Someone tell that Redacted douche-bag that NOTHING was verified by the Wall Street Journal. A WSJ blogger does NOT equal the WSJ.
He's either illiterate about mining or just plain out lying to the forum audience. How is disclosing a mining address a risk of hacking?
Besides the WSJ verified address is almost certainly known already (1P62VZZ9kL97dzzcWhG7JZDssaW2MDgn82), it's the actual address for newly generated coins that is not known.
I can answer your address question from Josh's previous answers to this same question - no you may not see them.
The Wall Street Journal did a third party verification of their wallet addresses and balances. This is as good as it is ever likely going to be, and if I had hundreds of millions of dollars invested in a project, I'm certainly not going to hang a "hack here" sign out on where it's being kept.
And this "staff" dude... wow.
maursader
maursader
Admin
GAW Staff
Industry Innovator
Account is newly made, through a proxy. Someone's trying to hide something, OP?
That's what you would call FUD I guess
https://archive.today/l0WtF