If you consider the amount of token allocated to bounty hunters, they are just minimal. 1% to 5% of the total supply, where devs hold 20% to 30%. which is quite a low budget for bounty right now and it certainly will not be able to cause a collapse when the token is distributed. If the economy of the token is established this 1% to 5% won't hurt the market that much. It can go down for some time and will recover eventually.
we should compared token allocation between bounty and dev allocation. team tokens used to future developtment if their projects getting stuck or something happen. they could use this token to get fresh money and recruit more team to developt product. meanwhile allocation for bounty hunter just for reward and could directly sell in market. its amount not too big but have effect on market psychology when holder dump their token. 
Topic: Giving away too much quantities of tokens in bounties - page 3. (Read 1319 times)
If you consider the amount of token allocated to bounty hunters, they are just minimal. 1% to 5% of the total supply, where devs hold 20% to 30%. which is quite a low budget for bounty right now and it certainly will not be able to cause a collapse when the token is distributed. If the economy of the token is established this 1% to 5% won't hurt the market that much. It can go down for some time and will recover eventually.
We cannot blame every user who gets a lot of tokens. If the project really decides to have 4 or more campaigns, they do it. That means they have thought and considered, so there is nothing wrong if after the distribution of dump prices. Because it is the decision of the project directly for its allocation.
yes, it is also true that the project team has considered this before. but the problem is who is holding the most number of project tokens? I'm not sure if it's a bounty hunter, I think the initial investor or the project team itself is holding a large token and making a dump.I've seen one or two bounty campaigns on here with massive token allocations for bounty participants, I'm wondering how this won't affect the value of the token, I believe giving away too many quantities of tokens can easily ruin the value of the token, most especially bounties that are doing 4 Rounds of campaigns, what's your take on this???
First and foremost there are not much projects to advertise that are a sure shot success, if you think there are too much participants promoting a project you have the choice to pull out of it, the main idea of advertisement for a project is to have more eyes on what they are doing and attract investors and they will not stop anyone from advertising their project. 
I've seen one or two bounty campaigns on here with massive token allocations for bounty participants, I'm wondering how this won't affect the value of the token, I believe giving away too many quantities of tokens can easily ruin the value of the token, most especially bounties that are doing 4 Rounds of campaigns, what's your take on this???
What is the supply of the token? I don't think any project would be giving large amount of supply to the bounty hunters. They know that if they giveaway higher percentage of the tokens to the bounty hunters, the price is going to dip.Check the supply and then you will know if they are overpaying or not. If you think they are overpaying in tokens, then don't just join it.
We cannot blame every user who gets a lot of tokens. If the project really decides to have 4 or more campaigns, they do it. That means they have thought and considered, so there is nothing wrong if after the distribution of dump prices. Because it is the decision of the project directly for its allocation.
yes, it is also true that the project team has considered this before. but the problem is who is holding the most number of project tokens? I'm not sure if it's a bounty hunter, I think the initial investor or the project team itself is holding a large token and making a dump. 
It is not actually the "quantity" of the token that matters it is how much of the marketcap that matters. If there is 100 million tokens created and you give out 10 millions of it for bounty that is not good at all, you are going to have a crash sooner or later when everyone has that much coin that they didn't paid for.
However if you give 10 million tokens but have 1 billion created, that is not going to hurt you at all. As you can see on both examples you gave out 10 million tokens and in one of them it hurt your token very much whereas on the other one it didn't hurt at all. That is why it is not about the quantity itself but more about how much of the total supply that bounty comes down to. Try to give out as little as possible, I always say 10% of the investors is good enough, if investors bought 10 million tokens, then give out 1 million in bounty, that is a good rate.
However if you give 10 million tokens but have 1 billion created, that is not going to hurt you at all. As you can see on both examples you gave out 10 million tokens and in one of them it hurt your token very much whereas on the other one it didn't hurt at all. That is why it is not about the quantity itself but more about how much of the total supply that bounty comes down to. Try to give out as little as possible, I always say 10% of the investors is good enough, if investors bought 10 million tokens, then give out 1 million in bounty, that is a good rate.
I guess these project managers thinks that if they give away a lot of money, people will work a lot more harder. However they are forgetting that how many of those tokens they are giving away doesn't really matter as long as people are willing to work for cheap and sell it right away and destroy the whole market of that token. So at the end of the day they are doing it because of a good reason but they are idiots so they can't see the consequences and it causes something bad.
Hopefully this trend will soon be over, people will realize that there is no reason to actually give away that much money, in fact if you do a whole bounty campaign for 5 thousand dollars with giving away USDT or bitcoin instead of actually giving your project, you are going to eventually get your token A LOT MORE attention than any other method you could have done.
hero member
Activity: 2912
Merit: 541
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
now the team has found a new way to keep prices stable, they do a gradual distribution to bounty hunters, for example 1% to 10% every month, so I think a very large allocation for the bounty will not be too influential. even projects that have a small allocation now implement such a thing
but all also returned to what the total supply was and also saw quality of the project, get lots of requests or not.
The best way to keep the price stable when distributing bounty is to distribute tokens in batches. They can distribute tokens in 2-3 batches over 3 months and I believe this will make their tokens much more stable.but all also returned to what the total supply was and also saw quality of the project, get lots of requests or not.
I think that can be done before they calculate the amount of distributing token so their participants will know how much reward they can get. Or maybe the teams can figure out the other way to prevent from the dump of their token price. There are many ways they can do to distribute the token, and as long as the bounty hunter can still make money from the project, they will accept that.
I've seen one or two bounty campaigns on here with massive token allocations for bounty participants, I'm wondering how this won't affect the value of the token,
Well have you checked how much token this Project has?and i'm afraid that this allocation is only there to Lure bounty hunters to work for them so they can fool investors but even How much token they promised?still there is no chance that Hunters will get what the amount they promised.Quote
I believe giving away too many quantities of tokens can easily ruin the value of the token, most especially bounties that are doing 4 Rounds of campaigns, what's your take on this???
If they are really legit?then they will never do this stupid high allocation mate is it really hard to understand?This company are for sure scammers and will never bring truthful to all of the affected parties.
I've seen one or two bounty campaigns on here with massive token allocations for bounty participants, I'm wondering how this won't affect the value of the token, I believe giving away too many quantities of tokens can easily ruin the value of the token, most especially bounties that are doing 4 Rounds of campaigns, what's your take on this???
Honestly, I don't join in any such campaign that running more than 2 rounds because most of the project I saw implementing
this concept always end up for nothing, I mean all their participants are not well compensated usually who joined with them.
This was just my experienced regarding about what you are telling it now.
now the team has found a new way to keep prices stable, they do a gradual distribution to bounty hunters, for example 1% to 10% every month, so I think a very large allocation for the bounty will not be too influential. even projects that have a small allocation now implement such a thing
but all also returned to what the total supply was and also saw quality of the project, get lots of requests or not.
Doing a phased distribution to bounty hunters will not have much effect on the price of the token, because I have seen a project that has a phased distribution to the bounty hunter, but the price of the token remains down in the market, this is what I see in the Atronocom project with the name AtromG8 (AG8), this token is listed on the Bibox market, at the beginning of the listing the price is quite expensive, but after that it goes down from day to day until now.but all also returned to what the total supply was and also saw quality of the project, get lots of requests or not.
General situation of the market is great, and for that we needed 10 years. New
projects that wish to enter the market had a hard time, and will have hard time to
get in. Some new projects drop down, other rise, don't blame anyone for that, its
a normal thing, just strongest survive and manor progress.
Bounties wish a lot of marketing for them, they will try what is necessary for
people to folloe and support. New ideas are needed and don't expect to like
all of them.
now the team has found a new way to keep prices stable, they do a gradual distribution to bounty hunters, for example 1% to 10% every month, so I think a very large allocation for the bounty will not be too influential. even projects that have a small allocation now implement such a thing
but all also returned to what the total supply was and also saw quality of the project, get lots of requests or not.
Doing a phased distribution to bounty hunters will not have much effect on the price of the token, because I have seen a project that has a phased distribution to the bounty hunter, but the price of the token remains down in the market, this is what I see in the Atronocom project with the name AtromG8 (AG8), this token is listed on the Bibox market, at the beginning of the listing the price is quite expensive, but after that it goes down from day to day until now.but all also returned to what the total supply was and also saw quality of the project, get lots of requests or not.
now the team has found a new way to keep prices stable, they do a gradual distribution to bounty hunters, for example 1% to 10% every month, so I think a very large allocation for the bounty will not be too influential. even projects that have a small allocation now implement such a thing
but all also returned to what the total supply was and also saw quality of the project, get lots of requests or not.
Doing a phased distribution to bounty hunters will not have much effect on the price of the token, because I have seen a project that has a phased distribution to the bounty hunter, but the price of the token remains down in the market, this is what I see in the Atronocom project with the name AtromG8 (AG8), this token is listed on the Bibox market, at the beginning of the listing the price is quite expensive, but after that it goes down from day to day until now. but all also returned to what the total supply was and also saw quality of the project, get lots of requests or not.
It depends on Project total token supply and also budget allocated for marketing bounty is the major crypto currency strategy from beginning will create awareness about project in community . More over it will increase the circulation supply . I am mostly looking for project whcih is already listed in exchange even though it is having very less bounty portion . Atlast we will be paid for our effort its upto the person want to earn more has to take risk . I stopped participating bounty after most of my earned token became worthless . Now again i started with new strategy
now the team has found a new way to keep prices stable, they do a gradual distribution to bounty hunters, for example 1% to 10% every month, so I think a very large allocation for the bounty will not be too influential. even projects that have a small allocation now implement such a thing
but all also returned to what the total supply was and also saw quality of the project, get lots of requests or not.
The best way to keep the price stable when distributing bounty is to distribute tokens in batches. They can distribute tokens in 2-3 batches over 3 months and I believe this will make their tokens much more stable. but all also returned to what the total supply was and also saw quality of the project, get lots of requests or not.
But I can see ARCS bounty having huge max supply and the token has huge value of 0.33$ per one, the bounty campaign is only giving out few thousands of tokens at around 30k in dollars, to me it's not always about max supply
What do you mean ? And in the end, their budget is only $ 30k, which is quite a low budget for bounty right now and it certainly will not be able to cause a collapse when the token is distributed.
Definitely low budget for bounty campaign, And their are many participant in the campaign which includes that each participants will earn small amount of the token. The token will not dump if their are many opportunity and use case about the project.
now the team has found a new way to keep prices stable, they do a gradual distribution to bounty hunters, for example 1% to 10% every month, so I think a very large allocation for the bounty will not be too influential. even projects that have a small allocation now implement such a thing
but all also returned to what the total supply was and also saw quality of the project, get lots of requests or not.
but all also returned to what the total supply was and also saw quality of the project, get lots of requests or not.
Its actually okay, if the total supplies of the token is big.
And its really up to the team when they will release its token, regardless on how much they would give out
but then again if they control the traffic distribution.
it could really maintain dumpers at the edge.
benefitting not only the hunters but also the investors
And its really up to the team when they will release its token, regardless on how much they would give out
but then again if they control the traffic distribution.
it could really maintain dumpers at the edge.
benefitting not only the hunters but also the investors
I've seen one or two bounty campaigns on here with massive token allocations for bounty participants, I'm wondering how this won't affect the value of the token, I believe giving away too many quantities of tokens can easily ruin the value of the token, most especially bounties that are doing 4 Rounds of campaigns, what's your take on this???
It depends on a lot of factors and in the end what matters is the product, use cases and community support, if a project has all these it has high probability of success irrespective of how many tokens were given away by them during their bounty campaigns.
The reward will always be adjusted with the supply that available for the project.
The development progress matter a lot.
Jump to: