Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 149. (Read 3377790 times)

wiki doesnt list names of people accused of crimes unless they are public figures

TBH that's a bit too much Homero, could be someone trolling.

a "sease and disist!" - confirmed homero

Homero's having an aneurysm.

Remember homero's meeting room picture with the big table? Can you imagine listening to that moron in a meeting briefing people on blockchain tech and giving the we can do it we rock speeches? i'd love to have been there to hear some of them. I bet most of his employees were like wtf is this guy going on about but who cares we'll all be rich!!!

(cur | prev) 09:54, 27 August 2016‎ DatGuy (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (41,306 bytes) (+979)‎ . . (Reverted 1 edit by Cryptoedge identified as test/vandalism using STiki) (undo)
(cur | prev) 05:47, 27 August 2016‎ Cryptoedge (talk | contribs)‎ . . (40,327 bytes) (-979)‎ . . (Undid revision 736389161 by 83.170.104.98 (talk)) (undo)
(cur | prev) 04:35, 27 August 2016‎ 83.170.104.98 (talk)‎ . . (41,306 bytes) (+979)‎ . . (Undid revision 736381299 by Cryptoedge (talk)) (undo)
(cur | prev) 02:48, 27 August 2016‎ Cryptoedge (talk | contribs)‎ . . (40,327 bytes) (-979)‎ . . (Undid revision 736353986 by David Gerard (talk)) (undo)
(cur | prev) 22:30, 26 August 2016‎ Penbat (talk | contribs)‎ . . (41,306 bytes) (-20)‎ . . (→‎List of cryptocurrencies) (undo)
(cur | prev) 22:13, 26 August 2016‎ David Gerard (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (41,326 bytes) (+979)‎ . . (Reverted edits by Cryptoedge (talk) to last version by 172.56.28.169) (undo)
(cur | prev) 20:13, 26 August 2016‎ Cryptoedge (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (40,347 bytes) (-979)‎ . . (Bad Faith, Edit being manipulated. Reference: bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=857670.msg16046092#msg16046092) (undo)
(cur | prev) 14:02, 26 August 2016‎ 172.56.28.169 (talk)‎ . . (41,326 bytes) (+527)‎ . . (Added Cryptsy / Paul Vernon class action lawsuit) (undo)
(cur | prev) 09:29, 26 August 2016‎ David Gerard (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (40,799 bytes) (+979)‎ . . (Reverted edits by Cryptoedge (talk) to last version by David Gerard) (undo)
(cur | prev) 02:43, 26 August 2016‎ Cryptoedge (talk | contribs)‎ . . (39,820 bytes) (-979)‎ . . (Undid revision 736222578 by David Gerard (talk)) (undo)

User talk:Cryptoedge
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
August 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Cryptocurrency. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 06:10, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm DatGuy. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cryptocurrency have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Dat GuyTalkContribs 09:54, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

yep, the 9/11 scam should be highlighted. not the worst they did, but this will stick with the public

this is too funny. as usual, homero has no idea how wiki works.

looks like a wiki mod has warned cryptoedge on their talk page as they are just removing that bit constantly. Anyone that have an account care to revert cryptoedges removal and see how they play their warning out? As usual gawd homero will ignore it and remove it because he isn't a scammer right?

--EDIT--

Datguy looks to be using stiki now to flag the article and auto revert vandalism from cryptoedge so i think his reign is over. Datguy seems to be a user that goes around wikipedia against vandalism attacks on pages and does general maintenance.

yep, the 9/11 scam should be highlighted. not the worst they did, but this will stick with the public

If you really want to make progress, be sure to mention the 9/11 hashlet scam when talking to these people. cantor fitzgerald is going to be talking a lot about 9/11 in the upcoming days, I'm sure they have plenty to say about all the money raised for 9/11 by Stuart Fraser's GAW company.

If you really want to make progress, be sure to mention the 9/11 hashlet scam when talking to these people. cantor fitzgerald is going to be talking a lot about 9/11 in the upcoming days, I'm sure they have plenty to say about all the money raised for 9/11 by Stuart Fraser's GAW company.

You make a good point, but I didn't say "pedophile," you did.   

Clearly, Stu's "relationship" with Homoero was inappropriate, at best.

That's what got him so deep into trouble!