PayCoin is a confirmed fraudulent ponzi. Current victims are trying to promote it in hopes they can exit. GAW is trying to con people interested in Bitcoin by selling them fake PayCoins. They announced several interviews, however they were all just paid PR articles. PayCoin is selling at $4 and promising $20 value. This is called securities fraud. Stuart Fraser , Vice Chairman and Partner, Cantor Fitzgerald is not involved. They are trying to fake involvement of many companies and individuals such as Stuart Fraser, Amazon, Walmart, Target and PayPal. If you are interested in Bitcoin, get it from a reputable source such as Coinbase or Circle. Do not fall victim to Bitcoin clones.
See, statements like this make me realize I might wanna stay into paycoin and feel there is those threatened by paycoin.
This is flat out lie at this point. Nothing has been proven, your misdirecting people. I thought this thread was about getting at the truth of what's going on? Apparently don't realize how serious USA law is about ponzi. If it is a ponzi Josh will be caught.
I think what we have in this thread is bitcoin investors or bagholders threatened by the new kid on the block.
I don't think people are threatened... people are concerned and raising the questions. They aren't being answered... everything is being redirected. Honestly consider this, dogecoin and litecoin exist and they are traded and have large enough followings. Why aren't the people here threatened by either? Its well known the community expects there to be multiple cryptos existing. Just because a community is against something doesn't mean it fears being taken over by it. Paycoin isn't proven so on the same lines we could state Paycoin investors are scared they won't overtake bitcoin so attack the others as FUD spreaders.
By people questioning and investigating this thats when ponzi's are proven. If nobody questions or challenges then a ponzi continues right? if its not challenged its not proven and nobody is held accountable and goes to jail.
Don't you think the following is a little strange though? Please comment on all these points.
1. Wall Street Journal, CNN and Forbes interviews NEVER eventuated. The WSJ thing was a paid advertisement put on multiple blogs etc. Josh stated the interviews were done. If WSJ, Forbes and CNN take the time to interview you they don't not publish it. Waiting for a slot when they need space isn't very convincing for a new revolution cryptocurrency. Isn't it strange they haven't been posted? Cmon pick a date that you would suggest they should be published by... i'm not talking a paid article i'm talking a full interview posted on each of those. I think 6 weeks would be fair and if it doesn't come by then red flag.
2. The paybase, paycoin developers. They haven't been named. GAW has apparently purchased companies to make it all happen. When apple and facebook etc buy companies they announce it because it adds faith to the companies direction. Facebook bought occulus rift and announced it. Why not name your developers? Or the companies bought? Cmon they aren't going to be targets of the mafia etc. What reason is there to hide them? If there is one then apple, facebook and google are putting their developers at risk and only GAW is smart enough not to do it right? There is no proof that paycoin exists at present or ever will. A paybase screenshot does not suffice... you could build a site that looks like that with icons etc. At present hashpoints, paybase etc are just static images / text on a page. There is absolutely no substance behind them other than a trust us. If developers were identified i'm sure there would be a dev blog explaining their current progress. Again lets name a date.... what should be the date for paycoin existing and used. If its delayed 2 months after a detailed roadmap is released should the faith keep going strong or should we start to question it?
3. No proof of mining. Pictures of a datacenter don't cut it. I can rent my friends mansion sit in the chair and have a video run showing i'm in the house... doesn't mean its mine. What possible problem could there be to change the wallet address for a week and have the proceeds from the mining pools directed there. After thats done MOVE the funds change the wallet back. The public can see that from the address owned by the pool that amount of BTC was received. I don't understand the risk here. It doesn't interfere with the virtual miners because they AREN'T physically mining as stated by josh... they point at the most profitable pools for them.
4. Target, Amazon, Wallmart. The posts were there... now they are gone. Why would you remove the posts after slipping it out then deny it was ever said? If he was that strict with his NDA's which he falls back on then he never would of said it in the first place. There is no google trend data on paycoin, hashcoin, hashpoints etc.... The information slipped out and was retracted i believe to simply build hype and reinforce financial security to the members on hashtalk.