I live in a religoius country, and yes same-sex marriage is illegal. But being a part of LGBT is respected nowadays, before they were bullied.
I have nothing against LGBT, some studies say that its a hormonal thing that leads to femininity at masculinity.
But Marriage is a sacrament and joing two man or two woman is a disrespect to the church.
If they want to live together then they should if this would make them happy enough to enjoy life.
Love for everyone right ?
When it comes to adoption, some studies also says that gay couple can become a much better parents than straight ones.
But gay couple should think about the child's psychological aspects specially when it grows up.
A child will be curious enough to see how is it possible that he has two father or two mother. This may lead to something else. Guidance is not enough for a child who are heart-broken by their parents. Few, maybe can be strong enough to be proud about it.
Topic: Gay Marriage and Adoption - page 6. (Read 12188 times)
I think every gay parent is terrible because being gay is a fatal disease which cannot be cured. Every straight parent I am not saying is perfect but surely is better suited to raise a child rather than a gay parent. Here in Italy is being done a lot in favor of the gays but I spit on them, the worst cancer of our society. Cancer needs to be cured. I am totally against same sex marriage.
Homosexuality is a terrible disease, but not so deadly and there are examples of successful treatment. Sadly, many do not recognize this phenomenon as a disease and do not understand why they should be treated.
Yesterday, the Bundestag adopted a decision on legalization of same-sex marriage. Is this some kind of epidemic of dementia. The people themselves are destroying their life, and then trying to overcome the effects. How can you tolerate this idiocy?
Same-sex marriage does not make any sense. Marriage is the union of man and woman. Hence "same-sex union of man and woman" does not make sense, man and woman are different sexes. Politicians have no business changing the definition of any words in the dictionary. As usual politicians like to stir up trouble and get society to fight among each other so they can tax more to solve the problems that they created.
A simple solution is to create two new words. One word that says "union of man and man" and another word that says "union of woman and woman." No fighting necessary.
As for adoption by gay people. A big no. Gay people can not procreate, simple as that. A straight couple splitting up, the child tend to stay with the mother on that basis that mother knows best. SO how can two blokes adopt? Researches showed that single parenting is terrible and created havoc in society and the welfare system. Children brought up by straight couple for the duration of their childhood are more balance and well behaved, due to having both mother and father inputs. Children who don't have a dad or mum tend to be problematic. So gay couple should not adopt or use any other means to have a child at all.
Since few gay couple have had children there is not enough data to make any meaningful study to the long-term effect. However we can look at single parenting and extrapolate the effects. However recently a gay couple had two grown up children adopted in the late 1990s. One hated their so-called dads and hated the fact they never had a mother. I expect more of that in the future.
I am very very happy to have a great family of mum and dad, sisters and brothers, and so on, and no loony leftie degenerate in my upbringing. I would not deny any innocent child the same pleasure that i had. Putting any child with gay couple just to satisfy their dogma and political correctness is child abuse.
A simple solution is to create two new words. One word that says "union of man and man" and another word that says "union of woman and woman." No fighting necessary.
As for adoption by gay people. A big no. Gay people can not procreate, simple as that. A straight couple splitting up, the child tend to stay with the mother on that basis that mother knows best. SO how can two blokes adopt? Researches showed that single parenting is terrible and created havoc in society and the welfare system. Children brought up by straight couple for the duration of their childhood are more balance and well behaved, due to having both mother and father inputs. Children who don't have a dad or mum tend to be problematic. So gay couple should not adopt or use any other means to have a child at all.
Since few gay couple have had children there is not enough data to make any meaningful study to the long-term effect. However we can look at single parenting and extrapolate the effects. However recently a gay couple had two grown up children adopted in the late 1990s. One hated their so-called dads and hated the fact they never had a mother. I expect more of that in the future.
I am very very happy to have a great family of mum and dad, sisters and brothers, and so on, and no loony leftie degenerate in my upbringing. I would not deny any innocent child the same pleasure that i had. Putting any child with gay couple just to satisfy their dogma and political correctness is child abuse.
What is the impact to your life if gay marriage is legal vs. illegal?
What is the impact to your life if gay couples adopt children after being vetted?
There is no impact, and you have no authority to change anything. So why try to control the lives of other people when it makes no difference to you?
Simple a matter of English language standard.
Not talking about my life but the life of an innocent child.
The word "impact" is irrelevant. I didn't use it. Who has authority? You, politicians, gay people? What about the child's natural rights to natural life free from harm. Who then speaks for the child? You are an idiot. You think it is about me. It isn't, it is about the child. Who then has the right to exercise control over a child well-being, since a child does not have sufficient intellect to take control?
Excellent colour coding.
I definitely don't have any authority. Gay people don't have authority either. Government does have authority and controls your freedom.
So you think that every gay parent is terrible and every straight parent is amazing? I could ask you what about the child's right to having a natural life that is free from harm with straight parents? Do you not know children that were abused by their parents who are straight? Don't you know kids that turned into sociopaths with straight parents? You do know that serial killers have straight parents right? Why aren't you standing up for those children? Seems like you care so much about the kids right? Not just homophobic?
I think every gay parent is terrible because being gay is a fatal disease which cannot be cured. Every straight parent I am not saying is perfect but surely is better suited to raise a child rather than a gay parent. Here in Italy is being done a lot in favor of the gays but I spit on them, the worst cancer of our society. Cancer needs to be cured. I am totally against same sex marriage.
Fatal disease is probably not the right term to use lol. It's definitely not fatal. What have gay people done to you for you to despise them? What if you have a child that is gay? Is it every gay person's obligation to pretend to be straight to satisfy your personal desire of having 100% straight society? If so, are you willing to pretend for some other ignorant person that doesn't accept you? And if you're not willing to pretend for strangers, then it shouldn't be expected for anyone to pretend for you.
Same-sex marriage does not make any sense. Marriage is the union of man and woman. Hence "same-sex union of man and woman" does not make sense, man and woman are different sexes. Politicians have no business changing the definition of any words in the dictionary. As usual politicians like to stir up trouble and get society to fight among each other so they can tax more to solve the problems that they created.
A simple solution is to create two new words. One word that says "union of man and man" and another word that says "union of woman and woman." No fighting necessary.
As for adoption by gay people. A big no. Gay people can not procreate, simple as that. A straight couple splitting up, the child tend to stay with the mother on that basis that mother knows best. SO how can two blokes adopt? Researches showed that single parenting is terrible and created havoc in society and the welfare system. Children brought up by straight couple for the duration of their childhood are more balance and well behaved, due to having both mother and father inputs. Children who don't have a dad or mum tend to be problematic. So gay couple should not adopt or use any other means to have a child at all.
Since few gay couple have had children there is not enough data to make any meaningful study to the long-term effect. However we can look at single parenting and extrapolate the effects. However recently a gay couple had two grown up children adopted in the late 1990s. One hated their so-called dads and hated the fact they never had a mother. I expect more of that in the future.
I am very very happy to have a great family of mum and dad, sisters and brothers, and so on, and no loony leftie degenerate in my upbringing. I would not deny any innocent child the same pleasure that i had. Putting any child with gay couple just to satisfy their dogma and political correctness is child abuse.
A simple solution is to create two new words. One word that says "union of man and man" and another word that says "union of woman and woman." No fighting necessary.
As for adoption by gay people. A big no. Gay people can not procreate, simple as that. A straight couple splitting up, the child tend to stay with the mother on that basis that mother knows best. SO how can two blokes adopt? Researches showed that single parenting is terrible and created havoc in society and the welfare system. Children brought up by straight couple for the duration of their childhood are more balance and well behaved, due to having both mother and father inputs. Children who don't have a dad or mum tend to be problematic. So gay couple should not adopt or use any other means to have a child at all.
Since few gay couple have had children there is not enough data to make any meaningful study to the long-term effect. However we can look at single parenting and extrapolate the effects. However recently a gay couple had two grown up children adopted in the late 1990s. One hated their so-called dads and hated the fact they never had a mother. I expect more of that in the future.
I am very very happy to have a great family of mum and dad, sisters and brothers, and so on, and no loony leftie degenerate in my upbringing. I would not deny any innocent child the same pleasure that i had. Putting any child with gay couple just to satisfy their dogma and political correctness is child abuse.
What is the impact to your life if gay marriage is legal vs. illegal?
What is the impact to your life if gay couples adopt children after being vetted?
There is no impact, and you have no authority to change anything. So why try to control the lives of other people when it makes no difference to you?
Simple a matter of English language standard.
Not talking about my life but the life of an innocent child.
The word "impact" is irrelevant. I didn't use it. Who has authority? You, politicians, gay people? What about the child's natural rights to natural life free from harm. Who then speaks for the child? You are an idiot. You think it is about me. It isn't, it is about the child. Who then has the right to exercise control over a child well-being, since a child does not have sufficient intellect to take control?
Excellent colour coding.
I definitely don't have any authority. Gay people don't have authority either. Government does have authority and controls your freedom.
So you think that every gay parent is terrible and every straight parent is amazing? I could ask you what about the child's right to having a natural life that is free from harm with straight parents? Do you not know children that were abused by their parents who are straight? Don't you know kids that turned into sociopaths with straight parents? You do know that serial killers have straight parents right? Why aren't you standing up for those children? Seems like you care so much about the kids right? Not just homophobic?
I think every gay parent is terrible because being gay is a fatal disease which cannot be cured. Every straight parent I am not saying is perfect but surely is better suited to raise a child rather than a gay parent. Here in Italy is being done a lot in favor of the gays but I spit on them, the worst cancer of our society. Cancer needs to be cured. I am totally against same sex marriage.
Same-sex marriage does not make any sense. Marriage is the union of man and woman. Hence "same-sex union of man and woman" does not make sense, man and woman are different sexes. Politicians have no business changing the definition of any words in the dictionary. As usual politicians like to stir up trouble and get society to fight among each other so they can tax more to solve the problems that they created.
A simple solution is to create two new words. One word that says "union of man and man" and another word that says "union of woman and woman." No fighting necessary.
As for adoption by gay people. A big no. Gay people can not procreate, simple as that. A straight couple splitting up, the child tend to stay with the mother on that basis that mother knows best. SO how can two blokes adopt? Researches showed that single parenting is terrible and created havoc in society and the welfare system. Children brought up by straight couple for the duration of their childhood are more balance and well behaved, due to having both mother and father inputs. Children who don't have a dad or mum tend to be problematic. So gay couple should not adopt or use any other means to have a child at all.
Since few gay couple have had children there is not enough data to make any meaningful study to the long-term effect. However we can look at single parenting and extrapolate the effects. However recently a gay couple had two grown up children adopted in the late 1990s. One hated their so-called dads and hated the fact they never had a mother. I expect more of that in the future.
I am very very happy to have a great family of mum and dad, sisters and brothers, and so on, and no loony leftie degenerate in my upbringing. I would not deny any innocent child the same pleasure that i had. Putting any child with gay couple just to satisfy their dogma and political correctness is child abuse.
A simple solution is to create two new words. One word that says "union of man and man" and another word that says "union of woman and woman." No fighting necessary.
As for adoption by gay people. A big no. Gay people can not procreate, simple as that. A straight couple splitting up, the child tend to stay with the mother on that basis that mother knows best. SO how can two blokes adopt? Researches showed that single parenting is terrible and created havoc in society and the welfare system. Children brought up by straight couple for the duration of their childhood are more balance and well behaved, due to having both mother and father inputs. Children who don't have a dad or mum tend to be problematic. So gay couple should not adopt or use any other means to have a child at all.
Since few gay couple have had children there is not enough data to make any meaningful study to the long-term effect. However we can look at single parenting and extrapolate the effects. However recently a gay couple had two grown up children adopted in the late 1990s. One hated their so-called dads and hated the fact they never had a mother. I expect more of that in the future.
I am very very happy to have a great family of mum and dad, sisters and brothers, and so on, and no loony leftie degenerate in my upbringing. I would not deny any innocent child the same pleasure that i had. Putting any child with gay couple just to satisfy their dogma and political correctness is child abuse.
What is the impact to your life if gay marriage is legal vs. illegal?
What is the impact to your life if gay couples adopt children after being vetted?
There is no impact, and you have no authority to change anything. So why try to control the lives of other people when it makes no difference to you?
Simple a matter of English language standard.
Not talking about my life but the life of an innocent child.
The word "impact" is irrelevant. I didn't use it. Who has authority? You, politicians, gay people? What about the child's natural rights to natural life free from harm. Who then speaks for the child? You are an idiot. You think it is about me. It isn't, it is about the child. Who then has the right to exercise control over a child well-being, since a child does not have sufficient intellect to take control?
Excellent colour coding.
I definitely don't have any authority. Gay people don't have authority either. Government does have authority and controls your freedom.
So you think that every gay parent is terrible and every straight parent is amazing? I could ask you what about the child's right to having a natural life that is free from harm with straight parents? Do you not know children that were abused by their parents who are straight? Don't you know kids that turned into sociopaths with straight parents? You do know that serial killers have straight parents right? Why aren't you standing up for those children? Seems like you care so much about the kids right? Not just homophobic?
Same-sex marriage does not make any sense. Marriage is the union of man and woman. Hence "same-sex union of man and woman" does not make sense, man and woman are different sexes. Politicians have no business changing the definition of any words in the dictionary. As usual politicians like to stir up trouble and get society to fight among each other so they can tax more to solve the problems that they created.
A simple solution is to create two new words. One word that says "union of man and man" and another word that says "union of woman and woman." No fighting necessary.
As for adoption by gay people. A big no. Gay people can not procreate, simple as that. A straight couple splitting up, the child tend to stay with the mother on that basis that mother knows best. SO how can two blokes adopt? Researches showed that single parenting is terrible and created havoc in society and the welfare system. Children brought up by straight couple for the duration of their childhood are more balance and well behaved, due to having both mother and father inputs. Children who don't have a dad or mum tend to be problematic. So gay couple should not adopt or use any other means to have a child at all.
Since few gay couple have had children there is not enough data to make any meaningful study to the long-term effect. However we can look at single parenting and extrapolate the effects. However recently a gay couple had two grown up children adopted in the late 1990s. One hated their so-called dads and hated the fact they never had a mother. I expect more of that in the future.
I am very very happy to have a great family of mum and dad, sisters and brothers, and so on, and no loony leftie degenerate in my upbringing. I would not deny any innocent child the same pleasure that i had. Putting any child with gay couple just to satisfy their dogma and political correctness is child abuse.
A simple solution is to create two new words. One word that says "union of man and man" and another word that says "union of woman and woman." No fighting necessary.
As for adoption by gay people. A big no. Gay people can not procreate, simple as that. A straight couple splitting up, the child tend to stay with the mother on that basis that mother knows best. SO how can two blokes adopt? Researches showed that single parenting is terrible and created havoc in society and the welfare system. Children brought up by straight couple for the duration of their childhood are more balance and well behaved, due to having both mother and father inputs. Children who don't have a dad or mum tend to be problematic. So gay couple should not adopt or use any other means to have a child at all.
Since few gay couple have had children there is not enough data to make any meaningful study to the long-term effect. However we can look at single parenting and extrapolate the effects. However recently a gay couple had two grown up children adopted in the late 1990s. One hated their so-called dads and hated the fact they never had a mother. I expect more of that in the future.
I am very very happy to have a great family of mum and dad, sisters and brothers, and so on, and no loony leftie degenerate in my upbringing. I would not deny any innocent child the same pleasure that i had. Putting any child with gay couple just to satisfy their dogma and political correctness is child abuse.
What is the impact to your life if gay marriage is legal vs. illegal?
What is the impact to your life if gay couples adopt children after being vetted?
There is no impact, and you have no authority to change anything. So why try to control the lives of other people when it makes no difference to you?
Simple a matter of English language standard.
Not talking about my life but the life of an innocent child.
The word "impact" is irrelevant. I didn't use it. Who has authority? You, politicians, gay people? What about the child's natural rights to natural life free from harm. Who then speaks for the child? You are an idiot. You think it is about me. It isn't, it is about the child. Who then has the right to exercise control over a child well-being, since a child does not have sufficient intellect to take control?
Same-sex marriage does not make any sense. Marriage is the union of man and woman. Hence "same-sex union of man and woman" does not make sense, man and woman are different sexes. Politicians have no business changing the definition of any words in the dictionary. As usual politicians like to stir up trouble and get society to fight among each other so they can tax more to solve the problems that they created.
A simple solution is to create two new words. One word that says "union of man and man" and another word that says "union of woman and woman." No fighting necessary.
As for adoption by gay people. A big no. Gay people can not procreate, simple as that. A straight couple splitting up, the child tend to stay with the mother on that basis that mother knows best. SO how can two blokes adopt? Researches showed that single parenting is terrible and created havoc in society and the welfare system. Children brought up by straight couple for the duration of their childhood are more balance and well behaved, due to having both mother and father inputs. Children who don't have a dad or mum tend to be problematic. So gay couple should not adopt or use any other means to have a child at all.
Since few gay couple have had children there is not enough data to make any meaningful study to the long-term effect. However we can look at single parenting and extrapolate the effects. However recently a gay couple had two grown up children adopted in the late 1990s. One hated their so-called dads and hated the fact they never had a mother. I expect more of that in the future.
I am very very happy to have a great family of mum and dad, sisters and brothers, and so on, and no loony leftie degenerate in my upbringing. I would not deny any innocent child the same pleasure that i had. Putting any child with gay couple just to satisfy their dogma and political correctness is child abuse.
A simple solution is to create two new words. One word that says "union of man and man" and another word that says "union of woman and woman." No fighting necessary.
As for adoption by gay people. A big no. Gay people can not procreate, simple as that. A straight couple splitting up, the child tend to stay with the mother on that basis that mother knows best. SO how can two blokes adopt? Researches showed that single parenting is terrible and created havoc in society and the welfare system. Children brought up by straight couple for the duration of their childhood are more balance and well behaved, due to having both mother and father inputs. Children who don't have a dad or mum tend to be problematic. So gay couple should not adopt or use any other means to have a child at all.
Since few gay couple have had children there is not enough data to make any meaningful study to the long-term effect. However we can look at single parenting and extrapolate the effects. However recently a gay couple had two grown up children adopted in the late 1990s. One hated their so-called dads and hated the fact they never had a mother. I expect more of that in the future.
I am very very happy to have a great family of mum and dad, sisters and brothers, and so on, and no loony leftie degenerate in my upbringing. I would not deny any innocent child the same pleasure that i had. Putting any child with gay couple just to satisfy their dogma and political correctness is child abuse.
What is the impact to your life if gay marriage is legal vs. illegal?
What is the impact to your life if gay couples adopt children after being vetted?
There is no impact, and you have no authority to change anything. So why try to control the lives of other people when it makes no difference to you?
Sleeping with brothers is quite another. Is incest. For me it's still better than same-sex relationships. Not only Indians, but the Jews were the common practice of incest. If you believe the Bible then all people are descended from the same family. But to call gay marriage a family I do not dare. To allow them to raise children is for me a crime.
Same-sex marriage does not make any sense. Marriage is the union of man and woman. Hence "same-sex union of man and woman" does not make sense, man and woman are different sexes. Politicians have no business changing the definition of any words in the dictionary. As usual politicians like to stir up trouble and get society to fight among each other so they can tax more to solve the problems that they created.
A simple solution is to create two new words. One word that says "union of man and man" and another word that says "union of woman and woman." No fighting necessary.
As for adoption by gay people. A big no. Gay people can not procreate, simple as that. A straight couple splitting up, the child tend to stay with the mother on that basis that mother knows best. SO how can two blokes adopt? Researches showed that single parenting is terrible and created havoc in society and the welfare system. Children brought up by straight couple for the duration of their childhood are more balance and well behaved, due to having both mother and father inputs. Children who don't have a dad or mum tend to be problematic. So gay couple should not adopt or use any other means to have a child at all.
Since few gay couple have had children there is not enough data to make any meaningful study to the long-term effect. However we can look at single parenting and extrapolate the effects. However recently a gay couple had two grown up children adopted in the late 1990s. One hated their so-called dads and hated the fact they never had a mother. I expect more of that in the future.
I am very very happy to have a great family of mum and dad, sisters and brothers, and so on, and no loony leftie degenerate in my upbringing. I would not deny any innocent child the same pleasure that i had. Putting any child with gay couple just to satisfy their dogma and political correctness is child abuse.
A simple solution is to create two new words. One word that says "union of man and man" and another word that says "union of woman and woman." No fighting necessary.
As for adoption by gay people. A big no. Gay people can not procreate, simple as that. A straight couple splitting up, the child tend to stay with the mother on that basis that mother knows best. SO how can two blokes adopt? Researches showed that single parenting is terrible and created havoc in society and the welfare system. Children brought up by straight couple for the duration of their childhood are more balance and well behaved, due to having both mother and father inputs. Children who don't have a dad or mum tend to be problematic. So gay couple should not adopt or use any other means to have a child at all.
Since few gay couple have had children there is not enough data to make any meaningful study to the long-term effect. However we can look at single parenting and extrapolate the effects. However recently a gay couple had two grown up children adopted in the late 1990s. One hated their so-called dads and hated the fact they never had a mother. I expect more of that in the future.
I am very very happy to have a great family of mum and dad, sisters and brothers, and so on, and no loony leftie degenerate in my upbringing. I would not deny any innocent child the same pleasure that i had. Putting any child with gay couple just to satisfy their dogma and political correctness is child abuse.
I am against the Hindus sleeping with the brothers and producing spastic children
then my taxes are getting spent on Hindu spastic children Knowing quite well what would happen if they sleep with the brothers and first cousins ..You will most likely produce a spastic child ..
And i am the person who as to pay for it..
Now because of your dirty Hindu habits i suffer because my taxes go on paying your HINDU SPASTIC CHILD.
And most Hindus are on peanuts they cost the me a lot in taxes to support SPASTIC HINDUS..
Now with gay people they are the inventors the creators the arts computer scientist geniuses
THEY MAKE THINGS ..MAKE MONEY
A gay as cost me nothing except invented something that most people use or will use
..
SPASTIC HINDU will invent nothing except take my taxes for a wheel chair..
A straight boy Hindu SLEEPS WITH THE SISTER..A GAY ONE SLEEPS WITH HIS BROTHER
.
then my taxes are getting spent on Hindu spastic children Knowing quite well what would happen if they sleep with the brothers and first cousins ..You will most likely produce a spastic child ..
And i am the person who as to pay for it..
Now because of your dirty Hindu habits i suffer because my taxes go on paying your HINDU SPASTIC CHILD.
And most Hindus are on peanuts they cost the me a lot in taxes to support SPASTIC HINDUS..
Now with gay people they are the inventors the creators the arts computer scientist geniuses
THEY MAKE THINGS ..MAKE MONEY
A gay as cost me nothing except invented something that most people use or will use
..SPASTIC HINDU will invent nothing except take my taxes for a wheel chair..
A straight boy Hindu SLEEPS WITH THE SISTER..A GAY ONE SLEEPS WITH HIS BROTHER
.Who pays for all the extremely drugs treatment for gay people catching HIV/AIDS... erm... oh yes taxpayers. If you don't fancy paying for Hindu S child then why do you fancy paying for gay people disease.
@popcorn1
ha ha ha ha ha ha
You made me laugh a lot, I did not know this custom of the Hindus, but I must agree with the point of @The One, what would be the difference between gays and Hindus?
As @the one said, you will pay for the all extremely drugs treatment for gay people catching HIV/AIDS
I am against the Hindus sleeping with the brothers and producing spastic children
then my taxes are getting spent on Hindu spastic children Knowing quite well what would happen if they sleep with the brothers and first cousins ..You will most likely produce a spastic child ..
And i am the person who as to pay for it..
Now because of your dirty Hindu habits i suffer because my taxes go on paying your HINDU SPASTIC CHILD.
And most Hindus are on peanuts they cost the me a lot in taxes to support SPASTIC HINDUS..
Now with gay people they are the inventors the creators the arts computer scientist geniuses
THEY MAKE THINGS ..MAKE MONEY
A gay as cost me nothing except invented something that most people use or will use..
SPASTIC HINDU will invent nothing except take my taxes for a wheel chair..
A straight boy Hindu SLEEPS WITH THE SISTER..A GAY ONE SLEEPS WITH HIS BROTHER .
then my taxes are getting spent on Hindu spastic children Knowing quite well what would happen if they sleep with the brothers and first cousins ..You will most likely produce a spastic child ..
And i am the person who as to pay for it..
Now because of your dirty Hindu habits i suffer because my taxes go on paying your HINDU SPASTIC CHILD.
And most Hindus are on peanuts they cost the me a lot in taxes to support SPASTIC HINDUS..
Now with gay people they are the inventors the creators the arts computer scientist geniuses
THEY MAKE THINGS ..MAKE MONEY
A gay as cost me nothing except invented something that most people use or will use
..SPASTIC HINDU will invent nothing except take my taxes for a wheel chair..
A straight boy Hindu SLEEPS WITH THE SISTER..A GAY ONE SLEEPS WITH HIS BROTHER
.Who pays for all the extremely drugs treatment for gay people catching HIV/AIDS... erm... oh yes taxpayers. If you don't fancy paying for Hindu S child then why do you fancy paying for gay people disease.
Lol where are you from? Middle Ages?
So if a specific portion of your population is more affected by a disease what do you do? You focus prevention and communication while trying to find specific solutions or you stop paying their medical bills?
Man I don't know where you live but I'm damn sure I don't want to be your neighboor xD
You have guts to write that after (highlighted in your post) hateful shit you spew on poster above? Now, I do get why you and popcorn are militant atheists, your are both basically gay, semen eating, sterile descendants of Third Reich.
You have the guts to call someone inbred for disagreeing you and claim he is taking your money from you, than you go on to tell him, that he is obliged to pay for disease your group is reponsible for.
Look into the mirror.
On way or another, you are not fit for upbringing children of someone (anyone) else. Because you are not fit to take care even for yourself.
It's not normal when gays want to adopt a child, because they can not fully bring it up and the child can get a distorted perception of reality. 2 fathers or 2 mothers can not give birth to a child naturally and do not need to violate this pattern.
I am against the Hindus sleeping with the brothers and producing spastic children
then my taxes are getting spent on Hindu spastic children Knowing quite well what would happen if they sleep with the brothers and first cousins ..You will most likely produce a spastic child ..
And i am the person who as to pay for it..
Now because of your dirty Hindu habits i suffer because my taxes go on paying your HINDU SPASTIC CHILD.
And most Hindus are on peanuts they cost the me a lot in taxes to support SPASTIC HINDUS..
Now with gay people they are the inventors the creators the arts computer scientist geniuses
THEY MAKE THINGS ..MAKE MONEY
A gay as cost me nothing except invented something that most people use or will use..
SPASTIC HINDU will invent nothing except take my taxes for a wheel chair..
A straight boy Hindu SLEEPS WITH THE SISTER..A GAY ONE SLEEPS WITH HIS BROTHER .
then my taxes are getting spent on Hindu spastic children Knowing quite well what would happen if they sleep with the brothers and first cousins ..You will most likely produce a spastic child ..
And i am the person who as to pay for it..
Now because of your dirty Hindu habits i suffer because my taxes go on paying your HINDU SPASTIC CHILD.
And most Hindus are on peanuts they cost the me a lot in taxes to support SPASTIC HINDUS..
Now with gay people they are the inventors the creators the arts computer scientist geniuses
THEY MAKE THINGS ..MAKE MONEY
A gay as cost me nothing except invented something that most people use or will use
..SPASTIC HINDU will invent nothing except take my taxes for a wheel chair..
A straight boy Hindu SLEEPS WITH THE SISTER..A GAY ONE SLEEPS WITH HIS BROTHER
.Who pays for all the extremely drugs treatment for gay people catching HIV/AIDS... erm... oh yes taxpayers. If you don't fancy paying for Hindu S child then why do you fancy paying for gay people disease.
Lol where are you from? Middle Ages?
So if a specific portion of your population is more affected by a disease what do you do? You focus prevention and communication while trying to find specific solutions or you stop paying their medical bills?
Man I don't know where you live but I'm damn sure I don't want to be your neighboor xD
Most of people here are not only dumb, they're also delusional illogical and irrational.
OF COURSE gays should have the right to adopt. That's the main reason there are gay people.
In all other animal species, especially mamals, you see gay couples taking care of the children that have lost their parents. Pengouins for example are very famous for it.
Anyone thinking a child is better alone than with gay parents shouldn't be allowed to have one (a child) xD
OF COURSE gays should have the right to adopt. That's the main reason there are gay people.
In all other animal species, especially mamals, you see gay couples taking care of the children that have lost their parents. Pengouins for example are very famous for it.
Anyone thinking a child is better alone than with gay parents shouldn't be allowed to have one (a child) xD
I am against the Hindus sleeping with the brothers and producing spastic children
then my taxes are getting spent on Hindu spastic children Knowing quite well what would happen if they sleep with the brothers and first cousins ..You will most likely produce a spastic child ..
And i am the person who as to pay for it..
Now because of your dirty Hindu habits i suffer because my taxes go on paying your HINDU SPASTIC CHILD.
And most Hindus are on peanuts they cost the me a lot in taxes to support SPASTIC HINDUS..
Now with gay people they are the inventors the creators the arts computer scientist geniuses
THEY MAKE THINGS ..MAKE MONEY
A gay as cost me nothing except invented something that most people use or will use..
SPASTIC HINDU will invent nothing except take my taxes for a wheel chair..
A straight boy Hindu SLEEPS WITH THE SISTER..A GAY ONE SLEEPS WITH HIS BROTHER .
then my taxes are getting spent on Hindu spastic children Knowing quite well what would happen if they sleep with the brothers and first cousins ..You will most likely produce a spastic child ..
And i am the person who as to pay for it..
Now because of your dirty Hindu habits i suffer because my taxes go on paying your HINDU SPASTIC CHILD.
And most Hindus are on peanuts they cost the me a lot in taxes to support SPASTIC HINDUS..
Now with gay people they are the inventors the creators the arts computer scientist geniuses
THEY MAKE THINGS ..MAKE MONEY
A gay as cost me nothing except invented something that most people use or will use
..SPASTIC HINDU will invent nothing except take my taxes for a wheel chair..
A straight boy Hindu SLEEPS WITH THE SISTER..A GAY ONE SLEEPS WITH HIS BROTHER
.Who pays for all the extremely expensive drugs treatment for gay people catching HIV/AIDS... erm... oh yes taxpayers. If you don't fancy paying for Hindu S child then why do you fancy paying for gay people disease.
Wow - unbelievable how much ignorance and stereotyping there is in the modern world.
My partner and I adopted two children at birth. They both have turned out to be very impressive and beautiful human beings.
If only heterosexual couples had to go through the same countless home-study interviews, drug tests and medical physicals just to prepare to have a child -- the world would certainly be a better place.
Good on you dude.
It can't be surprising to you to hear this type of homophobia on a global forum. I grew up in a suburb of Toronto, and there was definitely homophobia in the culture at the time...it wouldn't have been fun to go to school as a gay person. But I've been downtown for awhile now, and it's good to see those that have homophobia are the outsiders now. There's a pretty large gay population that can enjoy their life without (or with minimal) ignorant judgement from others.
Since homosexuality is fringe sexual deviation, would your Toronto group be so large, if you werent actively brainswashing young people into it?
You Canadians actually made "not adressing people by their favourite gender" to be a hate crime.
Not adressing homos by any of made up genders is comparable to Holocaust denial, you have to be proud of yourself. To the rest of the world, you are now officiallly degenerates.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/05/17/keeping-campaign-promise-justin-trudeau-moves-to-protect-transgender-canadians/?utm_term=.c09e3362b278
You sacrificed freedom of speech for what is essentially a fashion. Disgusting.
http://dailysignal.com/2017/06/19/canadians-face-hate-crimes-using-wrong-gender-pronouns/
A child needs money then love..If you have the 2 then all will be good with your child..
Now people could say love then money?..
Nappies clothes food shelter before love
A child will suffer more because they are poor than the parents being gay..
We in the UK don't care who your parents are as long as they hurt no one and you are happy
Now people could say love then money?..
Nappies clothes food shelter before love
A child will suffer more because they are poor than the parents being gay..
We in the UK don't care who your parents are as long as they hurt no one and you are happy
Who is "we"? A small minority of loony leftie degenerate doesn't speak for the majority.
The main argue I've heard is that the child will fare badly as a result of it. Whether it is true or not is another question, but I think I saw a local study some time ago that gave that argument some credit. I'm on phone at the moment, so I don't really feel like trying to that study now though (and it wouldn't be in English anyway).
Personally, I am a little bit hesitant, but if it can be proven that a child growing up with parents of the same sex will have an equally good childhood as those coming from a "normal" family, then I do not see any problem with it.
Personally, I am a little bit hesitant, but if it can be proven that a child growing up with parents of the same sex will have an equally good childhood as those coming from a "normal" family, then I do not see any problem with it.
As long as the society that the kids together with their gay parents are open minded then I see no problem to that and I ahve watched a real life story regarding a boy growing up has no problem with his foster parent but the real struggle is in his social life which kids would tease him and in much easier word they bully him. Nonetheless, the story ends that he realized what other people says doesn't matter because what matters is that his foster loves him and he loves him too more than his real parents should.
In many countries of the world homosexuality is still illegal and is sometimes even punished with death. (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d1/World_laws_pertaining_to_homosexual_relationships_and_expression.svg/1035px-World_laws_pertaining_to_homosexual_relationships_and_expression.svg.png)
In most Western countries, same sex marriage is now permitted. Adoption has also been allowed in some countries. There are no studies that show that children grow up badly in homosexual relationships.
Why do you think that so many Western countries have problems with same rights for homosexual ppl?
And what do you think about it personally?
In most Western countries, same sex marriage is now permitted. Adoption has also been allowed in some countries. There are no studies that show that children grow up badly in homosexual relationships.
Why do you think that so many Western countries have problems with same rights for homosexual ppl?
And what do you think about it personally?
Im not against gay marraige and adoptation. As long as this couple has good intention why they want to adopt and as long as they will be responsible parents.
Jump to: