Topic: GLBSE 2.0, Is safer now. (Read 8748 times)
Has anything been worked out for paying out dividends while this dispute is being resolved?
You mean the page itself or when submiting the form?
Because the page opens just fine.
You mean the page itself or when submiting the form?
Because the page opens just fine.
http://bitcoin-shitlist.com/2012/02/24/chaang-noi-goat-is-a-fussy-prick/
^^ It was true back then, it continues to be true now.
Still waiting for the lawsuit, Goat. You have my name/address. Maybe we'll get to verify your identity if you sue me...
PS: He probably also has a small penis...
^^ It was true back then, it continues to be true now.
Still waiting for the lawsuit, Goat. You have my name/address. Maybe we'll get to verify your identity if you sue me...
PS: He probably also has a small penis...
He already told you, but you are too slow to understand simple statements.
1. Large number of attempted logins
2. All GLBSE asset issuers are required to present this information as of v2.0
a. Verification is a manual process and will take a while to finish verifying evryone
He wouldn't be breaking his terms of service, but providing the identifying information to the police as part of an investigation would result in it becoming public in the police report.
1. Large number of attempted logins
2. All GLBSE asset issuers are required to present this information as of v2.0
a. Verification is a manual process and will take a while to finish verifying evryone
He wouldn't be breaking his terms of service, but providing the identifying information to the police as part of an investigation would result in it becoming public in the police report.
Two factor authentication has been added for withdrawals, transfers, and password changes(this will effect the account recovery option).
Implemented using GoogleAuth
Implemented using GoogleAuth
I just activated this and tried it.
2 failed attempts, dont know why, then it worked like a charm.
What if I lose my phone?
Write down the code then... and don't lose your phone, but just in case you do then write down the code. You can then enter it into another phone.
Luckily I had not activated googleauth for one of the three things (I think "transfer") yet, so I could activate that and write down the code (assuming it's the same for all 3 actions).
With all 3 activated, however, where can I see the code?
Wasn't (at one time) the plan to make verification optional, but if you skipped the verification your account would have scary warnings and such things, saying that it isn't verified? Which would enable shareholders to react appropriately.
I believe that was the plan. The site has the big red X saying not verified next to each ID type and indicates that will be the behavior above said big red X's. I think Nefario is concerned about giving access to the account to the wrong person now that it has been locked from brute forcing (because of the large sum of BTC involved). However, quite a bit was inferred by me to make this post, and there could be more to the story that is yet to be revealed.
Wasn't (at one time) the plan to make verification optional, but if you skipped the verification your account would have scary warnings and such things, saying that it isn't verified? Which would enable shareholders to react appropriately.
So what is the timeline Goat has for submitting verification and what is the plan if he refuses to submit the information?
Lol, I love this, feels like I've made it.
HorseRider chill
Quote
So let's back to our topic. GLBSE is asking for identity verification but Goat won't like to cooperate. So maybe you two good buddies can looking for financing your big big project somewhere else.
So now you can't read either oh joy! Just to help you out:
Quote
I'm working with him on stuff completely unrelated to all his gblse projects that makes them look tiny.
"completely unrelated to" means has nothing to do with and isn't going to have anything to do with Glbse.Furthermore, where has Goat said that he won't comply with this? He doesn't want to, that's clear and I can't say that I blame him as Gblse isn't a corporate entity in the same way as say Mt Gox, Cryptox or Bitcoinica. However I can also fully understand why Nefario wants to safeguard his users and I fully expect this to get resolved.
As to your FUD trolling in this and other threads all I can say is:
Quote
Goat spend some money on the advertise for the arbitrage Bot IPO. How much would the ad. cost?
Horserider, we all know you don't like/trust Goat but how exactly is this and the other hogwash you've been posting in anyway relevant to this thread?
Could a mod please split this off from where this hogwash starts.
Oh and Horserider Glbse isn't the only place Goat does business, I'm working with him on stuff completely unrelated to all his gblse projects that makes them look tiny.
So let's back to our topic. GLBSE is asking for identity verification but Goat won't like to cooperate. So maybe you two good buddies can looking for financing your big big project somewhere else.
Quote
Goat spend some money on the advertise for the arbitrage Bot IPO. How much would the ad. cost?
Horserider, we all know you don't like/trust Goat but how exactly is this and the other hogwash you've been posting in anyway relevant to this thread?
Could a mod please split this off from where this hogwash starts.
Oh and Horserider Glbse isn't the only place Goat does business, I'm working with him on stuff completely unrelated to all his gblse projects that makes them look tiny.
Goat spend some money on the advertise for the arbitrage Bot IPO. How much would the ad. cost?
HorseRider, what continent are you from?
I think 556j's comment is about how it should be run, not whether Nefario has the right. Although, I have come to the conclusion that this kind of regulation is inevitable in the case of a centralized stock exchange, and Nefario is managing it pretty well.
I think the regulation is inevitable, too. but you cannot convince everyone into believing it, especially if someone has already put the money into a Ponzi scheme. However, no matter someone agree with such kind of regulation or not, it's under the Nefario's decision. If someone don't like the regulation, he can leave the exchange. There is no gun pointing at his head.
In the real world, if the management team is feel bothered by the SEC and the public shareholder, they can purchase back all the stocks (privatization). Following the regulation sometimes cost less than a million dollars for a company comply with the regulation. Facebook did not want to be listed for a long time and doing private equity financing for several times. However, if you wanna be listed, obey the rules.
If Goat don't want to follow the ID verification rules, just leave the exchange. You can borrow on the forum in personal, or start an exchange of Goat's own.
Jump to: