They are planning an appeal, but they will lose, and the penalty for the damages have not been set yet, its going to get much more expensive for gawker.
Amazing.
Just thinking to post this picture gives you 100 karma.
Topic: GAWKER must pay $115mm to Hulk Hogan. - page 2. (Read 1347 times)
Amazing.
Just thinking to post this picture gives you 100 karma.
That video will never go offline people did share it already everywhere.
What it will do though is send a message to publications like these that they will be making very expensive mistakes if they go invading peoples' privacy like this, freedom of expression and speech does not give you the right to invade other peoples' privacy and essentially commit illegal espionage which is what a lot of these horrid stalkerish sites do to celebrities and other public figures.
If these weren't 'news' publications but individuals they would have had court restraining orders filed against them years ago.
That video will never go offline people did share it already everywhere.
They are planning an appeal, but they will lose, and the penalty for the damages have not been set yet, its going to get much more expensive for gawker.
They are planning an appeal, but they will lose, and the penalty for the damages have not been set yet, its going to get much more expensive for gawker.
I don't see the difference...
They hold the same stance in both situations... they refuse to take down the images/video until a court orders them to
They hold the same stance in both situations... they refuse to take down the images/video until a court orders them to
Exactly. Double standard from gawker/jezebel. They need to go away, to the cornfield...
Thank you Hulk!
How is holding the same stance in both situations a double-standard?
I don't see the difference...
They hold the same stance in both situations... they refuse to take down the images/video until a court orders them to
They hold the same stance in both situations... they refuse to take down the images/video until a court orders them to
Exactly. Double standard from gawker/jezebel. They need to go away, to the cornfield...
Thank you Hulk!
I don't see any hypocrisy between the women and men on Gawker, but it sounds like a pretty scummy pretend-journalist site that needs to rely on celebrity sex tapes to keep visitor numbers high or they would simply disappear.
isn't there protocol on wearing a hat in a court of law??? Skull caps should fall under the same heading, Where is the respect??
I don't see the difference...
They hold the same stance in both situations... they refuse to take down the images/video until a court orders them to
They hold the same stance in both situations... they refuse to take down the images/video until a court orders them to
---------------------------------------------
Karma...
Jump to: