Time for those of us who were attacked and received one or more GAW directed C&D letter(s) for initiating the numerous red flag raisings in 2014/2015 to have a pleasant get-together. The first round is on me..."and you can quote me on that."
My now framed cease and desist commutation dated November 10th , 2014. =>
http://sgb-e.com/gaw/cd.pdfScott-
Scott,
Do you have any grounds to attack back at the law firms sending the cease and desists as they are false cease and desists?
I really wish that attorneys had to have evidence that their client is telling them truthful facts when dispatching these such stupid notices?
I'd love for someone to email that solicitor office with the following.
Re: Cease and Desist
We the people ask that you cease and desist sending false cease and desists. We the people and any court of law would know that the wild claims by a past client of yours (see GAW) for profits are in no way possible. Your blind representation of such a known scam has caused irreversible and long standing damage to the cryptocurrency community as a whole. Please immediately cease all such activities of representation unless you have hard facts and background proof of such claims on citizens before irresponsibly accepting monetary funds to send careless letters.
If nothing else filing a complaint with the bar association might cause the layers some issues if not getting them disbarred.
One problem I see is that cease and desist letters are not from what google tells me legally binding documents that require a response or action you can bin them and laugh at will.. they also don't have to be signed by a lawyer they can be sent by the law firm on behalf of the client. So from what I gather they are a pretty much free form of harassment for law firms it only costs them the price of an email or letter and they bill their client to send it. Personally I think on this basis they can mass send them and its no wonder fox studios (here comes my c&d letter) use them so much.
Honestly its a form of bullying whether they are right or wrong they'll still send them. If you cased someones house and each day followed them verbally saying stop it stop it stop it or we'll send someone to get you, then you'd be up on charges.
I think at the least law firms need to have some sort of accountability to who they represent. You shouldn't be representing people you don't believe to be innocent that's just defending the wrong... its different if they tell you they are innocent and they aren't but cmon surely these so called smart lawyer individuals aren't so dense they can't see the obvious ones right? If they are guilty as sin their extent of action should be to reduce the sentence and not get them out of a sentence full stop.
Have we got any law students here? I'd be interested to know if there are avenues to pursue to attack a firm back for cease and desist letters once proven that you were speaking the truth? Isn't their cease and desist letter when wrong technically libel? Its a written form attacking you saying you a telling lies? SO... ?