evidence, will be publicly available.
He doesn't have to answer any questions he doesn't want to. Legal will ask him to not answer 80%++ of the things you'll send his way.
In a real discovery, you have to answer questions that are asked.
To me, this sounds like a way to save on legal fees, have the community send you everything they think they may have.
uhh, dude, he has been given numerous platforms to do this... reddit ama, miami in person, even on his own forum with the "30 days of questions/answers" bullshit. why do you think he all of a sudden changed his tune?
don't you find it a little odd that the guy can't answer ANYTHING that isn't pre-screened? this is just another shining example. he does not do/answer anything that he cannot control.
don't you find it a little odd that the guy can't answer ANYTHING that isn't pre-screened? this is just another shining example. he does not do/answer anything that he cannot control.
True, he already has 28 more questions to answer, let him start there.
Hrmm, I see your point. Like I said, I don't really expect much out of this, but I was surprised when he actually agreed to my request for proof that the allegations against him were not true. Maybe I should just throw some of the questions that I personally have + the remaining AMA questions at him and see what response that garners.
Although a likely futile attempt to get a straight answer, I suggest asking him one simple question:
Mr. Garza, in (250) words or less, please explain how you plain on defending your admitted involvement in what can be easily classified as a classic cryptocurrency pump-and-dump scheme in addition to other ongoing conduct relating to the mishandling of verifiable securities in violation of sections 5(a), 5(c), 17(a), and 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 [15 U.S.C. §§ 77e(a), 77e(c), 77q(a) & 77q(b)], Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)], and Rule 10b-5 thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5].
Sum it up with, "Again, please stay on topic, keep it (250) words or less and be specific. Thank you."
Scott-
February 07, 2015, 08:03:39 PM
He wants to rehearse and refine his answers that the SEC will be asking by this endeavor. Everyone throw every question they have at him, he'll craft his lie replies, guage how they go over, refine them for the next round.
Been going around in circles with this mutt for months now with the same MO each and every time. Don't give him a platform is what you should be doing i.e. instead of clicks and earning your keep, focus on shutting him down. You will get more accolades for that than this.
Been going around in circles with this mutt for months now with the same MO each and every time. Don't give him a platform is what you should be doing i.e. instead of clicks and earning your keep, focus on shutting him down. You will get more accolades for that than this.
That's what I've been sayin'.
February 07, 2015, 08:00:45 PM
If anyone has legitimate questions they would like to ask Josh Garza, go here and fill out the form: http://coinbrief.net/questions-for-gaw-crowdsourced/
Please make sure that the questions you are sending are legitimate...as in, there is evidence to show that something GAW has said was wrong, there are documents / images that have not been addressed, etc.
Josh reached out to me after our last article, and when I asked if he would be willing to answer questions, and provide evidence to back it up, he agreed. So, I'm crowdsourcing it.
Please make sure that the questions you are sending are legitimate...as in, there is evidence to show that something GAW has said was wrong, there are documents / images that have not been addressed, etc.
Josh reached out to me after our last article, and when I asked if he would be willing to answer questions, and provide evidence to back it up, he agreed. So, I'm crowdsourcing it.
It seems like every other week Josh asks for a list of questions so that he can research (most likely pay others to research) plausible answers to them. It has gotten old. Seriously, stop asking for this list every other week.
Basically, you're trying to find out what illegal activities that Josh and his team have committed that people have real documentation on...I say, you wait until court and you'll find out.
February 07, 2015, 07:58:54 PM
Dear Mr Gansa,
Y u heft 2 sell so many png.
Thats my questions please submit it thanks.
Y u heft 2 sell so many png.
Thats my questions please submit it thanks.
February 07, 2015, 07:39:45 PM
I don't really understand what you mean by "a way to avoid a real discovery". How would this result in avoiding any real discovery? The responses, and all evidence, will be publicly available.
He doesn't have to answer any questions he doesn't want to. Legal will ask him to not answer 80%++ of the things you'll send his way.
In a real discovery, you have to answer questions that are asked.
To me, this sounds like a way to save on legal fees, have the community send you everything they think they may have.
uhh, dude, he has been given numerous platforms to do this... reddit ama, miami in person, even on his own forum with the "30 days of questions/answers" bullshit. why do you think he all of a sudden changed his tune?
don't you find it a little odd that the guy can't answer ANYTHING that isn't pre-screened? this is just another shining example. he does not do/answer anything that he cannot control.
don't you find it a little odd that the guy can't answer ANYTHING that isn't pre-screened? this is just another shining example. he does not do/answer anything that he cannot control.
True, he already has 28 more questions to answer, let him start there.
Hrmm, I see your point. Like I said, I don't really expect much out of this, but I was surprised when he actually agreed to my request for proof that the allegations against him were not true. Maybe I should just throw some of the questions that I personally have + the remaining AMA questions at him and see what response that garners.
February 07, 2015, 07:31:26 PM
I don't really understand what you mean by "a way to avoid a real discovery". How would this result in avoiding any real discovery? The responses, and all evidence, will be publicly available.
He doesn't have to answer any questions he doesn't want to. Legal will ask him to not answer 80%++ of the things you'll send his way.
In a real discovery, you have to answer questions that are asked.
To me, this sounds like a way to save on legal fees, have the community send you everything they think they may have.
uhh, dude, he has been given numerous platforms to do this... reddit ama, miami in person, even on his own forum with the "30 days of questions/answers" bullshit. why do you think he all of a sudden changed his tune?
don't you find it a little odd that the guy can't answer ANYTHING that isn't pre-screened? this is just another shining example. he does not do/answer anything that he cannot control.
don't you find it a little odd that the guy can't answer ANYTHING that isn't pre-screened? this is just another shining example. he does not do/answer anything that he cannot control.
True, he already has 28 more questions to answer, let him start there.
February 07, 2015, 07:29:05 PM
He wants to rehearse and refine his answers that the SEC will be asking by this endeavor. Everyone throw every question they have at him, he'll craft his lie replies, guage how they go over, refine them for the next round.
Been going around in circles with this mutt for months now with the same MO each and every time. Don't give him a platform is what you should be doing i.e. instead of clicks and earning your keep, focus on shutting him down. You will get more accolades for that than this.
Been going around in circles with this mutt for months now with the same MO each and every time. Don't give him a platform is what you should be doing i.e. instead of clicks and earning your keep, focus on shutting him down. You will get more accolades for that than this.
February 07, 2015, 07:27:48 PM
If anyone has legitimate questions they would like to ask Josh Garza, go here and fill out the form: http://coinbrief.net/questions-for-gaw-crowdsourced/
Please make sure that the questions you are sending are legitimate...as in, there is evidence to show that something GAW has said was wrong, there are documents / images that have not been addressed, etc.
Josh reached out to me after our last article, and when I asked if he would be willing to answer questions, and provide evidence to back it up, he agreed. So, I'm crowdsourcing it.
Please make sure that the questions you are sending are legitimate...as in, there is evidence to show that something GAW has said was wrong, there are documents / images that have not been addressed, etc.
Josh reached out to me after our last article, and when I asked if he would be willing to answer questions, and provide evidence to back it up, he agreed. So, I'm crowdsourcing it.
uhh, dude, he has been given numerous platforms to do this... reddit ama, miami in person, even on his own forum with the "30 days of questions/answers" bullshit. why do you think he all of a sudden changed his tune?
don't you find it a little odd that the guy can't answer ANYTHING that isn't pre-screened? this is just another shining example. he does not do/answer anything that he cannot control.
February 07, 2015, 07:19:40 PM
Surely you jest?
What an utter waste of time. What, something like this "hey josh why do you lie so much" 'no I don't".
Good god man.
Ask Josh the pathological liar con-man questions in written form.
Like his debate with theMage.
Stupid and pointless exercise.
You weren't expecting him to tell the truth this time were you? Just because he "approached" you.
What an utter waste of time. What, something like this "hey josh why do you lie so much" 'no I don't".
Good god man.
Ask Josh the pathological liar con-man questions in written form.
Like his debate with theMage.
Stupid and pointless exercise.
You weren't expecting him to tell the truth this time were you? Just because he "approached" you.
Honestly, I don't expect anything. Still, to be fair, I offered him a chance to answer questions with PROOF. If the questions are returned with a bunch of BS, and nothing solid, then I don't expect anyone here would be surprised.
That said, if he can truly disprove any of the accusations, then it is only fair to give them that chance. The confusion, and uncertainty surrounding GAW helps nothing. If this clears up even a small portion of that, then great.
If anyone has legitimate questions they would like to ask Josh Garza, go here and fill out the form: http://coinbrief.net/questions-for-gaw-crowdsourced/
Please make sure that the questions you are sending are legitimate...as in, there is evidence to show that something GAW has said was wrong, there are documents / images that have not been addressed, etc.
Josh reached out to me after our last article, and when I asked if he would be willing to answer questions, and provide evidence to back it up, he agreed. So, I'm crowdsourcing it.
Please make sure that the questions you are sending are legitimate...as in, there is evidence to show that something GAW has said was wrong, there are documents / images that have not been addressed, etc.
Josh reached out to me after our last article, and when I asked if he would be willing to answer questions, and provide evidence to back it up, he agreed. So, I'm crowdsourcing it.
Sounds more like a fishing expedition for evidence, a one way discovery.
I would prefer this to be shared in a real "legal discovery", at least then there will be an obligation to share... what you're suggesting now is nothing more than a way to avoid a "real discovery" in my opinion.
I don't really understand what you mean by "a way to avoid a real discovery". How would this result in avoiding any real discovery? The responses, and all evidence, will be publicly available.
February 07, 2015, 07:18:51 PM
Where is the physical Zen Miner office located (Not the location of the mining Farm)? Did they move into GAW offices in CT? Anybody know?
I don't think it ever moved from Texas.
http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=270219788
February 07, 2015, 07:10:45 PM
If anyone has legitimate questions they would like to ask Josh Garza, go here and fill out the form: http://coinbrief.net/questions-for-gaw-crowdsourced/
Please make sure that the questions you are sending are legitimate...as in, there is evidence to show that something GAW has said was wrong, there are documents / images that have not been addressed, etc.
Josh reached out to me after our last article, and when I asked if he would be willing to answer questions, and provide evidence to back it up, he agreed. So, I'm crowdsourcing it.
Please make sure that the questions you are sending are legitimate...as in, there is evidence to show that something GAW has said was wrong, there are documents / images that have not been addressed, etc.
Josh reached out to me after our last article, and when I asked if he would be willing to answer questions, and provide evidence to back it up, he agreed. So, I'm crowdsourcing it.
Sounds more like a fishing expedition for evidence, a one way discovery.
I would prefer this to be shared in a real "legal discovery process", at least then there will be an obligation to share... what you're suggesting now is nothing more than a way to avoid a "real discovery" in my opinion.
February 07, 2015, 07:09:20 PM
Surely you jest?
What an utter waste of time. What, something like this "hey josh why do you lie so much" 'no I don't".
Good god man.
Ask Josh the pathological liar con-man questions in written form.
Like his debate with theMage.
Stupid and pointless exercise.
You weren't expecting him to tell the truth this time were you? Just because he "approached" you.
What an utter waste of time. What, something like this "hey josh why do you lie so much" 'no I don't".
Good god man.
Ask Josh the pathological liar con-man questions in written form.
Like his debate with theMage.
Stupid and pointless exercise.
You weren't expecting him to tell the truth this time were you? Just because he "approached" you.
February 07, 2015, 07:02:45 PM
If anyone has legitimate questions they would like to ask Josh Garza, go here and fill out the form: http://coinbrief.net/questions-for-gaw-crowdsourced/
Please make sure that the questions you are sending are legitimate...as in, there is evidence to show that something GAW has said was wrong, there are documents / images that have not been addressed, etc.
Josh reached out to me after our last article, and when I asked if he would be willing to answer questions, and provide evidence to back it up, he agreed. So, I'm crowdsourcing it.
Please make sure that the questions you are sending are legitimate...as in, there is evidence to show that something GAW has said was wrong, there are documents / images that have not been addressed, etc.
Josh reached out to me after our last article, and when I asked if he would be willing to answer questions, and provide evidence to back it up, he agreed. So, I'm crowdsourcing it.
February 07, 2015, 05:35:35 PM
Where is the physical Zen Miner office located (Not the location of the mining Farm)? Did they move into GAW offices in CT? Anybody know?
February 07, 2015, 03:58:22 PM
how about this moron putting his wife in a video for an illegal online poker site that he's running in the states?
https://hashtalk.org/topic/31345/check-out-the-new-paycoin-poker-girl/
be more stupid, you can't.
https://hashtalk.org/topic/31345/check-out-the-new-paycoin-poker-girl/
be more stupid, you can't.
tsk tsk gambling with your crypto... degenerates
The Winning Poker Network which US players can join now accepts Bitcoin as a payment and withdrawal option now.
February 07, 2015, 03:55:59 PM
how about this moron putting his wife in a video for an illegal online poker site that he's running in the states?
https://hashtalk.org/topic/31345/check-out-the-new-paycoin-poker-girl/
be more stupid, you can't.
https://hashtalk.org/topic/31345/check-out-the-new-paycoin-poker-girl/
be more stupid, you can't.
tsk tsk gambling with your crypto... degenerates
February 07, 2015, 03:40:22 PM
how about this moron putting his wife in a video for an illegal online poker site that he's running in the states?
https://hashtalk.org/topic/31345/check-out-the-new-paycoin-poker-girl/
be more stupid, you can't.
https://hashtalk.org/topic/31345/check-out-the-new-paycoin-poker-girl/
be more stupid, you can't.
You could ask him why he's such an idiot.
https://plus.google.com/104151562454230178735/about
https://www.facebook.com/teddydowding
Jump to: