Topic: GHASH.IO vs ELIGIUS.ST - page 2. (Read 6792 times)
Can't I say cex.io is profitable because GHash is profitable. right ?
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
It's Money 2.0| It’s gold for nerds | It's Bitcoin
GHASH.IO vs ELIGIUS.ST
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Ghash is effectively more profitable. They both merge mine namecoins but ghash mines dvc and ixc as well. They are both worth basically nothing but that little bit does make a difference.
Does it? A new template has to be generated every time DVC and IXC block changes. If this increases your stale rate by even 0.1% it's a net loss.
Already made money off my ixc that I mine. If the other pool operators weren't so greedy this wouldn't be an issue.
The DVC and IXC coins are basically lottery tickets that cost nothing. In theory they could explode in value in the future and the miners at ghash would profit, if they do not then the miners could simply sell the coins on an exchange and still make something off of the coins.
GHASH.IO vs ELIGIUS.ST
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Ghash is effectively more profitable. They both merge mine namecoins but ghash mines dvc and ixc as well. They are both worth basically nothing but that little bit does make a difference.
Does it? A new template has to be generated every time DVC and IXC block changes. If this increases your stale rate by even 0.1% it's a net loss.
Already made money off my ixc that I mine. If the other pool operators weren't so greedy this wouldn't be an issue.
But the greed of miners enabling a 51% attack for 0.05% higher profits is not an issue?
Good to know where your priorities lie.
GHASH.IO vs ELIGIUS.ST
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Ghash is effectively more profitable. They both merge mine namecoins but ghash mines dvc and ixc as well. They are both worth basically nothing but that little bit does make a difference.
Does it? A new template has to be generated every time DVC and IXC block changes. If this increases your stale rate by even 0.1% it's a net loss.
Already made money off my ixc that I mine. If the other pool operators weren't so greedy this wouldn't be an issue.
But the greed of miners enabling a 51% attack for 0.05% higher profits is not an issue?
Good to know where your priorities lie.
GHASH.IO vs ELIGIUS.ST
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Ghash is effectively more profitable. They both merge mine namecoins but ghash mines dvc and ixc as well. They are both worth basically nothing but that little bit does make a difference.
Does it? A new template has to be generated every time DVC and IXC block changes. If this increases your stale rate by even 0.1% it's a net loss.
Already made money off my ixc that I mine. If the other pool operators weren't so greedy this wouldn't be an issue.
But the greed of miners enabling a 51% attack for 0.05% higher profits is not an issue?
GHASH.IO vs ELIGIUS.ST
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Ghash is effectively more profitable. They both merge mine namecoins but ghash mines dvc and ixc as well. They are both worth basically nothing but that little bit does make a difference.
Does it? A new template has to be generated every time DVC and IXC block changes. If this increases your stale rate by even 0.1% it's a net loss.
Already made money off my ixc that I mine. If the other pool operators weren't so greedy this wouldn't be an issue.
But the greed of miners enabling a 51% attack for 0.05% higher profits is not an issue?
GHASH.IO vs ELIGIUS.ST
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Ghash is effectively more profitable. They both merge mine namecoins but ghash mines dvc and ixc as well. They are both worth basically nothing but that little bit does make a difference.
Does it? A new template has to be generated every time DVC and IXC block changes. If this increases your stale rate by even 0.1% it's a net loss.
Already made money off my ixc that I mine. If the other pool operators weren't so greedy this wouldn't be an issue.
GHASH.IO vs ELIGIUS.ST
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Ghash is effectively more profitable. They both merge mine namecoins but ghash mines dvc and ixc as well. They are both worth basically nothing but that little bit does make a difference.
Does it? A new template has to be generated every time DVC and IXC block changes. If this increases your stale rate by even 0.1% it's a net loss.
"AGAINST 51%"
GROUP PLEDGE AGAINST BITCOIN CENTRALISATION
CURRENT PROBLEM
GHASH = CEX + Other Miners = Near 51%
SOLUTION
Move out miners to other pools and make them equally fast.
THE PLAN
To gather as much miner, small home miners to fib farm miners and move out of a near 51% pool(Currently ghash) to another pool same day.
The movement in a single day will keep us all away from variance issue.
What you need to do?
Pledge here with your mining hash power for Sha256D and make a reminder in your mobile the switching date and switch to the other pool that day.
Switching day can be decided after we get gathered.
Also Add this Signature:
Code:
[color=blue][b]AGAINST 51% : PLEDGE AGAINST BITCOIN CENTRALISATION. [/b][/color][url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=651211.0][color=blue][b]PLEDGE NOW![/b][/color][/url]
For the good will of the community & Bitcoin, inviting all to pledge here and join this AGAINST 51% group here to the betterment of all. Also put all your input here.
MOVING DAY: JULY 01 2014
GHASH.IO vs ELIGIUS.ST
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Ghash is effectively more profitable. They both merge mine namecoins but ghash mines dvc and ixc as well. They are both worth basically nothing but that little bit does make a difference.
The main reason for moving to ghash is their simple neat interface and continues payout due to low or 0 varience.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
It's Money 2.0| It’s gold for nerds | It's Bitcoin
GHASH.IO vs ELIGIUS.ST
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Ghash is effectively more profitable. They both merge mine namecoins but ghash mines dvc and ixc as well. They are both worth basically nothing but that little bit does make a difference.
That's a reason NOT to mine at GHash. Do you want a 51% attack? The pool finding more blocks doesn't mean you mine more coins.
They don't want to destroy bitcoin network with a 51% attack (when ghash.io was very close to 51% of hashpower, they have posted an official statement about it: they are working and making profit with bitcoin network so is a totally nosense spread FUD with a 51% attack)
Here is one reason i now mine on GHash :
302040 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 08:20:15 GHash.IO
302039 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 08:10:30 GHash.IO
302038 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 08:04:06 GHash.IO
302037 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 07:52:14 GHash.IO
302036 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 07:14:42 GHash.IO
302035 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 07:02:59 107.170.228.129
302034 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:57:59 GHash.IO
302033 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:51:57 GHash.IO
302032 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:40:06 GHash.IO
302031 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:39:28 GHash.IO
302030 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:32:33 GHash.IO
302040 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 08:20:15 GHash.IO
302039 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 08:10:30 GHash.IO
302038 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 08:04:06 GHash.IO
302037 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 07:52:14 GHash.IO
302036 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 07:14:42 GHash.IO
302035 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 07:02:59 107.170.228.129
302034 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:57:59 GHash.IO
302033 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:51:57 GHash.IO
302032 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:40:06 GHash.IO
302031 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:39:28 GHash.IO
302030 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:32:33 GHash.IO
That's a reason NOT to mine at GHash. Do you want a 51% attack? The pool finding more blocks doesn't mean you mine more coins.
Theatricality the pool mines more blocks doesn't mean more coins. But in practise you that's not entirely true atleast in this case.
Here is one reason i now mine on GHash :
302040 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 08:20:15 GHash.IO
302039 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 08:10:30 GHash.IO
302038 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 08:04:06 GHash.IO
302037 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 07:52:14 GHash.IO
302036 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 07:14:42 GHash.IO
302035 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 07:02:59 107.170.228.129
302034 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:57:59 GHash.IO
302033 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:51:57 GHash.IO
302032 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:40:06 GHash.IO
302031 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:39:28 GHash.IO
302030 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:32:33 GHash.IO
302040 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 08:20:15 GHash.IO
302039 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 08:10:30 GHash.IO
302038 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 08:04:06 GHash.IO
302037 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 07:52:14 GHash.IO
302036 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 07:14:42 GHash.IO
302035 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 07:02:59 107.170.228.129
302034 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:57:59 GHash.IO
302033 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:51:57 GHash.IO
302032 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:40:06 GHash.IO
302031 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:39:28 GHash.IO
302030 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:32:33 GHash.IO
That's a reason NOT to mine at GHash. Do you want a 51% attack? The pool finding more blocks doesn't mean you mine more coins.
Any one have experience in mmpool.org ?
yea they like to pull shady shit like raise the auto payout fee without telling anyone.and to charge an auto payout fee how fricking greedy are you? My advice find a pool that doesn't charge auto payout fees.
And communicates to it's members.
the project seems pretty abandoned too. Haven't found a block since like months
Any one have experience in mmpool.org ?
yea they like to pull shady shit like raise the auto payout fee without telling anyone.and to charge an auto payout fee how fricking greedy are you? My advice find a pool that doesn't charge auto payout fees.
And communicates to it's members.
GHASH.IO vs ELIGIUS.ST
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
So I tried both with several th/s over the past couple of months because I started having problems with btcguild, ghash.io has a more refined interface and two-factor authentication for account management. The eligius interface seemed to have a lot of bugs in it, I got all of my miners to attach but the payouts didn't really meet expectations either, even taking pool luck into consideration. The eligius payout was 20% lower over a 5 day period when compared to both ghash.io and btcguild. That being said, the reported gh/s on miners over at ghash.io is not very accurate and off by about 5%-10%. Ghash.io also had an outage this week which resulted in dropped miners and there's also a problem with autopayouts too.
For me, ghash.io shows accurate hashrates and mines more coins that others. mmpool was the worst for me.
Any one tried multipool? Their stats shows astonishing figures in the tune of .0001+ But I never got that much and was below ghash.io.
The profitability numbers reported on the main page for SHA-256 are not very accurate due to the way they're calculated. I'm working on improving the accuracy.
My own mining stats (for my piddly BFL little single) show that we are generally 10-15% above mining btc(+merged coins) alone.
My advice Stop mining there and go find a new home. Because it should have triggered yesterday when they finally pushed it.
And that wallet addy is a bunch of pure BS spewed to make you feel like you got support.
I never deleted my wallet addy or changed it and was paid like it should have worked all along.
And that wallet addy is a bunch of pure BS spewed to make you feel like you got support.
I never deleted my wallet addy or changed it and was paid like it should have worked all along.
May or May not.
In some cases that process is required if there is a db entry needed to the auto payout to trigger.
Same time it can also be like you said.
It may take sometime even more than 30 hours but since started with them March 2014 I had 0 problems
and most of all 0 fees and able to trade my Namecoins and Litecoins
They promise to go for Doge trade and Devocoin trade but so far nothing I dont know how they manage to do it
with the multipool available...
My advice Stop mining there and go find a new home. Because it should have triggered yesterday when they finally pushed it.
And that wallet addy is a bunch of pure BS spewed to make you feel like you got support.
I never deleted my wallet addy or changed it and was paid like it should have worked all along.
And that wallet addy is a bunch of pure BS spewed to make you feel like you got support.
I never deleted my wallet addy or changed it and was paid like it should have worked all along.
May or May not.
In some cases that process is required if there is a db entry needed to the auto payout to trigger.
Same time it can also be like you said.
It may take sometime even more than 30 hours but since started with them March 2014 I had 0 problems
and most of all 0 fees and able to trade my Namecoins and Litecoins
They promise to go for Doge trade and Devocoin trade but so far nothing I dont know how they manage to do it
with the multipool available...
Here is one reason i now mine on GHash :
302040 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 08:20:15 GHash.IO
302039 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 08:10:30 GHash.IO
302038 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 08:04:06 GHash.IO
302037 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 07:52:14 GHash.IO
302036 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 07:14:42 GHash.IO
302035 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 07:02:59 107.170.228.129
302034 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:57:59 GHash.IO
302033 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:51:57 GHash.IO
302032 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:40:06 GHash.IO
302031 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:39:28 GHash.IO
302030 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:32:33 GHash.IO
302040 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 08:20:15 GHash.IO
302039 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 08:10:30 GHash.IO
302038 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 08:04:06 GHash.IO
302037 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 07:52:14 GHash.IO
302036 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 07:14:42 GHash.IO
302035 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 07:02:59 107.170.228.129
302034 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:57:59 GHash.IO
302033 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:51:57 GHash.IO
302032 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:40:06 GHash.IO
302031 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:39:28 GHash.IO
302030 (Main Chain) 2014-05-22 06:32:33 GHash.IO
Jump to: