I don't expect to see many goals in this match. Darmstadt is a very weak team I know, and their defense is also very weak. Even then my guess was less than 3 goals in this match. Because in the last matches we have not seen good performances from the attacking players of Leverkusen. Leverkusen's players could not score a single goal against Gladbach. The match was a goalless draw. Leverkusen won the match against Darmstadt 2-0. The Leverkusen players played very well. They were able to create a lot of scoring opportunities. But the team could not score more than two goals. Leverkusen is still 2 points ahead of Munich.
Highlighted by the goalless draw against Gladbach, raised doubts about their attacking prowess. However, the 2-0 victory against Darmstadt showcased the team's resilience and ability to capitalize on scoring opportunities, and the prediction regarding the goal count in the match proved accurate, especially considering Darmstadt's perceived defensive weaknesses. Leverkusen's recent struggles in scoring.
With Leverkusen maintaining a 2-point lead over Munich, every match becomes crucial in the race for league positioning. The dynamics of the league table remain compelling, and the upcoming matches will likely play a pivotal role in determining their standing It's interesting to note that despite creating numerous chances, Leverkusen couldn't secure more than two goals. The team's performance, though commendable, underlines the challenges they face in converting opportunities into goals.
-snip-
Teams that buy a player are actually the ones deciding the value of a player. A player who is not sold, has absolutely no set fixed value, you can consider a number fair to you, but it will never be true. The moment a team buys a player, they are showing what their value is, by paying that much.
So, when Bayern paid 100+ million for Kane for example, they basically said Kane worths that much to them, they are willing to pay it because they think he worths it, that's what decided his value. You could say he worths less, but Bayern disagreed and what a team spent on a player decides the value far greater than what some other person thinks that player worth. What I think his worth is has nothing to do with reality, only Bayern and their money can decide his worth.
When a team makes a significant financial commitment to acquire a player, as exemplified by Bayern paying 100+ million for Kane in your example, it signifies their assessment of the player's worth, and your perspective underscores a fundamental aspect of player valuation in the football transfer market. Indeed, the true value of a player is ultimately determined by the team willing to invest in them.
The concrete action of a team spending money establishes a tangible benchmark. The market dynamics, driven by clubs and their financial decisions, play a pivotal role in assigning value to players in the ever-evolving landscape of football transfers, The market value, therefore, is a reflection of the purchasing team's valuation, backed by their willingness to allocate substantial resources. While individual opinions on a player's worth may vary.