Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 2335. (Read 3377922 times)

Thanks for the explanation, was wondering what the 2 addresses paying to 1 address were for. I was looking at other addresses that signed up on the same day and tried to follow payments to their addresses 1 month later (give or take a couple of days), didn't find much of the same payment addresses, maybe some didn't complete the sig. Will look more into this when I have some time to play (not that I will find anything but hope to learn more about how blockchain/payments work).

Thanks again for the lesson, it was a valuable one for me

i stand corrected and retract my previous query.

on another note every crypto page i go to has those damn hashstaker ads on it. When is the digital penicillin coming?

It's real. See the top of coindesk.com front page.

Not really. It's not a mixer, at least the first few transactions leading to that address are not mixing anything, it's actually the "correct" way of doing BTC transactions - you transfer some amount to another address and the change goes to a new address. Then you use that change to transfer to another address and the change goes to a new address etc. That's why you see two transactions per address and then it's abandoned. But you can track it back to some "big" addresses if you follow the sig campaign payments - those are nice round amounts like 0.1 or 0.05.

For example this is where the last sig payment seems to have originated from:

https://blockchain.info/address/3MTdedCnsAaZSvRDPJSMbMPzFmq6v3SSZh

It might be coming from a coin mixer at that point, I don't know. Don't expect it to be easy. I don't think they used a single hot wallet for everything.

Edit: actually it's right there, linked to the 1P62 address:

https://blockchain.info/tx/cc09f4f88ddc34afa3f0a82860d764d140a30be077c32cfb4f619a8b709bf576

So it looks to be linked to the sig campaign. Is that what you were trying to find?

isnt it fake?

coindesk.com is real
coinde.sk appears not

I cant believe his campaigning for votes on this coindesk thing.

Yea that happens a lot on here but I forgive you for your comment. If you wish something bad to happen to him its your feelings/thoughts.

Just joking HAHA. I understood exactly what you were saying, it seems the highly educated ones took it to left field, hit the goal post and tried to score a home run.

P.S.
Don't let forums get 2 u, its not good.

Was that part the joke?

Seems like it also goes into the mixer, different addresses for each payment, 2 transactions on most addresses, etc. Will look more into it.

Just for the record: I nor anyone that I could find or read, suggested in anyway they wish anything bad physically against Josh. I just read through the last 8 pages or so, and a few are implying that some are wishing ill upon him? I never said that or suggested that either. In my above post I simply was making a point of everything about paycoin is centered on Josh's vision only it seems, and "WHAT IF" something bad were to happen to him like I mentioned, as purely example only, geez! Someone else took out of context what I maybe wrote and turned it into something else perhaps? IDK.

I used that as an example as for the same reasons the president and vice president or big corporate co-owners don't fly in the same planes, and that is to insure continuity in case a plane went down.... man people can be pinheads in these threads... read my whole post and you will see there is NO malice intent there upon Josh, God bless him I hope he succeeds. But I was implying what if? and who or what would become of paycoin, gaw and the whole shebang? lol and mostly all the people who have spent millions on his fantasy.

Someone mentioned the elders didn't take their meds lol, I may be getting old and a seasoned miner who started on slush's pool, but I would never ever "wish" anything bad like that on anyone (not that I consider myself an elder, yet)  

ok, just wanted to be clear to those who were implying some were wishing bad things on him.. not accurate at all. At least not from this guy 

Thank you,
MMNC

Thanks much!!

Podunk Used Car Dealership quantity.

If you look close enough there is the service manager with his permanent wry smile, over there the cheery ladies scurrying around doing their dutiful duties (must admit one of them strikes a remarkable resemblance to Star Gazer)

That goofball in the middle with that retarded permanent grin on his face, the owner perhaps?

The rest who knows    suckers, saps, family, friends ?

Luckily we have our dear puppet Slark as a reference point:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7740744

You can probably figure it out from there.

No, but if my employer was surrounded by so much controversy I'd know I was working for scumbags. Oh I meant I knew I was working for dirtbags

You might have something here, @panda btc address is linked to this. Is panda a shill account, reseller?
I know evilpanda from here is a shill, maybe the same person?
Does anybody have addresses from evilpanda' payouts?

I don't see this community as a problem, only 2-3 people with abnormal levels of hate unable to control their language.

Don't underestimate the power of the "IGNORE" button to make the threads less offensive and tiresome to read.

This is taking it too far! Guilty by association and group guilt is Nazi mentality.
When a coder is hired at GAW, do you think Josh sits down with him and explains his secret plans? Or is the guy looking for a job obliged to do detective work on his employer?

i love that picture. can you change it though to have a hashstaker or paycoin on the end of the fishing line. cause those are what they are chasing atm

That's a bit of info I'd like to have, just how many people work for GAW? How many people do you need to maintain a 28PH data center any?way

NO NO anything but that. Don't fret. I PM'd the offender and he has now earned his IGNORE badge.

That's the absolute last thing I want to do. Not because it's too hard to click a delete button, but because it would cast a shadow on the whole discussion.

We are certainly capable of having that discussion without supervision, but for some reason we sometimes tend to turn that ability off. Let's try harder.