Still waiting. Was that address supposed to be proof that the crooks handpicked by Homero Garza to distance Paycoin from him and were intimately involved in the Paycoin scam from the beginning are no longer under his control? I do not see it. What I do see is someone asking me to believe the word of a known habitual liar. I don't believe anything. I went through this same plea for belief when confronting the Hard Atheists in this forum who like to pretend that they are somehow intellectually superior because they believe there is no God, as opposed to those that believe there is or might be a God. Fuck belief. Know what you know. Nothing else matters. Those that say otherwise are fucking fools.
I was just looking through screenshots and found some addresses. Completely unrelated to the rest of the conversation.
OK, thank you for that. You keep going on about me not believing that Josh Garza is no longer in control of or not largely still profiting from Paycoin, saying that there is no amount of proof that will satisfy me. Please enlighten me, and all of us here, as to what YOU think is proof of this. I personally can honestly say that I have not seen ANY proof of this at all. None. All we have is the word of Josh Garza and the handpicked team of crooks who are supposedly now his enemy. If there is even one shred of actual proof that you know of, then please share it with us all.
You are welcome,
Proof that a sociopath/psychopath is lying is generally hard to come by. Many people have the internal press releases, the hashtalk posts, the leaked private chats and emails posted here as well other communications which as you have pointed out could all have been orchestrated by Ganza. I am neither agreeing nor disagreeing with you as I cannot provide proof in either direction.
My questions and statements, aside from me being a troll, are just pointing out that I don't believe proof exists in either direction though if you had a burden of proof to achieve perhaps it could be worked towards?
Yet you want to work towards this "burden of proof" by starting from the point of acceptance of that which is coming straight from a known pathological liar who has every reason to deceive me. I say work towards a burden of proof starting from the point of NOT accepting that which is coming from a pathological liar who has every reason to deceive me. You are saying I should accept probable lies at face value and work backwards to prove that they are not, and I say FUCK believing lies at all. These are complete and total opposite viewpoints. Yours being completely illogical and open to corruption, and the other totally logical and non corruptible. Why exactly is it that you want me to believe Homero Garza?
