GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 2343.

bitcoinnoisseur

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

Quote from: blacklizard on December 01, 2014, 10:59:05 PM

Thanks for sharing the link to my facebook profile. I had that for many years and it's reputation speaks for itself.

Have a nice days and keep trolling. Grin

You're an asshole and now we all know your name. So thank you. Sure seems like you're trolling here on high alert. That only took you seconds.

mullvads

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: blacklizard on December 01, 2014, 10:59:05 PM

Thanks for sharing the link to my facebook profile. I had that for many years and it's reputation speaks for itself.

Have a nice days and keep trolling. Grin

http://gawful.org

blacklizard

full member

Activity: 139

Merit: 103

Thanks for sharing the link to my facebook profile. I had that for many years and it's reputation speaks for itself.

Have a nice day and keep trolling. Grin

bitcoinnoisseur

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

I think someone said they thought they knew who that asshole cyberlizard was on HT. Or maybe they just said he was an asshole. lol. I agree as I had many back and forths with him when i had accounts there.

Here he is Andy Roehrl:

https://www.facebook.com/andyroehrl?fref=nf

Snipe85

sr. member

Activity: 756

Merit: 250

Infleum

Quote from: T0urist on December 01, 2014, 10:12:38 PM

Quote from: Phildo on December 01, 2014, 09:20:17 PM

It appears that coinfire is (or is attempting to be) actual journalists.

Them standing up for themselves will be a lesson for GAW and everyone else in the Streisand Effect

Good the picture is on record so no denying it wasnt received. Maybe josh's spam filter caught the original emails

.

Can coinfire counter sue on bully tactics ? Would be great to get coinfire to fund a transparent investigation with donations to get the truth. Would boost their journalism exposure too. heck id donate!

They are already gaining much on that hack FUD. Right after it happened they sent someone to sperad the word on reddit that "GAW hacked Coinfire". Now whatever they write will be welcomed with open arms by the anti corporate community.

T0urist

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: Phildo on December 01, 2014, 09:20:17 PM

It appears that coinfire is (or is attempting to be) actual journalists.

Them standing up for themselves will be a lesson for GAW and everyone else in the Streisand Effect

Good the picture is on record so no denying it wasnt received. Maybe josh's spam filter caught the original emails

.

Can coinfire counter sue on bully tactics ? Would be great to get coinfire to fund a transparent investigation with donations to get the truth. Would boost their journalism exposure too. heck id donate!

mullvads

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

http://gawful.org

KC6TTR

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 259

Quote from: zerocoder on December 01, 2014, 07:39:01 PM

...but I am sure @KC6TTR will help us to find out. I also wanna learn the truth and asking those firm to sue him immediately, if any of those claims are not real

Also will sue that 3rd party, if they are writing lies about that company as well.

Bring it on.

Scott-

KC6TTR

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 259

Quote from: bitcoinnoisseur on December 01, 2014, 09:09:52 PM

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2nz8yi/coin_fire_response_to_gaw_miners_cd/

Official response from Coin Fire regarding the GAW Miners cease and desist letter.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/248840123/Coin-Fire-Response-to-GAW-Miners-C-D

Excellent reply and more detailed than required. Needless to say, that attorney, who is the same guy that contact me, will not be on my Christmas card list this year.

Scott-

Phildo

legendary

Activity: 1526

Merit: 1000

It appears that coinfire is (or is attempting to be) actual journalists.

Them standing up for themselves will be a lesson for GAW and everyone else in the Streisand Effect

bitcoinnoisseur

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2nz8yi/coin_fire_response_to_gaw_miners_cd/

Official response from Coin Fire regarding the GAW Miners cease and desist letter.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/248840123/Coin-Fire-Response-to-GAW-Miners-C-D

T0urist

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: suchmoon on December 01, 2014, 08:16:58 PM

Quote from: zerocoder on December 01, 2014, 07:17:40 PM

Quote from: KC6TTR on December 01, 2014, 07:06:26 PM

Please register to hashtalk and share your findings with customers. Now, Ceo promise there is no risk for ban under https://hashtalk.org/topic/20855/wall-street-journal-validation topic so we can also see what action will be taken after your post

Don't get too carried away. He only removed the downvote button. Nothing was said about shadow bans (not mentioned in the WSJ blog either) and regular bans. This is a nice gesture but it won't magically make Hashtalk welcoming to critical thinking.

The topic is locked so you couldnt post even if you wanted to

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

So the article was picked apart already, not much to criticize there anymore. Let me reflect on the positive side.

It looks like GAW is concerned about criticism enough so that they made a somewhat half-assed attempt to "prove" themselves. I still don't understand why they needed to throw out an obviously bogus 28k BTC claim and how exactly WSJ verified that "flow", it would have been so much more believable with 5-10k BTC. So this shows a couple of things: 1) slightly less arrogance and slightly more listening; 2) this is a far as it goes and certain lines probably won't ever be crossed - e.g. publicly displaying those addresses and/or proving mining back to August. I think overall this is positive, as it establishes more clearly where GAW stands in the debate.

Let's also not forget that all this will fade into the background as "staking" becomes their main business. That thing has more red flags than a PLA parade and is even less comprehensible to any "media outlet".

zerocoder

full member

Activity: 252

Merit: 100

Quote from: suchmoon on December 01, 2014, 08:33:01 PM

No, the downvote button is removed everywhere, not just that one thread. I doubt anything else has changed but if someone wants to prove it by asking the CEO if he has had 35 PH/s of SHA256 for the last two months - please go ahead.

I hope that company lives couple more months so I can double my investment, already make a ROI so not my problem if they close it as well

After that time, I really do not care and yes, I also feel sorry for that 15 years old boy, but this not my problem this is his/her family problem. I am moving on and of course I won't ask any question related to real hash power (I never asked that question to Hashie, Chabatmining, Ltcgear, Cointellect and Hashprofit as well so why I am going to ask that to Josh right now. I don't care, maybe he is doing fractional mining. Up until he pays no problem for me)

Thanks for chit chat and valuable advice , I own you, In January will be in Oregon probably start my own mining farm from garage (I don't trust anybody, have to see miners). Take care yourself

bitcoinnoisseur

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

https://hashtalk.org/topic/20822/how-are-you-explaining-paycoin-to-the-people-you-know

This is hilarious. I so want to listen to these fools explain something that doesn't exist and changes on a day to day basis.And this is just classic:

tankjnr
GAW Founder
Paycoin Origin

I dont know many people, the ones i know are here.
Other friends just laugh at me.
Im happy.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: zerocoder on December 01, 2014, 08:21:26 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on December 01, 2014, 08:16:58 PM

Don't get too carried away. He only removed the downvote button. Nothing was said about shadow bans (not mentioned in the WSJ blog either) and regular bans. This is a nice gesture but it won't magically make Hashtalk welcoming to critical thinking.

They are removed for only that topic not for the whole hashtalk, I just asking you to state your opinions under that topic. If they ban you, that will show how they are keeping their promises right.

No, the downvote button is removed everywhere, not just that one thread. I doubt anything else has changed but if someone wants to prove it by asking the CEO if he has had 35 PH/s of SHA256 for the last two months - please go ahead.

zerocoder

full member

Activity: 252

Merit: 100

Quote from: suchmoon on December 01, 2014, 08:16:58 PM

Don't get too carried away. He only removed the downvote button. Nothing was said about shadow bans (not mentioned in the WSJ blog either) and regular bans. This is a nice gesture but it won't magically make Hashtalk welcoming to critical thinking.

They are removed for only that topic not for the whole hashtalk, I just asking you to state your opinions under that topic. If they ban you, that will show how they are keeping their promises right. Whatsoever, maybe that's just a time lost for you and you are right. Time for me to return back my job.

deeneendo

full member

Activity: 155

Merit: 104

people go on insisting that GAW is an elaborate scam. Could be, but I don't think so.

that doesn't mean it's not a botched up business plan in the process of failing though...

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: zerocoder on December 01, 2014, 07:17:40 PM

Quote from: KC6TTR on December 01, 2014, 07:06:26 PM

Please register to hashtalk and share your findings with customers. Now, Ceo promise there is no risk for ban under https://hashtalk.org/topic/20855/wall-street-journal-validation topic so we can also see what action will be taken after your post

Don't get too carried away. He only removed the downvote button. Nothing was said about shadow bans (not mentioned in the WSJ blog either) and regular bans. This is a nice gesture but it won't magically make Hashtalk welcoming to critical thinking.

T0urist

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote

Mr. Garza said GAW follows meticulous compliance and record-keeping to ensure it can’t be charged by the Securities and Exchange Commission with selling unregistered securities. “If one cent of our payout (to customers) comes from anything other than mining, it is a security,” he said.

Didnt GAW in the past say zen pool is a combination of mining/investing and other secret sauce stuff. If its pure mining as he states above how is zen pool the most profitable? He'd have to have major hash power dominating block solves. maybe > 51%?

Does nobody else see the flaw in his on the record quoted comment or did the wsj blog misquote him yet again?

Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 2343. (Read 3377790 times)