Author

Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 571. (Read 3377922 times)

sr. member
Activity: 323
Merit: 250
Looks like our internet detectives are back in full force with the launch of BTC.com.

Here is what you need to know :

1) Garza/GAW have lost the BTC.Com domain a while ago, it is being held in Escrow and the Bitcoinist owners are "renting" the domain name for three years, in order to turn it into a digital currency hub.

2) Of course Garza won't distance himself from anything that might give him a shred of credibility these days. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to figure that out. He cannot be trusted, ever.

3) BTC.com has nothing to do with GAW, Garza, paycoin or any of their other shill operations.



Sometimes you guys make me wonder where you get all the information from, instead of engaging in a dialog with the people directly. Posting crap on this forum isn't going to get you one step closer to the truth unless some of the people involved in the operation (in my case, as a content creator) happen to stumble upon it.
Didn't Garza buy Bitcoinist from Tokay/hire Tokay?
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1254
Thread-puller extraordinaire
Looks like our internet detectives are back in full force with the launch of BTC.com.

3) BTC.com has nothing to do with GAW, Garza, paycoin or any of their other shill operations.

Sometimes you guys make me wonder where you get all the information from, instead of engaging in a dialog with the people directly. Posting crap on this forum isn't going to get you one step closer to the truth unless some of the people involved in the operation (in my case, as a content creator) happen to stumble upon it.

Wow, you call yourself a journalist, a 'content creator'?

Yet all this post is doing is complaining about the truth being exposed?

Why? Why would you bother making a post which clearly shows you to be either ridiculously uninformed or attempting to protect the ongoing schemes and scams?

donator
Activity: 686
Merit: 519
It's for the children!
donator
Activity: 686
Merit: 519
It's for the children!
1) Garza/GAW have lost the BTC.Com domain a while ago, it is being held in Escrow and the Bitcoinist owners are "renting" the domain name for three years, in order to turn it into a digital currency hub.

http://bitcoinist.net/million-dollar-bitcoin-domain-name-btc-com-launches-bitcoin-digital-currency-industry-portal/
3) BTC.com has nothing to do with GAW, Garza, paycoin or any of their other shill operations.

http://bitcoinist.net/million-dollar-bitcoin-domain-name-btc-com-launches-bitcoin-digital-currency-industry-portal/
Quote
The right wording is:
The BTC.com domain was acquired By GAW Miners, LLC, However Bitcoinist LTD signed a private, long-term lease agreement until 2018.03.11. The licensee is Bitcoinist LTD and the licensor is GAW Miners LLC. Bitcoinsit is a Private Limited Company registered in ENGLAND ( Company Number: 09048848 ) HOVA HOUSE 1 HOVA VILLAS, BRIGHTON & HOVE, BN3 3DH But has its Headquarters in Budapest, Hungary!
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 509
Looks like our internet detectives are back in full force with the launch of BTC.com.

Here is what you need to know :

1) Garza/GAW have lost the BTC.Com domain a while ago, it is being held in Escrow and the Bitcoinist owners are "renting" the domain name for three years, in order to turn it into a digital currency hub.

2) Of course Garza won't distance himself from anything that might give him a shred of credibility these days. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to figure that out. He cannot be trusted, ever.

3) BTC.com has nothing to do with GAW, Garza, paycoin or any of their other shill operations.



Sometimes you guys make me wonder where you get all the information from, instead of engaging in a dialog with the people directly. Posting crap on this forum isn't going to get you one step closer to the truth unless some of the people involved in the operation (in my case, as a content creator) happen to stumble upon it.

Let me guess, Garza/Bitconist told you this so its 110% guaranteed factual?
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1010
Looks like our internet detectives are back in full force with the launch of BTC.com.

Here is what you need to know :

1) Garza/GAW have lost the BTC.Com domain a while ago, it is being held in Escrow and the Bitcoinist owners are "renting" the domain name for three years, in order to turn it into a digital currency hub.

2) Of course Garza won't distance himself from anything that might give him a shred of credibility these days. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to figure that out. He cannot be trusted, ever.

3) BTC.com has nothing to do with GAW, Garza, paycoin or any of their other shill operations.



Sometimes you guys make me wonder where you get all the information from, instead of engaging in a dialog with the people directly. Posting crap on this forum isn't going to get you one step closer to the truth unless some of the people involved in the operation (in my case, as a content creator) happen to stumble upon it.
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1004
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
BREAKING NEWS: You can buy pictures of airplanes and you will get a 30% discount if you use paycoin. So amazing! I need to get some paycoins now, this is the killer application for cryptocurrency. Pictures. Of. Airplanes!!!!

http://talk.btc.com/t/aircraft-photos-com-accepting-crypto-currency/182

Now XPY will go to the moon for sure!
sr. member
Activity: 369
Merit: 250
phm.link
Yea I noticed that too, this is concerning to say the least.

I'm surprised there is no coverage of this in other crypto-media. Sounds like a juicy story - a news site rents a domain from a company infamous for its 9/11 charity fraud, failed cloud mining business, and suspected in securities fraud. Even without mentioning Garza's name because he's "not involved". Come on guys, do I need to write headlines for you  Grin

Are they afraid of bitcoinSIT?

If I proposed such an article, the internal discussion would be like, "raise your hand if you know anyone who reads Bitcoinist."

Even better - a no-name self-proclaimed news site rents an uber-expensive domain from a company owned/controlled by individuals suspected in embezzlement, money laundering, and ties with foreign bad people.


The real story would be if someone could prove they weren't, in fact, renting it, but simply using it as part of the purchase agreement that went from official to secretive last fall. That would be a real story.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Yea I noticed that too, this is concerning to say the least.

I'm surprised there is no coverage of this in other crypto-media. Sounds like a juicy story - a news site rents a domain from a company infamous for its 9/11 charity fraud, failed cloud mining business, and suspected in securities fraud. Even without mentioning Garza's name because he's "not involved". Come on guys, do I need to write headlines for you  Grin

Are they afraid of bitcoinSIT?

If I proposed such an article, the internal discussion would be like, "raise your hand if you know anyone who reads Bitcoinist."

Even better - a no-name self-proclaimed news site rents an uber-expensive domain from a company owned/controlled by individuals suspected in embezzlement, money laundering, and ties with foreign bad people.
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1254
Thread-puller extraordinaire


http://www.na-berlin.de/termine/aktuelle%20Veranstaltungen%20PDFs/nanewyork_2012.pdf

Dani S. 917-513-2074= Buck Rogers = Daffy?

P.S: So, they sold you Emails along with the accounts? Seems legit.



'Serenity Keepers' ? WTF, sounds like the kind of heavies employed by Jim Jones to force people to drink the cool-aid.

So bitcoinist posts shilling article for coincard which had to be pulled for the shilly scam article it was, but now they want to pretend they are on the up and up by getting into bed with Homero on the basis he isn't going to get that domain seized by the three letter agencies?

Good plan.
sr. member
Activity: 369
Merit: 250
phm.link
Yea I noticed that too, this is concerning to say the least.

I'm surprised there is no coverage of this in other crypto-media. Sounds like a juicy story - a news site rents a domain from a company infamous for its 9/11 charity fraud, failed cloud mining business, and suspected in securities fraud. Even without mentioning Garza's name because he's "not involved". Come on guys, do I need to write headlines for you  Grin

Are they afraid of bitcoinSIT?

If I proposed such an article, the internal discussion would be like, "raise your hand if you know anyone who reads Bitcoinist."

donator
Activity: 686
Merit: 519
It's for the children!
Yea I noticed that too, this is concerning to say the least.

I'm surprised there is no coverage of this in other crypto-media. Sounds like a juicy story - a news site rents a domain from a company infamous for its 9/11 charity fraud, failed cloud mining business, and suspected in securities fraud. Even without mentioning Garza's name because he's "not involved". Come on guys, do I need to write headlines for you  Grin

Are they afraid of bitcoinSIT?
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Yea I noticed that too, this is concerning to say the least.

I'm surprised there is no coverage of this in other crypto-media. Sounds like a juicy story - a news site rents a domain from a company infamous for its 9/11 charity fraud, failed cloud mining business, and suspected in securities fraud. Even without mentioning Garza's name because he's "not involved". Come on guys, do I need to write headlines for you  Grin
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
Litecoin Association Director
Natalie Johnson wrote 3 articles about me and misspelled my name all 3 times Sad.


Mike I hope there is no relation! haha

It's funny. In the original version she decided to just hijack our entire article without even linking. I told her that's called IP theft and to kindly provide a link so the paytards could at least get riled up in the proper thread.

Something tells me if I wrote the same article today there'd be maybe ~15% of the hatred directed towards me, as Garza's shilling funds have run out and only the True BelieversTM stay on (because they can't afford the cognitive dissonance thing.)


Really? Holy crap that is a big no no....



https://hashtalk.ch/topic/37668/look-btc-com-says-its-launching-today
https://archive.is/BPJ2l

This thread is full of MrCEO not distancing himself.

I have seen no public statements from bitcoinist distancing themselves from Josh/GAW.  In addition to all of the above information.

Yea I noticed that too, this is concerning to say the least.
sr. member
Activity: 369
Merit: 250
phm.link
Natalie Johnson wrote 3 articles about me and misspelled my name all 3 times Sad.


Mike I hope there is no relation! haha

It's funny. In the original version she decided to just hijack our entire article without even linking. I told her that's called IP theft and to kindly provide a link so the paytards could at least get riled up in the proper thread.

Something tells me if I wrote the same article today there'd be maybe ~15% of the hatred directed towards me, as Garza's shilling funds have run out and only the True BelieversTM stay on (because they can't afford the cognitive dissonance thing.)
donator
Activity: 686
Merit: 519
It's for the children!
What chapter is this now?

Just wait for the next plot twist.  Soon™
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
Litecoin Association Director
Natalie Johnson wrote 3 articles about me and misspelled my name all 3 times Sad.


Mike I hope there is no relation! haha
donator
Activity: 686
Merit: 519
It's for the children!
https://hashtalk.ch/topic/37668/look-btc-com-says-its-launching-today
https://archive.is/BPJ2l

This thread is full of MrCEO not distancing himself.

I have seen no public statements from bitcoinist distancing themselves from Josh/GAW.  In addition to all of the above information.
sr. member
Activity: 369
Merit: 250
phm.link
So, BTC.com is a news portal? Seriously? And Garza think there is one journalist left in the cryptocurrency space who will touch his shit with a 10 foot pole?

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/20141011_210359-e1415066379631.jpg

Maybe if Joshy woshy gives 'em a lil smoochey moochey.

He's already the EDITOR in CHIEF of that rag.... He'll write anything for Pumpkin.

I ROFLOL when Bitcoinist had to take down the GAWMiners "interview" that Ganja recently paid for, to avoid a riot.

They have lost all credibility either way.


They took it down because I made them aware of the situation and as far as I can tell they want nothing to do with GAW, Josh, or anything related to them. Smiley



EDIT: As a side note from what I understand, BTC.com payments lapsed and the domain went to the original owner who then leased out the domain name to Bitcoinist completely outside the purview of GAW. I "Think" this is what happened.

People associated with Bitcoinist whom I do not trust besides the obvious:

J. D. E. Buntix -

Drew Cordell - http://bitcoinist.net/paycoinpoker-rebrands-cryptopoker-details-hack-new-features/
Natalie Johnson - http://paycoins.biz/paycoin/should-cryptocoinsnews-release-articles-with-profanity/
hero member
Activity: 702
Merit: 1000
★The Best Adult Video Chat Platform★
http://btc.com/million-dollar-bitcoin-domain-name-btc-com-launches-bitcoin-digital-currency-industry-portal/

Apparently they got a bit of a spanking by Domain Guardians:



Edit: "Bitcoinsit" - LOL. What kind of muggle posts shit on their website and can't even get their own name right. Rhetorical question of course. We all know who.

So basically they are paying money to garza who is paying it to domain guardians.  How long before garza just starts pocketing the money and not paying the bill and claims someone stole the money?

What chapter is this now?
Jump to: