Pages:
Author

Topic: Genesis-mining.com || World's leading hashpower provider! - page 99. (Read 400197 times)

sr. member
Activity: 430
Merit: 250
I understand that, my question was i have 2 contracts under one account with them will they both be in locked down for 30 days and 0 daily payouts or just the 1 order with cc?

Icon



Icon, We have sent you a PM about this.

Regards

Genesis Mining
sr. member
Activity: 430
Merit: 250
bitcoin isnt regulated anywhere in the US.  genesis is making stuff up.  

Hi Borgminer.

Perhaps this article will interest you. As you can see there were many companies and not just us.

http://fortune.com/2015/08/14/bitcoin-startups-leave-new-york-bitlicense/

Regards

Genesis Mining.
hero member
Activity: 821
Merit: 503
I understand that, my question was i have 2 contracts under one account with them will they both be in locked down for 30 days and 0 daily payouts or just the 1 order with cc?

Icon

hero member
Activity: 758
Merit: 500
bitcoin isnt regulated anywhere in the US.  genesis is making stuff up. 
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
so got a question, just upgraded my lifetime hashrate using btc  then turned around and bought an 1 year contract with my cc.

Problem is genesis had a nice little notice they have not posted on forms about using a cc after i already paid for the contract.

and i quote:

"Thank you for your order! We wish to point out that your credit card order is still under review and all your payouts (for contracts paid with credit card) will be held for 30 days. You can still use the mining allocation to allocate your coins and review your payouts. After period of 30 days ends, you will receive your payouts at once! Happy Mining!"

Now my question is will my life time contract be put on hold for a month too or just the 1 year contract?

Cause i paid in btc for my lifetime contract i should get paid daily and not have to wait a month..

Icon




its gonna be on hold for just for 30 days/ month. that is a normal condition of theirs. to make sure the card owner is you. also any chargeback issues.  

but while it is on hold. your contract is activated during the first 30-day hold.

part of their term agreement text-
Quote
By using the Credit Card Services the Customer hereby agrees and accepts that he will not be allowed and shall be prohibited from withdrawing any amounts that the Customer has deposited and/or is entitled to as a result of the Services rendered by the Service Provider for a period of 30 days. In case the payment by the Customer results in a charge-back or other material issues occur, the Service Provider is entitled to keep all existing, current and future Mining Output.

you can view their terms as well. so you know too Smiley its in the " View Agreement" box text before you pay your mining contracts. just scroll down and read in 8. Credit Card Services through Credit Card Service Provider Section.

hope this helps Smiley
hero member
Activity: 821
Merit: 503
so got a question, just upgraded my lifetime hashrate using btc  then turned around and bought an 1 year contract with my cc.

Problem is genesis had a nice little notice they have not posted on forms about using a cc after i already paid for the contract.

and i quote:

"Thank you for your order! We wish to point out that your credit card order is still under review and all your payouts (for contracts paid with credit card) will be held for 30 days. You can still use the mining allocation to allocate your coins and review your payouts. After period of 30 days ends, you will receive your payouts at once! Happy Mining!"

Now my question is will my life time contract be put on hold for a month too or just the 1 year contract?

Cause i paid in btc for my lifetime contract i should get paid daily and not have to wait a month..

Icon


full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
just a stupid move for genesis mining. they believe in a free market but yet they cut off about 8m people .
The problem is not Genesis Mining, the problem is the BitLicense.
i guess this problem is because of that new guy who was criticizing 'genesis ' which eventually ended this way,maybe he never wanted to invest either but he spoiled others mining too.
legendary
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1031
just a stupid move for genesis mining. they believe in a free market but yet they cut off about 8m people .
The problem is not Genesis Mining, the problem is the BitLicense.
hero member
Activity: 758
Merit: 500
just a stupid move for genesis mining. they believe in a free market but yet they cut off about 8m people .
hero member
Activity: 758
Merit: 500
this makes no sense at all . why just new york ?

Dear Genesis Mining community.

Genesis Mining will not be able to comply with the regulations set forth by the proposed BitLicense and as such, we will no longer be able to accept customers from the state of New York. All current customers will be able to continue their services, but going forward, no one with an IP address from the state of New York will be purchase hashpower contracts with us from this point onwards.

We stand by the cryptocurrency community and believe this particular piece of legislation is unnecessary and is an obstacle to free market innovation. We also believe that is exactly what it set it out to do. Companies across the world today posted similar announcements about leaving New York, and while it may seem like a victory to those who passed it, it is important to understand the difference between winning a battle and winning a war. Those who passed this bill have only succeeded in winning a small battle, and as a result have set their state further behind.

More information here
http://blog.genesis-mining.com/bitlicense-red-flag-acts-of-our-era

Coindesk have also written about it here.
http://www.coindesk.com/genesis-mining-leaves-new-york-following-bitlicense-deadline/


hero member
Activity: 758
Merit: 500
If you are going to buy cloud mining you are safer using a company that has their own exchange so you can sell hash if your plans change.
the is complete and utter BS


Well this is exactly the reason GM does not want to introduce their own exchange. Cause everyone would sell, dump the price down and leave.

This has already been addressed before:

...

3'') The question of why we are not offering hashpower trading is very good and we had long discussions about this already more than a year ago. The reason why we are not doing this is because we would need a licence for securities trading from the SEC. Most of the competitors who offered this service already received subpoenas and are not operating anymore. We have a lot of responsibilities towards our customers and doing anything that threatens our operation to that extent is not acceptable for us.
...

All the best and happy mining!
Marco Streng


According to FinCEN ruling cloud mining companies that simply pay out mined coins to the customer are not labeled money transmitters, see http://www.fincen.gov/news_room/rp/rulings/pdf/FIN-2014-R007.pdf Others that offer markets and exchanges (where the company transfers coins on behalf of customers to other customers) can be labeled as money transmitters.

And this following article is interesting as it tells us that getting proper licenses is (too) costly, and therefor you can assume failing to defend your business in US court as not being a money transmitter is even more costly/deadly: http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-law-money-transmission-compliance-avoidance

So... What is safer? Investing using a company that's making sure it's still operational next year and beyond, or investing using a company that may not have the required licensing to service US customers or to operate inside the US?

Good points new guy
sr. member
Activity: 430
Merit: 250
Dear Genesis Mining community.

Genesis Mining will not be able to comply with the regulations set forth by the proposed BitLicense and as such, we will no longer be able to accept customers from the state of New York. All current customers will be able to continue their services, but going forward, no one with an IP address from the state of New York will be purchase hashpower contracts with us from this point onwards.

We stand by the cryptocurrency community and believe this particular piece of legislation is unnecessary and is an obstacle to free market innovation. We also believe that is exactly what it set it out to do. Companies across the world today posted similar announcements about leaving New York, and while it may seem like a victory to those who passed it, it is important to understand the difference between winning a battle and winning a war. Those who passed this bill have only succeeded in winning a small battle, and as a result have set their state further behind.

More information here
http://blog.genesis-mining.com/bitlicense-red-flag-acts-of-our-era

Coindesk have also written about it here.
http://www.coindesk.com/genesis-mining-leaves-new-york-following-bitlicense-deadline/


THE one thing that u should add and which could increase your business very much . "Add the reselling option" that is the only option where a user can profit and plus it dosent effects the company, because there will be always new users to buy .There should be a market for GH.

Please read a few posts up. It has already been discussed why we will not do a resell option.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12111969
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Dear Genesis Mining community.

Genesis Mining will not be able to comply with the regulations set forth by the proposed BitLicense and as such, we will no longer be able to accept customers from the state of New York. All current customers will be able to continue their services, but going forward, no one with an IP address from the state of New York will be purchase hashpower contracts with us from this point onwards.

We stand by the cryptocurrency community and believe this particular piece of legislation is unnecessary and is an obstacle to free market innovation. We also believe that is exactly what it set it out to do. Companies across the world today posted similar announcements about leaving New York, and while it may seem like a victory to those who passed it, it is important to understand the difference between winning a battle and winning a war. Those who passed this bill have only succeeded in winning a small battle, and as a result have set their state further behind.

More information here
http://blog.genesis-mining.com/bitlicense-red-flag-acts-of-our-era

Coindesk have also written about it here.
http://www.coindesk.com/genesis-mining-leaves-new-york-following-bitlicense-deadline/


THE one thing that u should add and which could increase your business very much . "Add the reselling option" that is the only option where a user can profit and plus it dosent effects the company, because there will be always new users to buy .There should be a market for GH.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Dear Genesis Mining community.

Genesis Mining will not be able to comply with the regulations set forth by the proposed BitLicense and as such, we will no longer be able to accept customers from the state of New York. All current customers will be able to continue their services, but going forward, no one with an IP address from the state of New York will be purchase hashpower contracts with us from this point onwards.

We stand by the cryptocurrency community and believe this particular piece of legislation is unnecessary and is an obstacle to free market innovation. We also believe that is exactly what it set it out to do. Companies across the world today posted similar announcements about leaving New York, and while it may seem like a victory to those who passed it, it is important to understand the difference between winning a battle and winning a war. Those who passed this bill have only succeeded in winning a small battle, and as a result have set their state further behind.

More information here
http://blog.genesis-mining.com/bitlicense-red-flag-acts-of-our-era

Coindesk have also written about it here.
http://www.coindesk.com/genesis-mining-leaves-new-york-following-bitlicense-deadline/



Well that blows. I find it odd that the dude that pushed this crap BitLicense schlock through quit soon after. What a dick.
LMAO.. he never wanted to invest but he did made sure that no one else invests loll...
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
Dear Genesis Mining community.

Genesis Mining will not be able to comply with the regulations set forth by the proposed BitLicense and as such, we will no longer be able to accept customers from the state of New York. All current customers will be able to continue their services, but going forward, no one with an IP address from the state of New York will be purchase hashpower contracts with us from this point onwards.

We stand by the cryptocurrency community and believe this particular piece of legislation is unnecessary and is an obstacle to free market innovation. We also believe that is exactly what it set it out to do. Companies across the world today posted similar announcements about leaving New York, and while it may seem like a victory to those who passed it, it is important to understand the difference between winning a battle and winning a war. Those who passed this bill have only succeeded in winning a small battle, and as a result have set their state further behind.

More information here
http://blog.genesis-mining.com/bitlicense-red-flag-acts-of-our-era

Coindesk have also written about it here.
http://www.coindesk.com/genesis-mining-leaves-new-york-following-bitlicense-deadline/



Well that blows. I find it odd that the dude that pushed this crap BitLicense schlock through quit soon after. What a dick.
sr. member
Activity: 430
Merit: 250
Dear Genesis Mining community.

Genesis Mining will not be able to comply with the regulations set forth by the proposed BitLicense and as such, we will no longer be able to accept customers from the state of New York. All current customers will be able to continue their services, but going forward, no one with an IP address from the state of New York will be purchase hashpower contracts with us from this point onwards.

We stand by the cryptocurrency community and believe this particular piece of legislation is unnecessary and is an obstacle to free market innovation. We also believe that is exactly what it set it out to do. Companies across the world today posted similar announcements about leaving New York, and while it may seem like a victory to those who passed it, it is important to understand the difference between winning a battle and winning a war. Those who passed this bill have only succeeded in winning a small battle, and as a result have set their state further behind.

More information here
http://blog.genesis-mining.com/bitlicense-red-flag-acts-of-our-era

Coindesk have also written about it here.
http://www.coindesk.com/genesis-mining-leaves-new-york-following-bitlicense-deadline/

legendary
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1031
If you are going to buy cloud mining you are safer using a company that has their own exchange so you can sell hash if your plans change.

Well this is exactly the reason GM does not want to introduce their own exchange. Cause everyone would sell, dump the price down and leave.

This has already been addressed before:

...

3'') The question of why we are not offering hashpower trading is very good and we had long discussions about this already more than a year ago. The reason why we are not doing this is because we would need a licence for securities trading from the SEC. Most of the competitors who offered this service already received subpoenas and are not operating anymore. We have a lot of responsibilities towards our customers and doing anything that threatens our operation to that extent is not acceptable for us.
...

All the best and happy mining!
Marco Streng


According to FinCEN ruling cloud mining companies that simply pay out mined coins to the customer are not labeled money transmitters, see http://www.fincen.gov/news_room/rp/rulings/pdf/FIN-2014-R007.pdf Others that offer markets and exchanges (where the company transfers coins on behalf of customers to other customers) can be labeled as money transmitters.

And this following article is interesting as it tells us that getting proper licenses is (too) costly, and therefor you can assume failing to defend your business in US court as not being a money transmitter is even more costly/deadly: http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-law-money-transmission-compliance-avoidance

So... What is safer? Investing using a company that's making sure it's still operational next year and beyond, or investing using a company that may not have the required licensing to service US customers or to operate inside the US?
Good quality post +1
legendary
Activity: 1100
Merit: 1032
Isn't Genesis Mining affected by BitLicense? (different from FinCEN)

The final version refers to virtual currencies as a whole, and the New York DFS lists "service contract providers" in its "who we supervise" list (http://www.dfs.ny.gov/about/whowesupervise.htm), doesn't a mining contract fall under that?
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
If you are going to buy cloud mining you are safer using a company that has their own exchange so you can sell hash if your plans change.

Well this is exactly the reason GM does not want to introduce their own exchange. Cause everyone would sell, dump the price down and leave.

This has already been addressed before:

...

3'') The question of why we are not offering hashpower trading is very good and we had long discussions about this already more than a year ago. The reason why we are not doing this is because we would need a licence for securities trading from the SEC. Most of the competitors who offered this service already received subpoenas and are not operating anymore. We have a lot of responsibilities towards our customers and doing anything that threatens our operation to that extent is not acceptable for us.
...

All the best and happy mining!
Marco Streng


According to FinCEN ruling cloud mining companies that simply pay out mined coins to the customer are not labeled money transmitters, see http://www.fincen.gov/news_room/rp/rulings/pdf/FIN-2014-R007.pdf Others that offer markets and exchanges (where the company transfers coins on behalf of customers to other customers) can be labeled as money transmitters.

And this following article is interesting as it tells us that getting proper licenses is (too) costly, and therefor you can assume failing to defend your business in US court as not being a money transmitter is even more costly/deadly: http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-law-money-transmission-compliance-avoidance

So... What is safer? Investing using a company that's making sure it's still operational next year and beyond, or investing using a company that may not have the required licensing to service US customers or to operate inside the US?

Interesting so companies like Hashnest etc are doing something that could get them into trouble down the road. ..I guess.. unless they can block US customers from trading hashpower. Luckily being a Brit it doesn't affect me hehe Smiley
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
If you are going to buy cloud mining you are safer using a company that has their own exchange so you can sell hash if your plans change.

Well this is exactly the reason GM does not want to introduce their own exchange. Cause everyone would sell, dump the price down and leave.

This has already been addressed before:

...

3'') The question of why we are not offering hashpower trading is very good and we had long discussions about this already more than a year ago. The reason why we are not doing this is because we would need a licence for securities trading from the SEC. Most of the competitors who offered this service already received subpoenas and are not operating anymore. We have a lot of responsibilities towards our customers and doing anything that threatens our operation to that extent is not acceptable for us.
...

All the best and happy mining!
Marco Streng


According to FinCEN ruling cloud mining companies that simply pay out mined coins to the customer are not labeled money transmitters, see http://www.fincen.gov/news_room/rp/rulings/pdf/FIN-2014-R007.pdf Others that offer markets and exchanges (where the company transfers coins on behalf of customers to other customers) can be labeled as money transmitters.

And this following article is interesting as it tells us that getting proper licenses is (too) costly, and therefor you can assume failing to defend your business in US court as not being a money transmitter is even more costly/deadly: http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-law-money-transmission-compliance-avoidance

So... What is safer? Investing using a company that's making sure it's still operational next year and beyond, or investing using a company that may not have the required licensing to service US customers or to operate inside the US?

Good points new guy
Pages:
Jump to: