But as soon as they don't get executed right away, I'm a maker and won't have to pay fees - so why freeze them?
Thats a good point. Actually this is a holdover from the old fee system, and needs to be fixed.
Topic: GLBSE better, harder, stronger, faster, cheaper now with MAKER/TAKER (Read 5521 times)
Thats a good point. Actually this is a holdover from the old fee system, and needs to be fixed.
May 21, 2012, 06:43:22 AM
But as soon as they don't get executed right away, I'm a maker and won't have to pay fees - so why freeze them?
Oh, I forgot about the fee split. In that case, yes, you have a point. 
May 21, 2012, 06:17:56 AM
But as soon as they don't get executed right away, I'm a maker and won't have to pay fees - so why freeze them?
May 21, 2012, 05:28:44 AM
Great, however I encountered a weird bug(?):
Available balance displayed: 0.0401499, Bid (unmatched!) for 4 shares of HEDGE at 0.01 BTC is NOT possible!
After a bid for 3 shares at 0.01 BTC: "Available: 0.0099999" - my bid did freeze 301500 Satoshis. As the bid is NOT immediately matched though, I should be able to place the remaining bid too, if I have the funds and my first bid did not get executed right away. I wonder if the system only freezes the 0.5% fee or if it even silently charges it too... /tinfoilhat
tl;dr: Even nonexecuted bids in the orderbook get the additional 0.5% fee frozen for no apparent reason to me.
Available balance displayed: 0.0401499, Bid (unmatched!) for 4 shares of HEDGE at 0.01 BTC is NOT possible!
After a bid for 3 shares at 0.01 BTC: "Available: 0.0099999" - my bid did freeze 301500 Satoshis. As the bid is NOT immediately matched though, I should be able to place the remaining bid too, if I have the funds and my first bid did not get executed right away. I wonder if the system only freezes the 0.5% fee or if it even silently charges it too... /tinfoilhat
tl;dr: Even nonexecuted bids in the orderbook get the additional 0.5% fee frozen for no apparent reason to me.
Sorry, I don't see why that should be non-apparent. You need enough funds to fulfil not only your bids, but also the fees on them.
May 21, 2012, 04:59:58 AM
Great, however I encountered a weird bug(?):
Available balance displayed: 0.0401499, Bid (unmatched!) for 4 shares of HEDGE at 0.01 BTC is NOT possible!
After a bid for 3 shares at 0.01 BTC: "Available: 0.0099999" - my bid did freeze 301500 Satoshis. As the bid is NOT immediately matched though, I should be able to place the remaining bid too, if I have the funds and my first bid did not get executed right away. I wonder if the system only freezes the 0.5% fee or if it even silently charges it too... /tinfoilhat
tl;dr: Even nonexecuted bids in the orderbook get the additional 0.5% fee frozen for no apparent reason to me.
Available balance displayed: 0.0401499, Bid (unmatched!) for 4 shares of HEDGE at 0.01 BTC is NOT possible!
After a bid for 3 shares at 0.01 BTC: "Available: 0.0099999" - my bid did freeze 301500 Satoshis. As the bid is NOT immediately matched though, I should be able to place the remaining bid too, if I have the funds and my first bid did not get executed right away. I wonder if the system only freezes the 0.5% fee or if it even silently charges it too... /tinfoilhat
tl;dr: Even nonexecuted bids in the orderbook get the additional 0.5% fee frozen for no apparent reason to me.
May 16, 2012, 04:27:18 PM
Full account history CSV export now live.
Link at the top of your portfolio page.
Link at the top of your portfolio page.
May 14, 2012, 01:48:21 PM
GLBSE rocks ! It's fun.
May 13, 2012, 05:21:57 PM
Any way to see older transaction in my portfolio?
I can see just my buy history of last week and dividend history of last 2 weeks.
I can see just my buy history of last week and dividend history of last 2 weeks.
I'm adding CSV export for history over 10 records.
May 13, 2012, 04:58:21 PM
Any way to see older transaction in my portfolio?
I can see just my buy history of last week and dividend history of last 2 weeks.
I can see just my buy history of last week and dividend history of last 2 weeks.
May 13, 2012, 12:19:39 PM
400 errors have been fixed.
Thank you, I no longer have any problems 
//DeaDTerra
May 13, 2012, 12:07:20 PM
400 errors have been fixed.
May 13, 2012, 05:49:18 AM
Sorry to say that am still getting 400 bad request errors :8
I like the new updates on the order book and order history though
//DeaDTerra
I like the new updates on the order book and order history though
//DeaDTerra
I was getting similar errors from 24 hours, until I closed and reopened my browser.
Maybe is a coincidence, but just try.
//DeaDTerra
May 13, 2012, 05:47:11 AM
Sorry to say that am still getting 400 bad request errors :8
I like the new updates on the order book and order history though
//DeaDTerra
I like the new updates on the order book and order history though
//DeaDTerra
I was getting similar errors from 24 hours, until I closed and reopened my browser.
Maybe is a coincidence, but just try.
May 13, 2012, 04:02:00 AM
I've made some much needed performance changes, the site is now usable (please don't go hammering it), but shouldn't fall over when more than a few users visit.
Still plenty of more performance improvements to be made.
One useful addition is the refresh button beside the orderbook table, it will update the orderbook, pulling json data from the GLBSE api. No more need to refresh the entire page.
Sorry to say that am still getting 400 bad request errors :8Still plenty of more performance improvements to be made.
One useful addition is the refresh button beside the orderbook table, it will update the orderbook, pulling json data from the GLBSE api. No more need to refresh the entire page.
I like the new updates on the order book and order history though
//DeaDTerra
May 12, 2012, 08:52:42 PM
I've made some much needed performance changes, the site is now usable (please don't go hammering it), but shouldn't fall over when more than a few users visit.
Still plenty of more performance improvements to be made.
One useful addition is the refresh button beside the orderbook table, it will update the orderbook, pulling json data from the GLBSE api. No more need to refresh the entire page.
Still plenty of more performance improvements to be made.
One useful addition is the refresh button beside the orderbook table, it will update the orderbook, pulling json data from the GLBSE api. No more need to refresh the entire page.
Nice work Nefario. Thanks for working away on this very helpful tool for the BitCoin community.
May 12, 2012, 08:45:34 PM
I've made some much needed performance changes, the site is now usable (please don't go hammering it), but shouldn't fall over when more than a few users visit.
Still plenty of more performance improvements to be made.
One useful addition is the refresh button beside the orderbook table, it will update the orderbook, pulling json data from the GLBSE api. No more need to refresh the entire page.
Still plenty of more performance improvements to be made.
One useful addition is the refresh button beside the orderbook table, it will update the orderbook, pulling json data from the GLBSE api. No more need to refresh the entire page.
May 11, 2012, 04:17:56 PM
If it were up most of the time it would be great...
May 11, 2012, 01:57:49 PM
& just to clarify, with the new site we can now reuse the 4 deposit addresses that we are initially given with np I assume, instead of needing to generate new ones each time I assume, much handier for me to just keep 1 or 2 of these in a wallet labelled for GLBSE deposit address, thanks for the improvements & hope that the doors can open again soon for buisness
While this is handy, ALWAYS confirm the address on the site before sending funds to it. Remember when Bitcoinica was hacked the first time? The deposit addresses were compromised, and some people continued to send funds to the old addresses because they didn't log in to check and see if it had changed.yep, I always double check site's permanent deposit addresses for me hasn't been pulled or anything before sending large amounts, but it is handy to store a non dynamic one in one's wallet & to use that once you see that it's all still OK
May 11, 2012, 01:50:25 PM
& just to clarify, with the new site we can now reuse the 4 deposit addresses that we are initially given with np I assume, instead of needing to generate new ones each time I assume, much handier for me to just keep 1 or 2 of these in a wallet labelled for GLBSE deposit address, thanks for the improvements & hope that the doors can open again soon for buisness
While this is handy, ALWAYS confirm the address on the site before sending funds to it. Remember when Bitcoinica was hacked the first time? The deposit addresses were compromised, and some people continued to send funds to the old addresses because they didn't log in to check and see if it had changed. May 11, 2012, 01:44:21 PM
& just to clarify, with the new site we can now reuse the 4 deposit addresses that we are initially given with np I assume, instead of needing to generate new ones each time I assume, much handier for me to just keep 1 or 2 of these in a wallet labelled for GLBSE deposit address, thanks for the improvements & hope that the doors can open again soon for buisness
Jump to: