Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 1574. (Read 3377857 times)

No. Your a fucking moron, and i'm sorry you got so butthurt over xpy, but your now on ignore, you moronic freak.

Edit - delete your moronic posts already, your clogging our thread.

That Jeff Favelle75 becomes more irritating as he ages. He used to slither around here but it certainly is clear now he is constricted by his all in, investment in playcoins.

Didn't take long for the op to get shadow banned!  

So where is Joe and Eric?

Archive

That proxy warning is temporary. If you still cannot see it through the url, nothing I can do.

It is not my image or upload. It is the image in suchmoon's post.

Why don't you simply read his post as instructed instead of arguing.

try it as a url instead of embed:

https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi.snag.gy%2Fzw7nS.jpg&t=548&c=KfYO4bvsm48-KQ

It is the screen cap in suchmoon's referenced post. The screen shot of the kid facing the twitter account where it says you deleted it you can renew it in 30 days. Something like that. Check the link above it to suchmoon's post.

https://archive.today/prkyI

How accurate is this?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10240164

Is it confirmed that only the account holder inside would see this message? Because the poster "Bl4nk" left her foot prints all over the place

1. here she's talking about her loan

https://archive.today/OEzW7

2. her loan leads to account:

https://btcjam.com/listings/28493-4

In Serbia which corresponds with the good English but missed word on one of the tweets they did.

Somewhere in the btc jam muck is their real name.

However the easy route is the individual who was in on the caper who snickered at the time it was taking place that someone must have gone into the registrar. Those .ca domains are as weak as they come no real privacy policy hiding behind godaddy in Canada.

You can see through the ordeal the script kiddie received instructions to try to turn it around and say it is a marketing scam by coinfire themselves. When you go from all caps and swearing (immature) to clever(er) instructions like that, someone is behind it and one can only guess who.





The real joke is on Homero who as expected is dead silent. This is all just up his alley. But now if "the community" he keeps trying to leverage for his ill gotten gains, didn't like or mind him before, now they really hate him.

Homero is an anus. Hes thinking movies and RL by tweeting going to or love Tesla, thinks he is creating an alibi that he is out of town, and when this shit hit the fan, he is out of state. That's what that was in his mind. Dumb dumb doesn't get it were in the ether and that idea is inapplicable.

the tips looks like they been up someones anus and mayber the leak leaked lol

I'm too lazy at the moment to look it up.  Who are you quoting and was that from here or hashtalk?

For what it is, it's still very expensive.

I'm not bagholder, just interest about gaw since they launch hastaker then after analyze, it was a garbage for me. But I want to take my chance since xyp so cheap now.

We've passed along any information that might be relevant to law enforcement and we are trying to put everything in one place for ICANN complaint and complaint to registrar.

He did.

From his reddit post: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2tgefn/official_coin_fire_response_and_discussion_for/

We use 2FA on everything but our domain registration and Twitter account. We didn't use it with our registrar because they don't offer 2FA, but it was our fault for not using 2FA on Twitter. We should have enabled it and I take full responsibility for that.

They do not offer 2FA or we would have enabled it.

That's right, only someone with intimate knowledge would have made that comment at the time it took place. I was there and recorded inside of 10 minutes of it happening:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10239236

As soon as that kid stated that, the site had a mismatched ssl cert., html was gone but it still said coinfire in the body. I took a look at the whois and recorded it at that time as you see.

Nothing between a mismatched ssl cert and broken text at that exact time, would warrant someone guessing and then stating:


At that specific time.

As you see even hours afterwards people at first and still think it is due to the domain having expired and being scooped up and re-registered. This would be the normal immediate thought.

Except one person at the time it took place, "guessed" exactly what did actually transpire.

I believe he mentioned on his reddit post (I linked to it a bit ago?) that this particular registrar did not offer it. Sorry but it's late here and i can't go back and re-read it atm.

Do registrars implement 2FA, if not why not you think?

The domain was NOT set to expire until 05/15/15. This was not the case of an expired domain name.

We hope to have proof of this from our registrar in the near future.