XPY is very cheap right now. I bye more Pacyoin!! XPY.io 2 is much innovativ Plattform!!
Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 236. (Read 3377790 times)
January 30, 2016, 08:57:30 AM
January 29, 2016, 05:43:37 PM
I wonder if Homero is still making payments on Fraser's Tesla.
Remember that video clip where Homero is gifting the car to Uncle Stu with the "Garza" plates still attached? LMFAO. If anybody can dig that clip out it would be great.
January 29, 2016, 02:27:45 AM
so that means cuntor stugerald is invovled too?
Damage limitation.
They get to keep tabs on exactly what Garza is saying, or not saying, regarding the likelihood of being able to spin the crimes as unintentional business errors and dodge the law entirely or, if the shit is really hitting the fan hard and Cantor looks like it could be exposed for any wrongdoing, to instruct their lawyers to throw Homero, Carlos and anybody else non-Cantor under the bus.
Homero probably thinks he's managed to scam himself some free lawyering. He's too busy patting himself on the back for being so clever that he can't see that his legal team are there for Cantor, not him.
January 29, 2016, 01:05:19 AM
Yeah as if this illiterate junior high school drop out out of the bush in Vermont flipped through his Rolodex and came up with this law firm 
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/876378/000129993315000278/htm_51334.htm
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/876378/000129993315000278/htm_51334.htm
Quote
5.1 Opinion of Ballard Spahr LLP
10.1 Controlled Equity OfferingSM Sales Agreement by and between TransEnterix, Inc. and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. dated February 20, 2015.
10.1 Controlled Equity OfferingSM Sales Agreement by and between TransEnterix, Inc. and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. dated February 20, 2015.
so that means cuntor stugerald is invovled too?
January 28, 2016, 07:27:14 PM
Tito's still very scared the SEC is coming for him:
Hey Carlos Tito Rudolpho: You're doing it wrong!
Use a selfie stick, Dude!
January 28, 2016, 02:13:17 PM
Tito's still very scared the SEC is coming for him:
January 28, 2016, 01:14:12 PM
I wonder if Homero is still making payments on Fraser's Tesla.
January 28, 2016, 10:36:04 AM
"........wheels in the sky keep on turnin........".......... (are the only words i know to that idiotic song ,so nm if the rest dont apply)
January 28, 2016, 09:54:00 AM
Yeah as if this illiterate junior high school drop out out of the bush in Vermont flipped through his Rolodex and came up with this law firm
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/876378/000129993315000278/htm_51334.htm
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/876378/000129993315000278/htm_51334.htm
Quote
5.1 Opinion of Ballard Spahr LLP
10.1 Controlled Equity OfferingSM Sales Agreement by and between TransEnterix, Inc. and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. dated February 20, 2015.
10.1 Controlled Equity OfferingSM Sales Agreement by and between TransEnterix, Inc. and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. dated February 20, 2015.
January 28, 2016, 09:12:34 AM
Bit of activity with our Hero Homero:
Not clear to me what any of it means, quick checking suggests as follows:
Wild guess based on Homero's past legal expertise being to simply ignore the big bad boogeyman in the hopes it goes away?
Did he stick his fingers in his ears and whimper under his covers 'la lalalala la la la lala ....please go away...please go away'
New lawyer / law firm:
http://www.ballardspahr.com/people/attorneys/grudberg-michael.aspx
Nope same law firm new or different lawyer.
http://www.ballardspahr.com/people/attorneys/peerce-marjorie.aspx
Probably got sick of trying to untangle his bullshit weave and foisted him off onto ole Michael there...
Quote
Wednesday, January 27, 2016
13 order Order on Motion for Default Entry 55(a) Wed 3:06 PM
ORDER granting10 Motion for Default Entry 55(a) Motion for default judgment due by 2/26/2016. A Motion for Default Judgment pursuant to FRCP 55(b) shall be filed or this action will be dismissed by the Clerk pursuant to FRCP 41(a).. Signed by Clerk on 1/27/2016. (Oliver, T.)
12 motion Extension of Time Wed 11:56 AM
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until March 2, 2016 to Answer1 Complaint by Homero Joshua Garza. (Grudberg, Michael)
11 notice Notice of Appearance Wed 11:44 AM
NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Grudberg on behalf of Homero Joshua Garza (Grudberg, Michael)
13 order Order on Motion for Default Entry 55(a) Wed 3:06 PM
ORDER granting10 Motion for Default Entry 55(a) Motion for default judgment due by 2/26/2016. A Motion for Default Judgment pursuant to FRCP 55(b) shall be filed or this action will be dismissed by the Clerk pursuant to FRCP 41(a).. Signed by Clerk on 1/27/2016. (Oliver, T.)
12 motion Extension of Time Wed 11:56 AM
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until March 2, 2016 to Answer1 Complaint by Homero Joshua Garza. (Grudberg, Michael)
11 notice Notice of Appearance Wed 11:44 AM
NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Grudberg on behalf of Homero Joshua Garza (Grudberg, Michael)
Not clear to me what any of it means, quick checking suggests as follows:
Quote
Civil Procedure Rule 55: Default
(a) Entry. When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by these rules and that fact is made to appear by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk shall enter his default.
(a) Entry. When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by these rules and that fact is made to appear by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk shall enter his default.
Wild guess based on Homero's past legal expertise being to simply ignore the big bad boogeyman in the hopes it goes away?
Quote
has failed to plead or otherwise defend
Did he stick his fingers in his ears and whimper under his covers 'la lalalala la la la lala ....please go away...please go away'
New lawyer / law firm:
http://www.ballardspahr.com/people/attorneys/grudberg-michael.aspx
Nope same law firm new or different lawyer.
http://www.ballardspahr.com/people/attorneys/peerce-marjorie.aspx
Probably got sick of trying to untangle his bullshit weave and foisted him off onto ole Michael there...
January 27, 2016, 06:29:32 PM
Maybe if you get used to come over, you'll get used how to answer to questions instead of answering without to answer. I lost again my free time in reading links that you posted.You were asked there so many times about exact number on miners, .... . I could not really see answers to these questions. Can you explain again what was going on with your team/s and who is doing what?
I agree to the statement that it looks pretty incompetent what happens there, do you agree?
I agree to the statement that it looks pretty incompetent what happens there, do you agree?
The exact number of miners fluctuates as we sell S5s and purchase S7s.
A list of S7s to date were given in the thread and = 33 either onsite, shipped from bitmain, or waiting to be shipped. More are ordered ever few days.
The total S5 count changes daily since we are actively selling them, which is why we focus more on the total hashrate which was stated to be running around 300 TH. I do not understand how that does not answer the question? We are low on hashrate to the expected 385 TH because of the way we are upgrading the hardware. There is no mystery there
As for the team, we decided to continue waiting on posting information until the transition of a core team member is complete.
One of these guys, no doubt:
January 27, 2016, 12:47:44 PM
Maybe if you get used to come over, you'll get used how to answer to questions instead of answering without to answer. I lost again my free time in reading links that you posted.You were asked there so many times about exact number on miners, .... . I could not really see answers to these questions. Can you explain again what was going on with your team/s and who is doing what?
I agree to the statement that it looks pretty incompetent what happens there, do you agree?
I agree to the statement that it looks pretty incompetent what happens there, do you agree?
The exact number of miners fluctuates as we sell S5s and purchase S7s.
A list of S7s to date were given in the thread and = 33 either onsite, shipped from bitmain, or waiting to be shipped. More are ordered ever few days.
The total S5 count changes daily since we are actively selling them, which is why we focus more on the total hashrate which was stated to be running around 300 TH. I do not understand how that does not answer the question? We are low on hashrate to the expected 385 TH because of the way we are upgrading the hardware. There is no mystery there
As for the team, we decided to continue waiting on posting information until the transition of a core team member is complete.
One of these guys, no doubt:
January 27, 2016, 07:44:03 AM
Maybe if you get used to come over, you'll get used how to answer to questions instead of answering without to answer. I lost again my free time in reading links that you posted.You were asked there so many times about exact number on miners, .... . I could not really see answers to these questions. Can you explain again what was going on with your team/s and who is doing what?
I agree to the statement that it looks pretty incompetent what happens there, do you agree?
I agree to the statement that it looks pretty incompetent what happens there, do you agree?
The exact number of miners fluctuates as we sell S5s and purchase S7s.
A list of S7s to date were given in the thread and = 33 either onsite, shipped from bitmain, or waiting to be shipped. More are ordered ever few days.
The total S5 count changes daily since we are actively selling them, which is why we focus more on the total hashrate which was stated to be running around 300 TH. I do not understand how that does not answer the question? We are low on hashrate to the expected 385 TH because of the way we are upgrading the hardware. There is no mystery there
As for the team, we decided to continue waiting on posting information until the transition of a core team member is complete.
January 27, 2016, 04:46:34 AM
Well you might have another bunch to harass I suggest that people look at the GHX asset. It seems to now be losing money however if you look at the Nice Hash payout they should be in profit, so either incompetence or not the hashing power they state.
This was already explained. We are currently low on hashrate due to a combination of dead units and selling S5s to then turn around and buy S7s to stay relevant.....
https://forum.gethashing.com/t/ghcoin-payouts-discussion-thread/1165/2731?u=thepeddler
Also I'm not sure if folks can see the farm stats with the below link, but if you can you will see we are around 300 TH at the moment (and also fixed an API issue to antpool yesterday which is why the graphs were flatlined for awhile......)
You obviously did not actually look at the actual nicehash payout, but instead estimated based on 385TH to come to your conclusion. The info on updating the farm has been known for awhile and is all in the linked thread somewhere.
https://cloud.gethashing.com/?_=#ghfarm
-Edit-
Please don't judge based on my post count.
I rarely come to play over here.
Maybe if you get used to come over, you'll get used how to answer to questions instead of answering without to answer. I lost again my free time in reading links that you posted. You were asked there so many times about exact number on miners, .... . I could not really see answers to these questions. Can you explain again what was going on with your team/s and who is doing what?
I agree to the statement that it looks pretty incompetent what happens there, do you agree?
Sound like Garza much: https://forum.gethashing.com/t/who-has-or-is-coming-close-to-roi-through-ghx/6098
Negative payouts?!? You guys rock! I've never seen someone praise for not getting paid. I must be in the wrong business.
Remember when Garza made that thread asking all the sock puppets who reached ROI already then proceeded to brag about it?
I do enjoy answer that are links to other forums instead of answering the question where you are asked (as I have a post to another forum in my response...). It seems to be the crypto way. Lulz
stop fudding. if you don't sell you don't lose a dime. jesus
January 27, 2016, 04:41:21 AM
wpstudio loves free money though
January 27, 2016, 04:28:39 AM
Well you might have another bunch to harass I suggest that people look at the GHX asset. It seems to now be losing money however if you look at the Nice Hash payout they should be in profit, so either incompetence or not the hashing power they state.
This was already explained. We are currently low on hashrate due to a combination of dead units and selling S5s to then turn around and buy S7s to stay relevant.....
https://forum.gethashing.com/t/ghcoin-payouts-discussion-thread/1165/2731?u=thepeddler
Also I'm not sure if folks can see the farm stats with the below link, but if you can you will see we are around 300 TH at the moment (and also fixed an API issue to antpool yesterday which is why the graphs were flatlined for awhile......)
You obviously did not actually look at the actual nicehash payout, but instead estimated based on 385TH to come to your conclusion. The info on updating the farm has been known for awhile and is all in the linked thread somewhere.
https://cloud.gethashing.com/?_=#ghfarm
-Edit-
Please don't judge based on my post count.
I rarely come to play over here.
Maybe if you get used to come over, you'll get used how to answer to questions instead of answering without to answer. I lost again my free time in reading links that you posted. You were asked there so many times about exact number on miners, .... . I could not really see answers to these questions. Can you explain again what was going on with your team/s and who is doing what?
I agree to the statement that it looks pretty incompetent what happens there, do you agree?
Sound like Garza much: https://forum.gethashing.com/t/who-has-or-is-coming-close-to-roi-through-ghx/6098
Negative payouts?!? You guys rock! I've never seen someone praise for not getting paid. I must be in the wrong business.
Remember when Garza made that thread asking all the sock puppets who reached ROI already then proceeded to brag about it?
I do enjoy answer that are links to other forums instead of answering the question where you are asked (as I have a post to another forum in my response...). It seems to be the crypto way. Lulz
January 27, 2016, 02:33:53 AM
This thread has slowed down a bit. If you're looking for a new puzzle, I believe I've found Satoshi's hacker. Check out my previous two posts on this forum, I'm interested in your feedback.
January 26, 2016, 05:41:12 PM
Well you might have another bunch to harass I suggest that people look at the GHX asset. It seems to now be losing money however if you look at the Nice Hash payout they should be in profit, so either incompetence or not the hashing power they state.
This was already explained. We are currently low on hashrate due to a combination of dead units and selling S5s to then turn around and buy S7s to stay relevant.....
https://forum.gethashing.com/t/ghcoin-payouts-discussion-thread/1165/2731?u=thepeddler
Also I'm not sure if folks can see the farm stats with the below link, but if you can you will see we are around 300 TH at the moment (and also fixed an API issue to antpool yesterday which is why the graphs were flatlined for awhile......)
You obviously did not actually look at the actual nicehash payout, but instead estimated based on 385TH to come to your conclusion. The info on updating the farm has been known for awhile and is all in the linked thread somewhere.
https://cloud.gethashing.com/?_=#ghfarm
-Edit-
Please don't judge based on my post count.
I rarely come to play over here.
Maybe if you get used to come over, you'll get used how to answer to questions instead of answering without to answer. I lost again my free time in reading links that you posted. You were asked there so many times about exact number on miners, .... . I could not really see answers to these questions. Can you explain again what was going on with your team/s and who is doing what?
I agree to the statement that it looks pretty incompetent what happens there, do you agree?
January 26, 2016, 09:59:04 AM
Well you might have another bunch to harass I suggest that people look at the GHX asset. It seems to now be losing money however if you look at the Nice Hash payout they should be in profit, so either incompetence or not the hashing power they state.
This was already explained. We are currently low on hashrate due to a combination of dead units and selling S5s to then turn around and buy S7s to stay relevant.....
https://forum.gethashing.com/t/ghcoin-payouts-discussion-thread/1165/2731?u=thepeddler
Also I'm not sure if folks can see the farm stats with the below link, but if you can you will see we are around 300 TH at the moment (and also fixed an API issue to antpool yesterday which is why the graphs were flatlined for awhile......)
You obviously did not actually look at the actual nicehash payout, but instead estimated based on 385TH to come to your conclusion. The info on updating the farm has been known for awhile and is all in the linked thread somewhere.
https://cloud.gethashing.com/?_=#ghfarm
-Edit-
Please don't judge based on my post count.
I rarely come to play over here.
January 26, 2016, 09:49:43 AM
My bad... thought I hit edit and I hit delete.
No... GHX isn't going down the tube. Come join us on the forums and you'll see what we're doing.
No... GHX isn't going down the tube. Come join us on the forums and you'll see what we're doing.
Jump to: