Josh,
The least you could do is to get on the phone and be frank with me. What
happened to looking after me? I got no accountability for the money and
time I put it. I told you many times before I am a very flexible person and
we can talk to resolve this. You keep avoiding the issues.
So you don't want to talk about the details? Fine. I'll take a hit and walk
away. Let's talk about this.
I really don't want to go to your office/home/church to confront you and
also take the legal route. But I will if I have to. Since i'm losing
hundreds of thousand, I'll spend more as a matter of principle.
So do we still have direct dialogue?
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Josh Garza wrote:
> I think it may be easier at this point to put your legal person in touch
> with ours.
>
>
> On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Alex Huynh wrote:
>
>> Josh,
>>
>> Since you are transparent enough to allow an audit
>> =E2=80=8B,=E2=80=8B
>> it goes without saying that you have no issues with preliminarily
>> providing me with unaudited financials and minutes of board meeting
>> immediately. You said much more money was invested, so I just want to kn=
ow
>> the particulars of that. That would be clear in the incoming cashflow of
>> the business and in the board members minutes.
>>
>> *I respectfully request that you provide me with the above information.
>> When will I receive that?*
>>
>> Furthermore, you say that mining has not worked for months now but we ar=
e
>> a service provider to customers first and foremost. We have a huge
>> community and customer database
>> =E2=80=8B,=E2=80=8B
>> =E2=80=8Bwhich
>> was built and originated from gaw
>> =E2=80=8B,=E2=80=8B
>> that is very valuable (hundred
>> =E2=80=8B =E2=80=8B
>> thousands of customer
>> =E2=80=8Bs=E2=80=8B
>> by your admission). This asset can be used to pivot the business into
>> other crypto currency services. It seems you utilized the asset but it
>> seems to be on a completely unrelated company, ie paybase.
>>
>> =E2=80=8BAnother issue that needs to be clarified is the relationship an=
d related
>> transactions between Gaw/Zen and your other companies Business Technolog=
y
>> for Cryptocurrency. and Paybase. I hope Gaw/Zen is not a wholly owned
>> subsidiary of BTC. Becasue if this transaction happened I certainly was =
not
>> made aware of it.
>>
>> The program is launching tomorrow, so we should be able to get back in
>> touch in a few days. *When is a good time?* we need to talk earlier in
>> the week. I am not waiting to the end of the week. I have been very pati=
ent
>> towards you already but you keep brushing me off. By the way, I have
>> highlighted my questions as time and time again you have not address any=
of
>> my questions in your reply.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 1 Feb 2015, at 5:36 am, Josh Garza wrote:
>>
>> Alex,
>>
>> As you have said, can get back in touch after the program.
>>
>> But, you are welcome to start whatever process you want. If you want to
>> pay to have our books audited, be my guest. GAW miners was a mining
>> company, plane and simple. And mining has not worked for many months now=
.
>> The audit you will pay for is going to show that.
>>
>> On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Alex Huynh wrote=
:
>>
>>> Josh,
>>>
>>> I remember that conversation and understand what you are saying. My
>>> point is that as a oppressed shareholder, our professional relationship
>>> should end here and we should part on good terms. Naturally if this
>>> happens, then the issue of Paybase is a non-issue since right now as it=
is
>>> in its infancy. What I have the right to know is if and how Paybase
>>> benefited from the operation of gaw/zen, such as access to its customer
>>> through email campaigns, etc... Given all the related information, my
>>> accountants and lawyers can examine the self-dealing between the compan=
ies
>>> you are CEO of and determine if there is any conflicts of interest.
>>> Providing the financial accounts of gaw/zencloud and the minutes of
>>> director meetings should go a long way towards clearing any confusion. =
The
>>> financials is expected to be audited and cover all the related
>>> cryptocurrency addresses involved with the business. Where are the
>>> documents that documents your $1m purchase of btc.com? And I also know
>>> the $8m purchase of zen was a marketing ploy as we both know zen always
>>> belonged to gaw before you started to build it. We were talking about z=
en
>>> so many times when discussing strategy. You have not answered or chosen=
to
>>> ignore all my previous questions, thus keeping me in the dark.
>>>
>>> A few events in the last 24 hours is also very concerning; the disablin=
g
>>> of cloud mining based and this: https://hashbase.com/ (which says
>>> zencloud will be right back). You have not attempted to communicate to =
me
>>> your future plans for gaw/zencloud. As of right now zencloud is intertw=
ined
>>> with paycoin/paybase through the conversion of hashlets to hashstakers =
and
>>> the selling of hashtaskers. In any event, if this platform is moved to
>>> another entity anytime in the future without proper dealing, then it wo=
uld
>>> be improper dealing. I can only guess what is happening from following =
all
>>> the threads in hashtalk and bitcointalk.
>>>
>>> Also in terms of gaw/zen's financials, you claims have varied according
>>> to context. To me, you claim the whole business is not profitable, yet =
to
>>> others you claim of $100m turnover in 6 months. Before you cut me off f=
rom
>>> the information, you were already doing a $20m annual run rate. And upo=
n
>>> examination of top hashlet list, the answer seems to be different again=
.
>>> Without concrete evidence all I can make is assumptions. Even then, 10%
>>> gross margin on tens of million of turnover is plenty to cover your
>>> development, marketing expenses and other overheads.
>>>
>>> Back to the issue of shareholder oppression. Being a majority
>>> shareholder gives you the ability to cause the corporation to do things
>>> that harm minority shareholders. When these acts prevent the minority
>>> shareholder=E2=80=99s participation in the business, they are commonly =
referred to
>>> as a =E2=80=9Cfreeze out=E2=80=9D or a =E2=80=9Csqueeze out.=E2=80=9D
>>>
>>> I believe this happened to me.
>>>
>>> 1. We started as 50/50 partners. Over time that changed without my
>>> consultation and providing me board meeting minutes that document capit=
al
>>> raising decisions. In fact, from the start I should have been allowed t=
o
>>> participate.
>>>
>>> 2. Since then you have denied me access to information, not giving me a
>>> right to participate in board meetings. I do not even know who is on th=
e
>>> board of directors.
>>>
>>> 3. Firing/relieving me from a job with the company (which by the way I
>>> did not receive any renumeration for).
>>>
>>> 4. Yet to be ascertained conflict of interest transactions. I do not
>>> have transparency of the self-dealings between the companies you are ce=
o of.
>>>
>>> Shareholder oppression doctrine can be upheld in all American courts of
>>> law. I consulted American lawyers and done my preparation for the worse
>>> case scenario. I can only assume the worse.
>>>
>>> Josh, I believed in the you and the type of person you were from the
>>> start, yet your treatment of me has left sour grapes. Any outsider can =
see
>>> the reality of it, so I am not over-reacting. Time and time again, from=
the
>>> delay of shareholding documents (under the excuses of waiting for the
>>> shareholders operating agreement) to ignoring all my questions you have=
not
>>> treated me fairly as a partner/shareholder.
>>>
>>> I hope to resolve this fairly and amicably with you and work out
>>> something that suits us both before it escalates.
>>>
>>> Let me know the progress of the auditing of the documents I have
>>> provided and the decision of the board members of my intentions (most
>>> preferably in the form of a director's meeting minutes). What can I exp=
ect
>>> it?
>>>
>>> I know you are busy with the honors program launching feb 1. But I
>>> assume you have time after this date to get on a conference call with m=
e.
>>> So let's arrange a phone meeting.
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Josh Garza wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>
>>>> The conversation we had over the phone was about Paycoin. Where I told
>>>> you I spoke look in to the possibility of using Paycoin instead of sto=
ck.
>>>> Paybase is an entirely different company, with different shareholders =
and
>>>> funding. As I said, the only discussion we can have is around GAW mine=
rs
>>>> and zen cloud, as originally discussed.
>>>>
>>>> I have a suggestion out to the partners and are waiting to hear backs
>>>> please be advised, no one has been bought out of the company.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, January 30, 2015, Alex Huynh wrote=
:
>>>>
>>>>> Josh,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been transparent with you. Will you provide the same
>>>>> transparency towards me?
>>>>>
>>>>> Please respond to this and previous questions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Again, when can you arrange that conference call with me?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Alex Huynh
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regardless of the business being built by others and myself not bein=
g
>>>>>> involved after six months, I put my money and risked it based on our
>>>>>> originally agreement 50/50 as per our skype chat messages and the in=
itial
>>>>>> conference call I had with you. IT was shareholding at the start. Yo=
u run
>>>>>> the business as CEO and report to shareholders (you, myself, stuart,=
etc),
>>>>>> whoever built it were not shareholders, so I don't understand your a=
rgument.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you say additional money was injected. I understand that. I just
>>>>>> want to see the dates, amounts, and how the business was valued at t=
ime of
>>>>>> injection. Just show me what you did so I can verify it. I will acce=
pt the
>>>>>> evidence.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Paybase was launched independent of Gaw miners you say. That's not
>>>>>> what you told me in the late November conference call. How did that =
happen
>>>>>> with Gaw customer base? And transactions happening within Zencloud
>>>>>> concerning hashpoints in exchange for forgoing mined bitcoins? I hav=
e an
>>>>>> ear for you to explain it to me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At this point I want to exit completely. You are pushing me around a=
s
>>>>>> a minority shareholder. Can we please talk it out over the phone? I =
prefer
>>>>>> sometime in the afternoon your time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hope to have this conversation in the next couple of days. So when
>>>>>> is a good time?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Josh Garza wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alex,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Providing you interest in two companies, that were primarily built
>>>>>>> by others, is taking care of you by any standard.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The six month period you were involved, the company lost money, it
>>>>>>> was survived by investment by others. I am happy to have a conversa=
tion
>>>>>>> with you about GAW miners and Zencloud.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But, PayBase was launched with resources independent of GAW miners.
>>>>>>> Paybase is also looking to raise money as well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Chat soon
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 29, 2015, Alex Huynh
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Josh,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You speak to your lawyer. I want to have a conference call with yo=
u
>>>>>>>> and talk it out. This is not what you said in previous emails and =
what you
>>>>>>>> told me on a conference call with you late November.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On the phone you specifically said to me you were going to prepare
>>>>>>>> liquidity for me in hashcoins (paycoins) and share in the new inve=
stment
>>>>>>>> vehicle (which we were waiting for David to finalise in December, =
which
>>>>>>>> never eventuated to anything). It is nearly February now. I put mo=
ney in
>>>>>>>> last March and worked with your for 6 months.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Or was what you said on the phone a lie? You represent yourself as
>>>>>>>> a man of your words.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To remind you, a previous email thread you replied with:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Hey Alex,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The issue is there is not much to tell. The corporate structure is
>>>>>>>> still not done. Additionally, we are going to be closing GAW, the =
hardware
>>>>>>>> business is over. If you know of anyone that would be interested i=
n buying
>>>>>>>> it, let me know.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The majority of my efforts have been spent on build out two new
>>>>>>>> companies (payment processing, and trading)"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and later in that email:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Alex, I never said or implied that I intended to screw you. So
>>>>>>>> please calm down.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I simply was telling you what I have been working on, so you can
>>>>>>>> know why I am busy. I fully intend to make sure your taken care of=
. But, I
>>>>>>>> do not respond well to threats, and I promise it will work out unf=
avorable
>>>>>>>> if we go that way.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So let's head in the right direction so it works out well for
>>>>>>>> everyone "
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We both know that paycoin/paybase will not exist today without the
>>>>>>>> customer base acquisition by Gaw Miners and Zencloud. Also, what a=
re the
>>>>>>>> arms length transactions between Gaw MIners , Zencloud and paybase=
?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I wonder how you accounted for all the mined BTC by customers(whic=
h
>>>>>>>> was kept). Instead of paying out customers for months, you gave th=
em
>>>>>>>> hashpoints instead, after which was exchanged for paycoins.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To say I am limited to Gaw/Zen you are saying Gaw/Zen didn't inves=
t
>>>>>>>> in the ICO of paypal as part of the $100m CAF. You are also saying=
you spun
>>>>>>>> paybase and paycoins out of Gaw/Zen and developed it with your own
>>>>>>>> resources while using the customer base.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is really a lot to clear up here and I would like to speak t=
o
>>>>>>>> you and come to resolution that will suit us both. Again you have =
indicated
>>>>>>>> all this time you will look after me and I emphasise what you said=
to me
>>>>>>>> during our last phone conversation.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When is a suitable time? Or do I have to arrange a meeting through
>>>>>>>> your secretary?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Josh Garza wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Alex,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I will ring dave up about this today.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please be advised, any conversation we have is limited to GAW
>>>>>>>>> miners and zencloud
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 28, 2015, Alex Huynh m>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Josh,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Having not heard from you for three days, I was beginning to
>>>>>>>>>> think you were not accountable for my investment and running awa=
y with it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It goes without saying that you need to verify the documents.
>>>>>>>>>> Please give me an indication of how long this process would take=
. I believe
>>>>>>>>>> a week will be plenty of time provided you give it the utmost pr=
iority.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I also imagine that you will provide me dates and amounts of you=
r
>>>>>>>>>> investments in the business.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As a shareholder I have the right to be provided with upto date
>>>>>>>>>> financial accounts of Gaw Miners outlining when and how my origi=
nal 50%
>>>>>>>>>> share was diluted and also related party transactions with zen m=
iner,
>>>>>>>>>> paybase, etc.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> When will you forward these details to me?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 29 Jan 2015, at 10:08 am, Josh Garza wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We are going through these. As you can imagine, they need to be
>>>>>>>>>> verified
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my mobile phone
>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 28, 2015 8:20 AM, "Alex Huynh"
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Josh,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am still waiting for a reply.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Alex Huynh <
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Josh,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you reply please? I just want confirmation you have
>>>>>>>>>>>> received all the documents and you have or will be reviewing i=
t.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:37 AM, Alex Huynh <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Josh,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is the supporting documents: receipts of payments to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> miner suppliers, receipts of purchases, paypal sales, staff w=
ork logbook.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:34 AM, Alex Huynh <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Josh,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has taken a while to get my hands on all the invoices and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> double check all the transactions. However, I believe I fina=
lly have all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the transactions accounted for such as all the miner stock I=
contributed,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> payments to miner suppliers, goods and services purchases ma=
de, payments
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> received from GAW.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The attached workbook outlines it all clearly and I will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email you supporting documents in the next email. Please rev=
iew it quickly,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to have this resolved. The total amount is a lo=
t less than the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $200,000 we originally spoke about. It is about $165,000.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please reply with confirmation that you received this email
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the next with attached documents.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Alex Huynh <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Josh,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did get your previous email. We are auditing on our side
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to make sure we have everything. I will forward it to you w=
hen it's ready.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Josh Garza
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure if you saw in my previous emails. But we are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a list of the investments you made. Dollar amou=
nt and dates.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let us know when we can have this. We want to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolve as soon as you do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my mobile phone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 5, 2015 11:54 AM, "Alex Huynh" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Josh, thank you for finally getting back to me. :) I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was anticipating on flying to meet you at your office/hom=
e to get a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolution on the matter.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know you have been under the pump lately but taking 7
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> days to respond to me after I email everyday does not con=
vey your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intentions to resolve this. I will get the accounting amo=
unts that you need
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asap and after that I wish to have it resolved within a w=
eek or two max.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Understand from my perspective that this has taken far to=
o long,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reiterating what I told you months ago.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, is David back at work? I presume he is and helping
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you, since you are having such a pr nightmare of late. Ca=
n you ask him to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reply my emails promptly regarding documentation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If the new investment vehicle documentation is not ready =
I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think it would be best if we can resolve this amicably an=
d in a way that I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can exit the business completely. It is hard to be a part=
nership of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business due to the lack of communication and feedback to=
me in recent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> months.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Josh Garza
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Alex, as I am sure you can imagine,mine last few
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weeks have been hell on earth.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want to resolve this. We are still waiting on an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accounting of what you guys invested, I want to make sur=
e we get it all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, January 4, 2015, Alex Huynh <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =E2=80=8BHi Josh,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have been patient and polite. At least have the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> courtesy to send me a one line reply.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When did Gaw Miners get acquired? And the details of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that I would like to know considering I am a shareholde=
r:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Some facts before we begin*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PayBase is a cryptocurrency payment processing business
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned by Business Technology for Cryptocurrency, LLC (B=
TC). BTC is also the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parent company of GAW Miners (GM), a Bitcoin and Liteco=
in mining business.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex=E2=80=8B
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 4:20 AM, Alex Huynh <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Josh,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know you have been really busy today defending
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paycoin but please acknowledge and let me know when we=
can touch base.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Alex Huynh <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Josh,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I hope you had a great festive season with your famil=
y
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even though you have been very busy with the paybase =
launch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Congratulations on the progress of paycoin and launch=
of paybase. I have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been following it very closely. Can you tell me if Da=
vid is working now or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when will he be back to work? He is not responding to=
my email. Also, when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will you be available for a conference call? Can I sp=
eak to Amber about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> booking in a time? I need to continue the conversatio=
n we had last time. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know you are a very busy man but please get back to m=
e.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Alex Huynh <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =E2=80=8BHi guys,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can I get a response please?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex=E2=80=8B
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Alex Huynh <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi David/Josh,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I hope you both had a wonderful festive holiday.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Neither of you provided further details requested b=
y me. Can you please
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update me asap?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David, in your last email you said you will have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything finalised this month and it is already n=
ear the end of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> month. Please let me know where we stand.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:50 AM, Alex Huynh <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have a more concrete date? How about more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> details about the investment vehicle itself and th=
e asset that falls into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11 Dec 2014, at 11:14 am, David McLain <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex - our restructuring process has taken longer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than expected. This month we will have everything=
finalized including
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> forming an investment vehicle to distribute your i=
nterests.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David H. McLain, Esq.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> General Counsel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Geniuses at Work Corporation / GAW Miners, LLC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct dial: 267-257-8945
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Alex Huynh <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't hear back from you. Please respond, it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been more than a few days.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5 Dec 2014, at 3:14 am, Alex Huynh <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi David,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please elaborate on the investment vehicl=
e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and timeframe?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As an existing stakeholder I have never received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the proper paperwork for over 9 months. Months ag=
o Josh was saying the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> members agreement on Gaw Miners LLC was not compl=
ete, now he is talking all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new investment vehicle which I have no details ab=
out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh, I need to have this completed asap. I know
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is not in your priority, but It has taken too =
long to formalize my stake
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> while the business is operating. I am sure other =
shareholders are not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting that long to have their stake accounted f=
or. Please update me with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> details at least so I know it is progressing. I d=
o not have anymore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information after we last spoke.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3 Dec 2014, at 3:02 pm, Josh Garza <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex, we are building an investment vehicle to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mange the investments of new an existing investor=
s. Dave, do you think we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can have this done by eoy?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, December 2, 2014, Alex Huynh <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi josh,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry I seemed to miss your reply. Hope you had =
a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> great thanksgiving with your family. When will y=
ou hear back from your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resources? Can you please clarify what is holdin=
g up the proposal?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You said you needed 4-6 weeks a fortnight ago to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work something out for me. Please stick to this =
timeframe as things have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dragged out too long.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 28 Nov 2014, at 12:48 am, Josh Garza <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex, I am waiting to hear back from other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resources. Plus, it's thanksgiving bud.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, November 27, 2014, Alex Huynh <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Get back to me please
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 27 Nov 2014, at 2:17 am, Alex Huynh <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
