Topic: German gold reserves hauled back to Germany (Read 2335 times)

It's important to remember that Europe is having its own issues right now so stunts that are a distraction are to be expected.

Not that the Germans don't have reason to be genuinely concerned, of course.

all that glitters is not gold

Are you the Politician who sold the Gold?

So they don't have any gold then. What other explanation is there for these shenanigans?

Also, is this a sign of global conflict to come? Is Germany just distrustful of the USA with it's gold or are they just making sure they have it at home when war erupts?

Also, if it becomes clear that the USA has no gold, how will this influence markets? Could it trigger the collapse of the dollar?

Good news.  Based on this new standard of a 7-year grace period for delivery of monetary assets, Pirate hasn't yet defaulted

"Hauled" is not the right verb to be using in this context .... US fed can only deliver 50 tons per year for the next 7 years, basically is how long it takes to buy it off the mines I'd imagine.

More like a trickle and not even a majority of the holding will be repatriated. So basically the terms of delivery have been changed, i.e. would be called default in any other era.

It is mostly historicaly related, why there are such large reserves stored in the U.S., U.K. and France. In times of the cold-war it seemed reasonable to have this assets at different save locations. And the Bundesbank is just doing what it would do if there was no cold-war. Also 1256.52 tonnes will remain in NYC (not Fort Knox), that is 37% of German gold reserves. Not so much about distrust in my eyes.
But how do the French feel about it? This week we celebrate 50 years of France-German friendship and Germany just announced it wants all of its gold back.  

http://www.cnbc.com/id/100384749

So it goes like this?:

1. Suspend gold interchangeability and print more paper money

2. Lease out the country's gold from another country's bank.

3. 2*profit!!

It's like eating you cake twice but keeping the box if anyone asks!

I was referring to the perspective of a central bank like Germany has, it would be more wise to keep your gold in one place when you have such a large store. It's not individual people trading ounces in and out, it's a store of value. They should keep that store secure. The clear thing is that America is no longer a secure place to keep one's gold (FDR anyone?).

Because they trust who they lent it to .

Damned Americans!

Denmark: has 67 Tonnes in Bank of England and only 2-3 Tonnes in the US. Phew!!

I know, not much. Apparently it's loaned out at interest?? How can my county call it a reserve then?

Yep.  War was a biggie since the invading forces tend to just take shit.  International trade was the other biggie.  By having trusted third party hold the gold nations could easily settle up by asking the third party to reallocate the gold.  It was the "trusted" part that broke down is 1971 when France asked the US for the gold value of the bonds it held.  Nixon promptly went on television to announce that dollars were no longer convertible to gold and thus we stole much of the world's gold.

Yep, there were reasons ( )  for some gouvernaments to stack there gold reserves in different parts of the world, Canada, VS, GB ect. for logistic reasons and because of the hassle it brings...thats why i love BTC...lol...no hassle..

It may have been the best option available at the time.  They really didn't have any good way of doing it.  We do now... since 2009 .

Where does habit of shipping your gold to the US come from, WWII?

If all countries would take there gold or other metals back at ones..hell breakes loose, i know for example the Dutch don,t know how many fysical gold they have excactly, if they went over to NY and ask for it they will show them the same pile as they show the Germans, just change the tag.....

( http://www.nu.nl/beurs/2969111/sp-en-cda-bezorgd-nederlandse-goudvoorraad.html )

great history lesson! +1

Government seperate from finance, an appealing concept.

Ah...on third reading, it seems mr Del Mar would have would have had sufficient faith in the bank if it was under the thumb of the State. Well.

Long, but somewhat relevant:

Adam Smith wrote in 1775

"At Amsterdam, however, no point of faith is better established than that, for every guilder circulated as bank money, there is a correspondent guilder in gold or silver to be found in the treasures of the bank. The city is guarantee that it should be so. The bank is under the direction of the four reigning burgomasters who are changed every year. Each new set of burgomasters visits the treasure, compares it with the books, receives it upon oath, and delivers it over, with the same awful solemnity to the set which succeeds; and in that sober and religious country, oaths are not yet disregarded. A rotation of this kind seems alone a sufficient security against any practices which cannot be avowed. Amidst all the revolutions which faction has ever occasioned in the government of Amsterdam, the prevailing party has at no time accused their predecessors of infidelity in the administration of the bank. No accusation could have affected more deeply the reputation and fortune of the disgraced party; and if such an accusation could have been supported, we may be assured that it would have been brought. In 1672, when the French king was at Utrecht, the bank of Amsterdam paid so readily, as left no doubt of the fidelity with which it had observed its engagements. Some of the pieces which were then brought from its repositories, appeared to have been scorched with the fire which happened in the town-house soon after the bank was established. Those pieces, therefore, must have lain there from that time. "

And in 1895, Alexander del Mar wrote

"Alas, for Dutch burgher patriotism, and the credulity of our great Scotch
sophist! When, fourteen years later, that is to say, in
1790, the French again invaded Holland, they found
the bank empty and insolvent. Even whilst Adam
Smith was penning his panegyrics, it was secretly
loaning away bullion which belonged to its depositors
and noteholders. Its pious burgomasters were forsworn,
the City was dishonored, and the woild received its
hundredth useless lesson on the folly of trusting to the
stability of a monetary system which is not absolutely
under the thumb of the State."

Methinks the Germans are allowed to be a bit sceptic.

If gold goes up and the dollar goes down it won't be because of silly stuff like this, it will be because of hyper-inflation, this is merely a consequence of America's fraud, everyone is starting to want their money back, I wouldn't be surprised if China starts selling its bonds now too because apparently Japan is now the largest holder of the debt which is going to be bad news for them. This is another case of people trying to find fault with anything but themselves, awhile ago you even had the Americans accusing China of manipulating their currency etc. when they did the exact same thing.